how to conclude an english literature essay

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• How to conclude an essay | Interactive example

How to Conclude an Essay | Interactive Example

Published on January 24, 2019 by Shona McCombes . Revised on July 23, 2023.

The conclusion is the final paragraph of your essay . A strong conclusion aims to:

• Tie together the essay’s main points
• Show why your argument matters
• Leave the reader with a strong impression

Your conclusion should give a sense of closure and completion to your argument, but also show what new questions or possibilities it has opened up.

This conclusion is taken from our annotated essay example , which discusses the history of the Braille system. Hover over each part to see why it’s effective.

Braille paved the way for dramatic cultural changes in the way blind people were treated and the opportunities available to them. Louis Braille’s innovation was to reimagine existing reading systems from a blind perspective, and the success of this invention required sighted teachers to adapt to their students’ reality instead of the other way around. In this sense, Braille helped drive broader social changes in the status of blindness. New accessibility tools provide practical advantages to those who need them, but they can also change the perspectives and attitudes of those who do not.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

Step 1: return to your thesis, step 2: review your main points, step 3: show why it matters, what shouldn’t go in the conclusion, more examples of essay conclusions, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about writing an essay conclusion.

To begin your conclusion, signal that the essay is coming to an end by returning to your overall argument.

Don’t just repeat your thesis statement —instead, try to rephrase your argument in a way that shows how it has been developed since the introduction.

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

Next, remind the reader of the main points that you used to support your argument.

Avoid simply summarizing each paragraph or repeating each point in order; try to bring your points together in a way that makes the connections between them clear. The conclusion is your final chance to show how all the paragraphs of your essay add up to a coherent whole.

To wrap up your conclusion, zoom out to a broader view of the topic and consider the implications of your argument. For example:

• Does it contribute a new understanding of your topic?
• Does it raise new questions for future study?
• Does it lead to practical suggestions or predictions?
• Can it be applied to different contexts?
• Can it be connected to a broader debate or theme?

Whatever your essay is about, the conclusion should aim to emphasize the significance of your argument, whether that’s within your academic subject or in the wider world.

Try to end with a strong, decisive sentence, leaving the reader with a lingering sense of interest in your topic.

The easiest way to improve your conclusion is to eliminate these common mistakes.

Don’t include new evidence

Any evidence or analysis that is essential to supporting your thesis statement should appear in the main body of the essay.

The conclusion might include minor pieces of new information—for example, a sentence or two discussing broader implications, or a quotation that nicely summarizes your central point. But it shouldn’t introduce any major new sources or ideas that need further explanation to understand.

Don’t use “concluding phrases”

Avoid using obvious stock phrases to tell the reader what you’re doing:

• “In conclusion…”
• “To sum up…”

These phrases aren’t forbidden, but they can make your writing sound weak. By returning to your main argument, it will quickly become clear that you are concluding the essay—you shouldn’t have to spell it out.

Don’t undermine your argument

Avoid using apologetic phrases that sound uncertain or confused:

• “This is just one approach among many.”
• “There are good arguments on both sides of this issue.”
• “There is no clear answer to this problem.”

Even if your essay has explored different points of view, your own position should be clear. There may be many possible approaches to the topic, but you want to leave the reader convinced that yours is the best one!

• Argumentative
• Literary analysis

This conclusion is taken from an argumentative essay about the internet’s impact on education. It acknowledges the opposing arguments while taking a clear, decisive position.

The internet has had a major positive impact on the world of education; occasional pitfalls aside, its value is evident in numerous applications. The future of teaching lies in the possibilities the internet opens up for communication, research, and interactivity. As the popularity of distance learning shows, students value the flexibility and accessibility offered by digital education, and educators should fully embrace these advantages. The internet’s dangers, real and imaginary, have been documented exhaustively by skeptics, but the internet is here to stay; it is time to focus seriously on its potential for good.

This conclusion is taken from a short expository essay that explains the invention of the printing press and its effects on European society. It focuses on giving a clear, concise overview of what was covered in the essay.

The invention of the printing press was important not only in terms of its immediate cultural and economic effects, but also in terms of its major impact on politics and religion across Europe. In the century following the invention of the printing press, the relatively stationary intellectual atmosphere of the Middle Ages gave way to the social upheavals of the Reformation and the Renaissance. A single technological innovation had contributed to the total reshaping of the continent.

This conclusion is taken from a literary analysis essay about Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein . It summarizes what the essay’s analysis achieved and emphasizes its originality.

By tracing the depiction of Frankenstein through the novel’s three volumes, I have demonstrated how the narrative structure shifts our perception of the character. While the Frankenstein of the first volume is depicted as having innocent intentions, the second and third volumes—first in the creature’s accusatory voice, and then in his own voice—increasingly undermine him, causing him to appear alternately ridiculous and vindictive. Far from the one-dimensional villain he is often taken to be, the character of Frankenstein is compelling because of the dynamic narrative frame in which he is placed. In this frame, Frankenstein’s narrative self-presentation responds to the images of him we see from others’ perspectives. This conclusion sheds new light on the novel, foregrounding Shelley’s unique layering of narrative perspectives and its importance for the depiction of character.

If you want to know more about AI tools , college essays , or fallacies make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!

• Ad hominem fallacy
• Post hoc fallacy
• Appeal to authority fallacy
• False cause fallacy
• Sunk cost fallacy

College essays

• Choosing Essay Topic
• Write a College Essay
• Write a Diversity Essay
• College Essay Format & Structure
• Comparing and Contrasting in an Essay

 (AI) Tools

• Grammar Checker
• Paraphrasing Tool
• Text Summarizer
• AI Detector
• Plagiarism Checker
• Citation Generator

Your essay’s conclusion should contain:

• A rephrased version of your overall thesis
• A brief review of the key points you made in the main body
• An indication of why your argument matters

The conclusion may also reflect on the broader implications of your argument, showing how your ideas could applied to other contexts or debates.

For a stronger conclusion paragraph, avoid including:

• Important evidence or analysis that wasn’t mentioned in the main body
• Generic concluding phrases (e.g. “In conclusion…”)
• Weak statements that undermine your argument (e.g. “There are good points on both sides of this issue.”)

Your conclusion should leave the reader with a strong, decisive impression of your work.

The conclusion paragraph of an essay is usually shorter than the introduction . As a rule, it shouldn’t take up more than 10–15% of the text.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

McCombes, S. (2023, July 23). How to Conclude an Essay | Interactive Example. Scribbr. Retrieved September 3, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/academic-essay/conclusion/

Is this article helpful?

Shona McCombes

Other students also liked, how to write an essay introduction | 4 steps & examples, how to write a thesis statement | 4 steps & examples, example of a great essay | explanations, tips & tricks, what is your plagiarism score.

In a short paper—even a research paper—you don’t need to provide an exhaustive summary as part of your conclusion. But you do need to make some kind of transition between your final body paragraph and your concluding paragraph. This may come in the form of a few sentences of summary. Or it may come in the form of a sentence that brings your readers back to your thesis or main idea and reminds your readers where you began and how far you have traveled.

So, for example, in a paper about the relationship between ADHD and rejection sensitivity, Vanessa Roser begins by introducing readers to the fact that researchers have studied the relationship between the two conditions and then provides her explanation of that relationship. Here’s her thesis: “While socialization may indeed be an important factor in RS, I argue that individuals with ADHD may also possess a neurological predisposition to RS that is exacerbated by the differing executive and emotional regulation characteristic of ADHD.”

In her final paragraph, Roser reminds us of where she started by echoing her thesis: “This literature demonstrates that, as with many other conditions, ADHD and RS share a delicately intertwined pattern of neurological similarities that is rooted in the innate biology of an individual’s mind, a connection that cannot be explained in full by the behavioral mediation hypothesis.”  

Highlight the “so what”  

At the beginning of your paper, you explain to your readers what’s at stake—why they should care about the argument you’re making. In your conclusion, you can bring readers back to those stakes by reminding them why your argument is important in the first place. You can also draft a few sentences that put those stakes into a new or broader context.

In the conclusion to her paper about ADHD and RS, Roser echoes the stakes she established in her introduction—that research into connections between ADHD and RS has led to contradictory results, raising questions about the “behavioral mediation hypothesis.”

She writes, “as with many other conditions, ADHD and RS share a delicately intertwined pattern of neurological similarities that is rooted in the innate biology of an individual’s mind, a connection that cannot be explained in full by the behavioral mediation hypothesis.”  

Leave your readers with the “now what”  

After the “what” and the “so what,” you should leave your reader with some final thoughts. If you have written a strong introduction, your readers will know why you have been arguing what you have been arguing—and why they should care. And if you’ve made a good case for your thesis, then your readers should be in a position to see things in a new way, understand new questions, or be ready for something that they weren’t ready for before they read your paper.

In her conclusion, Roser offers two “now what” statements. First, she explains that it is important to recognize that the flawed behavioral mediation hypothesis “seems to place a degree of fault on the individual. It implies that individuals with ADHD must have elicited such frequent or intense rejection by virtue of their inadequate social skills, erasing the possibility that they may simply possess a natural sensitivity to emotion.” She then highlights the broader implications for treatment of people with ADHD, noting that recognizing the actual connection between rejection sensitivity and ADHD “has profound implications for understanding how individuals with ADHD might best be treated in educational settings, by counselors, family, peers, or even society as a whole.”

To find your own “now what” for your essay’s conclusion, try asking yourself these questions:

• What can my readers now understand, see in a new light, or grapple with that they would not have understood in the same way before reading my paper? Are we a step closer to understanding a larger phenomenon or to understanding why what was at stake is so important?  
• What questions can I now raise that would not have made sense at the beginning of my paper? Questions for further research? Other ways that this topic could be approached?  
• Are there other applications for my research? Could my questions be asked about different data in a different context? Could I use my methods to answer a different question?  
• What action should be taken in light of this argument? What action do I predict will be taken or could lead to a solution?  
• What larger context might my argument be a part of?  

What to avoid in your conclusion  

• a complete restatement of all that you have said in your paper.  
• a substantial counterargument that you do not have space to refute; you should introduce counterarguments before your conclusion.  
• an apology for what you have not said. If you need to explain the scope of your paper, you should do this sooner—but don’t apologize for what you have not discussed in your paper.  
• fake transitions like “in conclusion” that are followed by sentences that aren’t actually conclusions. (“In conclusion, I have now demonstrated that my thesis is correct.”)
• picture_as_pdf Conclusions

• PRO Courses Guides New Tech Help Pro Expert Videos About wikiHow Pro Upgrade Sign In
• EDIT Edit this Article
• EXPLORE Tech Help Pro About Us Random Article Quizzes Request a New Article Community Dashboard This Or That Game Happiness Hub Popular Categories Arts and Entertainment Artwork Books Movies Computers and Electronics Computers Phone Skills Technology Hacks Health Men's Health Mental Health Women's Health Relationships Dating Love Relationship Issues Hobbies and Crafts Crafts Drawing Games Education & Communication Communication Skills Personal Development Studying Personal Care and Style Fashion Hair Care Personal Hygiene Youth Personal Care School Stuff Dating All Categories Arts and Entertainment Finance and Business Home and Garden Relationship Quizzes Cars & Other Vehicles Food and Entertaining Personal Care and Style Sports and Fitness Computers and Electronics Health Pets and Animals Travel Education & Communication Hobbies and Crafts Philosophy and Religion Work World Family Life Holidays and Traditions Relationships Youth
• Browse Articles
• Learn Something New
• Quizzes Hot
• Happiness Hub
• This Or That Game
• Train Your Brain
• Explore More
• Support wikiHow
• About wikiHow
• Log in / Sign up
• Education and Communications
• College University and Postgraduate
• Academic Writing

How to Conclude an Essay (with Examples)

Last Updated: July 22, 2024 Fact Checked

Writing a Strong Conclusion

What to avoid, brainstorming tricks.

This article was co-authored by Jake Adams and by wikiHow staff writer, Aly Rusciano . Jake Adams is an academic tutor and the owner of Simplifi EDU, a Santa Monica, California based online tutoring business offering learning resources and online tutors for academic subjects K-College, SAT & ACT prep, and college admissions applications. With over 14 years of professional tutoring experience, Jake is dedicated to providing his clients the very best online tutoring experience and access to a network of excellent undergraduate and graduate-level tutors from top colleges all over the nation. Jake holds a BS in International Business and Marketing from Pepperdine University. There are 8 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page. This article has been fact-checked, ensuring the accuracy of any cited facts and confirming the authority of its sources. This article has been viewed 3,220,889 times.

So, you’ve written an outstanding essay and couldn’t be more proud. But now you have to write the final paragraph. The conclusion simply summarizes what you’ve already written, right? Well, not exactly. Your essay’s conclusion should be a bit more finessed than that. Luckily, you’ve come to the perfect place to learn how to write a conclusion. We’ve put together this guide to fill you in on everything you should and shouldn’t do when ending an essay. Follow our advice, and you’ll have a stellar conclusion worthy of an A+ in no time.

Tips for Ending an Essay

• Rephrase your thesis to include in your final paragraph to bring the essay full circle.
• End your essay with a call to action, warning, or image to make your argument meaningful.
• Keep your conclusion concise and to the point, so you don’t lose a reader’s attention.
• Do your best to avoid adding new information to your conclusion and only emphasize points you’ve already made in your essay.

• “All in all”
• “Ultimately”
• “Furthermore”
• “As a consequence”
• “As a result”

• Make sure to write your main points in a new and unique way to avoid repetition.

• Let’s say this is your original thesis statement: “Allowing students to visit the library during lunch improves campus life and supports academic achievement.”
• Restating your thesis for your conclusion could look like this: “Evidence shows students who have access to their school’s library during lunch check out more books and are more likely to complete their homework.”
• The restated thesis has the same sentiment as the original while also summarizing other points of the essay.

• “When you use plastic water bottles, you pollute the ocean. Switch to using a glass or metal water bottle instead. The planet and sea turtles will thank you.”
• “The average person spends roughly 7 hours on their phone a day, so there’s no wonder cybersickness is plaguing all generations.”
• “Imagine walking on the beach, except the soft sand is made up of cigarette butts. They burn your feet but keep washing in with the tide. If we don’t clean up the ocean, this will be our reality.”
• “ Lost is not only a show that changed the course of television, but it’s also a reflection of humanity as a whole.”
• “If action isn’t taken to end climate change today, the global temperature will dangerously rise from 4.5 to 8 °F (−15.3 to −13.3 °C) by 2100.”

• Focus on your essay's most prevalent or important parts. What key points do you want readers to take away or remember about your essay?

• For instance, instead of writing, “That’s why I think that Abraham Lincoln was the best American President,” write, “That’s why Abraham Lincoln was the best American President.”
• There’s no room for ifs, ands, or buts—your opinion matters and doesn’t need to be apologized for!

• For instance, words like “firstly,” “secondly,” and “thirdly” may be great transition statements for body paragraphs but are unnecessary in a conclusion.

• For instance, say you began your essay with the idea that humanity’s small sense of sense stems from space’s vast size. Try returning to this idea in the conclusion by emphasizing that as human knowledge grows, space becomes smaller.

• For example, you could extend an essay on the television show Orange is the New Black by bringing up the culture of imprisonment in America.

Community Q&A

Reader Videos

Share a quick video tip and help bring articles to life with your friendly advice. Your insights could make a real difference and help millions of people!

• Always review your essay after writing it for proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation, and don’t be afraid to revise. Thanks Helpful 0 Not Helpful 0

Tips from our Readers

• Have somebody else proofread your essay before turning it in. The other person will often be able to see errors you may have missed!

You Might Also Like

• ↑ https://www.uts.edu.au/current-students/support/helps/self-help-resources/grammar/transition-signals
• ↑ https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/argument_papers/conclusions.html
• ↑ http://writing2.richmond.edu/writing/wweb/conclude.html
• ↑ https://writingcenter.fas.harvard.edu/pages/ending-essay-conclusions
• ↑ https://www.pittsfordschools.org/site/handlers/filedownload.ashx?moduleinstanceid=542&dataid=4677&FileName=conclusions1.pdf
• ↑ https://www.cuyamaca.edu/student-support/tutoring-center/files/student-resources/how-to-write-a-good-conclusion.pdf
• ↑ https://library.sacredheart.edu/c.php?g=29803&p=185935

About This Article

To end an essay, start your conclusion with a phrase that makes it clear your essay is coming to a close, like "In summary," or "All things considered." Then, use a few sentences to briefly summarize the main points of your essay by rephrasing the topic sentences of your body paragraphs. Finally, end your conclusion with a call to action that encourages your readers to do something or learn more about your topic. In general, try to keep your conclusion between 5 and 7 sentences long. For more tips from our English co-author, like how to avoid common pitfalls when writing an essay conclusion, scroll down! Did this summary help you? Yes No

• Send fan mail to authors

Reader Success Stories

Eva Dettling

Jan 23, 2019

Did this article help you?

Mar 7, 2017

Jul 16, 2021

Gabby Suzuki

Oct 17, 2019

Nicole Murphy

Apr 26, 2017

Featured Articles

Trending Articles

Watch Articles

• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Do Not Sell or Share My Info
• Not Selling Info

wikiHow Tech Help Pro:

Level up your tech skills and stay ahead of the curve

Conclusions

What this handout is about.

This handout will explain the functions of conclusions, offer strategies for writing effective ones, help you evaluate conclusions you’ve drafted, and suggest approaches to avoid.

About conclusions

Introductions and conclusions can be difficult to write, but they’re worth investing time in. They can have a significant influence on a reader’s experience of your paper.

Just as your introduction acts as a bridge that transports your readers from their own lives into the “place” of your analysis, your conclusion can provide a bridge to help your readers make the transition back to their daily lives. Such a conclusion will help them see why all your analysis and information should matter to them after they put the paper down.

Your conclusion is your chance to have the last word on the subject. The conclusion allows you to have the final say on the issues you have raised in your paper, to synthesize your thoughts, to demonstrate the importance of your ideas, and to propel your reader to a new view of the subject. It is also your opportunity to make a good final impression and to end on a positive note.

Your conclusion can go beyond the confines of the assignment. The conclusion pushes beyond the boundaries of the prompt and allows you to consider broader issues, make new connections, and elaborate on the significance of your findings.

Your conclusion should make your readers glad they read your paper. Your conclusion gives your reader something to take away that will help them see things differently or appreciate your topic in personally relevant ways. It can suggest broader implications that will not only interest your reader, but also enrich your reader’s life in some way. It is your gift to the reader.

Strategies for writing an effective conclusion

One or more of the following strategies may help you write an effective conclusion:

• Play the “So What” Game. If you’re stuck and feel like your conclusion isn’t saying anything new or interesting, ask a friend to read it with you. Whenever you make a statement from your conclusion, ask the friend to say, “So what?” or “Why should anybody care?” Then ponder that question and answer it. Here’s how it might go: You: Basically, I’m just saying that education was important to Douglass. Friend: So what? You: Well, it was important because it was a key to him feeling like a free and equal citizen. Friend: Why should anybody care? You: That’s important because plantation owners tried to keep slaves from being educated so that they could maintain control. When Douglass obtained an education, he undermined that control personally. You can also use this strategy on your own, asking yourself “So What?” as you develop your ideas or your draft.
• Return to the theme or themes in the introduction. This strategy brings the reader full circle. For example, if you begin by describing a scenario, you can end with the same scenario as proof that your essay is helpful in creating a new understanding. You may also refer to the introductory paragraph by using key words or parallel concepts and images that you also used in the introduction.
• Synthesize, don’t summarize. Include a brief summary of the paper’s main points, but don’t simply repeat things that were in your paper. Instead, show your reader how the points you made and the support and examples you used fit together. Pull it all together.
• Include a provocative insight or quotation from the research or reading you did for your paper.
• Propose a course of action, a solution to an issue, or questions for further study. This can redirect your reader’s thought process and help them to apply your info and ideas to their own life or to see the broader implications.
• Point to broader implications. For example, if your paper examines the Greensboro sit-ins or another event in the Civil Rights Movement, you could point out its impact on the Civil Rights Movement as a whole. A paper about the style of writer Virginia Woolf could point to her influence on other writers or on later feminists.

Strategies to avoid

• Beginning with an unnecessary, overused phrase such as “in conclusion,” “in summary,” or “in closing.” Although these phrases can work in speeches, they come across as wooden and trite in writing.
• Stating the thesis for the very first time in the conclusion.
• Introducing a new idea or subtopic in your conclusion.
• Ending with a rephrased thesis statement without any substantive changes.
• Making sentimental, emotional appeals that are out of character with the rest of an analytical paper.
• Including evidence (quotations, statistics, etc.) that should be in the body of the paper.

Four kinds of ineffective conclusions

• The “That’s My Story and I’m Sticking to It” Conclusion. This conclusion just restates the thesis and is usually painfully short. It does not push the ideas forward. People write this kind of conclusion when they can’t think of anything else to say. Example: In conclusion, Frederick Douglass was, as we have seen, a pioneer in American education, proving that education was a major force for social change with regard to slavery.
• The “Sherlock Holmes” Conclusion. Sometimes writers will state the thesis for the very first time in the conclusion. You might be tempted to use this strategy if you don’t want to give everything away too early in your paper. You may think it would be more dramatic to keep the reader in the dark until the end and then “wow” them with your main idea, as in a Sherlock Holmes mystery. The reader, however, does not expect a mystery, but an analytical discussion of your topic in an academic style, with the main argument (thesis) stated up front. Example: (After a paper that lists numerous incidents from the book but never says what these incidents reveal about Douglass and his views on education): So, as the evidence above demonstrates, Douglass saw education as a way to undermine the slaveholders’ power and also an important step toward freedom.
• The “America the Beautiful”/”I Am Woman”/”We Shall Overcome” Conclusion. This kind of conclusion usually draws on emotion to make its appeal, but while this emotion and even sentimentality may be very heartfelt, it is usually out of character with the rest of an analytical paper. A more sophisticated commentary, rather than emotional praise, would be a more fitting tribute to the topic. Example: Because of the efforts of fine Americans like Frederick Douglass, countless others have seen the shining beacon of light that is education. His example was a torch that lit the way for others. Frederick Douglass was truly an American hero.
• The “Grab Bag” Conclusion. This kind of conclusion includes extra information that the writer found or thought of but couldn’t integrate into the main paper. You may find it hard to leave out details that you discovered after hours of research and thought, but adding random facts and bits of evidence at the end of an otherwise-well-organized essay can just create confusion. Example: In addition to being an educational pioneer, Frederick Douglass provides an interesting case study for masculinity in the American South. He also offers historians an interesting glimpse into slave resistance when he confronts Covey, the overseer. His relationships with female relatives reveal the importance of family in the slave community.

Works consulted

We consulted these works while writing this handout. This is not a comprehensive list of resources on the handout’s topic, and we encourage you to do your own research to find additional publications. Please do not use this list as a model for the format of your own reference list, as it may not match the citation style you are using. For guidance on formatting citations, please see the UNC Libraries citation tutorial . We revise these tips periodically and welcome feedback.

Douglass, Frederick. 1995. Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himself. New York: Dover.

Hamilton College. n.d. “Conclusions.” Writing Center. Accessed June 14, 2019. https://www.hamilton.edu//academics/centers/writing/writing-resources/conclusions .

Holewa, Randa. 2004. “Strategies for Writing a Conclusion.” LEO: Literacy Education Online. Last updated February 19, 2004. https://leo.stcloudstate.edu/acadwrite/conclude.html.

You may reproduce it for non-commercial use if you use the entire handout and attribute the source: The Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Make a Gift

• +44 (0) 207 391 9032

Recent Posts

• Why Is Your CV Getting Rejected and How to Avoid It
• Where to Find Images for Presentations
• What Is an Internship? Everything You Should Know

How Long Should a Thesis Statement Be?

• How to Write a Character Analysis Essay
• Best Colours for Your PowerPoint Presentation: Top Colour Combinations
• How to Write a Nursing Essay – With Examples
• Top 5 Essential Skills You Should Build As An International Student
• How Professional Editing Services Can Take Your Writing to the Next Level
• How to Write an Effective Essay Outline: Template & Structure Guide
• Academic News
• Custom Essays
• Dissertation Writing
• Essay Marking
• Essay Writing
• Essay Writing Companies
• Model Essays
• Model Exam Answers
• Oxbridge Essays Updates
• PhD Writing
• Significant Academics
• Student News
• Study Skills
• University Applications
• University Essays
• University Life
• Writing Tips

How to write a captivating essay conclusion

(Last updated: 12 May 2021)

Since 2006, Oxbridge Essays has been the UK’s leading paid essay-writing and dissertation service

We have helped 10,000s of undergraduate, Masters and PhD students to maximise their grades in essays, dissertations, model-exam answers, applications and other materials. If you would like a free chat about your project with one of our UK staff, then please just reach out on one of the methods below.

You may be surprised when we say that an essay conclusion is, in some ways, comparable to a piece of text as emotive as say, Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" speech. Sounds ridiculous? Perhaps. But, extravagant comparisons aside, what we mean here is that the core purpose of an essay conclusion can be compared to the end of any great speech, monologue or presentation that leaves you feeling something . Ultimately, when you conclude an essay, you want to engage the reader's emotions, whether they be excitement, surprise, contemplation, or a mix of these and more. And you want to do this in much the same way that Martin Luther King would have done with his captivated audience on that memorable day in 1963.

Conclusions are among the hardest parts of an essay to write well. You need to round off your essay effectively. You need to leave your reader with the best possible impression of your work. And, you need to somehow recap all your central points without simply repeating yourself. Sound like a tricky balancing act? We explain it all in more depth below – read on for our tips on how to conclude an essay effectively.

How do I conclude an essay?

What is a conclusion? It’s a question that seems, on the face of it, to have a perfectly simple answer. It’s the paragraph (or so) at the end of your essay where you bring your essay to a stop by recapping your central arguments, right? Easy.

If we asked you to list a few synonyms for an essay conclusion, we’re willing to bet you’d come up with a few words or phrases like “recap”, “summary”, “restatement of your thesis”, and so on. And it’s true you’re likely to find all of these somewhere in the conclusion of an essay.

"Words and phrases like 'recap', 'summary' and 'restatement of your thesis' don't accurately describe what an essay conclusion is. A conclusion is so much more, and a lot hinges on how well it is done."

But none of the phrases above fully grasp the function of an essay conclusion. In fact, taking any one of them to be entirely synonymous with an essay conclusion is likely to lead you down the path towards writing bad essay conclusions, or at least missed-opportunity conclusions – conclusions that don’t take full advantage of their place at the end of the essay to fulfil their rhetorical potential.

OK then, how do I avoid concluding an essay badly?

Before we get to answering the question of what an essay conclusion is, it’s useful to spend a moment thinking about some of the things an essay conclusion isn’t .

• It’s not a repeat of your introduction. Every university instructor has encountered an essay where a student has copied and pasted, almost word-for-word, their introduction at the bottom of their essay. It should be obvious that there’s no point in doing this. You're just eating up words by repeating the same information over again. And if a conclusion were simply a rehash of the introduction, there wouldn’t be any point in ending the essay with it. You could just end with your final body paragraph argument. Or, if you really wanted your reader to read the introduction again and remind themselves of your central arguments, you could simply say something like, “See introduction”! OK, so copying and pasting the introduction is an extreme example, and you’re probably thinking “there’s no way I’d do something like that.” But it’s fairly common for students to conclude an essay by simply rephrasing their introduction. Just paraphrasing yourself while retaining all the content of your introduction isn’t a whole lot different from the copy-paste job. You’re still just going through the motions and repeating the same information without really getting to grips with the dedicated function a conclusion is supposed to fulfil.
• It’s not just a summary of your body paragraphs. Another common trap students fall into is to view the essay conclusion simply as a recap. They conclude an essay by providing a concise summary of each of the arguments they’ve made. This kind of recap can form an important part of your conclusion, especially in longer essays where you’ve made a series of complex arguments. But, as with repeating your introduction, eating up valuable word count simply to rehash stuff you’ve already said is redundant and doesn’t fulfil any sort of rhetorical or persuasive function.
• It’s not a place to add new content or make new arguments. Yes, your essay conclusion shouldn’t be simply a recap, a summary, or a repeat of what you’ve already written in your essay. But it is a place where you reflect on the arguments you’ve made rather than starting to introduce anything new. And here’s where the whole business of how to conclude an essay starts to get a bit complicated. If a conclusion is neither simply a recap of old information nor a place for new information, what is it, exactly?

A conclusion is a sales pitch!

If you’ve been paying attention you may have seen that we’ve already mentioned “rhetoric” a couple of times so far in this post – and this is no accident. You can’t really talk about essay conclusions without talking about rhetoric. The conclusion to an essay is the most purely rhetorical part of the entire piece.

By “rhetorical”, we mean a conclusion’s (and indeed the entire essay’s) ability to convince or persuade the reader of certain outlooks or arguments. An essay conclusion needs to use rhetoric to emotionally connect with the reader in some way. And this is done through the use of certain language and the way the information is presented.

If alarm bells are starting to ring at the mention of rhetoric, quiet them. Rhetoric gets a bad name in public discourse. Phrases like “pure rhetoric” or “empty rhetoric” are often used to suggest that an utterance lacks substance or integrity, or is somehow dishonest or insincere. And those are the last things you want your reader to take away from reading your essay! But rhetoric is one of the oldest scholarly disciplines in the world. In Classical societies – and in fact right up to the beginning of the twentieth century – it was considered one of the most important disciplines throughout Western society. The fact that it’s acquired something of a bad name over the last hundred years or so doesn’t mean it’s not still the foundation of good writing.

More importantly, your rhetorical skills can make a huge difference to whether your reader actually buys your argument. Let’s say we have two writers. One is skilled in rhetoric; the other less so. Both could make an identical set of arguments with the same supporting evidence and elicit entirely different responses in their readers. It’s true that the excessive use of rhetorical flourishes can rub your reader up the wrong way. It could cause them to think your essay is more about style than substance. But the subtler cues – in the way you phrase, structure, and present your arguments – can unquestionably make the difference between winning over a sceptical audience and leaving them unmoved.

"How you phrase, structure, and present arguments in your essay conclusion can make the difference between winning over a sceptical audience and leaving them unmoved – which could easily make a difference to your overall grade."

So what does all this have to do with how you conclude an essay? This can all seem a bit abstract when we’re dealing with essay writing , so let’s try an analogy. Let’s imagine you’re delivering a sales pitch for a property company. That company is trying to sell waterfront properties in a desirable holiday location – the Caribbean, say. Your audience is a set of moderately well-off individuals who regularly take expensive holidays. But, they’re not sure they can afford to buy a second home in the Caribbean. Even if they can afford it, they’re unclear if it would be a good investment.

To convince the members of your audience that they want to buy one of your properties, you’re going to have to conduct quite a detailed pitch. It could easily take a couple of hours or more to list the features of the property, the merits of the location, and the financial arrangements that will allow buyers to fund their purchase. You’ll make many arguments throughout your pitch, not all of which will be equally exciting. Sure, you’ll tell your potential customers about the balcony that leads off the master bedroom, the distance to the beach, and the amenities of the town in which the properties are located.

But your customers will also want to know other details: can they let the property while they’re not using it, for example? What kind of returns will that bring, and will these be enough to offset the purchase price? How are properties taxed in the area? And how about the facilities the local authority will provide? What kind of sanitation and waste facilities does the property have? Is it connected to a sewer or does it use a septic tank?

If the buyer is going to sign on the dotted line when it’s all done, you’re going to have to provide convincing answers to all of these questions. But simply recapping your arguments in order isn’t going to end the presentation effectively. You don’t want the lingering thought in your audience’s mind to be taxes or sewage. And you certainly don’t want to hit them with any new detail in your closing few slides. In fact, you don’t really want them to leave the presentation with any of the details you’ve discussed uppermost in their mind. Dwelling on any of the details is likely to remind them that buying and owning property is time-consuming, expensive, and stressful.

The impression you want to leave them with is that of having their very own place in the sun. An island paradise that’s theirs to return to any time they want to. You don’t want them leaving the building still musing over any of the specific points of your sales pitch. They need to be moved by the overall effect – and the promise – of what you’ve offered them. Sun on their backs, sand between their toes, and a crystal-clear blue ocean stretching out ahead of them.

So how does this help me conclude an essay?

OK, we get it. You’re not selling anybody a beach getaway when you conclude an essay. But what the above analogy describes is rhetoric . In an essay, you are making a pitch. And the same principles as the property sales example above apply.

Your essay conclusion is your parting shot. It’s your opportunity to leave your reader with a favourable impression of the arguments you’ve just made. You want them, at minimum, to be convinced that you’ve achieved what you set out to achieve; that you’ve proved your points . Better yet, you want them to feel satisfied that you’ve taken them on an intellectual journey that was interesting and rewarding.

Best of all, though, is if you leave them with a feeling of excitement . Excitement that your essay promises a new way of thinking about a topic, or a promising line of intellectual inquiry. The scholarly equivalent of feeling sand between their toes, in other words.

My five-paragraph essay has to be exciting ? How do you propose I manage that?

It’s true that not all essays are equally rewarding to read. But academia is all about the collaborative generation of knowledge. And even first-year undergraduate students can offer an original take on a subject that causes their instructors to think about a topic in a new way. Maybe they’ll even incorporate that new angle into their class teachings, or the next paper they write. Don’t underestimate how exciting that can be for instructors. And don’t underestimate how much your instructor – with a pile of fifty or a hundred essays to sift through – will appreciate a well-written, animated essay that reads satisfyingly from start to finish. And if there’s even a germ of an original idea in the essay, it’s your job to sell it. It’s your job to highlight what’s new and innovative about your argument, and to excite your reader. That’s what a good essay conclusion does.

Here's a note if you’re writing an essay using a formulaic structure like the five-paragraph, three-argument essay. With these formulaic essays it’s even more important that you don’t simply regurgitate your introduction in your conclusion. The key to concluding an essay of any length or complexity is persuading your reader that there’s been development between the start and end of the essay. They must end knowing more than they did at the start. The same applies for five-paragraph essays.

Let’s consider an example where you’re writing a five-paragraph essay about Shakespeare’s famous Sonnet 18, and you’ve been asked to examine some of the formal features of the sonnet. We’ll take a look at a sample introduction that concisely outlines the thesis of the essay, and then think about how we might conclude such an essay effectively. (Note: this example contains some fairly detailed literary-critical terminology, but you don’t need to understand this to be able to follow along.)

Introduction:

William Shakespeare’s Sonnet 18 (“Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?”) is one of his best-known sonnets and deals with themes of eternal love, ageing, and the nature of art. This essay explores how Shakespeare uses the formal structure of the sonnet, together with small but significant variations in the meter, and the conceit of the changing seasons, to explore these themes.

Body paragraphs:

[ Body paragraph 1: the structure of an English sonnet, the use of the “turn” at the start of the third quatrain, and the couplet at the end that presents a neat summary of the poem’s message about the timelessness of art in the face of human ageing.]

[ Body paragraph 2: the generally regular use of iambic pentameter in the sonnet, and the effects of strategic substitutions, in particular the replacement of the first iambic foot in line 3 with a spondaic foot, and its introduction of a note of restlessness and discord after the harmonious opening two lines.]

[ Body paragraph 3: the conceit of the changing seasons that runs through the entire poem, and the ways in which Shakespeare uses the sonnet structure to explore different aspects of this theme.]

Bad essay conclusion (rephrasing of the thesis statement, lacking any development):

Sonnet 18 explores the themes of love, ageing, and art through the extended metaphor of the changing seasons. Shakespeare uses the sonnet’s formal structure, variations in the iambic pentameter meter, and the conceit of summer changing into winter, to explore these eternal themes.

Better essay conclusion (recaps on central points and makes some attempt to draw them together):

In Sonnet 18, Shakespeare explores the themes of love, ageing, and art through the extended metaphor of the changing seasons. Shakespeare uses both the meter and structure of the sonnet to maximise the effectiveness of this metaphor. Metrical variations like the spondaic substitution at the start of the third line maximise the drama of this metaphor. By making use of the formal structure of the sonnet – especially the “turn” at the start of the third quatrain – Shakespeare is able to explore different facets of his central conceit of summer changing into winter.

Best essay conclusion (recaps central points but makes the key links between them explicit and gestures towards broader implications):

Shakespeare’s sonnets are among the most celebrated sequences of poems in the English language, and Sonnet 18 provides several important illustrations of why this is. The formal techniques Shakespeare uses to explore the poem’s central conceit of changing seasons are often very subtle, but demonstrate a mastery of the sonnet form that enhances his exploration of his central conceit of the changing seasons. We have seen, for example, how minor metrical variations have a powerful impact on the poem’s message, like the use of the spondaic foot “Rough winds” in place of an iambic foot at the start of the third line, which introduces a note of conflict into the seemingly harmonious simile with which he begins the sonnet. And the archetypal sonnet “turn” that Shakespeare deploys at the start of the third quatrain allows him to convey a profound message about the redemptive, eternal power of art, transforming a melancholy lament on the process of ageing into a triumphant celebration of the poem itself.

As you’ll see from these three examples, there are many different ways to conclude an essay and recap on its central points. Each of the above essay conclusions could apply to the same basic thesis statement and three body paragraphs, but they would have radically different effects on the overall way a reader interprets the value of these arguments.

Our first example simply restates the thesis without displaying any significant development. The points made in the three body paragraphs are simply presented in the conclusion as a list. This creates an overall effect of disjointedness (often a major problem for five-paragraph essays).

The second example demonstrates the bare minimum a reader should expect from a conclusion. It creates a sense of development through the essay by revisiting some of the detail of the body paragraphs and attempting to draw links between them.

However, the third example represents a much more convincing “sales pitch” for this kind of essay. It groups together the various body paragraph arguments into a single unifying theme. In this case, it’s the idea that Shakespeare’s greatness as a poet rests in his mastery of form and content, and his ability to weave the two subtly into a poem that first descents into a lament on the ravages of ageing and then abruptly turns into a celebration of art and poetry.

What makes this conclusion example really stand out from the other two is its sense of balance between recap and sales pitch. Although it doesn’t introduce any new content, it does gesture towards broader implications for the arguments presented in the essay. For example, it highlights Shakespeare’s greatness as a poet and a master of form. The effect on a mundane, humdrum five-paragraph essay is quite transformative. The essay conclusion takes the contents of a fairly bog-standard, elementary literary-critical argument and makes them seem exciting and relevant.

A conclusion can’t save a bad essay, of course. But if you conclude an essay with the right sales pitch you can make even fairly elementary arguments sparkle!

How (and how not) to conclude an essay – dos and don’ts

The examples above offer some good pointers to help you conclude an essay in the most persuasive possible way. Here’s a summary of what we’ve learned:

• Do sell it. If your introduction and body paragraphs are where you lay the solid groundwork for your essay, your conclusion is where you convince your reader that what they’ve read represented a fun, insightful, intellectual journey that was worth their time. Don’t be afraid of rhetoric when you’re looking to conclude an essay – make the biggest, boldest pitch you can for the value of what you’ve argued.
• Do pull it all together. When you conclude an essay, you’re not only trying to convince your reader of the merit of your individual points or body paragraphs. You’re also making the case that your essay represented a unified, coherent whole. If you include one new thing in your introduction, make it an explicit theme that unifies all of your points and convinces your reader that your essay is a single, flowing, logical unit.
• Do be speculative. The conclusion to an essay is the one place where you get to bend the rules just a little bit. Throughout the rest of your essay you need to be scrupulously careful not to make assertions you can’t back up. But it’s expected that your conclusion gestures broadly – and slightly speculatively – towards the implications of your argument. Don’t go nuts and claim your argument will change the world, of course. That’s wholly unsupportable and comes across as ludicrous and overblown – the “bad” kind of rhetoric. But you should be aiming to excite your reader. You can often do this by suggesting that there’s an urgent need to change approach to a problem or view it in a new way.
• Don’t just rehash your thesis. The absolute least effective way you can conclude an essay is to simply repeat what you’ve already said in your introduction. You’ll create a sense of stagnation which is the very opposite of the sense of progression and dynamism you’re trying to create. This is especially true if your essay is short.
• Don’t introduce whole new arguments. It’s true, your essay conclusion should revisit your arguments in a fresh way, whether that’s by underlying a unifying theme or gesturing towards the implications of what you’ve written. But you still need to conclude your essay by reflecting on arguments you’ve already made, not by introducing new ones.

Essay exams: how to answer ‘To what extent…’

How to write a master’s essay.

• academic writing
• essay conclusion
• essay writing service
• writing a good essay
• writing tips

Writing Services

• Essay Plans
• Critical Reviews
• Literature Reviews
• Presentations
• Dissertation Title Creation
• Dissertation Proposals
• Dissertation Chapters
• PhD Proposals
• Journal Publication
• CV Writing Service
• Business Proofreading Services

Editing Services

• Proofreading Service
• Editing Service
• Academic Editing Service

Additional Services

• Marking Services
• Consultation Calls
• Personal Statements
• Tutoring Services

Our Company

• Frequently Asked Questions
• Become a Writer

Terms & Policies

• Fair Use Policy
• Policy for Students in England
• Privacy Policy
• Terms & Conditions
• Editing Service Examples
• [email protected]
• Contact Form

Payment Methods

Cryptocurrency payments.

Essay writing: Conclusions

• Introductions
• Conclusions
• Analysing questions
• Planning & drafting
• Revising & editing
• Proofreading
• Essay writing videos

Jump to content on this page:

“Pay adequate attention to the conclusion.” Kathleen McMillan & Jonathan Weyers,  How to Write Essays & Assignments

Conclusions are often overlooked, cursory and written last minute. If this sounds familiar then it's time to change and give your conclusions some much needed attention. Your conclusion is the whole point of your essay. All the other parts of the essay should have been leading your reader on an inevitable journey towards your conclusion. So make it count and finish your essay in style.

Know where you are going

Too many students focus their essays on content rather than argument. This means they pay too much attention to the main body without considering where it is leading. It can be a good idea to write a draft conclusion before  you write your main body. It is a lot easier to plan a journey when you know your destination! 

It should only be a draft however, as quite often the writing process itself can help you develop your argument and you may feel your conclusion needs adapting accordingly.

What it should include

A great conclusion should include:

A clear link back to the question . This is usually the first thing you do in a conclusion and it shows that you have (hopefully) answered it.

A sentence or two that summarise(s) your main argument but in a bit more detail than you gave in your introduction.

A series of supporting sentences that basically reiterate the main point of each of your paragraphs but show how they relate to each other and lead you to the position you have taken. Constantly ask yourself "So what?" "Why should anyone care?" and answer these questions for each of the points you make in your conclusion.

A final sentence that states why your ideas are important to the wider subject area . Where the introduction goes from general to specific, the conclusion needs to go from specific back out to general.

What it should not  include

Try to avoid including the following in your conclusion. Remember your conclusion should be entirely predictable. The reader wants no surprises.

Any new ideas . If an idea is worth including, put it in the main body. You do not need to include citations in your conclusion if you have already used them earlier and are just reiterating your point.

A change of style i.e. being more emotional or sentimental than the rest of the essay. Keep it straightforward, explanatory and clear.

Overused phrases like: “in conclusion”; “in summary”; “as shown in this essay”. Consign these to the rubbish bin!

Here are some alternatives, there are many more:

• The x main points presented here emphasise the importance of...
• The [insert something relevant] outlined above indicate that ...
• By showing the connections between x, y and z, it has been argued here that ...

Maximise marks

Remember, your conclusion is the last thing your reader (marker!) will read. Spending a little care on it will leave her/him absolutely sure that you have answered the question and you will definitely receive a higher mark than if your conclusion was a quickly written afterthought.

Your conclusion should be around 10% of your word count. There is never a situation where sacrificing words in your conclusion will benefit your essay.

The 5Cs conclusion method: (spot the typo on this video)

• << Previous: Main body
• Next: Formatting >>
• Last Updated: Jul 4, 2024 10:15 AM
• URL: https://libguides.hull.ac.uk/essays
• Login to LibApps
• Library websites Privacy Policy
• University of Hull privacy policy & cookies
• Website terms and conditions
• Accessibility
• Report a problem

Select a year to see courses

Learn online or on-campus during the term or school holidays

• Maths Acceleration
• English Advanced
• Maths Standard
• Maths Advanced
• Maths Extension 1
• English Standard
• Maths Extension 2

Get HSC exam ready in just a week

• UCAT Exam Preparation

Select a year to see available courses

• English Units 1/2
• Biology Units 1/2
• Chemistry Units 1/2
• Physics Units 1/2
• Maths Methods Units 1/2
• English Units 3/4
• Maths Methods Units 3/4
• Biology Unit 3/4
• Chemistry Unit 3/4
• Physics Unit 3/4
• Matrix Learning Methods
• Matrix+ Online Courses
• Matrix Term Courses
• Matrix Holiday Courses
• Campus overview
• Castle Hill
• Strathfield
• Sydney City
• Liverpool (Opening soon)
• Year 3 NAPLAN Guide
• OC Test Guide
• Selective Schools Guide
• NSW Primary School Rankings
• NSW High School Rankings
• NSW High Schools Guide
• VIC School Rankings
• ATAR & Scaling Guide
• HSC Study Planning Kit
• Student Success Secrets
• Reading List
• Year 6 English
• Year 7 & 8 English
• Year 9 English
• Year 10 English
• Year 11 English Standard
• Year 11 English Advanced

Year 12 English Standard

Year 12 english advanced.

• HSC English Skills
• How To Write An Essay
• How to Analyse Poetry
• English Techniques Toolkit
• Year 7 Maths
• Year 8 Maths
• Year 9 Maths
• Year 10 Maths
• Year 11 Maths Advanced
• Year 11 Maths Extension 1
• Year 12 Maths Standard 2

Year 12 Maths Advanced

Year 12 maths extension 1, year 12 maths extension 2.

Science guides to help you get ahead

• Year 11 Biology
• Year 11 Chemistry
• Year 11 Physics
• Year 12 Biology
• Year 12 Chemistry
• Year 12 Physics
• Physics Practical Skills
• Periodic Table
• Set Location
• 1300 008 008
• 1300 634 117

Welcome to Matrix Education

To ensure we are showing you the most relevant content, please select your location below.

Essay Structure: How to Write a Conclusion | Essay Writing Part 5

Guide Chapters

• 1. Thesis statement
• 2. Introduction structure
• 3. Topic sentence
• 4. Body paragraph structure
• 5. Conclusion

This post, How to Write a Conclusion, is part 4 in our Essay Writing Series.

Some common questions students have about essay structure are:

• How do I develop strong essay structure?
• Are conclusions important for essay structure?
• Can a conclusion be too long or too short?
• What should a conclusion include?
• How do I write a good conclusion?

In this post we’ll discuss the theory behind essay structure and show you why conclusions, are essential. We will then give you a step-by-guide for writing a Band 6 conclusion for your killer essay!

Table of Contents

1. Essential Essay Structure 2. Sustained Arguments and Conclusions 3. Recapping Essay Structure 4. Structuring Your Conclusion 5. How to Write a Conclusion – A Step-by-Step Guide

If you are unsure how to write an introduction or topic sentences, then you should read the previous posts in the series:

• Introduction Structure: How to Write a Thesis Statement | Essay Writing Part 1
• Introduction Structure: How to Write a Thematic Framework | Essay Writing Part 2
• Paragraph Structure: How to Write a Topic Sentence | Essay Writing Part 3   
• Paragraph Structure: How to Write a Body Paragraph | Essay Writing Part 4

These posts give you step-by-step advice for writing well structured essays that will score you Band 6. They will provide the foundations of essay structure that we will conclude (pun intended!) in this post.

Now, let’s discuss how to develop a conclusion that sustains your argument and concludes it effectively and memorably before walking through an easy step-by-step process for writing fabulous conclusions.

Let’s go!

Essential essay structure: How to write a conclusion | Essay writing Part 5

Essay writing is not an innate skill, it is a craft that it is learned and refined through practice and dedication. Whether you write fiction or non-fiction, writing is something you need to work at to perfect. Writing good conclusions takes practice. But before you begin practising, you should learn how to write them effectively.

Let’s see how Matrix Students are taught how to write conclusions.

What is a conclusion?

A conclusion is the part of an essay that summarises your argument and recaps what has come before it.

A conclusion needs to do three things:

• Restate the thesis : It needs to reassert you overarching argument, first;
• Recap the key ideas : It needs to revisit the key ideas from the essay and touch on the logic for their inclusion or relevance.
• Make a closing statement : It needs to include a statement that explains your final thought on the matter, a statement on what you have taken away from writing the essay, or perhaps provide an overall statement about studying the text or Module you have been engaging with.

Think about that.

A conclusion is a simple thing, but very important to your argument. So, you have to get it right!

Let’s discuss how to do that.

Conclusions, and sustained arguments – Thinking for the reader

A good speech or a good essay is essentially manipulative. It is crafted to convince your readers of a position or belief that you have. To do this effectively, you need to present information in an order and fashion that makes it digestible and logical.

You want to do the reader’s thinking for them!

This is a crucial part of readability that Matrix students learn. Writing that is readable presents the information the composer feels is relevant to an audience, and connects it together in a way that makes it seem unified and logical.

A good essay keeps a reader in it, rather than jarring them out of it. You don’t want a reader to stop reading and question your ideas while they are in the middle of the essay. This means that you have a logical flaw, or part of the structure and writing is convoluted in a manner that makes it difficult for your reader to follow your argument.

Remember, it’s fine for people to question your ideas and disagree with them, but you want to present your position in a clear and logical fashion first, so they have your whole perspective before critiquing it. A concise but comprehensive conclusion is essential for this.

A conclusion restates all the key parts of your argument to leave a complete picture in your reader’s mind.

So, your essay needs to be easy to read, and your conclusion has to sum things up for the reader so they can think about the broader picture you’ve argued. It is important that they do not struggle to remember the various parts of the argument.

Before we jump into writing conclusions, let’s recap the structure of an essay. This will help us focus on the logical role of the conclusion while we write it.

Want to write essays like a pro?

Sharpen your essay writing and analysis skills with our comprehensive resources, engaging lessons, and personalised feedback from Matrix teachers!

Start HSC English confidently

Expert teachers, detailed feedback, one-to-one help! Learn from home with Matrix+ Online English courses.

Recapping essay structure

In the previous posts in this series we discussed how the key parts of the introduction and body work together to produce a sustained argument. Let’s see how that worked again to understand the role of the conclusion:

As you can see, there are clear connections between the different parts of the essay.

The Thesis and Thematic Framework connect to the Topic Sentences and Linking Statements in the Body . But importantly, all of these structural elements are reasserted and connected in the conclusion.

The conclusion ties all of your ideas together.

By the time a reader reaches the conclusion, they may have forgotten key parts of your argument. The best way to reassert your ideas so they remain fresh in a reader’s mind when they finish reading your essay, is to use the logical structure of the introduction.

Let’s have a look at how to do that.

Structuring your conclusion

A conclusion needs to be structured to remind the audience what they have encountered, what the logic of it was, and then present them with a final, conclusive remark.

To do this effectively there are some important rules to follow:

• Your conclusion needs to be at least 3 sentences – You’re summarising an argument, not making a point;
• You must reassert your thesis in the first sentence – Make it clear what you have been arguing!
• Don’t try and cram your themes into one sentence – You have presented a carefully structured argument that is logical and develops several complex ideas. It is often impossible to boil this down to one sentence, use two or, even, three if you need to be clear. Clarity is essential.
• Don’t ramble – You must be concise. Even though you need to recap a significant amount of information, you need to be efficient. Aim to keep your conclusion shorter than your introduction.
• Aim to keep your conclusion under 5 sentences – Your conclusion must be memorable. If it is too long, a reader will struggle to hold the essence of your essay in their minds as their final interaction with your argument.

Think about those points for a moment.

So, what does this mean for you when you write conclusions?

Let’s have a look.

Restate the thesis

The first part of the conclusion needs to reassert the key idea that you have argued. This means it needs to restate your thesis statement. But we don’t want to merely say the exact same thing we have already said. No. We want to paraphrase our central argument in an authoritative way.

To sound authoritative it is important to avoid low modality expressions. Low modality words reflect uncertainty – for example, “may,” “can,” might”. We need to make clear statements so we need high modality words – for example, “is”, “are”, “will.” Don’t say, “a reader might understand.” Say “the composer compels the audience to understand.”

Recap the themes

You need to restate your ideas in a logical manner. You don’t want to merely say “I have discussed theme 1, theme 2, and theme 3.” This doesn’t develop a sustained argument. If you say this, a reader will have to glance back to your introduction and body to remember your exact argument.

These are moments where you are taking the reader away from your argument. In those moments you just dropped two to three marks. That is a potential change from a Band 5 to a Band 6!

Instead, you want quickly recap your themes in a way that conveys the logic of your argument. Try saying “I discussed themes 1 and 2 because they support this part of my thesis. I looked at theme 3 because it supports a different way of looking at the same idea.” This structure allows you to maintain any of the nuance you have structured into your essay.

Make a final statement

You need to leave the reader with a powerful statement that encapsulates your argument. Don’t try and say something profound about the text.

Statements like “Thus, the human condition is innately volatile” don’t mean anything unless they are anchored in the text. They might sound insightful, and perhaps are in a broad way, but they don’t contribute to your reader’s understanding of your insights into the text and/or module.

Instead, try to make a statement that conveys your understanding of the key idea in your text and, if applicable, connect it to the module you’re studying. In light of this, your final statement should instead be “Hence this texts illustrates how difficult circumstances can make human experience volatile.”

This second statement does something that the first does not, it adds context and logic. It creates a sustained argument by doing the thinking for the reader.

Your final statement wants to leave your reader thinking because they are intrigued, not because they are trying to piece together your point!

Now that we have a rough idea of what a conclusion should do, and how it should do it. Let’s have a go at putting one together.

How to write a conclusion – A step-by-step guide

What we will do now is go through the step-by-step process of writing a conclusion. We will continue to look at Macbeth , so that we have a clear text to study.   So to do this effectively, we need to quickly recap what the question was, and what our thesis and thematic framework were in response to it.

Revisiting the question

The question in the previous posts was:

“William Shakespeare’s Macbeth is not about revenge, it is a play concerned with morality and madness.”

To what extent do you agree with this statement? Make use of detailed references to the play in your response.

Revisiting our argument

To recap, our argument was that:

• Macbeth is about morality
• Macbeth goes mad with guilt
• His fear of revenge, a convention of the play’s genre, is what leads to his madness.

Revisiting our thesis

In the previous posts, our thesis statement was:

“The resolution of The Tragedy of Macbeth (1606) is driven by revenge. However, it is Shakespeare’s interrogation of the morality of Macbeth’s actions and his subsequent descent into madness that is the central focus of the text.”

Revisiting our thematic framework

And, similarly, our thematic framework introduced the following thematic points:

• “Macbeth’s madness is a response to his awareness of his immorality, it is driven by his fear of the revenge he feels he deserves.”
• “Macbeth’s actions are immoral, killing a king is regicide and the murder of his friends demonstrate his increasing depravity.”
• “As Macbeth’s madness emerges as he questions his morality and is plagued by visions and haunted by the spirits of his victims.”

Now we know what we’ve argued, let’s go through the step-by-step process for writing conclusions.

Step 1: Restate your thesis

The first step is reiterating our core argument. Our thesis was that,  “The resolution of The Tragedy of Macbeth (1606) is driven by revenge. However, it is Shakespeare’s interrogation of the morality of Macbeth’s actions and his subsequent descent into madness that is the central focus of the text.” We need to restate that in an effective way to summarise what we have just argued.

So, we need to restate that:

• Macbeth is Tragedy concerned with revenge and morality
• Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are driven by lust for power
• They are stricken by guilt for the immoral way they gained power.

Matrix students learn how to paraphrase things concisely and directly. So let’s have a go at paraphrasing these 2 sentences into 1:

This sentence is assertive and makes a clear and strong statement about what has been argued in the essay. We have made it more concise than the introduction’s thesis. This gives us more room to discuss the logic of our thematic framework.

What we need to do now is restate our thematic framework.

Step 2: Reassert your thematic framework

To reassert our thematic framework we need to revisit the logic of our argument first. Our argument structure was:

• Macbeth is about morality;
• Macbeth goes mad with guilt; and,

And in our introduction we broke this down into three separate sentences to show you how to write a thematic framework:

For our conclusion we want to demonstrate concision and erudition, so we will paraphrase this in a shorter more direct way. To do this we will wrap these ideas into two sentences. Let’s see what that looks like:

Matrix students are taught to take this logical approach to writing conclusions. This statement reasserts the framework we presented in our introduction, but streamlines it and presents it in a chronological and logical order.

Now we need to make a statement that summarises our position on the question and conveys our central idea about the text.

Step 3: Make a final statement that summarises your argument

Your final statement is very important. It is the last engagement that you have with your reader. You need to demonstrate your knowledge of the text, your understanding of the questions, and an insight into the module being studied.

We were analysing at this text through the lens of Module B: Critical Study of Literature . As you remember, Module B look at well known texts to see why they are considered important and whether or not they have lasting value.

For our argument we will consider the text’s lasting value for audiences.

Our concluding statement, then, needs to reference this idea of a text’s lasting value and connect it to the themes in the text.  Macbeth is concerned with morality and guilt. So, we can argue that it is Macbeth ‘s depiction of morality and guilt that makes it relevant to modern audiences.

We also need to connect this to our restated thesis which was:

“Clearly, Shakespeare’s  Macbeth is a tragedy primarily focused on the consequences of guilt on those who discard their morality in the pursuit of power.”

Now, let’s have a look at the kind of concluding statement a Matrix student would be taught to write that connects all of these threads together:

The finished conclusion

To get a better sense of what we have argued, let’s have a look at how the finished conclusion looks:

Now that we have finished writing our conclusion, what next?

Next you need to practice writing your essays! Remember to proofread and edit your essay after you have finished writing it. Never submit the first draft!

© Matrix Education and www.matrix.edu.au, 2023. Unauthorised use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Matrix Education and www.matrix.edu.au with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Related courses

Matrix teachers are experts in HSC Year 12 English Standard tutoring. Gain skills and confidence. Learn with on-campus or online programs.

Learning methods available

Year 12 English Advanced tutoring at Matrix will help you gain strong reading and writing skills for the HSC.

NSW Year 12 Maths Standard 2

Boost your Maths marks and confidence with structured courses online or on-campus.

Start improving your Maths marks and confidence with structured courses online or on-campus.

Start improving your Maths Ext 1 marks and confidence with structured courses online or on-campus.

Start improving your Maths Extension 2 marks and confidence with structured courses online or on-campus.

More essential guides

How to Study Effectively During Isolation or at Home

The English Literary Techniques Toolkit for The HSC

The Visual Techniques Toolkit

How to Write a Conclusion for a Literary Analysis Essay

Matt rauscher, 27 jun 2018.

Whether you are writing about a novel, short story, poem or play, the conclusion to your literary analysis essay needs to connect your thesis statement to the end of your essay. Summarizing your points is necessary, but the conclusion needs to synthesize all the different elements of the work you analyzed. Conclusions illustrate the significance of your essay in light of the question you have asked and demonstrate that you have successfully defended your literary argument.

Explore this article

• Restate the Thesis
• Synthesize Your Details
• Look Forward
• Stay Positive

1 Restate the Thesis

A conclusion in a literature paper should begin with a reiteration of your thesis statement, which is your main argument. Inform the reader how you managed to demonstrate your view. If, for example, you are writing about Harper Lee's "To Kill A Mockingbird," your thesis may have been that the main character, Scout, has experiences throughout the novel that give her a more mature point of view by book's end. Summarize for the reader how you examined textual evidence to come to that conclusion, which is realized in your thesis statement and then restated in different language in the conclusion.

2 Synthesize Your Details

Each body paragraph in your essay should have broken down your thesis into subsections that you applied to the narrative, poem or play that you are writing about. The conclusion is where you synthesize the support you developed in the essay and form it into a cohesive statement that demonstrates how well you defended your argument. If Scout in "To Kill A Mockingbird" matured greatly throughout the novel, the conclusion reminds the reader of the way you analyzed the book's events, other critiques and theories throughout each paragraph of your essay.

3 Look Forward

Conclusions should not give a definitive answer to the question your thesis asks. Literary analysis does not stop at one particular point in time, and essays like yours keep a work of literature moving forward. A good conclusion will ask what needs to be done to solve the problem you have identified. If "To Kill A Mockingbird" centers on blatant racial problems with the criminal justice system, you could discuss aspects of that small town controversy that still exist today. Do not introduce completely new ideas, but draw from your thesis statement and connect it to a sense of duty that you have hopefully instilled in your readers.

4 Stay Positive

The tone of the conclusion should be positive and achieve a feeling of completion. You can use other literary techniques, like simile or metaphor, and you can refer to on-point contemporary issues or ideas. Advanced students may refer to aspects of literary theory if you are knowledgeable about it. Overall, if you have a well-defended argument throughout the paper, the conclusion should be as strong as the rest of the essay.

• 1 Royal Literary Fund: Conclusions
• 2 Syracuse City Schools: Sample Concluding Paragraph
• 3 The Writing Center at UNC Chapel Hill: Conclusions

About the Author

Matt Rauscher has been writing professionally since 1996, recently serving as a contributing writer/film critic for "Instinct Magazine." He is also a novelist and co-author of a Chicago city guidebook. In 1997, Rauscher graduated from the University of Illinois with a B.A. in rhetoric.

Related Articles

How to Write a Theme Paragraph

Transitions For Essays

How to Write a Thesis Statement for an Article Critique

How to Write About an Ethical Dilemma

How to Develop Analytical Skills

How to Write a Conclusion for a Literary Criticism

How to Write an Essay About a Piece of Literature

How to Write a Critique Essay

What Makes Up a Well-Written Essay in High School?

How to Write an Insight Paper

How to Answer Open-Ended Essay Questions

How to Write a Literature Report

Lesson Plan Ideas for Teaching Point of View for Middle...

How to Write a Critical Analysis of a Short Story

How to Write an Introduction for a Character Analysis

How to Critique a Dissertation

What Is a Hook Paragraph in an Essay?

How to Write a Comparison Essay on Two Different Stories

How to Write a Fourth Grade Essay

Types of Introductions in Essays

Regardless of how old we are, we never stop learning. Classroom is the educational resource for people of all ages. Whether you’re studying times tables or applying to college, Classroom has the answers.

• Accessibility
• Terms of Use
• Privacy Policy
• Copyright Policy
• Manage Preferences

© 2020 Leaf Group Ltd. / Leaf Group Media, All Rights Reserved. Based on the Word Net lexical database for the English Language. See disclaimer .

• Link to facebook
• Link to linkedin
• Link to twitter
• Link to youtube
• Writing Tips

5 Examples of Concluding Words for Essays

4-minute read

• 19th September 2022

If you’re a student writing an essay or research paper, it’s important to make sure your points flow together well. You’ll want to use connecting words (known formally as transition signals) to do this. Transition signals like thus , also , and furthermore link different ideas, and when you get to the end of your work, you need to use these to mark your conclusion. Read on to learn more about transition signals and how to use them to conclude your essays.

Transition Signals

Transition signals link sentences together cohesively, enabling easy reading and comprehension. They are usually placed at the beginning of a sentence and separated from the remaining words with a comma. There are several types of transition signals, including those to:

●  show the order of a sequence of events (e.g., first, then, next)

●  introduce an example (e.g., specifically, for instance)

●  indicate a contrasting idea (e.g., but, however, although)

●  present an additional idea (e.g., also, in addition, plus)

●  indicate time (e.g., beforehand, meanwhile, later)

●  compare (e.g., likewise, similarly)

●  show cause and effect (e.g., thus, as a result)

●  mark the conclusion – which we’ll focus on in this guide.

When you reach the end of an essay, you should start the concluding paragraph with a transition signal that acts as a bridge to the summary of your key points. Check out some concluding transition signals below and learn how you can use them in your writing.

To Conclude…

This is a particularly versatile closing statement that can be used for almost any kind of essay, including both formal and informal academic writing. It signals to the reader that you will briefly restate the main idea. As an alternative, you can begin the summary with “to close” or “in conclusion.” In an argumentative piece, you can use this phrase to indicate a call to action or opinion:

To conclude, Abraham Lincoln was the best president because he abolished slavery.

Find this useful?

Subscribe to our newsletter and get writing tips from our editors straight to your inbox.

As Has Been Demonstrated…

To describe how the evidence presented in your essay supports your argument or main idea, begin the concluding paragraph with “as has been demonstrated.” This phrase is best used for research papers or articles with heavy empirical or statistical evidence.

As has been demonstrated by the study presented above, human activities are negatively altering the climate system.

The Above Points Illustrate…

As another transitional phrase for formal or academic work, “the above points illustrate” indicates that you are reiterating your argument and that the conclusion will include an assessment of the evidence you’ve presented.

The above points illustrate that children prefer chocolate over broccoli.

In a Nutshell…

A simple and informal metaphor to begin a conclusion, “in a nutshell” prepares the reader for a summary of your paper. It can work in narratives and speeches but should be avoided in formal situations.

In a nutshell, the Beatles had an impact on musicians for generations to come.

Overall, It Can Be Said…

To recap an idea at the end of a critical or descriptive essay, you can use this phrase at the beginning of the concluding paragraph. “Overall” means “taking everything into account,” and it sums up your essay in a formal way. You can use “overall” on its own as a transition signal, or you can use it as part of a phrase.

Overall, it can be said that art has had a positive impact on humanity.

Proofreading and Editing

Transition signals are crucial to crafting a well-written and cohesive essay. For your next writing assignment, make sure you include plenty of transition signals, and check out this post for more tips on how to improve your writing. And before you turn in your paper, don’t forget to have someone proofread your work. Our expert editors will make sure your essay includes all the transition signals necessary for your writing to flow seamlessly. Send in a free 500-word sample today!

Share this article:

Post A New Comment

Got content that needs a quick turnaround? Let us polish your work. Explore our editorial business services.

5-minute read

Free Email Newsletter Template

Promoting a brand means sharing valuable insights to connect more deeply with your audience, and...

6-minute read

How to Write a Nonprofit Grant Proposal

If you’re seeking funding to support your charitable endeavors as a nonprofit organization, you’ll need...

9-minute read

How to Use Infographics to Boost Your Presentation

Is your content getting noticed? Capturing and maintaining an audience’s attention is a challenge when...

8-minute read

Why Interactive PDFs Are Better for Engagement

Are you looking to enhance engagement and captivate your audience through your professional documents? Interactive...

7-minute read

Seven Key Strategies for Voice Search Optimization

Voice search optimization is rapidly shaping the digital landscape, requiring content professionals to adapt their...

Five Creative Ways to Showcase Your Digital Portfolio

Are you a creative freelancer looking to make a lasting impression on potential clients or...

Make sure your writing is the best it can be with our expert English proofreading and editing.

How to Write a GCSE English Literature Essay

I was an English teacher for many years, both at GCSE and A Level , and I found that students did best when they knew exactly what examiners wanted (and crucially, didn’t want) to see in any English essay. This guide will give you some of my top tips for success when it comes to achieving the top grade in any GCSE English Literature paper.

English Senior Content Creator

22 January 2024

• 1 . What do examiners want to see in any English essay at GCSE? 
• 2 . How long should a GCSE English Literature essay be?
• 3 . Planning the GCSE English Literature essay
• 4 . How do you structure an English Literature essay?
• 5 . How do you write a GCSE English Literature essay conclusion?
• 6 . GCSE English Literature essay examples

Whichever exam board you are studying as part of your GCSE English Literature (AQA, Edexcel, OCR, Eduqas or WJEC), or if you’re studying for an IGCSE (Edexcel or CIE), you will be required to write a long essay on at least one type of text. These texts could include a Shakespeare play, a 19th-century novel, a modern text, or poetry, either from an anthology or unseen. Because some of these essay questions can be worth up to 40 marks (and therefore a huge chunk of your overall GCSE mark), it is vital that you have a good grounding in essay writing to get the top marks in your English Literature exam. 

What do examiners want to see in any English essay at GCSE? 

My experience also working as an examiner means that I have first-hand knowledge of the conversations that exam boards have with their individual examiners. The first thing to say is that examiners always want to give students credit: GCSE exams are “positively” marked, which means that they don’t deduct marks for mistakes. Instead, they start from the top of the mark scheme and fit students into a level, working down until they find a “best fit” between the student and a level.

So what? I hear you cry. Well, this means that if you - as a student - understand the English Literature mark scheme, and the assessment objectives, then you know exactly what you have to do to succeed. I always talked to my students about “thinking like an examiner”. The best way to do this is to look at the mark scheme on your exam board’s website. Even better, here at SME we have created student-friendly mark schemes, where we have “translated” them into everyday language. Here’s one for the Shakespeare essay question for AQA Paper 1.

How long should a GCSE English Literature essay be?

This is a great question, and one my students always asked me! The simple answer is: not as long as you might think. A “good essay” is certainly not the same as a long essay. In fact, I drummed into my students a favourite phrase of mine: “write less, plan more”. Much like the writing questions in the GCSE English Language paper, it is a much better idea to write a shorter, well-planned essay than including everything you can possibly remember about the character or theme that has come up in the exam question. In fact, when I was an examiner, I was often instructed to mark an essay down a level if it was too long, because inevitably these hyper-long pieces of writing lost focus and became unstructured. A shorter essay, focused throughout on the exam question, will always do better than a 10-page mega-essay that includes as many points as a student can remember in the timeframe. I have seen a whole essay that is only four sides of A4 achieve full marks. As a result, it can be a good idea to spend at least 20-30% of your allocated time on planning your answer.

Planning the GCSE English Literature essay

As already mentioned, planning can be the key to unlocking the very highest marks at GCSE. At SME, we have detailed, step by step guides on how to plan essays for Shakespeare , and also for the AQA GCSE English Literature 19-century novel (including A Christmas Carol ) and modern text (including An Inspector Calls ). However, before you start writing your essay, some great tips include:

Make sure you understand the exam question. Underline the key words of the question

Annotate the exam paper (this is especially great if you are answering an essay question that also includes an extract)

Establish your own argument, or viewpoint, based on the key words of the question

Write down your overarching argument (this is often called a “thesis statement”) at the top of your page

Select evidence that backs up your thesis statement (if you have been given an extract, try to select evidence from elsewhere in the text as well)

Based on your selected evidence, organise your argument into two or three main points (these will form your paragraphs)

How do you structure an English Literature essay?

A lot of schools and colleges teach students very specific paragraph structures, such as PEE, or PETAL. Although this can be a great way to learn how to write essay paragraphs, for the very highest marks at GCSE these rigid structures can be limiting. Exam boards say that they would prefer students to move away from PEE-style structures, because this allows students the space to be more “exploratory” and “conceptualised”: both of these words really mean that they want a lot more of that second “E” in PEE: explanation. 

Overall, I always asked my students to follow this broad structure for any essay:

Introduction: for the very highest marks, this must include a thesis statement, or a summary of your overall argument

Paragraph 1: This would include a topic sentence, which sets out the main point of the paragraph, and then uses various pieces of evidence to back up the argument made in the topic sentence

Paragraph 2: This would include a topic sentence, which sets out the main point of the paragraph, and then uses various pieces of evidence to back up the argument made in the topic sentence

Paragraph 3: This would include a topic sentence, which sets out the main point of the paragraph, and then uses various pieces of evidence to back up the argument made in the topic sentence. Depending on the exam board, and question, this could include a counter-argument

Conclusion: This would make the case that the argument, as set out in the introduction, has been proved

How do you write a GCSE English Literature essay conclusion?

Conclusions are tricky. Lots of English teachers have slightly different opinions on how to write conclusions for a GCSE English Literature essay. Some teachers might even say that it is not necessary to write a conclusion, but here at SME we always think it’s a great idea. This is because it really helps create what examiners call a “coherent response”: an argument that is focused all the way through, right to the end. Here are my top tips for writing a conclusion for a GCSE English Literature essay:

A conclusion should only summarise the proof you have provided for your argument

It only needs to be two or three sentences long

It should include the words of the question and your thesis statement

Remember, you do not get rewarded for including the same information twice, so try to be brief when summarising the points you made in the main body of your essay

GCSE English Literature essay examples

At SME, we have lots of annotated model answers for GCSE English Literature questions, including one for Macbeth , and another for A Christmas Carol.

Here is an excerpt from our model answer on whether Lady Macbeth is a character who changes throughout the play:

Shakespeare presents Lady Macbeth as a female character who changes dramatically over the course of the play: she changes from a ruthless, remorseless woman who is able to manipulate her husband, to one that is side-lined by Macbeth and, ultimately, totally consumed by guilt. Shakespeare is perhaps suggesting that unchecked ambition and hubris, particularly for women, have fatal consequences.

Here’s an excerpt from our model answer for A Christmas Carol on how Dickens presents the suffering of the poor:

In this extract, Dickens uses the two characters, Ignorance and Want, as an allegory, as they are symbolic of society’s cruelty towards the suffering of the poor. Dickens uses these two characters to expose the consequences of society’s greed and avarice. The children are first depicted as emerging from the spirit’s robe which underscores Dickens’s message of how poverty, and its devastating consequences, remain largely shrouded, unseen and ignored by society. Furthermore, Dickens’s imagery depicts the children as emaciated and wretched which induces both horror and pity in the reader.

For lots more model answers, tips and step by step guides, please do visit the GCSE English Literature pages of SME. 

Sign up for articles sent directly to your inbox

Receive news, articles and guides directly from our team of experts.

Written by Nick Redgrove

Nick is a graduate of the University of Cambridge and King’s College London. He started his career in journalism and publishing, working as an editor on a political magazine and a number of books, before training as an English teacher. After nearly 10 years working in London schools, where he held leadership positions in English departments and within a Sixth Form, he moved on to become an examiner and education consultant. With more than a decade of experience as a tutor, Nick specialises in English, but has also taught Politics, Classical Civilisation and Religious Studies.

Share this article

The examiner written revision resources that improve your grades 2x.

• Open access
• Published: 30 August 2024

Barriers in providing quality end-of-life care as perceived by nurses working in critical care units: an integrative review

• Yousef Saleh Rubbai 1 , 2 ,
• Mei Chan Chong 1 ,
• Li Yoong Tang 1 ,
• Khatijah Lim Abdullah 3 ,
• Walid Theib Mohammad 6 ,
• Samira Mohajer   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7118-1783 1 , 4 &
• Mohammad Namazinia   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2198-7556 5  

BMC Palliative Care volume  23 , Article number:  217 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

Despite increasing interest in quality end-of-life care (EOLC), critically ill patients often receive suboptimal care. Critical care nurses play a crucial role in EOLC, but face numerous barriers that hinder their ability to provide compassionate and effective care.

An integrative literature review was conducted to investigate barriers impacting the quality of end-of-life care. This review process involved searching database like MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, EBSCO, and ScienceDirect up to November 2023. Search strategies focused on keywords related to barriers in end-of-life care and critical care nurses from October 30th to November 10th, 2023. The inclusion criteria specified full-text English articles published between 2010 and 2023 that addressed barriers perceived by critical care nurses. This integrative review employs an integrated thematic analysis approach, which combines elements of deductive and inductive analysis, to explore the identified barriers, with coding and theme development overseen by the primary and secondary authors.

Out of 103 articles published, 11 articles were included in the review. There were eight cross-sectional descriptive studies and three qualitative studies, which demonstrated barriers affecting end-of-life care quality. Quality appraisal using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool was completed by two authors confirmed the high credibility of the selected studies, indicating the presence of high-quality evidence across the reviewed articles. Thematic analysis led to the three main themes (1) barriers related to patients and their families, (2) barriers related to nurses and their demographic characteristics, and (3) barriers related to health care environment and institutions.

This review highlights barriers influencing the quality of end of life care perceived by critical care nurses and the gaps that need attention to improve the quality of care provided for patients in their final stages and their fsmilies within the context of critical care. This review also notes the need for additional research to investigate the uncover patterns and insights that have not been fully explored in the existing literature to enhance understanding of these barriers. This can help to inform future research, care provision, and policy-making. Specifically, this review examines how these barriers interact, their cumulative impact on care quality, and potential strategies to overcome.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

It was estimated that 56.8 million people, including 25.7 million at the end of life, need palliative care; however, only about 14% of people who need palliative care currently receive it [ 1 ]. The need for acute care settings increased in response to life-threatening emergencies and the acute exacerbation of diseases [ 2 , 3 ]. These settings were developed to meet the need for providing optimal health care, saving patient lives and decreasing the rate of mortality using advanced technology [ 2 , 4 ]. Caring in intensive care units sometimes involves withholding or withdrawing treatments that have lasted a lifetime, and in these cases, the role of ICU nurses goes from providing life-saving measures to end-of-life care [ 5 ]. Care at the end of a life is a special kind of health care for individuals and families who are living with a life-limiting illness [ 6 ]. End-of-life care (EOLC) includes a crucial component of intensive care nurses’ work; nurses are in a unique position to cooperate with families to provide care for patients at the end of their lives [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 43 ].

Advanced technology in critical care units has led to improved nursing care in many areas, such as End-Of-Life-Care (EOLC) [ 11 ]. This type of care has moved towards enhancing comfort and reducing patients’ suffering [ 12 ]. As EOLC involves enhancing the physical, emotional, and spiritual quality of life for critically ill patients, traditional measures are now challenged as advanced technology has revolutionized nursing care through innovations such as adjustable beds and pressure-relieving mattresses, which help optimize patient comfort, and advanced communication technologies, for example, video conferencing facilitating communication between patients, families, and healthcare providers, allowing for ongoing support, counseling, and decision-making discussions throughout the end-of-life journey. Therefore, quality EOLC has become a significant concern for healthcare decision-makers, healthcare providers, researchers, patients, and families [ 13 ]. Despite the increased interest and demand in providing good EOLC, this care is still limited In the critical care and does not meet the recommended standards [ 14 ]. Critical Care Nurses spend more time with patients compared to other members of the multidisciplinary team. They serve as implementers, educators, and coordinators in end-of-life care. Their role in delivering EOLC is essential as they are presumably prepared to provide this care and meet patients and their family’s needs, including pain control, management of physical, emotional, spiritual, and social needs, and communication with patients and their families [ 15 ]. Therefore, it is important to look into the factors that impede the provision of quality end-of-life care from their perspectives. Many barriers affecting the provision of EOLC in critical care areas have been reported in the literature [ 13 , 16 , 17 ].

End-of-life care (EOLC) involves caring for and managing terminally ill patients and families. The quality of EOLC in critical care units has been evaluated based on factors such as patient/family involvement in decision-making, professional communication between health professionals and patients/families, care quality, support types, illness and symptom management, spirituality, and organizational support for critical care nurses [ 18 ]. Furthermore, working in a critical care unit environment is stressful and emotionally taxing for health professionals such as nurses. Carers of terminally ill patients may experience distressing emotions such as helplessness, loss of power, sadness, and hopelessness [ 18 ]. These feelings make it difficult to provide optimal end-of-life care. Additionally, nurses focus on managing symptoms, disease prognosis, treatment options, and physical aspects, but in fact, caring in critical care units follows a universal and holistic model. Previous research has shown that patients and families are not receiving adequate care at the end of life.

Researchers categorized factors that affect EOLC into barriers and challenges [ 13 ]. Barriers have been classified into three categories: patient and family-related, nurses and other health care workers’ related, and health care institutions’ related [ 16 , 17 ].

Barriers related to communication between health care providers and patients and families and characteristics of critical care nurses, including nurses’ age, gender, educational level, and end-of-life care training, significantly affect providing good EOLC [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. this integrative review aims to go beyond merely identifying and categorizing barriers. By synthesizing results from a wide range of studies, the review seeks to uncover patterns and insights that have not been fully explored in the existing literature to enhance understanding of these barriers. This can help to inform future research, care provision, and policy-making. Specifically, this review will examine how these barriers interact, their cumulative impact on care quality, and potential strategies to overcome Despite the fact that EOLC is decisive to patient care, appropriate provision of this service is still lacking in several aspects. In the ICUs, EOLC must be considered an essential factor. However, owing to the existing practices of nurses, the adequate delivery of EOLC tends to bear various inefficiencies.

Nurses and other healthcare staff seem to come across multiple barriers that hinder their ability to offer effective care to critically ill patients. Considering the given dearth of research in this context, we intend to present a comprehensive insight into the issue. In this review, we focused on EOLC provided by critical care nurses, who were defined as nurses dealing with patients suffering from acute health problems due to injury, surgery, or exacerbated chronic diseases and need close monitoring in units such as intensive care units (surgical, medical, and pediatric) and cardiac care units. Due to the importance of exploring these barriers in determining the quality of EOLC, this integrative review paper was conducted to examine and highlight evidence from the literature on these barriers that affect the provision of quality EOLC. This paper explores and identifies current published peer-reviewed studies addressing barriers that affect the quality of EOLC as perceived by critical care nurses. This integrative review seeks to answer the following question: What barriers affect the quality of end-of-life care perceived by nurses working in critical care units?

An integrative review design was the most suitable method to explore and produce a new understanding from various types of literature (experimental, non-experimental, and theoretical) to enhance understanding of the phenomenon under investigation (i.e., EOLC). This method also facilitated nursing science by informing further research, care provision, and policy-making. It also highlights strengths, weaknesses, limitations, and gaps in knowledge, and supports what is already known about theories relevant to our topic [ 24 ]. Therefore, this design helps meet this review’s purposes.

Search strategies

The search process involved four phases which were developed by the first author (YR) and validated by two expert authors (MCC and KLA) as follows: (1) identifying the problems related to the research question, (2) conducting a systematic literature search, (3) screening the articles to develop themes, and (4) performing critical analysis to develop the themes.

From October 30, 2023, to November 10, 2023, electronic literature searches were conducted using major databases such as MEDLINE, Cochrane, CINAHL, EBSCO, and ScienceDirect.

Search methods were defined using the MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) descriptors of the keywords “end-of-life care,” “barriers,” and “critical care nurses.” Additionally, the reference lists of all identified articles were manually searched for additional studies. The operators used in this search included “AND” and “OR,” as well as the truncation tools of each database. A refined search was performed with terms such as “critical care nurses’ perceptions” OR “opinions” AND “quality end-of-life care” OR “quality of death and dying.” Subsequently, terms like “barriers” OR “obstacles” OR “challenges” AND “quality end-of-life care” OR “quality of death and dying” were employed. Finally, the descriptors “critical care nurses’ perceptions,” “barriers,” and “quality end-of-life care” were used (Fig.  1 ).

PRISMA search flow diagram

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria for this search to select relevant articles were as follows: (1) Full-text articles, (2) Papers published in the English language from 2010 to 2023, and (3) Articles that specifically describe the barriers perceived by critical care nurses that affect the quality of end-of-life care.

Intervention studies and studies that describe barriers to providing quality end-of-life care from other perspectives, such as physicians and patients’ families were excluded. For the studies who included nurses and other health care workers within the context of critical care, the researchers included the results that relevant to nurses and excluded the others.

Data extraction

The data extraction and analysis were carried out to collect and consolidate the data from the selected studies into a standard format relevant to the research field. The extracted data included specific descriptions of the settings, populations, study methods, and outcome measures (Table  31 ). Two authors (YSR and KLA) independently extracted the data and reached an agreement after discussion with the third author (MCC).

Included and excluded studies

Following the review process, the authors made the final decision on studies that met the study criteria. Out of a total of 103 articles, 9 duplicates were removed. The abstracts of the remaining 94 articles were initially found to be somewhat relevant to the research topic. However, after examining the articles in terms of research methodology and results, 36 articles that matched the selection criteria for this study were ultimately chosen. The full text of the 36 articles was reexamined based on the title first for suitability. Subsequently, the abstracts of the studies were reviewed, leading to the exclusion of 23 articles for various reasons, leaving 13 studies for further consideration in this study. However, two articles were disqualified as they did not contain a specific research methodology or reviewed literature papers; they relied solely on theoretical information. This step resulted in the inclusion of 11 research articles in this integrative review of the literature (Table  1 ).

Quality appraisal

To ensure the methodology’s quality and avoid bias in the design, highly credible and respected search engines were adopted to select peer-reviewed studies according to the inclusion criteria in this review. The articles chosen in this review were categorized into two sections based on study design and research methodology: quantitative and qualitative studies. These were evaluated manually and independently for each study, with any disagreements resolved by two experts (KLA, Professor, and MCC, Associate Professor) who have experience in research methodology, using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 [ 25 ]. This tool includes specific criteria for evaluating the quality of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method studies. The MMAT consists of a checklist of five research components for each type of study with a rating scale including “Yes,” “No,” and “Can’t tell.” The overall results suggest that the evidence quality across the ten studies was high (Table  2 ).

Data synthesis

Thematic analysis in this review involves a systematic process of coding and theme development, using both inductive and deductive approaches. This method ensures a comprehensive synthesis of diverse data sources, providing valuable insights into the research topic [ 24 , 26 ]. Thematic analysis was employed for all studies to investigate the subject of interest. The coding for the themes in this review followed the six recommended phases: Familiarizing with the data; making initial codes; searching for themes; reviewing themes and making a thematic plan; defining and naming themes; generating the final picture of the report [ 24 ]. The coding was conducted by the primary author (YSR) and confirmed by the three secondary authors (LH, SM, and LY). Any discrepancies were discussed and resolved through consensus.

Search outcomes

The search process yielded a total of 103 articles. All articles resulting from the search process were independently reviewed by all authors in this study for the research process, purpose, methodology, tools, main findings, recommendations, and limitations.

Characteristics of included studies

Eight cross-sectional descriptive studies and three qualitative studies were selected, which were conducted in the following countries: two from the USA [ 27 , 28 ] and a single study from each of the following countries: Saudi Arabia [ 22 ], Jordan [ 29 ], Egypt [ 12 ], Malaysia [ 13 ], Scotland [ 30 ], Poland [ 31 ], Hong Kong [ 32 ], South Africa [ 33 ], and China [ 34 ].

In this comprehensive analysis of 11 studies, a diverse range of methodologies and findings were examined across different countries and healthcare settings. The studies included a mix of quantitative and qualitative approaches, with sample sizes varying from small convenience samples to larger cohorts. Key barriers to providing End of Life Care (EOLC) were identified, such as challenges in communication with families, lack of support from managers, and insufficient training in EOLC. The studies highlighted the importance of addressing these barriers to improve the quality of care provided by nurses in critical care settings. Notably, demographic characteristics and their impact on EOLC provision were not consistently addressed across the studies, indicating a potential area for further research and exploration in this field (Table  31 ).

The thematic analysis of included studies revealed several key themes and sub-themes related to barriers in End of Life Care (EOLC). These themes encompassed various aspects, including challenges related to patients and their families, healthcare institutions and the environment, as well as barriers specific to nurses. Communication and collaboration between patients, nurses, and families included issues such as seeking updates about patient status, misunderstandings about life-saving measures, misunderstanding poor prognosis, troubled family dynamics, and conflicts within families regarding life support decisions [ 22 , 34 ]. Additionally, barriers related to Institution Policy and procedures highlighted concerns such as insufficient standard procedures, communication challenges in decision-making, inadequate ICU design, inappropriate staffing policies, and deficiencies in rooms, supplies, and noise control. Furthermore, barriers associated with nurses encompassed their emotional experiences and socio-demographic characteristics [ 12 ] (Table  4 ).

Among the results of the selected articles on nurses’ perceptions of barriers affecting quality EOLC, three main themes were identified: (1) Communication and collaboration between patients, nurses, and families (2) Institution Policy and procedural barriers, and (3) barriers related to nurses and their demographics. An overlap in some of these areas, such as the themes addressing barriers related to patients and their families, was identified [ 11 , 22 , 35 ]. This overlap indicates a high level of consensus between the authors in identifying the barriers affecting the quality of end-of-life care.

Communication and collaboration between patients, nurses, and families

After reviewing the existing body of literature in this domain, it was observed that some familial factors had been largely perceived as prominent barriers to providing EOLC by the nurses. Although some authors concluded family issues as the highest-ranking concern for nurses in providing quality EOLC, there were variations in the type of barriers they encountered [ 11 , 28 , 35 ]. For example, continuous requests for updates on patients’ status from their families were identified as the top-rated barrier affecting the quality of EOLC from the perspective of critical care nurses. In addition, family misunderstandings about life-saving measures, as well as doubts and uncertainties regarding prognosis, resulted in a lack of time for nurses to provide quality EOLC, as they spent significant time explaining these matters [ 29 ]. Similarly, continuous phone calls from family members seeking updates on patients’ conditions were ranked highest (M = 4.23) among barriers affecting EOLC [ 28 ]. Additionally, dealing with distressed family members also received the highest total mean score (M = 3.3) [ 13 ]. On the contrary, another study found that out of 70 nurses, the practice of calling nurses for updates on patients’ conditions had the lowest impact on EOLC practice (62.2%), while misunderstanding about life-saving measures (65.7%) played a crucial role in determining the quality of EOLC [ 36 ]. The study concluded that the primary barrier related to patients and their families was the lack of understanding among family members about what life-saving measures entailed. Similarly, another source also reported consistent findings indicating that families often did not accept poor prognoses for patients and struggled to grasp the significance of life-saving measures [ 22 ].

Furthermore, previous studies have indicated that barriers affecting EOLC and thereby the quality of care include the presence of family members with patients, inadequate communication with patients’ families, lack of involvement in discussions about patient care decisions, conflicts among family members regarding decisions to cease or continue life support treatment, and unrealistic expectations regarding prognosis [ 22 , 30 , 37 ].

Communication and collaboration among doctors and nurses are vital in designing an effective healthcare plan for patients. However, inadequate and inappropriate collaboration and support, such as conflicting opinions, disagreements, and insufficient cooperation between them, can lead to various difficulties that may result in poor patient care [ 22 ]. Research scholars who have conducted studies in this area have acknowledged that agreement between nurses and physicians regarding care directions for patients at the end of life is one of the most critical barriers to enhancing the quality of EOLC [ 29 ].

Similarly, another study found that poor communication between nurses and physicians resulted in inappropriate decision-making and disagreement about care plans, which subsequently impacted the quality of care [ 13 ]. Additionally, inadequate and poor communication between nurses and other healthcare teams diverted attention from the goal of care [ 28 ].

Failures in communication between nurses and other healthcare providers can lead to misunderstandings of care messages, which can affect EOLC practices [ 30 ]. It also highlighted the lack of communication and cooperation between doctors and other healthcare team members; nurses emphasized the need for a communication training course [ 11 ].

Good communication between nurses and physicians and consideration of nurses’ opinions were found to enhance the quality of EOLC [ 12 ]. Furthermore, educating critical care nurses about communication and collaboration skills was reported as crucial for improving the quality of EOLC [ 13 ].

Barriers related to nurses

The given three sub-themes were identified regarding the impact of nurses-related barriers and the influence of some of their demographic factors on the quality of EOLC:

Lack of opportunities for training and education.

Emotional and psychological issue.

Nurses’ socio -demographic factors.

Lack of opportunities for training and education

It was reported that critical care nurses were not adequately prepared to provide EOLC; nurses needed to increase their knowledge about cultural aspects, ethical issues, skills, communication, and training regarding the continuity of care and the management of physical and psychosocial symptoms [ 11 , 13 , 28 ]. Furthermore, nurses who did not participate in any EOLC training course perceived more barriers to delivering quality EOLC than those who had participated in introductory training courses [ 13 , 28 ]. Attia et al. [ 12 ]. reported that 60% of critical care nurses perceived that they had received poor education and training concerning family grieving, symptom management, and quality EOLC. Furthermore, Holms et al. [ 30 ]. found that all participants acknowledged that they had received very little formal education and training on EOLC, particularly those who worked in intensive care. In a study by Jordan et al. [ 37 ], nurses emphasized that EOLC education is essential during the orientation period before starting their ICU jobs.

Emotional and psychological issue

Five articles in this review have studied the effect of nurses’ feelings and emotions as barriers to providing quality EOLC [ 11 , 13 , 28 , 30 , 37 ]. Nurses stated that they feel sad when they cannot help the patients to die peacefully, and they lack emotional support, considering this one of the main barriers to providing EOLC [ 11 ]. Staff morale distress was reported repeatedly during interviews with ICU nurses about their experience of EOLC. This feeling of despair is accompanied by many causes, such as lack of staff experience, poor communication, inadequate training about EOLC, lack of a suitable environment, and lack of support from senior staff [ 30 ]. Nurses acknowledged that they felt like they were participating in decisions to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining treatment, resulting in conflicting emotions and feeling helpless in advocating for the patients with mixed feelings of sadness, grief, anger, and frustration [ 37 ]. Lastly, Crump et al. [ 28 ] and Omar Daw Hussin et al. [ 13 ] observed that critical care nurses received inadequate emotional support from managers and experts within healthcare institutions, which affects the quality of EOLC they provide.

Nurses’ socio -demographic factors

It has been identified that some socio-demographic characteristics of nurses also play a significant role in shaping their opinions regarding perceived barriers. For example, age, education, experience in the field, and other similar factors profoundly impact their perceptions of the barriers to providing EOLC. A study by Omar Daw Hussin et al. [ 13 ] revealed that nurses ( n  = 553) aged 21–30 years old had the highest mean total score for barrier factors to provide quality EOLC compared to other age groups. This was also higher in diploma holders than in nurses with certificates and bachelor’s degrees. Regarding years of experience as critical care nurses, they found that nurses with minimal years of experience (1–10 years) had the highest mean total score for difficulties. Similarly, Chan et al. [ 38 ] found that nurses’ age, qualifications, and experience in caring for patients at EOL were significantly associated with their perceived barriers. Nurses’ distress in intensive care units was linked to various factors, one of which is the lack of experience in providing EOLC, as reported by Holms et al. [ 30 ].

Institution Policy and procedural barriers

Healthcare facilities and the surrounding environment where patients stay have a significant influence on their quick recovery, mental and physical health, as well as health progress [ 11 ]. Therefore, healthcare institutions ought to establish a healthy environment for patients’ well-being. However, in the current review, it was understood that nurses identified a group of barriers related to hospital settings, such as the insufficiency of standard procedures pertaining to EOLC in place at the institution, inappropriate staffing policies in the ICU, lack of rooms prepared for EOLC, insufficient supplies to assist families in EOLC, and a noisy environment with bright lights in patients’ rooms [ 11 ]. Likewise, researchers concluded that intensive care unit nurses face time constraints due to heavy workloads; they also reported that intensive care units have poor designs that interrupt patients’ privacy and affect the provision of quality EOLC [ 12 , 28 ]. Previous studies identified a lack of EOLC rules and guidelines governing the provision of quality EOLC in critical care units, such as limited visiting hours, guiding preferred care pathways, and excessive paperwork burdens [ 12 , 13 , 30 ].

In this section, we discuss the results of this review on the barriers to providing quality end-of-life care derived from the literature and compare them with the results of previous studies.

The themes emerging from the data helped us understand that some familial factors play a decisive role in hindering timely and effective EOLC provision to patients. Our findings are consistent with Beckstrand et al. [ 36 ] and Friedenberg et al. [ 39 ], who also found that families’ lack of understanding or insufficient understanding of the life-saving measures performed for patients often contributes to delayed EOLC provision, due to their ambiguous opinions and uncertainty about the treatment given. Additionally, before taking any action, barriers related to other factors such as cultural aspects, not covered in this paper, should not be disregarded as they may have a significant influence on the outcomes.

There was agreement among all the authors in this review that communication and collaboration issues were at the forefront of factors that affect the quality of EOLC.in critical care setings, poor communication and collaboration between nurses and physicians makes nurses perceive their roles as secondary in the decision-making process. Additionally, critical care nurses also noted that interrupted communication leads to misunderstandings and conflicts in decision-making, diverting them from the goal of EOLC. It was also agreed that communication breakdown and conflicts in decision-making among healthcare teams impact the quality of care for patients with chronic end-stage diseases [ 40 ].

Reviewing the selected studies made us aware that nurses perceived inadequate training and education about EOLC significantly impacts their practice in delivering quality EOLC. The nurses also acknowledged the importance of receiving training and education regarding EOLC, such as symptom management, dealing with grieving families, and communication skills during the orientation period before starting their work in critical care units. Therefore, critical care nurses need to enhance their knowledge about cultural aspects, ethical issues, communication skills, and training related to the continuity of care and the management of physical and psychosocial symptoms [ 36 ].

Apart from training issues, we found that the feeling of not being able to provide proper care to some patients, consistent distress due to increased workload, or managing patients with critical conditions such as prolonging unavoidable death could be attributed to their deteriorating mental health, which they perceive as a barrier to offering EOLC. These results were also supported by Calvin et al. [ 41 ], who found that novice cardiac care unit nurses expressed more fear and discomfort while caring for dying patients and communicating with their families.

This review further shows that healthcare organizations lack policies and guidelines that govern EOLC, such as staffing policies and scheduling visiting hours, leading to a shortage of nurses, increased workload, and decreased presence of family members with their patients. This lack of policies was also indicated in their study [ 36 ]. Critical care units in this review have a poor design that challenges nurses when providing EOLC and interrupts patient privacy. This is consistent with Sheward et al. [ 42 ], who found that the poor design of critical care units may compromise patients’ confidentiality and affect the provision of quality EOLC.

In summary, our findings revealed that some familial factors play a decisive role in hindering timely and effective EOLC provision to patients. Moreover, nurses perceived that inadequate training and education about EOLC significantly impact their practice in providing good EOLC. Therefore, these aspects of our results are confirmed by broader literature, as evidenced before. The ceuurent review highlights the importance of enhancing family communication throught the needs for conducting education and training programs among health care profesionals in crirical care settings about communication skills. Additionally, healthcare organizations lack policies and guidelines that lead to a shortage of nurses, increased workload, and decreased family members’ presence with their patients, governing EOLC. Thus, this integrative review addresses the question of what barriers affect the quality of end-of-life care as perceived by nurses working in critical care units. Combining diverse methodologies can lead to inadequate rigor, imprecision, bias, flawed analysis, synthesis, and deductions. Therefore, there is a need for future studies to further refine the key indicators.

Strengths and limitations

The selected studies were conducted in several countries, which may enhance the generalizability of the study findings. The limitations of this review study are that it focused mainly on descriptive and non-experimental studies. Additionally, the assessment of quality appraisal for selected studies was subjective to the authors according to MMAT, which could affect the studies’ appraisal. The selection of only English articles may introduce bias regarding barriers beyond EOLC in countries where English is not commonly spoken.

The review indicated that healthcare organizations must provide critical care nurses with evidence-based pathways and guidelines to guide them in providing EOLC, increase emotional support from nursing managers and supervisors, and improve critical care settings design. Further studies need to be conducted on the barriers that affect the quality of EOLC and suggestions to overcome these barriers at the level of patients and families, nurses, physicians, other healthcare providers, and healthcare organizations to enhance teamwork and collaboration and improve the quality of EOLC.

This review also calls for additional research to be conducted to explore the barriers that affect the quality of end-of-life care. These studies should investigate barriers at multiple levels, including those affecting patients and families, nurses, physicians, other healthcare providers, and healthcare organizations. By identifying and understanding these barriers, recommendations can be made to overcome them, ultimately enhancing teamwork, collaboration, and the overall quality of end-of-life care.

International implications for practice

Many tools can be easily used to assess barriers to end-of-life care in critical care settings. We recommend monitoring and evaluating them regularly among nurses because they are significantly linked to the quality of end-of-life care. Furthermore, we advise to assess the quality of end-of-life care from patients and their families perspectives and provide them with greif and emotional support if they are unable to contribute in providing feedback that help in assissing the quality of end-of- life care. Refreshing training and education courses about end-of-life care aspects are significantly associated with the quality of care. We advise nursing management to conduct such courses for critical care nurses periodically. In general, there is an opportunity for improvement in terms of the quality of end-of-life care in critical care settings. As the critical care unit is part of a larger institution, it is worthwhile for the hospital’s management to adjust their policies regarding staffing, ICU design, visiting hours, and provide evidence-based guidelines so they can enhance the quality of end-of-life care.

Data availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Abbreviations

End-Of-Life-Care

Mixed Method Appraisal Tool

World Health Organization W. palliative care key facts 2022, 2022(8 aug 2022).

Ransea K, Yatesb P, Coyer F. Modelling end-of-life care practices: factorsassociated with critical care nurseengagement in care provision. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2016;33:48–55.

Article   Google Scholar  

Haji Ali Beigloo R, Mohajer S, Eshraghi A, Mazlom SR. Self-administered medications in Cardiovascular Ward: a study on patients’ Self-efficacy, knowledge and satisfaction. Evid Based Care. 2019;9(1):16–25.

Google Scholar  

Ghasemi A, Karimi Moonaghi H, Mohajer S, Mazlom SR, Shoeibi N. Effect of self-management educational program on vision-related quality of life among elderly with visual impairment. Evid Based Care. 2018;8(1):35–44.

Kisorio LC, Langley GCJI, Nursing CC. Intensive care nurses’ experiences of end-of-life care. 2016, 33:30–8.

Fraser J. Palliative and End-Of-Life Care Provincial Roundtable Report. Queen’s Print Ont 2016 2016:1–31.

Ranse K, Yates P, Coyer F. End-of-life care practices of critical care nurses: a national cross-sectional survey. Australian Crit Care. 2016;29(2):83–9.

Namazinia M, Mazlum SR, Mohajer S, Lopez V. Effects of laughter yoga on health-related quality of life in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2023;23(1):192.

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Mohajer S, Mazlum SR, Rajabzadeh M, Namazinia M. The effect of laughter yoga on depression in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a randomized clinical trial. Hayat. 2022;28(3):284–95.

Bagheri S, Valizadeh Zare N, Mazlom SR, Mohajer S, Soltani M. Effect of implementing family-centered empowerment model on burden of care in caregivers of the elderly with Parkinson’s disease. Evid Based Care. 2019;9(3):41–8.

Ozga D, Woźniak K, Gurowiec PJ. Difficulties perceived by ICU nurses providing end-of-life care: a qualitative study. Global Adv Health Med. 2020;9:2164956120916176.

Attia AK, Abd-Elaziz WW, Kandeel NA. Critical care nurses’ perception of barriers and supportive behaviors in end-of-life care. Am J Hospice Palliat Medicine ® . 2013;30(3):297–304.

Omar Daw Hussin E, Wong LP, Chong MC, Subramanian P. Nurses’ perceptions of barriers and facilitators and their associations with the quality of end-of‐life care. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(3–4):e688–702.

PubMed   Google Scholar  

Gott M, Ingleton C, Bennett MI, Gardiner C. Transitions to palliative care in acute hospitals in England: qualitative study. BMJ 2011, 342.

Blackman I, Adesina MT, Zannettino L, DeBellis DA. Factors that influence graduating nursing students’ consensus about learning and end of life nursing care Background; Graduating nursing students’ attitudes and behaviours towards learning and end of life nursing care. ergo 2014, 3(3).

Dening KH, Greenish W, Jones L, Mandal U, Sampson EL. Barriers to providing end-of-life care for people with dementia: a whole-system qualitative study. BMJ Supportive Palliat care. 2012;2(2):103–7.

Dufour B. Barriers Faced by Nurses Caring For End-of-Life Patients on a Medical Surgical Unit. 2018.

Sharour LA, Subih M, Salameh O, Alrshoud M. End-of-life care (EOLC) in Jordanian critical care units: barriers and strategies for improving. Crit Care Shock. 2019;22:88–97.

Ayed A, Sayej S, Harazneh L, Fashafsheh I, Eqtait F. The nurses’ knowledge and attitudes towards the Palliative Care. J Educ Pract. 2015;6(4):91–9.

Cavaye J, Watts JH. End-of-life education in the pre-registration nursing curriculum: patient, carer, nurse and student perspectives. Volume 17. London, England: Sage Publications Sage UK; 2012. pp. 317–26.

Coffey A, McCarthy G, Weathers E, Friedman MI, Gallo K, Ehrenfeld M, Chan S, Li WH, Poletti P, Zanotti R. Nurses’ knowledge of advance directives and perceived confidence in end-of‐life care: a cross‐sectional study in five countries. Int J Nurs Pract. 2016;22(3):247–57.

Mani ZA, Ibrahim MA. Intensive care unit nurses’ perceptions of the obstacles to the end of life care in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2017;38(7):715.

Sinuff T, Dodek P, You JJ, Barwich D, Tayler C, Downar J, Hartwick M, Frank C, Stelfox HT, Heyland DK. Improving end-of-life communication and decision making: the development of a conceptual framework and quality indicators. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2015;49(6):1070–80.

Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):546–53.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Hong QN, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardman F, Cargo M, Dagenais P. Gagnon M-P, Griffiths F, NICOLAU B: mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version française 2018. In.

Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2008;52(5):546–53.

Beckstrand RL, Lamoreaux N, Luthy KE, Macintosh JL. Critical care nurses’ perceptions of end-of-life care obstacles: comparative 17-year data. %J Dimensions Crit Care Nurs. 2017;36(2):94–105.

Crump SK, Schaffer MA, Schulte E. Critical care nurses’ perceptions of obstacles, supports, and knowledge needed in providing quality end-of-life care. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2010;29(6):297–306.

Sharour LA, Subih M, Salameh O, Alrshoud M. End-of-life care (EOLC) in Jordanian critical care units: barriers and strategies for improving. Crit Care Shock 2019, 22(2).

Holms N, Milligan S, Kydd A. A study of the lived experiences of registered nurses who have provided end-of-life care within an intensive care unit. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2014;20(11):549–56.

Ozga D, Woźniak K, Gurowiec PJ. Difficulties perceived by ICU nurses providing end-of-Life Care: a qualitative study. J Global Adv Health Med. 2020;9:2164956120916176.

Chan CW, Chow MC, Chan S, Sanson-Fisher R, Waller A, Lai TT, Kwan CW. Nurses’ perceptions of and barriers to the optimal end‐of‐life care in hospitals: a cross‐sectional study. %J J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(7–8):1209–19.

Jordan PJ, Williams M, Clifford I. The experiences of critical care nurses with regard to end-of-life issues in the intensive care unit. Afr J Nurs Midwifery. 2014;16(2):71–84.

Xu D-d, Luo D, Chen J, Zeng J-l, Cheng X-l, Li J, Pei J-j, Hu F. Nurses’ perceptions of barriers and supportive behaviors in end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a cross-sectional study. BMC Palliat Care. 2022;21(1):1–10.

Beckstrand RL, Lamoreaux N, Luthy KE, Macintosh JL. Critical care nurses’ perceptions of end-of-life care obstacles: comparative 17-year data. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017;36(2):94–105.

Beckstrand RL, Callister LC, Kirchhoff KT. Providing a good death: critical care nurses’ suggestions for improving end-of-life care. Am J Crit Care. 2006;15(1):38–45.

Jordan P, Clifford I, Williams M. The experiences of critical care nurses with regard to end-of-life issues in the intensive care unit. Afr J Nurs Midwifery. 2014;16(2):71–84.

Chan CW, Chow MC, Chan S, Sanson-Fisher R, Waller A, Lai TT, Kwan CW. Nurses’ perceptions of and barriers to the optimal end‐of‐life care in hospitals: a cross‐sectional study. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(7–8):1209–19.

Friedenberg AS, Levy MM, Ross S, Evans LE. Barriers to end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: perceptions vary by level of training, discipline, and institution. J Palliat Med. 2012;15(4):404–11.

Stajduhar K, Sawatzky R, Robin Cohen S, Heyland DK, Allan D, Bidgood D, Norgrove L, Gadermann AM. Bereaved family members’ perceptions of the quality of end-of-life care across four types of inpatient care settings. BMC Palliat care. 2017;16:1–12.

Calvin AO, Lindy CM, Clingon SL. The cardiovascular intensive care unit nurse’s experience with end-of-life care: a qualitative descriptive study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2009;25(4):214–20.

Sheward K, Clark J, Marshall B, Allan S. Staff perceptions of end-of-life care in the acute care setting: a New Zealand perspective. J Palliat Med. 2011;14(5):623–30.

Nia MN, Mohajer S, Ghahramanzadeh M, Mazlom SR: Effect of Laughter Yoga on Mental Well-Being of Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy. Journal of Evidence-based Care 2019, 9(3).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Yousef Saleh Rubbai, Mei Chan Chong, Li Yoong Tang & Samira Mohajer

Princess Aisha bint AL-Hussein College of Nursing and Health Science, Al-Hussein Bin Talal University, Maan, Jordan

Yousef Saleh Rubbai

Department of Nursing, School of Medical and Life Science, Sunway University, Bandar Sunway, 46200, Malaysia

Khatijah Lim Abdullah

Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran

Samira Mohajer

Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran

Mohammad Namazinia

Faculty of medicine, Yarmouk University , Irbid, Jordan

Walid Theib Mohammad

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

YSR and KLA set up the search strategy, with the verification of MCC. MCC, LYT, WTM analyzed results. All authors wrote and approved the final manuscript. SM, MN provided critical review and significant revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, proof-read, and supervised the preparation of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yousef Saleh Rubbai or Mei Chan Chong .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate, consent for publication, competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Rubbai, Y.S., Chong, M.C., Tang, L.Y. et al. Barriers in providing quality end-of-life care as perceived by nurses working in critical care units: an integrative review. BMC Palliat Care 23 , 217 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01543-y

Download citation

Received : 17 August 2023

Accepted : 08 August 2024

Published : 30 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01543-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Quality end-of-life care
• Critical care units

BMC Palliative Care

ISSN: 1472-684X

• General enquiries: [email protected]