Students pursuing the MS degree in Marine Sciences are encouraged to follow the thesis option. However, a non-thesis curriculum is available for students, upon agreement of the major professor and advisory committee, who so elect. The student will be required to complete the same degree requirements as those for a student who chooses the thesis option, with the following exceptions:
Send Page to Printer
Print this page.
Download Page (PDF)
The PDF will include all information unique to this page.
Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Nature Sustainability volume 7 , pages 1027–1037 ( 2024 ) Cite this article
1108 Accesses
Metrics details
Marine bioprospecting, which involves the exploration of genetic and biochemical material from marine organisms, can be used towards addressing a broad range of public and environmental health applications such as disease treatment, diagnostics and bioremediation. Marine genetic resources are important reservoirs for such bioprospecting efforts; however, the extent to which they are used commercially for natural product discovery and the marine sources from which they are derived are not well understood. Here we introduce a comprehensive database of marine genes referenced in patent filings, the Marine Bioprospecting Patent database. It includes 92,550 protein-coding sequences associated with 4,779 patent filings, identified by analysing all relevant records from genetic sequence databases. Three companies alone—BASF, IFF and DuPont—included sequences from 949 species (more than half of referenced species with identified marine origin). Microbial life in the deep sea, a vast and remote biome predominantly beyond national jurisdiction, is already attracting substantial economic interest; the top ten patent holders have all filed marine gene patents referencing sequences from deep-sea life. Our findings provide an updated understanding of the marine bioprospecting landscape, contribute to the sustainable use of marine biodiversity and underscore the need for policymakers to ensure stewardship of deep-sea ecosystems.
Biodiscovery—the exploration and use of genetic and biochemical properties of biological materials—has a long and rich history. For instance, centuries before the discovery of penicillin from mould in a laboratory, skin diseases were already being treated in the Kingdom of Jordan via red soils with potent antibacterial properties that have only recently been confirmed 1 . Other examples include traditional medicines extracted from evergreen shrubs for cancer treatment 2 , derivatives of the foxglove plant used to treat heart problems 3 , antimalarial quinine 4 and fungi-extracted podophyllotoxin to treat sexually transmitted diseases 5 . However, recent advances in genetics and sequencing innovations have spurred an unprecedented growth in the scale of discoveries. Today, bioprospecting—the search for potential products with scientific and industrial value derived from biological resources such as animals, plants and microorganisms—often involves large-scale screening, analysis and prediction of prospective biological compounds through the exploration of databases with sequencing data, including DNA extracted directly from environmental samples 6 .
In this context, the ocean is considered a promising but largely untapped frontier for biodiscovery 7 . Marine organisms have evolved over millions of years to adapt to extreme conditions of temperature, salinity, light, pressure and water flow 8 . These conditions as well as a far longer evolutionary history have contributed to substantially greater taxonomic and functional diversity in marine habitats than in other biomes 9 . Nearly one million eukaryotic species are believed to inhabit the ocean 10 , and the number of archaea and bacteria may be ten thousand times higher 11 , yet most remain undescribed by science.
Despite these knowledge gaps, marine biotechnology—the use of marine organisms and their compounds for a wide range of applications in industrial sectors—has managed to distinguish itself from the broader biotechnology landscape. For instance, while nearly half of the approved pharmaceuticals are based on biological compounds produced by living organisms, success rates are two to four times higher for compounds from marine organisms 7 , 12 . Annual sales and licensing revenues from marine drugs have exceeded US$1 billion annually since 2011 13 , and prospects for greater commercial growth are substantial: in 2020 alone, more than 1,400 new compounds were isolated from marine species 14 . Biomolecules extracted from marine bacteria and other products developed from sequences of larger marine organisms are widely used in food production, diagnostics, bioremediation and disease treatment 15 . Some notable examples include the discovery of a thermostable enzyme required for the production of lactose-free milk in Archaea Pyrococcus furiosus 16 , seawater cyanobacteria toxins developed into anticancer treatment products 17 and the extensive use of green fluorescent protein found in jellyfish Aequorea victoria 18 as a molecular marker, both in medical and diagnostic contexts and fundamental research.
Establishing a regulatory landscape that keeps pace with rapid advances in biotechnology, while also promoting transparency, equitable access and benefit-sharing mechanisms, has proven challenging 19 . The adoption of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) in 1993 was a crucial milestone, as it defined genetic resources as ‘any material of marine plant, animal, microbial or other origin containing functional units of heredity of actual or potential value’, and established the fair and equitable sharing of benefits from their use as one of the convention’s three core objectives 20 . In 2014, the convention’s Nagoya Protocol provided a framework to regulate the access and benefit sharing of marine genetic resources (MGR) sampled in national jurisdictions 21 . Yet, some two-thirds of the ocean lies beyond national jurisdiction, and it was not until 2023, following protracted negotiations, that the ‘High Seas Treaty’ was agreed upon, including provisions to address MGR from areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ) 22 .
Despite these encouraging developments, the actual and potential value of MGR for marine bioprospecting remains poorly understood. Studies have focused on counting referenced marine species in patents 23 or GenBank 24 , examining sequences in international patent applications 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 or exploring biological compounds for natural product discovery 29 , 30 . A common aspect to all these studies, however, is their lack of focus on the connection between the actors involved in the use of MGR and the potential sources for natural product discovery. They also suffer from limited information in patent and GenBank records about the geographical origin of gene sequences, which in many cases are referenced without naming the source species. The unevenness of these data presents a challenge for interpreting the true scale, scope and trajectory of marine bioprospecting.
Here we address these gaps by creating a comprehensive database of genetic sequences and related patent applications from 1989 to 2022 in marine bioprospecting. In addition to systematically compiling and presenting key data about the sequences, coded proteins, date of deposition and patent holders, we also address significant data gaps by developing and applying a BlastX sequence similarity model to consider sequences from unnamed species. We also assess the biodiversity data of species currently considered unique to ABNJ and highlight the special importance of deep-sea conservation for future biotechnology focused on the innovation and development of naturally derived products.
Our analysis of patent filings revealed 29,065 nucleotide sequences from 1,474 disclosed marine species across 3,636 unique patents, representing approximately 1% of all gene patents submitted to the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC). Many patents referenced multiple sequences, with a majority including both marine and non-marine sequences (Fig. 1a ). Overall, marine sequences and species represented only 16% and 15%, respectively, of all sequences and species identified within the 3,636 patents (Fig. 1b,c ). For comparison, approximately 242,000 marine species have been described to date (World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS), 2022), corresponding to roughly 10% of the 2.1 million species described by science 31 . This suggests considerable untapped potential of marine bioprospecting (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Table 1 ).
a , Number of patents that contain sequences associated with species of marine origin only, and patents with species from both marine and mixed origins. b , Number of unique marine and non-marine species referenced in patent applications that include at least one sequence of marine origin. c , Sequence frequency aggregated by species they originate from. Only 16% of all sequences attached to patent applications originate from marine species. The top five species with the highest frequency in each class are indicated. Marine species: (1) C. intestinalis (2.96%), (2) Gadus morhua (1.76%), (3) Anguilla japonica (0.67%), (4) Salmo salar (0.34%) and (5) Oncorhynchus mykiss (0.26%). Non-marine species: (6) Arabidopsis thaliana (4.31%), (7) Zea mays (3.61%), (8) Glycine max (2.87%), (9) Homo sapiens (2.71%) and (10) Oryza sativa (2.60%).
The patent applicants who referenced the highest number of unique genetic sequences included both protein-coding and non-coding sequences, with the former having a higher potential for natural product discovery (Fig. 2 ). Most of the companies with a large number of applications referenced protein-coding genes that originate from multiple species, with an average length between 500 and 2,000 nucleotides. Some applicants specifically focused on MGR from a single species and predominately referenced non-coding sequences. For instance, the Fisheries Research Agency of the National Research and Development Agency in Japan included 1,179 sequences in their patent applications, mostly originating from Japanese eel ( Anguilla japonica) , yet only 127 are protein-coding sequences. Similarly, the Japan Science and Technology Agency has referenced 5,190 sequences from the sea vase tunicate ( Ciona intestinalis ), only 150 of which are protein-coding genes.
Applicants that submitted at least 25 nucleotide sequences in their patent claims (81% of all sequences) are shown. Companies that submitted at least 250 sequences are indicated. The size of the dots represents the number of patents submitted by each applicant. The dotted grey line indicates the shortest protein length estimation (150 base pairs). The continuous colour bar indicates the percentage of protein-coding sequences submitted in applicant claims. BASF [DE], BASF; JST [JP], Japan Science and Technology Agency; GENOME ATLANTIC [CA], Genome Atlantic; FRA [JP], Fisheries Research Agency; EW GROUP [DE], EW Group GmbH; UNIVERSITY OF UTAH [US], The University of Utah; YEDA [IL], Yeda Research and Development Company Ltd.; KIOST [KR], The Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology; DU PONT [US], DuPont; OGT [UK], Oxford Gene Technology Ltd.; KHK [JP], Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.; DSM [NL], DSM N.V.; KANEKA CORP [JP], Kaneka Corporation; GS [AU], Gene Stream Pty Ltd.; GENOMAR [NO], GenoMar.
Most short non-coding sequences of identical length, originating from the same species, exhibit a wide range of GC content (that is, the percentage of two DNA basic building blocks), which is typical for artificially modified sequences used in amplification or as probes for detecting specific sequences of DNA or RNA (Supplementary Fig. 1 ). Out of all the patents that include at least one sequence from disclosed marine species, 71% contain nucleotide sequences that are potentially protein-coding genes. This suggests that most MGR are used in bioprospecting (Fig. 3a ). For sequences of particular interest (that is, those submitted to all patent systems), we provide examples illustrating the conversion of DNA molecules into products of value (Box 1 ).
a , Share of companies that submitted patents with at least one protein-coding sequence (bioprospecting patents) and patents with non-coding sequences only. b , Top 100 largest patent applicants in marine bioprospecting, aggregated by applicant type. The terms ‘multinational’ and ‘national’ denote the extent of company presence in more than two countries or less, respectively. c , Top 100 largest patent applicants in marine bioprospecting, aggregated by country of origin (the country of headquarters).
Global actors often seek patent protection for their inventions in multiple countries. Filing fees for patent applications extend into the thousands of US dollars per application, and the inventor still has to pay additional fees for each filing. For instance, the average cost of filing in the USA, including attorney’s fees, has been estimated at around US$50,000 (ref. 78 ). Therefore, it is more likely that protection will be sought for highly promising products, methods or associated biotechnological processes. A review of patent filings that include identical nucleotide sequences submitted to all national patent bureaus (13 sequences in total) reveals that the scope of patented commercial biotechnological applications is wide and usually involves transferring specific enzymes to cell metabolic pathways to maximize the production of a specific compound. Examples include applications of biotechnology in medicine (enzymes used for skin care), the food industry (enzymes used in baking and dairy products), agriculture (production of herbicide-tolerant transgenic crops), industrial production (metal nanomaterials used in products such as creams, shampoos, clothing, footwear and plastic containers) and the production of biofuel (isobutanol production and hydrocarbon biosynthesis) (Supplementary Table 2 ).
One sequence originating from the methanogenic marine archaea species Methanococcus maripaludis has been the subject of a series of lawsuits between Butamax (now a subsidiary of International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF)) and Gevo, a transnational biofuels company. The enzyme found in M. maripaludis was essential for isobutanol production, and these companies fought over the production of isobutanol instead of ethanol using yeast. After many years of patent disputes, the issue was finally settled through the splitting of the parties’ licences in all fields of isobutanol production 79 . In 2021, all Butamax-owned patents were completely acquired by Gevo 80 .
While INSDC records provide considerable insight into the genes referenced in patents, only 37.3% of records include the name of source species, primarily filed under the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), the European Patent Office, the Patent Office of Japan and the Korean Intellectual Property Office. Most of the remaining records are from the US Patent and Trademark Office, which does not share species names in its records (Supplementary Fig. 2 ).
To address this gap, we developed a sequence similarity model and BlastX search tool to query all genetic sequences with unknown origins against the UniProtKB protein sequence database. This model retrieved an additional 60,636 sequences, which can be said with a high degree of certainty to originate from marine organisms. Together with the 31,914 protein-coding sequences of confirmed marine species, this resulted in a comprehensive database of 92,550 sequences, which form the basis for all subsequent analysis in this paper and were used to construct the Marine Bioprospecting Patent (MABPAT) database ( https://mabpat.shinyapps.io/main/ ).
We found that 100 applicants accounted for 58% of all patents that contain protein-coding sequences with identified marine origin (that is, bioprospecting patents). The remaining 42% were associated with applicants who filed fewer than two patents on average. For companies in the top 100 (Supplementary Table 3 ), the total number of patent applications would have been underestimated by at least one-third if we had not applied the sequence similarity model. Transnational corporations (1,675 applications) are the most frequent type of applicant, although roughly one-fifth of filings are from research institutes and their commercialization centres (634 applications) (Fig. 3b ). In total, 78% of all bioprospecting patents filed by the top 100 were submitted by actors headquartered in the USA, Germany or Japan (Fig. 3c ).
The number of patents registered by each applicant is correlated with the total count of unique species included in such patents ( r = 0.8168, P = 2.17552 × 10 −318 ). To illustrate how much biological diversity each of these applicants is drawing upon, we connected patent holders and unique species included in patent claims and aggregated on the domain (Fig. 4a ) and phylum level of biological taxonomy (Supplementary Fig. 6 ). For each flow diagram, we also added information if the corresponding marine species had been observed in a deep-sea environment. The most active users of MGR are primarily dependent on sequences from bacteria and archaea (Fig. 4a ). The ten largest actors, including eight multinational corporations and two public research bodies (Fig. 4a ), collectively registered more than one-third of all patents in the top 100. Deep-sea marine species have attracted interest from all ten of the largest users of MGR.
a , Species of interest in bioprospecting connected to a company of reference (top 10 largest patent applicants) in patent application grouped by domain and potential presence in ABNJ and deep-sea habitats. AIST, The National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology; UC, The University of California. The interactive version of this plot is available at https://mabpat.shinyapps.io/main/ . b , Percentage of deep-sea species present exclusively in ABNJ and all species living in the ocean according to WoRMS. Credit: flags in a , flagpedia.net ; icons in a , FreePik.com .
Issues of access and benefit sharing related to genetic material from ABNJ are of particular interest as they fall outside the scope of the Nagoya Protocol of the Convention on Biological Diversity and were at the core of negotiations for the High Seas Treaty adopted in June 2023. It is therefore notable that among 1,639 species of identified marine origin referenced in INSDC patent records, 281 species have been observed in ABNJ, with only 5 of them being exclusive. This contrasts with the 5,889 species found exclusively in ABNJ, predominantly from the Arthropoda, Foraminifera and Nematoda phyla, according to our analysis of species observation data available in the Ocean Biodiversity Information System (OBIS), a global open-access database on marine biodiversity ( https://obis.org ). The complete taxonomic distribution is given in Supplementary Fig. 7 . According to the records from the World Register of Deep-Sea Species (WoRDSS), 39% of marine species were exclusively found to inhabit deep-sea environments, in contrast to only 15% of all species listed in WoRMS (Fig. 4b ). The spatial distribution of ABNJ-specific species (Supplementary Table 4 ) is predominantly in the sub-Antarctic and Antarctic latitudes (Supplementary Fig. 8 ).
ABNJ account for 64% of the ocean surface area and 95% of its volume. Once thought to be largely devoid of life, the deep-sea habitats and the water column have been found to harbour many marine species. While many of these species are thought to be considerably cosmopolitan, hotspots of endemism are found throughout the deep sea, perhaps most strikingly around hydrothermal vent systems 32 . According to geolocations of active hydrothermal vents (721 in total), more than half (363) are located in ABNJ.
Marine biotechnology is mainly focused on species that serve as model organisms in basic research and as a backbone in genetic engineering, allowing the creation of new drugs and increasing the efficiency of biotechnological processes for food and energy production, plant agriculture or the invention of new materials 33 . Marine species currently represent a small, but important, share that is used as a source for natural product discovery 7 , 30 . Unravelling the global scope of economic interest in MGR is a crucial first step towards understanding the value that rests in the biological functions encoded in genetic sequences and pathways to fair and equitable sharing of benefits from its use.
Patent data are a valuable source of information in examining innovation and technological advancements, which are widely acknowledged as key drivers of firm performance and economic growth 34 , 35 . Aggregate patent application counts in particular are useful for studying national patenting activity 36 . Patent data also provide insights into the scope of ‘pre-emptive patenting’ to block competitors, to increase the market price of existing products or to ensure operational freedom 37 —strategies that biotechnology corporations are known to use 38 . While estimating the market value of patents or establishing links to commercialization is challenging 39 , patent data are a useful indicator for gaining insights into the long-term economic interest of societal actors in MGR applications on a global level, in the form of either knowledge production or market control.
The MABPAT database offers a global catalogue of patent sequences derived from marine species over the past three decades. It includes in depth information on patent applications, the genetic sequences attached to them and the marine species from which the sequences were derived, effectively connecting the resources and users of marine bioprospecting. In doing so, the MABPAT database not only fills an important research gap but also contributes to the transparency and interoperability of MGR use. By making it publicly available, we hope to enable further research efforts to inform improved policymaking. The analysis that generated this database also resulted in three key insights that are addressed below.
Scholars have suggested that the earliest form of a patent system can be traced back 2,500 years ago to ancient Greece and that the first modern patent law dates back to the year 1474 40 . Little surprise then that the patent system has struggled to keep pace with the rapid advances in genetics and genomics research of the past decades, as seen, for instance, in the considerable variation in ground rules for patenting genetic sequences across jurisdictions 27 . Key developments over the past 30 years have focused on jurisdictional norms and compliance standards. In 1998, international applications introduced a mandatory data element for sequence description (‘organism’), which aimed to indicate biological origin 41 . Yet, current international standards 42 still allow the inclusion of custom organism names not listed in the Integrated Taxonomic Information System ( https://www.itis.gov/ ), including ‘unknown’, ‘unidentified’ and ‘artificial sequence’. The new requirements of INSDC 43 , announced in November 2021, aim to ensure correct origin disclosure for all incoming sequences. But the effect on the 24.5 million patent sequences already stored in the databases as well as new depositions remains uncertain given that it is ultimately up to patent offices to define standards for the sequences attached to patent applications ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/education/patent_and_ip_faqs/ ).
The analysis of patents therefore often depends on either accepting considerable data gaps or developing methods to reconstruct missing data. In this study, for instance, 17.2 million sequences would have been excluded from the analysis owing to the lack of species names (primarily from the US Patent and Trademark Office, the largest repository of biological sequences and patents). Instead, our sequence similarity model allowed us to reasonably and more comprehensively estimate the patent shares across national states and actor types. This reconstruction allowed us to identify marine origin, focusing on molecular similarities of biological molecules instead of relying on disclosed species names, and to confirm with higher confidence than previous work that Japan, the USA and Germany are the headquarters location for the world’s primary MGR patent applicants 25 , 27 . The disproportionate importance of these three states suggests a corresponding responsibility to work towards innovative benefit-sharing and capacity-building mechanisms. These could include, for instance, the establishment of a multilateral fund for the equitable sharing of benefits between providers and users of digital sequence information (DSI), which has been agreed to be finalized at CBD COP16 (ref. 44 ).
Marine viruses, although having been recognized as being highly prevalent in ocean ecosystems, contributing to the largest pool of genetic diversity 45 , have seen little commercial activity to date beyond a limited focus on those that affect commercial aquaculture production. However, the potential role of viruses in creating proteins of interest for marine bioprospecting could be bigger than we think. Viruses have shaped the majority of the genomes of Archaea and Bacteria via horizontal gene transfer, the exchange of genetic material between organisms that do not form parent–offspring relationships 46 . Bacterial and archaeal species often live in symbiosis and exchange genes with microbial eukaryotes, protists 47 , and together constitute the vast majority of organisms used in marine bioprospecting. Importantly, many archaeal and bacterial species used in bioprospecting live in deep-sea habitats, most of which are located in ABNJ. The diversity of microbial marine species is still highly underrepresented in databases that document the distribution and abundance of marine life (Box 2 ). This underrepresentation may account for the lack of patenting interest in species found exclusively in ABNJ. However, even with limited data, our findings show that ABNJ-specific species are 2.5 times more likely to inhabit the deep ocean compared with marine species in general.
Our analysis of the past three decades of global gene patents indicates that deep-sea species have become an important source for marine bioprospecting. All of the ten largest actors in marine bioprospecting are already using deep-sea species. As a result, there is a logic for benefit sharing from MGR utilization to flow into conservation projects aimed at protecting at-risk deep-sea habitats 48 , not least as a vital source for future biotechnology focused on innovation and development of naturally derived products. More advanced biodiversity models that put emphasis on safeguarding entire communities with unique functional roles, including microbial species, should also be better integrated into conservation plans 49 .
With the successful conclusion of the High Seas Treaty and the recognition of DSI in the legally binding agreement, MGR used for bioprospecting and product discovery opens a new opportunity to protect biodiversity in deep-sea habitats. However, the INSDC database, the largest data repository of DSI, is currently missing from the biodiversity informatics landscape 50 ; therefore, genetic diversity and information on the spatial origin of genetic information are not available on a global level. Adoption of the principles of Open and Responsible Data Governance and the development of MGR data repositories 51 will be a necessary step to overcome the lack of information on MGR in ABNJ.
Intellectual property questions are not discussed within the High Seas Treaty, yet commercial sensitivities and national patent regulations are important for benefit sharing related to MGR sourced from the deep sea in ABNJ. While the agreed text of the treaty includes a voluntary mechanism to ensure traceability of MGR collected from ABNJ to end product, the treaty implementation will not affect sequences already used in marine bioprospecting up to date. As there are no legal requirements for patent holders to disclose commercialization of their patents, the scale of commercial products developed and marketed from deep-sea organisms will remain poorly understood. A continued increase in corporate interest along current trajectories would lead to unequal opportunities for new developments in biotechnology.
Microbial species from all domains of life account for more than 95% of total marine biomass and play a pivotal role in the functioning of marine ecosystems, as a foundational level of food webs, climate regulation elements and the backbone of immense genetic diversity 81 . However, as of November 2022, the OBIS database contains only 499 bacterial ( https://obis.org/taxon/6 ) and 7 archaeal species ( https://obis.org/taxon/8 ). The total diversity of microbial marine species, including those uniquely present in ABNJ, is highly underrepresented. Similarly, the WoRDSS list contains almost no bacteria (18 species) or archaea (3 species) as both databases use WoRMS taxonomy as a backbone, and INSDC and National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) taxonomy is not supported as one of the data sources in OBIS.
Thanks to the continuous effort of TARA Oceans, Malaspina, BioGEOTRACES and other projects contributing towards a deeper understanding of microbial diversity, more data have become available to project world map microbial distribution in the global ocean 82 . Some regional diversity studies, including a study in the Clarion–Clipperton Fracture Zone, have already shown that the molecular diversity of deep-sea species is equivalent to levels found in coral reef ecosystems 83 . Ocean datasets are currently missing a global map of microbial functions 84 . As most marine species listed in patent claims are of microbial origin, our understanding of how many of them are uniquely present in ABNJ is far from complete 20 , 21 , 31 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 57 , 58 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 78 , 79 , 80 .
Analysis of bioprospecting patents yielded an asymmetrical distribution of patent registrations, consistent with previous findings 25 , 27 . The sector is dominated by transnational corporations, which have a higher capacity to undertake genomic research. One-third of all patents were held by the ten largest actors, eight of which are large multinational corporations and none of which conduct marine research themselves but instead rely on public gene databases for sequences with potential commercial applications. While many multinational pharmaceutical companies have marine biology departments 52 , their total share of bioprospecting patents is modest (Supplementary Table 3 ). Still, a fair estimate of corporate engagement in marine species discovery is hard to calculate. Marine scientists who study microbial diversity often engage in collaboration with the oil and gas industry for the collection of samples in deep-sea oil wells 53 , 54 . With the rising popularity of using remotely operating vehicles for the inspection and maintenance of offshore oil and gas development sites, it is likely that more science–industry partnerships will emerge to support collection of biological data in the deep sea 55 .
The disproportionate role of a small number of actors also suggests the potential for science–industry collaboration in the spirit of previous efforts with so-called keystone actors, which consists in engaging the largest companies in a given sector to enable transformative change 56 . Constructive efforts to promote sustainable management in ABNJ have also been undertaken by partnerships such as the Deep Seas Project ( https://www.deep-seas.eu ) and the Common Oceans ABNJ Project 57 , as well as regional bodies such as OSPAR Comission, the North East Atlantic Fisheries Comission and the Sargasso Sea Commission 58 , which have addressed challenges related to illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, and pollution, based on integrated and holistic approaches. The International Seabed Authority, empowered by UNCLOS (Supplementary Text 1 ) to manage the resources of the seabed in ABNJ, has begun to apply tools such as Regional Environmental Management Plans (REMPs) and designated associated Areas of Particular Ecological Interest (APEIs) aimed at conserving ecosystem function and biodiversity. The impact of such measures could be further amplified by seeking a coordinated approach in accordance with overarching environmental goals 59 . Such initiatives can foster cross-sectoral dialogue and capacity-building activities that improve the capacity of national governments and local communities to engage in sustainable resource use in ABNJ.
Corporate efforts to safeguard intellectual property rights, significant data gaps and the heterogeneity of data standards have contributed to the use of ambiguous terminology and a lack of precision in discussions concerning MGR and bioprospecting in ABNJ. This has shaped perceptions of the scale and nature of commercial interest in MGR from ABNJ, feeding expectations of a lucrative ‘deep-sea gold rush’ without adequate empirical support for such claims 60 , 61 . While the conclusion of the High Seas Treaty has laid the foundation for improved management in ABNJ, its entry into force and full implementation are a remote prospect and, in the meantime, voluntary collaborative efforts based on the best available science can help inform future binding mechanisms to ensure conservation and sustainable use. By filling the crucial knowledge gap in understanding the potential of MGR, the MABPAT database represents a first step in that direction.
The GenBank patent division, the European Bioinformatics Institute database (EMBL-EBI) and the DNA DataBank of Japan (DDBJ) exchange their data daily and together form the INSDC. Genetic sequences associated with patents were retrieved from the Patent division of GenBank from the NCBI (GenBank database) on 10 November 2022; this included 24,600,503 annotated sequences. All files (from gbpat1.seq.gz to gbpat254.seq.gz) were downloaded and processed following the methodology of ref. 25 to create database entries with information on the nucleotide sequence of DNA, species name, patent number, patent data and the party registering the patent. This was done by splitting each file into individual sequences and by extracting the data in the ‘origin’ field (nucleotide sequence), ‘organism’ field (species name) and ‘journal’ field (patent application number, year of application, patent system and patent applicant name) for each sequence. Unlike previous studies 25 , 27 that restricted their analysis to sequences submitted in a given patent system, here we considered both patents submitted in national jurisdictions and those filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (‘international’ patents) of WIPO.
As of November 2022, sequences from a total of 14,708 different species were included in the GenBank database. To determine the subset of ‘marine species’ within the database, the taxon match tool of the WoRMS was used for all database entries, resulting in a filtered list of 4,000 species. Web searches were conducted for each of these species to verify the marine origin and to collect further information about the nature of each species. More than half of the matched species were subsequently excluded as non-unique to marine environments, resulting in the list of 1,474 marine species, which was used to select patent records associated with disclosed marine species. See ref. 27 for details of marine origin determination and criteria for filtering.
The taxonomy (domain and phylum) of 879 marine species was retrieved from the WoRMS database. In cases in which such taxonomic levels were not available, we obtained species taxonomy from the NCBI taxonomy database ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy ) and Wikipedia ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ ) (220 and 356 species, respectively). We did not succeed in matching 19 of the marine species (predominantly marine bacterial strains) into related taxonomic groups owing to lack of certainty in organism names. The complete list of marine species selected for this study is given in Supplementary Table 5a .
Marine biotechnology pipelines usually focus on the search for biological compounds that encode a new functionality 62 . There are two types of nucleotide sequences encoded in DNA: protein-coding sequences and non-coding sequences. The latter could have either a functional or a non-functional role in genome regulation, including DNA fragments that code for proteins involved in all cell functions. Except for short peptides like cone snail peptide toxins 63 , most natural products are derived from proteins, which are polypeptide chains of a certain length. While identifying the shortest polypeptide chain length to form a protein is still controversial, it is currently estimated at 50 (ref. 64 ) to 100 (ref. 65 ) amino acids or 150 to 300 DNA base pairs, respectively.
Another important metric widely used to analyse genome composition variation in molecular biology and genomics is nucleotide usage, which is normally calculated as GC content—the percentage of certain nucleotide bases (guanine and cytosine) that form stronger chemical bonds in DNA strings. Modern genetic engineering techniques such as CRISPR 66 have proven to be very useful at enhancing important functions of proteins by altering DNA makeup. This could involve changing individual nucleotides or introducing short sequences that control gene regulation and protein synthesis. Hence, GC content for modified proteins with similar functionality remains the same. Short DNA sequences, below the shortest DNA length required for protein formation, have various functions, including in the amplification of a specific gene sequence (as PCR primers), and usually have a wide range of GC content.
To predict whether genetic sequences are protein coding or not, we applied two filtering criteria: sequence length threshold and the presence of an open reading frame (ORF)—a gene region that has the potential to be transcribed into RNA and, after, translated into proteins. Sequences with an ORF longer than 150 base pairs have been considered protein-coding sequences. As most natural products are derived from proteins, we reason that at least one protein-coding sequence has to be included in a patent application, to be related to marine bioprospecting. Following that, we selected 31,914 protein-coding sequences associated with 1,039 marine species together with 112,115 of other sequences that have been submitted as a part of the same application.
For all companies that have registered patents associated with MGR, we counted the total number of nucleotide sequences and calculated the average sequence length (Fig. 2 ). Based on the shortest protein length estimation, the number of protein-coding or non-coding sequences for each company was identified. In each category, for the ten companies with the highest counts of genetic sequences attached to patent claims, we calculated the length and DNA composition (GC content) of each sequence, and coloured by distinct species origin (Supplementary Fig. 1 ).
For each sequence that was included in patent applications submitted in national jurisdictions as well as ‘international’ patents (sequences of special patenting interest), we collected the description of the invention and the protein function, if a nucleotide sequence search (BlastX) resulted in a significant match to a protein with annotated function. Web searches were conducted for each of these proteins to collect further information about protein function and potential application. The resulting information about the sequences of special patenting interest is available in Supplementary Table 2 .
Patents owned by subsidiaries were replaced with ultimate owner names of controlled subsidiaries as stated in the Orbis company database, which contains information on around 400 million companies worldwide (Orbis; https://orbis.bvdinfo.com/ ). For jointly owned patents, the ownership was assigned to the first company on the list. After filtering and removing duplicate entity names and aggregating subsidiaries, we identified a total of 1,125 applicants and collected information about each through web searches, including the country where it is headquartered and the type of entity that it represents. Our classification resulted in five major entity types: multinational (presence in more than two countries) or national companies, universities and their commercialization centres, governmental agencies and ‘other’ (predominantly applications submitted by private individuals). We also included patent applications from 201 entities that contained protein-coding sequences with identified marine origins, which we were unable to classify under any specific entity type (‘none’).
Each record in the MABPAT database includes the following: (1) patent applicant name, (2) type of applicant, (3) country where it is headquartered, (4) year of application, (5) patent application number, (6) patent system, (7) genetic sequence identification, (8) marine species name associated with the sequence, (9 and 10) species taxonomy, (11) taxonomic source, (12) whether species can be classified as ‘deep-sea’ species, (13) source of deep-sea presence, (14) whether species were observed in ABNJ, (15) genetic sequence, (16) GC content, (17) sequence length, (18) whether the sequence originated from a marine organism, (19) whether the marine origin of the sequence was disclosed by the patent applicant or bioinformatically predicted, (20) whether the sequence contains protein-coding information and (21) sequence prediction source. If the marine origin was predicted, the following information about the most similar protein entry in the reference database is provided: (22) protein entry header, (23) protein entry sequence identification, (24) protein entry title, (25) E -value, (26) hit identity and (27) query coverage.
The search for presence of species in deep-sea habitats was conducted based on multiple sources. For species in the Eukarya domain of life, we used the WoRDSS, a taxonomic database of deep-sea species. As Bacteria and Archaea species are not present in WoRDSS, we used web search based on the PubMed ( https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ ) and Integrated Microbial Genomes and Microbiomes ( https://img.jgi.doe.gov/ ) databases to establish their potential presence in deep-sea habitats, whether within or beyond national jurisdiction. Samples of species collected from deep-sea environments that have already been found to be associated with international patent applications 27 are also marked as ‘deep-sea’ species. For the definition of deep-sea marine species, we followed the inclusion criteria in WoRDSS, that is, that the biological material was sampled in depths greater than 500 m.
Sequence similarity models are widely used to identify newly sequenced data or unknown species 67 . To conduct sequence similarity BlastX searches (translated nucleotide versus protein) against the database of annotated protein sequences, we created the reference database of all proteins belonging to 627 genera of previously confirmed marine species in Supplementary Table 5a . A total of 24,024,531 proteins from all species within those genera were selected from UniProt Knowledgebase (UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot; UniProt Consortium 2023) which included Swiss-Prot (the expertly curated protein records) and TrEMBL (bioinformatically predicted proteins).
BlastX searches with a specific set of search parameters ( E -value ≤ 10 −5 , query coverage ≥ 80%, hit identity ≥ 99%) were used to verify that marine sequences could be identified to a genus level with at least 95% confidence (correct hit) (Supplementary Fig. 3a ). We also tested whether correct hits and searches with confidence below 95% tend to be included in certain patent applications, patented by certain actors or in certain patent systems, but did not find any preference (Supplementary Fig. 3b,c ). Using the sequence search tool DIAMOND 68 , we queried 12,716 protein-coding sequences with disclosed marine origin against the selected records from UniProtKB, which resulted in 10,514 correct hits (82.68% recovery rate).
We then queried 7,467,396 sequences with unknown taxonomic origin (‘unknown’, ‘unidentified’ and ‘synthetic construct’ species tag)—62.7% of all GenBank records—against the selected records from UniProtKB, and found 234,836 sequences originating from 1,368 species not previously disclosed in patent records. All matched species were subsequently verified to be exclusively present in marine habitats, resulting in a final list of 561 additional marine species (Supplementary Table 5b ). Overall, we have recovered 60,636 previously unknown protein-coding sequences with marine origin and 144,545 other sequences that have been submitted as a part of the same patent application (2,257 patent applications in total).
Finally, we compared summary statistics (number of sequences, number of patents and median year of application) for the top 10 largest patent applicants that referenced sequences with disclosed marine origin and top 10 applicants that referenced sequences with predicted marine origin (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5 , respectively), and found that both lists contained the two largest patent applicants (Bayer and BASF, respectively).
The geolocation of hydrothermal vents was collected from the InterRidge Vents Database. The maritime boundary map of World High Seas was downloaded from Marine Regions ( https://marineregions.org/ ). Each set of hydrothermal vent coordinates was checked for presence within any of the High Seas polygons. Spatial vector data were analysed with the R package sf version 1.0-9 (ref. 69 ).
To establish the list of species uniquely present in ABNJ, we used species geographical abundance data from OBIS. We first retrieved all 28,375 species with at least one occurrence record in ABNJ ( https://obis.org/area/1 ). For each ABNJ-present species, we checked if it was also observed in the territorial waters of any country. Species with at least one occurrence record were excluded. Data were obtained from the OBIS database (2022) using the R package robis version 2.11.0. (ref. 70 ) and parallel version 3.6.2. (ref. 71 ).
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data were collected from publicly available data sources: INSDC ( ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/genbank/ ) 72 , UniProtKB 73 , WoRMS ( https://www.marinespecies.org ) 74 , WoRDSS 75 , PubMed ( https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ) and the Integrated Microbial Genomes and Microbiomes database ( https://img.jgi.doe.gov ). Species observation records were obtained from OBIS ( https://obis.org ). The geolocations of hydrothermal vents were collected from the InterRidge Vents database ( http://vents-data.interridge.org ) 76 . The maritime boundaries map of World High Seas was downloaded from Marine Regions (World EEZ v.11) ( https://marineregions.org ). The resulting MABPAT database is available at https://mabpat.shinyapps.io/main and via figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25289404.v3 (ref. 77 ).
Analysis scripts are available via GitHub at https://github.com/zhivkoplias/mabpat .
Falkinham, J. O. et al. Proliferation of antibiotic-producing bacteria and concomitant antibiotic production as the basis for the antibiotic activity of Jordan’s red soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75 , 2735–2741 (2009).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Cragg, G. M. & Pezzuto, M. Natural products as a vital source for the discovery of cancer chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive agents. Med Princ. Pract. 25 , 41–59 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
Hournan, P. C. H., Hertog, M. G. L. & Katanc, M. B. Analysis and health effects of flavonoids. Food Chem. 57 , 43–46 (1996).
Achan, J. et al. Quinine, an old anti-malarial drug in a modern world: role in the treatment of malaria. Malar. J. 10 , 144 (2011).
Shah, Z. et al. Podophyllotoxin: history, recent advances and future prospects. Biomolecules 11 , 603 (2021).
Atanasov, A. G. et al. Natural products in drug discovery: advances and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20 , 200–216 (2021).
Sigwart, J. D. et al. Unlocking the potential of marine biodiscovery. Nat. Prod. Rep. 38 , 1235–1242 (2021).
Beraldi-Campesi, H. Early life on land and the first terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Process. 2 , 1 (2013).
Román-Palacios, C., Moraga-López, D. & Wiens, J. J. The origins of global biodiversity on land, sea and freshwater. Ecol. Lett. 25 , 1376–1386 (2022).
Appeltans, W. et al. The magnitude of global marine species diversity. Curr. Biol. 22 , 2189–2202 (2012).
Eguíluz, V. M. et al. Scaling of species distribution explains the vast potential marine prokaryote diversity. Sci. Rep. 9 , 18710 (2019).
Gerwick, W. H. & Moore, B. S. Lessons from the past and charting the future of marine natural products drug discovery and chemical biology. Chem. Biol. 19 , 85–98 (2012).
Blasiak, R. et al. A forgotten element of the blue economy: marine biomimetics and inspiration from the deep sea. PNAS Nexus 1 , pgac196 (2022).
Carroll, A. R., Copp, B. R., Davis, R. A., Keyzers, R. A. & Prinsep, M. R. Marine natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 38 , 362–413 (2021).
Blasiak, R. et al. Making marine biotechnology work for people and nature. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7 , 482–485 (2023).
Li, B. et al. Preparation of lactose-free pasteurized milk with a recombinant thermostable β-glucosidase from Pyrococcus furiosus . BMC Biotechnol. 13 , 73 (2013).
Aesoy, R. & Herfindal, L. in Principles of Cancer Treatment and Anticancer Drug Development (ed. Link, W.) 137–139 (Springer International Publishing, 2022).
Chalfie, M., Tu, Y., Euskirchen, G., Ward, W. W. & Prasher, D. C. Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science 263 , 802–805 (1994).
Wynberg, R. & Laird, S. A. Fast science and sluggish policy: the Herculean task of regulating biodiscovery. Trends Biotechnol. 36 , 1–3 (2018).
Convention on Biological Diversity (Secretariat of the CBD, UN Environment Programme, 2011); https://www.cbd.int/convention/text
Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity (Secretariat of the CBD, UN Environment Programme, 2011); https://www.cbd.int/abs/text
UN General Assembly. Draft Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction ; https://www.un.org/bbnj/sites/www.un.org.bbnj/files/draft_agreement_advanced_unedited_for_posting_v1.pdf (2023).
Oldham, P., Hall, S. & Barnes, C. Patent Landscape Report on Animal Genetic Resources (World Intellectual Property Organization, 2014); https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_947_3.pdf
Scholz, A. H. et al. Myth-busting the provider-user relationship for digital sequence information. Gigascience 10 , giab085 (2021).
Arnaud-Haond, S., Arrieta, J. M. & Duarte, C. M. Marine biodiversity and gene patents. Science 331 , 1521–1522 (2011).
Arrieta, J. M., Arnaud-Haond, S. & Duarte, C. M. What lies underneath: conserving the oceans’ genetic resources. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107 , 18318–18324 (2010).
Blasiak, R., Jouffray, J.-B., Wabnitz, C. C. C., Sundström, E. & Österblom, H. Corporate control and global governance of marine genetic resources. Sci. Adv. 4 , eaar5237 (2018).
Blasiak, R., Jouffray, J.-B., Wabnitz, C. C. C. & Österblom, H. Scientists should disclose origin in marine gene patents. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34 , 392–395 (2019).
Katz, L. & Baltz, R. H. Natural product discovery: past, present, and future. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 43 , 155–176 (2016).
Jaspars, M. et al. The marine biodiscovery pipeline and ocean medicines of tomorrow. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. 96 , 151–158 (2016).
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2024-1 (IUCN, 2022).
Van Dover, C. L. et al. Scientific rationale and international obligations for protection of active hydrothermal vent ecosystems from deep-sea mining. Mar. Policy 90 , 20–28 (2018).
Khan, I., Akmal, K. F., Chong, W. S., Maran, B. A. V. & Shah, M. D. in Marine Biotechnology: Applications in Food, Drugs and Energy (eds Shah, M. D. et al.) Ch. 1 (Springer Nature, 2023).
Hasan, I. et al. The innovation–economic growth nexus: global evidence. Res. Policy 39 , 1264–1276 (2010).
Lara-Lopez, A., Valdés, L., de Pinho, R. & Enevoldsen, H. In Global Ocean Science Report 2020: Charting Capacity for Ocean Sustainability (ed. Isensee, K.) 135–173 (UNESCO Publishing, 2020).
Haščič, I. et al. Public Interventions and Private Climate Finance Flows: Empirical Evidence from Renewable Energy Financing ; OECD Environment Working Papers no. 80 (2015).
Guellec, D., Martinez, C. & Zuniga, M. P. Pre-emptive patenting: securing market exclusion and freedom of operation. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 21 , 1–29 (2012).
Gurgula, O. Strategic patenting by pharmaceutical companies—should competition law intervene? IIC Int. Rev. Ind. Prop. Copyr. Law 51 , 1062–1085 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. & Trajtenberg, M. Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econ. 36 , 16–38 (2005).
Adams, J. N. in Research Handbook on Patent Law and Theory (ed. Takenaka, T.) Ch. 1, 2–26 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019).
Jefferson, O. A., Köllhofer, D., Ajjikuttira, P. & Jefferson, R. A. Public disclosure of biological sequences in global patent practice. World Pat. Inf. 43 , 12–24 (2015).
Standard ST.26: Recommended Standard for the Presentation of Nucleotide and Amino Acid Sequence Listings Using XML (Extensible Markup Language) (WIPO, 2023); https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/standards/en/pdf/03-26-01.pdf
Spatio-Temporal Annotation Policy (INSDC, 2021); https://www.insdc.org/news/spatio-temporal-annotation-policy-18-11-2021/
COP15: Nations Adopt Four Goals, 23 Targets for 2030 in Landmark UN Biodiversity Agreement (Secretariat of the CBD, UN Environment Programme, 2022); https://www.cbd.int/article/cop15-cbd-press-release-final-19dec2022
Suttle, C. Marine viruses—major players in the global ecosystem. Nat. Rev. Microbiol . 5 , 801–812 (2007).
Sobecky, P. A. & Hazen, T. H. Horizontal gene transfer and mobile genetic elements in marine systems. Methods Mol. Biol. 532 , 435–53, (2009).
Husnik, F. et al. Bacterial and archaeal symbioses with protists. Curr. Biol. 31 , 862–877 (2021).
Cordes, E. E. & Levin, L. A. Exploration before exploitation. Science 359 , 719 (2018).
Pollock, L. J. et al. Protecting biodiversity (in all its complexity): new models and methods. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35 , 1119–1128 (2020).
Bingham, H. et al. The biodiversity informatics landscape: elements, connections and opportunities. Res. Ideas Outcomes 3 , e14059 (2017).
Oldham, P., Chiarolla, C. & Thambisetty, S. Digital Sequence Information in the UN High Seas Treaty: Insights from the Global Biodiversity Framework-related Decisions ; LSE Law School Policy Briefing Series 53/2023. Available at SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4343130 (2023).
Trevisanut, S. & Bonfanti, A. Intellectual Property Rights Beyond National Jurisdiction: Outlining a Regime for Patenting Products Based on Marine Genetic Resources of the Deep-Sea Bed and High Sea. Available at SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1861020 (2011).
Alexander, J. B. et al. Complementary molecular and visual sampling of fish on oil and gas platforms provides superior biodiversity characterisation. Mar. Environ. Res. 179 , 105692 (2022).
Franco, N. R. et al. Bacterial composition and diversity in deep-sea sediments from the southern Colombian Caribbean Sea. Diversity 13 , 10 (2020).
McLean, D. L. et al. Enhancing the scientific value of industry remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) in our oceans. Front. Mar. Sci. 7 , 00220 (2020).
Österblom, H. et al. Scientific mobilization of keystone actors for biosphere stewardship. Sci. Rep. 12 , 3802 (2022).
The Common Oceans: ABNJ Deep Seas Project (FAO, 2018); https://www.fao.org/3/CA2245EN/ca2245en.pdf
Wright, G. & Rochette, J. Regional Ocean Governance of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction: Lessons Learnt and Ways Forward (STRONG High Seas Project, 2019); https://www.prog-ocean.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/STRONG-HS_Lessons-Learnt-Report.pdf
Amon, D. J. et al. Assessment of scientific gaps related to the effective environmental management of deep-seabed mining. Mar. Policy 138 , 105006 (2022).
Leary, D. & Juniper, S. K. in The Limits of Maritime Jurisdiction (eds Schofield, C. et al.) Ch. 34, 769–785 (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2014).
Leary, D. Marine genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction: do we need to regulate them in a new agreement? Marit. Saf. Secur. Law J. 5 , 22–47 (2018).
Rotter, A. et al. The essentials of marine biotechnology. Front. Mar. Sci. 8 , 629629 (2021).
Terlau, H. & Olivera, B. M. Conus venoms: a rich source of novel ion channel-targeted peptides. Physiol. Rev. 84 , 41–68 (2004).
Woolfson, D. N., Baker, E. G. & Bartlett, G. J. How do miniproteins fold? Science 357 , 133–134 (2017).
Brunet, M. A., Leblanc, S. & Roucou, X. Reconsidering proteomic diversity with functional investigation of small ORFs and alternative ORFs. Exp. Cell Res. 393 , 112057 (2020).
Zhang, F., Wen, Y. & Guo, X. CRISPR/Cas9 for genome editing: progress, implications and challenges. Hum. Mol. Genet. 23 , 40–46 (2014).
Pearson, W. R. An introduction to sequence similarity (“homology”) searching. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics Chapter 3 , 3.1.1–3.1.8 (2013).
Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 12 , 59–60 (2015).
Pebesma, E. Simple features for R: standardized support for spatial vector data. R J. 10 , 439 (2018).
Provoost, P., Bosch, S. & Best, B. iobis/robis: robis 2.11.0. Zenodo https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.1489948 (2022).
parallel: support for Parallel computation in R. R version 3.6.2 https://rdocumentation.org/packages/parallel/versions/3.6.2
Arita, M. et al. The international nucleotide sequence database collaboration. Nucleic Acids Res. 49 , D121–D124 (2021).
The Uniprot Consortium. UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res . 51 , D523–D531 (2023).
World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS Editorial Board, accessed 15 November 2022); https://doi.org/10.14284/170
Glover, A. G., Higgs, N. & Horton, T. World Register of Deep-Sea Species (WoRDSS) (accessed 15 November 2022); https://doi.org/10.14284/352
Beaulieu, S. E. & Szafranski, K. InterRidge Global Database of Active Submarine Hydrothermal Vent Fields Version 3.4 (InterRidge, accessed 1 February 2023).
Zhivkoplias, E. MArine Bioprospecting PATent dataset. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25289404.v3 (2024).
How much does a patent cost? BlueIron (16 January 2022); https://blueironip.com/how-much-does-a-patent-cost
Butamax, Gevo settle patent dispute. Biomass Magazine (24 August 2015); https://biomassmagazine.com/articles/butamax-gevo-settle-patent-dispute-12339
Gevo acquires Butamax patent estate. Yahoo Finance (23 September 2021); https://finance.yahoo.com/news/gevo-acquires-butamax-patent-estate-130000249.html
Abida, H. et al. Bioprospecting marine plankton. Mar. Drugs 11 , 4594–4611 (2013).
Delmont, T. O. et al. Functional repertoire convergence of distantly related eukaryotic plankton lineages abundant in the sunlit ocean. Cell Genom. 2 , 100123 (2022).
Haward, M. G. & Rogers, A. D. Marine genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction: promoting marine scientific research and enabling equitable benefit sharing. Front. Mar. Sci. 8 , 667274 (2021).
Tara Ocean Foundation, T. O. & Oceans, T. Priorities for ocean microbiome research. Nat. Microbiol. 7 , 937–947 (2022).
Download references
We thank D. Khvostovetc for providing valuable consultancy in the Patent Cooperation Treaty and European Patent Convention. E.Z., A.P. and R.B. are funded by FORMAS, project number 2020-01048. A.P. is also funded by FORMAS, project number 2019-01220. P.D. is funded by the Research Platform Governance of Digital Practices at the University of Vienna. J.-B.J. is funded by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (2021.0343).
Open access funding provided by Stockholm University.
Authors and affiliations.
Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Erik Zhivkoplias, Jean-Baptiste Jouffray, Agnes Pranindita & Robert Blasiak
Stanford Center for Ocean Solutions, Stanford, CA, USA
Jean-Baptiste Jouffray
Research Platform Governance of Digital Practices, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Paul Dunshirn
Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
Agnes Pranindita
Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Robert Blasiak
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
E.Z. and A.P. collected the raw data. E.Z., J.-B.J. and R.B. designed the research and analysed the data. E.Z., P.D., J.-B.J. and R.B. wrote the paper.
Correspondence to Erik Zhivkoplias .
Competing interests.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information.
Nature Sustainability thanks Peter McGarvey and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information.
Supplementary Text 1 and 2, Figs. 1–8 and Tables 1–5.
Rights and permissions.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .
Reprints and permissions
Cite this article.
Zhivkoplias, E., Jouffray, JB., Dunshirn, P. et al. Growing prominence of deep-sea life in marine bioprospecting. Nat Sustain 7 , 1027–1037 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01392-w
Download citation
Received : 03 July 2023
Accepted : 25 June 2024
Published : 08 August 2024
Issue Date : August 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01392-w
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.
The College of Marine Sciences and Maritime Studies is the state’s premier marine and maritime destination, with internationally renowned faculty and programs tailored to your passion for the coast and sea. Located on Texas A&M’s island campus in a vibrant coastal community, you’ll have an ocean of possibilities at your doorstep.
Whether above, below or on the water, you’ll find a second home with students who share your personal and career interests while getting a world-class education and unparalleled hands-on experiences.
There are multiple admissions pathways to attend the College of Marine Science and Maritime Studies as an undergraduate student.
Discover our uniquely-positioned graduate programs and learn about the admissions process.
We are located on Texas A&M’s Galveston Campus, a hub of marine, coastal and maritime excellence in the vibrant coastal community of Galveston, Texas. Here we have direct access to the Gulf of Mexico, Houston and Galveston ports, shipping lanes, estuaries, and coastlines, which serve as our natural laboratories for hands-on learning, training and research.
We offer more than ten undergraduate programs spanning marine science, engineering, business and logistics, transportation and liberal arts that make the most of our location with immersive experiences and rigorous classroom engagement. Four of our degree programs can be combined with a U.S. Coast Guard license through the Texas A&M Maritime Academy to expand your earnings and opportunities.
Our graduate programs explore the economic, social, political, and ecological aspects of our oceans and coasts, aiming to enhance understanding, stewardship, and sustainability of these vital resources. All graduate programs can be combined with a U.S. Coast Guard license through the Texas A&M Maritime Academy to support your career goals.
Discover new cultures, build a global network and enrich your education through over 400 education abroad programs.
Our seven departments are home to pioneers, researchers and educators at the top of their field. With a strong focus on immersive experiences, we are making a difference in real-world problems that impact marine wildlife and resources, coastal communities, maritime industries and urban infrastructure.
Our talented advisors and academic coaching staff are here to empower you to achieve your academic goals. As part of the Galveston Campus Center for Academic Learning Support, they are your partner in exploring your interests and able to connect you with the support you need for academic success.
We support the Texas A&M Maritime Academy, one of six state maritime academies in the nation, through our programs that combine an undergraduate or graduate degree with a U.S. Coast Guard license to serve as civilian officers on commercial ocean-going vessels or serve in the armed services. These licenses prepare graduates for research, industry and maritime service throughout the world. The academy also supports the U.S. Navy through leadership and training programs to prepare you for active or reserve duty.
Your one-stop for all admissions, business, scholarships, financial aid and student business services. Calculate the cost of attendance, find scholarships and more!
Interested in Aggieland by the Sea? By submitting the form below, you'll receive information about undergraduate admissions, invitations to special events, announcements, and how the College of Marine Sciences and Maritime Studies is a place to discover, learn and explore.
The carbonate compensation depth — a zone where high pressure and low temperature creates conditions so acidic it dissolves shell and skeleton — could make up half of the global ocean by the end of the century.
In the deepest parts of the ocean , below 13,100 feet (4,000 metres), the combination of high pressure and low temperature creates conditions that dissolve calcium carbonate, the material marine animals use to make their shells.
This zone is known as the carbonate compensation depth — and it is expanding.
This contrasts with the widely discussed ocean acidification of surface waters due to the ocean absorbing carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels.
But the two are linked: because of rising concentrations of carbon dioxide in the ocean, its pH is decreasing (becoming more acidic), and the deep-sea area in which calcium carbonate dissolves is growing, from the seafloor up.
The transition zone within which calcium carbonate increasingly becomes chemically unstable and begins to dissolve is called the lysocline. Because the ocean seabed is relatively flat, even a rise of the lysocline by a few metres can rapidly lead to large under-saturated (acidic) areas.
Our research showed this zone has already risen by nearly 100 metres since pre-industrial times and will likely rise further by several hundreds of metres this century.
Millions of square kilometres of ocean floor will potentially undergo a rapid transition whereby calcareous sediment will become chemically unstable and dissolve.
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
The upper limit of the lysocline transition zone is known as the calcite saturation depth, above which seabed sediments are rich in calcium carbonate and ocean water is supersaturated with it. The calcite compensation depth is its lower limit, below which seabed sediments contain little or no carbonate minerals.
RELATED: Alaska's rivers are turning bright orange and as acidic as vinegar as toxic metal escapes from melting permafrost
The area below the calcite compensation depth varies greatly between different sectors of the oceans. It already occupies about 41% of the global ocean. Since the industrial revolution, this zone has risen for all parts of the ocean, varying from almost no rise in the western Indian Ocean to more than 980 feet (300 m) in the northwest Atlantic.
If the calcite compensation depth rises by a further 980 feet, the area of seafloor below it will increase by 10% to occupy 51% of the global ocean .
For the first time, a recent study showed the calcite compensation depth is a biological boundary with distinct habitats above and below it. In the northeast Pacific, the most abundant seabed organisms above the calcite compensation depth are soft corals, brittle stars, mussels, sea snails, chitons and bryozoans, all of which have calcified shells or skeletons.
However, below the calcite compensation depth, sea anemones, sea cucumbers and octopus are more abundant. This under-saturated (more acidic) habitat already limits life in 54.4 million square miles (141 million square kilometres) of the ocean and could expand by another 13.5 million square miles (35 million sq/km) if the calcite compensation depth were to rise by 980 feet.
In addition to the expansion of the calcite compensation depth, parts of the ocean in low latitudes are losing species because the water is getting too warm and oxygen levels are declining , both also due to climate change.
Thus, the most liveable habitat space for marine species is shrinking from the bottom (rising calcite compensation depth) and the top (warming).
— Heat waves are hitting the deep ocean floor, with potentially catastrophic results
— 'We are approaching the tipping point': Marker for the collapse of key Atlantic current discovered
— 19 'mass extinctions' had CO2 levels we're now veering toward, study warns
The exclusive economic zones of some countries will be more affected than others. Generally, oceanic and island nations lose more, while countries with large continental shelves lose proportionately less.
Bermuda's EEZ is predicted to be the most affected by a 980-feet rise of the calcite compensation depth above the present level, with 68% of that country's seabed becoming submerged below the lysocline. In contrast, only 6% of the US EEZ and 0.39% of the Russian EEZ are predicted to be impacted.
From a global perspective, it is remarkable that already 41% of the deep sea is effectively acidic, that half may be by the end of the century, and that the first study showing its effects of marine life was only published in the past year.
This edited article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article .
Tonga eruption entombed deep-sea life in ash
Earth from space: 'River of tea' bleeds into sea after Hurricane Sally smashes into US coast
Last meal of crocodile mummified in ancient Egypt revealed in CT scans 3,000 years later
Meet the disturbing parasite that eats—and becomes—tongues.
Imagine a small, otherworldly looking crustacean that invades its host, devours its tongue and then ... [+] anatomically takes its place. It's not science fiction.
It might sound like something out of a horror movie plot (because it sort of is ), but the tongue-replacing parasite is very real. The movie imagines mutated parasites taking over the bodies of humans to wreak havoc on an idyllic town. Breathe easy, though—in reality, Cymothoa exigua , the parasitic isopod in question, only targets fish.
Commonly known as the tongue-eating louse, it measures only about 0.3-1.1 inches in length, but its appearance is unsettling. They have segmented bodies with seven pairs of legs adapted for gripping and tearing, and their bodies are covered in a hard exoskeleton, giving them a somewhat alien-like look.
These parasites are prevalent in warm coastal waters and can be found from the Gulf of California southward to the north of the Gulf of Guayaquil, Ecuador. Despite its gruesome modus operandi, this little creature offers a fascinating glimpse into the complexities of parasitism and adaptation in the animal kingdom.
The tongue-eating louse begins as a free-swimming juvenile, searching for a suitable fish host. Once it finds one, typically a snapper, it enters through the gills and attaches itself to the fish’s tongue.
The louse then uses its sharp dactyli (or “claws”) to cut off the blood supply to the tongue, causing it to wither and die. However, this isn’t the end for the fish; the louse then attaches itself to the remaining tissue and effectively takes over as the fish’s new tongue, feeding on its blood and mucus.
Nyt ‘strands’ hints, spangram and answers for sunday, august 18th, today’s nyt mini crossword clues and answers for sunday, august 17.
This might strike you as cruel, but it’s a highly specialized survival strategy. By replacing the fish’s tongue, the louse ensures a stable environment with a constant food supply. And in most cases, the fish can continue to live and feed normally, albeit with a new and unusual appendage.
What sets Cymothoa exigua apart from other parasites is its method of sustenance. Unlike typical blood-feeding parasites, this louse is the only known case where the parasite anatomically replaces a host’s organ, according to a 2019 paper published in BMC Ecology and Evolution .
Here's what it looks like when the louse replaces a fish's tongue.
While other parasites may seem like they could be doing something similar, they don’t quite cross the line into full organ replacement.
For instance, the parasitic barnacle Sacculina carcini invades crabs and takes over their reproductive systems. It doesn’t replace the organs entirely but instead hijacks them, forcing the crab to care for the parasite’s larvae as if they were its own. The barnacle manipulates the host’s behavior and physiology but doesn’t serve as a direct functional substitute for the reproductive organs.
Another example is the lancet liver fluke ( Dicrocoelium dendriticum ), which infects the brains of ants, altering their behavior to increase the likelihood that they will be eaten by grazing animals. While the fluke exerts a strong influence over the ant’s actions, it doesn’t replace any part of the ant’s body—it manipulates rather than substitutes.
These are ingenious strategies, but neither parasite actually becomes a part of the host in the same way that Cymothoa exigua becomes a fish’s tongue. The louse’s ability to not just destroy but to replace an organ makes it a truly unique and terrifying example of parasitic adaptation in the animal kingdom.
If several of these lice attach themselves to a host fish, there’s some—if dated—evidence to show that the host could become underweight. That’s nature, though.
Here’s the real sad part: There’s a pretty good chance that commercial fishing is driving these fishes further into malnourishment territory.
Ceratothoa italica , a blood-sucking cousin of the tongue-eating louse, is more than 60% likely to infect fishes in overfished waters versus protected waters, according to a 2012 paper published in the Biological Journal of the Linnean Society . The study also found that the infected fishes in overfished waters were more malnourished than their protected-water counterparts.
So while the tongue-eating louse may seem like an aberration of nature, the paper still serves as a reminder that human activities often result in far more devastating consequences.
Parasites like Cymothoa exigua, on the other hand, play a crucial role in their ecosystems, often regulating host populations and maintaining ecological balance. Our understanding of them has barely scratched the surface—there’s more to learn about the specifics of its reproductive cycle, for instance—and their existence will continue to challenge our understanding of symbiosis, parasitism and the delicate interplay between different species.
How does the part about our overfishing and how it effectively worsens the condition of parasite-infected fish make you feel? If you’re curious about your relationship with nature, take this test: Connectedness To Nature Scale
One Community. Many Voices. Create a free account to share your thoughts.
Our community is about connecting people through open and thoughtful conversations. We want our readers to share their views and exchange ideas and facts in a safe space.
In order to do so, please follow the posting rules in our site's Terms of Service. We've summarized some of those key rules below. Simply put, keep it civil.
Your post will be rejected if we notice that it seems to contain:
User accounts will be blocked if we notice or believe that users are engaged in:
So, how can you be a power user?
Thanks for reading our community guidelines. Please read the full list of posting rules found in our site's Terms of Service.
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Theses/Dissertations from 2021. Metabolic Rate, Critical Oxygen Partial Pressure, and Oxygen Supply Capacity of Farfantepenaeus duorarum at their Lower Thermal Limit, Alexandra L. Burns. From River to Sea: Improving Carbon System Measurement Methods for use in Rivers, Estuaries, and Oceans, Ellie Hudson-Heck.
Since the founding of the USF College of Marine Science in 1967, we have conferred over 650 master's and PhD degrees. Recent faculty ... All thesis and dissertations produced by College of Marine Science students are also available at the USF Library. [use the advanced search, and choose "manuscript" as the format, "marine science ...
Accessibility and Inclusivity in Marine Science Education: A Suite of Collaborative Marine Science Lesson Plans, Amy Nicholson. PDF. Multi-Decadal Changes In Blue Crab Reproductive Ecology, Alexandra Kenyon Schneider. Theses/Dissertations from 2023 PDF
Adriana Webb (M.S. non-thesis): Guiding the way with Marine Debris 101: An online course for ecotour guides. Kilgore, Taylor (M.S. non-thesis): Oceans of Plankton: Designing an interactive exhibit and evaluating engagement with aquarium visitors
M.S. Thesis, Marine Science. Major Professor: Richard W. Heard (Research Director: Chet F. Rakocinski). Garber, Nikola Marie Application of the mitochondrial DNA control region in population structure studies of Mugil cephalus (Striped Mullet) in North America. M.S. Thesis, Biological Sciences. Major Professor: Kenneth C. Stuck. ...
School of Marine Science theses and dissertations are available online via the university repository, W&M Scholarworks. Browse SMS theses and dissertations. Hargis Library also holds circulating print copies of all theses and dissertations prior to 2017. Search the title in the catalog database to locate the call number.
Theses/Dissertations from 2010. PDF. Molecular Detection of the Toxic Marine Diatom Pseudo-nitzschia multiseries, Jennifer A. Delaney. PDF. The Life History and Energy Budget of Hippocampus erectus in Tampa Bay, Florida, Nicole M. Dunham. PDF.
Theses/Dissertations from 2014. PDF. Dynamics and Survival of Coral and Octocoral Juveniles following Disturbance on Patch Reefs of the Florida Reef Tract, Lucy Bartlett. PDF. A Multi-Scale Approach to Study Predator-Prey Interactions and Habitat Use of Pinfish, Lagodon rhomboids, Dinorah Helena Chacin. PDF.
The thesis/dissertation committee and the Office of Academic Affairs will be the responsible parties for determining what is acceptable for your thesis. Electronic thesis and dissertation submission through ProQuest is required for School of Marine Science graduation candidates. All completed theses and dissertations (prior to August 2016) are ...
Master of Science Theses. McKeegan, K. A. 2022. The effect of Targeted Acoustic Startle Technology on the foraging success of individual harbor seals MSc thesis, Department of Biology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA. Lewis, Z. K. 2022. Foraging ecology of sexually-dimorphic marine generalist predators: describing Steller sea lion ...
Master's thesis. Your Masters's research project ─ concluding in a Master's thesis ─ represents the culmination of your programme. Through your research, you'll demonstrate both your ability to pursue independent research and your grasp of advanced knowledge in your programme's field. Your thesis is an individual project, which you ...
Theses/Dissertations from 2024. The Practice of Small Island Developing States on the Consent Regime for Marine Scientific Research: Developing and Reframing the Law of the Sea in Changing Circumstances, Luciana Fernandes Coelho. ( Ph.D (Maritime Affairs), PDF. Gender inequality in the practice of international marine science: case study on the ...
Our established thesis track is a research-based program that emphasizes a hands-on approach to learning through the completion of an original thesis project under the direct mentorship of an experienced marine science researcher. The purpose of the T-track is to give students the opportunity to develop a strong foundation in research methodology.
Facilities for graduate work in marine science are based in Austin and at the shore-side laboratory of the Marine Science Institute in Port Aransas, Texas. ... Students then reside in Port Aransas while they undertake thesis or dissertation research at the Marine Science Institute. These students also take additional courses there, including ...
The Master of Science in Marine Science degree program fosters a broad understanding of marine systems through an interdisciplinary program of study. Choose from two tracks for the program - applied ( MSMS-A) and thesis ( MSMS-T ). Research Track. A traditional thesis program designed to prepare you for a career in academia, whether ...
The M.S. The M.S. Thesis program requires a minimum of 30 hours of graduate-level credit, of which 9 must consist of core courses in Biological Oceanography (MARS 8010), Chemical Oceanography (MARS 8020), and Physical Oceanography (MARS 8030).
Each student, upon completion of the coursework and thesis or capstone experience, will present a faculty- and peer-reviewed seminar on the thesis content. Additionally, the Advisory Committee will administer a final oral examination. The master of science in marine science degree requires at least 30 hours of graduate credit.
After completing the required core and concentration coursework, students must take two required capstone courses, totaling 6 credits. For specific course requirements, refer to the "Master of Science in Marine Science Program (M.S.)" in NSU's Halmos College of Arts and Sciences Graduate Student catalog. The academic program and curriculum ...
UF Resources Search library catalog for all formats (print and online) Search library catalog for online only Due to technical issues, the bulk search for online theses and dissertations lists only around 50% of the works that are online Search the IR@UF for online only Browse by UF departments External Resources UF Dissertations and Theses…
MS, Marine Sciences - Non-thesis. Study the biology, chemistry, geology, and physics of Earth's oceans and coasts. We offer interdisciplinary training at facilities in Athens and the Skidaway Institute of Oceanography, and provide research opportunities on local and global issues. Degree Type: Masters.
Students pursuing the MS degree in Marine Sciences are encouraged to follow the thesis option. However, a non-thesis curriculum is available for students, upon agreement of the major professor and advisory committee, who so elect. The student will be required to complete the same degree requirements as those for a student who chooses the thesis ...
Master of Science in Marine Biology This program provides comprehensive training in marine biological sciences guided by internationally renowned faculty. Master of Marine Resources Management This program provides a deep understanding of the complexities of marine resource management for recent graduates and professionals to advance their ...
Large-scale fish deaths caused by harmful algal blooms are global health, environmental, and food security problems ().Anthropogenic causes appear to be hastening the severity and frequency of toxic eukaryotic microalgal blooms in freshwater and marine ecosystems, including the massive fish kill along the Oder River in 2022 by the golden alga Prymnesium parvum (Haptophyta) that decimated half ...
Types of sequence in marine gene patents. The patent applicants who referenced the highest number of unique genetic sequences included both protein-coding and non-coding sequences, with the former ...
The Bachelor of Science in University Studies, Tourism and Coastal Community Development Concentration equips you with the knowledge and skills to drive sustainable development in coastal communities dominated by the tourism industry. You will explore a range of fields including tourism marketing and management, public policy, environmental ...
We offer more than ten undergraduate programs spanning marine science, engineering, business and logistics, transportation and liberal arts that make the most of our location with immersive experiences and rigorous classroom engagement. Four of our degree programs can be combined with a U.S. Coast Guard license through the Texas A&M Maritime ...
A new paper describes a ground-breaking experiment that united 25 independent taxonomists from 10 countries. The initiative boasts the discovery of 11 new marine species from all over the globe ...
The genus is hotly debated among researchers but we do know it was a large marine predator. ... Newcastle Research Higher Degree Thesis. ... Learn is an award-winning D.C.-based science writer. An ...
In the deepest parts of the ocean, below 13,100 feet (4,000 metres), the combination of high pressure and low temperature creates conditions that dissolve calcium carbonate, the material marine ...
It's not science fiction. PA Images via Getty Images. It might sound like something out of a horror movie plot (because it sort of is), but the tongue-replacing parasite is very real. The movie ...