Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience.
Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis.
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree (Licence or Karshenasi) with a final mark of at least 15. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Diploma di Laurea with an overall mark of at least 105. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree with a minimum C/GPA of at least 3.0/4.0 or equivalent. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree with a CGPA of at least 3.0/4.0 or 80%. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree with an overall mark of 4 or better (on a scale of 1-5)/CGPA 3,33. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors (Honours) degree with a second-class upper division. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree with a CGPA of at least 3.0/4.0 or B+. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree with a CGPA 3.5/4.0 or 14/20. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Masters degree, depending on your university. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree with a CGPA of at least 3.0/4.0. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Licenciado with a final mark of at least 8/10. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree with a second-class upper division or CGPA of at least 3.0-3.49/4.0, 3.5-4.49/5.0 or 4.6-5.9/7.0 |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree with an overall grade of B. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree with a CGPA of at least 3.3/4.0. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Four-year Bachelors degree with an overall mark of at least 65%-70% or CGPA 2.6 - 2.8 depending on your university. Masters degree following a 3-year Bachelors degree with an overall mark of at least 65%-70% or CGPA 2.6 - 2.8 depending on your university. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree with at least 80% or CGPA of at least 3.0/4.0 |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors with a final mark of at least 7.5/10. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Licenciado with a final mark of at least 13/20 from a public university or 15/20 from a private university. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Masters degree with 1.5/5.0 (where 1 is the highest) or 3.7/4.0 |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree with an overall CPGA of at least 3 (on a scale of 4). |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bakalavr or Specialist Diploma with an average mark of at least 4. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree with a CGPA of 3.5/5.0 or 3/4.0. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors (Honours) degree with a second-class upper division or CAP 4.0. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors (honours) degree with a second-class division 1. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree with a CGPA of at least 3.3/4.5 or 3.1/4.3 or B+ |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Licenciado with a final mark of at least 2/4 or 7/10. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors Special degree with an upper second honours. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Licence or Diplôme with 5/6 or 8/10. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree with an overall mark of at least 67%-80% depending on your university. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree with CGPA of at least 2.8 - 3.0/4.0 or equivalent depending on your university. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Lisans Diplomasi with CGPA of at least 2.8 - 3.0/4.0 or equivalent depending on your university. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree with CGPA of at least 3.0/4.0 or equivalent. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree with CGPA of at least 3.3/4.0. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Bachelors degree (with a Graduate Thesis/research component) with CGPA of at least 3.3/4.0 or 7.5/10. As evidence of completing your degree you must provide both proof of graduation in addition to your transcript. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
Masters degree requirement | You’re normally expected to have the equivalent of a UK Masters degree, which will mean having completed some academic study beyond your Bachelors degree. |
---|---|
Undergraduate degree requirement | Masters degree with GPA of 2.0/2.5 or equivalent. |
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
Please note | Our entry requirements are guidelines and we assess all applications on a case-by-case basis. |
If your country is not listed, you need to contact us and find out the qualification level you should have for this course. Contact us
Subject-specific requirements | Your qualification should be in a subject area related to science and technology policy. You may also be considered for the degree if you have several years of equivalent professional experience. |
---|
Ielts (academic).
High level (6.5 overall, including at least 6.0 in each component).
IELTS scores are valid for two years from the test date. You cannot combine scores from more than one sitting of the test. Your score must be valid when you begin your Sussex course. Find out more about IELTS
We accept IELTS One Skills Retake.
We do not accept IELTS Online.
Check full details of our English Language requirements and find out more about some of the alternative English language qualifications listed below
Proficiency tests, cambridge advanced certificate in english (cae).
169 overall, including at least 162 in each skill.
We would normally expect the CAE test to have been taken within two years before the start of your course.
You cannot combine scores from more than one sitting of the test. Find out more about Cambridge English: Advanced
We would normally expect the CPE test to have been taken within two years before the start of your course.
You cannot combine scores from more than one sitting of the test. Find out more about Cambridge English: Proficiency
High level (70 overall, including at least 65 in each component).
LanguageCert Academic SELT scores are valid for two years from the test date. Your score must be valid when you begin your Sussex course. Find out more about LanguageCert Academic SELT
We only accept LanguageCert when taken at SELT Test Centres.
We do not accept the online version. We also do not accept the non-SELT version.
High level (International ESOL SELT B2 with a minimum of 39 in each component)
LanguageCert International ESOL scores are valid for two years from the test date. Your score must be valid when you begin your Sussex course. Find out more about LanguageCert SELT
We only accept LanguageCert when taken at SELT Test Centres. We do not accept the online version.
High level (62 overall, including at least 59 in all four skills)
PTE (Academic) scores are valid for two years from the test date. You cannot combine scores from more than one sitting of the test. Your score must be valid when you begin your Sussex course. Find out more about Pearson (PTE Academic)
We do not accept the PTE Academic Online test.
High level 88 overall, including at least 20 Listening, 19 in Reading, 21 in Speaking, 23 in Writing.
TOEFL (iBT) scores are valid for two years from the test date. You cannot combine scores from more than one sitting of the test. Your score must be valid when you begin your Sussex course. Find out more about TOEFL (iBT)
We do not accept TOEFL (iBT) Home Edition.
The TOEFL Institution Code for the University of Sussex is 9166.
As/a-level (gce).
Grade C or above in English Language.
Hong Kong Advanced Level Examination (HKALE)/ AS or A Level: grade C or above in Use of English.
Grade C or above in English.
Brunei/Cambridge GCE O-level in English: grades 1-6.
Singapore/Cambridge GCE O-level in English: grades 1-6.
Grade C or above in English as a First Language (Grade 4 or above in GCSE from 2017).
Grade B or above in English as a Second Language.
If awarded before 1993: grades 1-6 in English language.
If awarded between 1993 and 2005: grades A-D in English language.
Level 4, including at least 3 in each component in English Language.
The Indian School Certificate is accepted at the grades below when awarded by the following examination boards:
Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) – English Core only: 70%
Council for Indian School Certificate Examinations (CISCE) - English: 70%
English A or English B at grade 5 or above.
Grades A - C in English language
If taken before the end of 2008: grades 1-6 in English Language.
If taken from 2009 onwards: grade C or above in English Language.
The qualification must be jointly awarded by the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (UCLES).
Grades A1-C6 (1-6) in English language when awarded by the West African Examinations Council (WAEC) or the National Examinations Council (NECO).
Select to see the list of exempt english-speaking countries.
If you are a national of one of the countries below, or if you have recently completed a qualification equivalent to a UK Bachelors degree or higher in one of these countries, you will normally meet our English requirement. Note that qualifications obtained by distance learning or awarded by studying outside these countries cannot be accepted for English language purposes.
You will normally be expected to have completed the qualification within two years before starting your course at Sussex. If the qualification was obtained earlier than this, we would expect you to be able to demonstrate that you have maintained a good level of English, for example by living in an English-speaking country or working in an occupation that required you to use English regularly and to a high level.
Please note that this list is determined by the UK’s Home Office, not by the University of Sussex.
List of exempt countries:
** Canada: you must be a national of Canada; other nationals not on this list who have a degree from a Canadian institution will not normally be exempt from needing to provide evidence of English.
If you don’t meet the English language requirements for your degree, you may be able to take a pre-sessional course
Research proposal | If you are applying for a PhD, you will need to write a research proposal. |
---|
If your qualifications aren’t listed or you have a question about entry requirements, contact us
If you’d like to join us as a research student, there are two main routes:
Find out how to apply for a PhD at Sussex
Choose to work on your research full time or part time, to fit around your work and personal life. For details about part-time study, contact us at [email protected]
You can choose to study for a PhD or an MPhil. PhD and MPhil degrees differ in duration and in the extent of your research work.
Visiting Professor
View profile of Constantin Blome
Reader in Economics
View profile of Ingo Borchert
Senior Lecturer in Economics of Innovation
View profile of Roberto Camerani
Professor of Development Economics, Innovation and Global Health
View profile of Chirantan Chatterjee
RM Phillips Freeman Chair in InnovationManagement
View profile of Andrew Davies
Professor of Innovation Management
View profile of Michael Hopkins
Associate Faculty
View profile of Marv Khammash
Professor Of Science And Technology Policy
View profile of Gordon Mackerron
Visiting Fellow
View profile of Alberto Marzucchi
Senior Lecturer in Strategy and Entrepreneurship
View profile of Monica Masucci
View profile of Piera Morlacchi
Professor of Technology and Organisation
View profile of Dimitra Petrakaki
Lecturer In Marketing
View profile of Maria Restuccia
Senior Lecturer
View profile of Carlos Sato
Senior Lecturer in Management
View profile of Josh Siepel
Professor of Marketing
View profile of Chris Storey
Professor of Operations & Logistics Management and Supply Chains
View profile of Nachiappan Subramanian
Professor of Economics
View profile of Shqiponja Telhaj
Senior Lecturer in Entrepreneurship and Sustainability
View profile of Shova Thapa Karki
Emeritus Professor
View profile of Joseph Tidd
Professor of Entrepreneurship and Small Business
View profile of Mirela Xheneti
Senior Lecturer in Operations Management
View profile of Biao Yang
How can i fund my course, funded projects and scholarships.
Our aim is to ensure that every student who wants to study with us is able to despite financial barriers, so that we continue to attract talented and unique individuals. Don’t miss out on scholarships – check the specific application deadlines for funding opportunities. Note that funded projects aren’t available for all our PhDs.
Details of our scholarships are not yet set for entry in the academic year 2025/26.
If any part of your funding, at any time, is through USA federal Direct Loan funds, you will be registered on a separate version of this degree which does not include the possibility of distance learning which is prohibited under USA federal regulations. Find out more about American Student Loans and Federal Student Aid .
We advertise around 2,500 part-time jobs a year so you can make money and gain work experience. We have a special scheme to employ students on campus, wherever possible.
Find out more about careers and employability
Fees for self-funding students.
Home students: Fees are not yet set for entry in the academic year 2025/26. Fees will become available once set by United Kingdom Research and Innovation.
Channel Islands and Isle of Man students: Fees are not yet set for entry in the academic year 2025/26. Fees will become available once set by United Kingdom Research and Innovation.
International students: £22,575 per year for full-time students
Home PhD student fees are set at the level recommended by United Kingdom Research and Innovation (UKRI) annually, rising in line with inflation. Overseas fees are subject to an annual increase - see details on our tuition fees page
Note about additional costs.
Please note that all costs are best estimates based on current market values. Activities may be subject to unavoidable change in response to Government advice. We’ll let you know at the earliest opportunity. We review estimates every year and they may vary with inflation. Find out how to budget for student life .
On top of your PhD fees and living costs, you may also need to cover some research and training costs, relevant to your research project. These costs will depend on your research topic and training needs, but may include: - travel (to archives, collections or scientific facilities) - a laptop - overseas fieldwork costs (travel and accommodation, and language training) - conference costs (travel, registration fees and accommodation) - laboratory consumables and workshop materials - participant costs - transcription or translation costs - open-access publication costs. If you have a scholarship from one of the UK Research Councils, your scholarship should cover these types of costs. You'll receive details of how to claim this additional funding. If you're self funded, or if your scholarship doesn’t cover these costs, check with the Research and Enterprise Co-ordinator in your School for details of School or Doctoral School funding that may be available.
Find out typical living costs for studying at Sussex
Find out about our terms and conditions
Experience Sussex life in our virtual tour.
Start your virtual tour
Visit campus and chat to staff and students. Book your place
Join a live webchat. Book your place
Meet us in your country
+44 (0)1273 876787
Send us a message
If you haven’t applied yet:
+44 (0)1273 678169 business-researchstudents@sussex.ac.uk
Find out about the University of Sussex Business School
After you’ve applied:
+44 (0)1273 877773 [email protected]
Find out how to apply
This course introduces students to contemporary theories and empirical studies in the field. Through highlighting the role of organizational and institutional actors in shaping technological advancements, the course offers insights into the complex nature of digital innovation processes.
Marleen Huysman is Professor of Knowledge and Organization at the KIN Center for Digital Innovation. She studied Sociology at the Erasmus University Rotterdam and has a PhD in Business Economics at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Since 2006 she holds a chair in Knowledge and Organization at the VU School of Business and Economics. Marleen has been visiting scholar during her PhD at Stanford and in 2000-2001 she was a visiting scholar at the Technology and Innovation Management (TIM) group at Harvard Business School. Marleen conducts research in: new ways of working, technology in practice, knowledge sharing, - coordinating, development and integration. Her research has been published in various international journals and books and is a frequent speaker at academic and professional meeting in the field.
Philipp Tuertscher is a Professor of Collaborative Innovation at the KIN Center for Digital Innovation. He earned his PhD from the University of St. Gallen, Switzerland, in 2009, receiving prestigious Fellowships from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the US National Science Foundation for his research on large-scale scientific collaborations. Before joining VU, Philipp was a visiting scholar at Pennsylvania State University's Smeal School of Business and became an assistant professor at WU Vienna, Austria. His research focuses on organizational mechanisms and social practices for collaborative innovation, including work on large-scale scientific collaborations at CERN and innovation processes in communities like Linux and Wikipedia.
Course Description
The core theme of this course is organizing around digital innovation. It will introduce students to contemporary theories and empirical studies addressing various aspects of digital innovation, but also some classics on technological innovations in organizations. Students will develop a thorough understanding of theories explaining how technological innovations come about and how technologies influence ways of working and organizing. Such understanding is needed to overcome the limitations of deterministic perspectives on the role of technology in organizations and society at large. Specifically, students will learn to appreciate that technology is not a given; rather it is being shaped by organizational and institutional actors on a micro, meso, and macro level. the course will introduce students to practice- and process research approaches, and demonstrate the power of these approaches for understanding the nature, role and influence of technology on organizing around digital innovation.
The course places a special emphasis on understanding the “digital” nature of emerging technologies, discussing cases of digital innovation in sectors such as healthcare, agriculture, high-tech industry, creative industry, and science. A critical engagement with these readings will provide students with a thorough grounding in various theoretical perspectives and in-depth empirical studies on technology development and use.
Please download the course manual here .
Please register with the Apply Now button at the top of this page. For more information please contact:
This website uses cookies
You can accept all cookies or set your preferences per cookie category. You can always alter your choice by removing the cookies from your browser. VU Amsterdam and others use cookies to: 1) analyse website use; 2) personalise the website; 3) connect to social media networks; 4) show relevant advertisements. More information about the cookies we use
Cookie preferences
You can accept all cookies or you can set your preferences per cookie category. You can always alter your choice by removing the cookies from your browser. See more information in the cookie statement.
Personal settings:
These cookies are used to ensure that our website operates properly.
These cookies help to analyse the use of the website. These measurement data are subsequently used to improve the website.
Personalisation
These cookies are used to analyse how you use our website. This enables us to adapt our website content with information that suits your interests.
Social media
These cookies are placed by social media networks. For example, if you watch a YouTube video embedded in the website, or use the social media buttons on our website to share or like a post. This allows social media networks to track your internet behaviour and use that for their own purposes.
Advertising
These cookies are placed by advertising partners. They are used to show you relevant advertisements for Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam on other websites that you visit. They enable advertising networks to track your internet behaviour.
Copyright © 2024 - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Degrees offered in this discipline.
The focus of these programs is the integration of information technologies with business processes and strategies within a dynamic legal and business environment. The core of e-business technologies is centred on the concept that the application of Internet and information technologies lead to remarkable new ways of conceiving and organizing businesses. This, in turn, leads to many innovative modes of management, new organizational structures and information architectures, new legislation as well as new legal and corporate strategies.
The Digital Transformation and Innovation program is a multi-faculty collaboration between the Telfer School of Management, the Faculty of Arts, and the Faculty of Engineering to train highly qualified professionals to create, manage and research the profound change to our world that is happening as a result of electronic digital technology. At its heart, the technology enables the collection and communication of huge amounts of data that transforms how business and society works. It also creates a new online environment where the experience of business and social interactions by individuals is being reinvented. Innovation is an important aspect of the program to emphasize the re-invention and creative design of user experiences in business and social interactions.
Degree options.
The master's program includes a CO-OP option, which provides two consecutive terms of valuable industry experience.
CO-OP program requirements, employers, salaries, and details
These programs are only offered in English.
Program requirements, career opportunities.
How to apply keyboard_arrow_right
Find a thesis supervisor keyboard_arrow_right
Awards and financial support keyboard_arrow_right
Student experience keyboard_arrow_right
Graduate studies office keyboard_arrow_right
Graduate studies office.
[email protected]
Phone: 613-562-5347
Ais sig dite phd research academy.
In this series, senior scholars share practical tips and hands-on advice on their favorite types of research or research methods with interested PhD students and early-career researchers. Each session is split into a 30 minute presentation on the respective topic, followed by a maximum of 45 minutes of Q&A, where participants can ask clarifying questions, dive deeper into the presented topic, or discuss concrete studies or examples.
The sessions take place via Zoom, with the Zoom-Link being provided in advance via email and on this website.
Zoom-Link for the September-session: https://tu-darmstadt.zoom-x.de/j/67292576126?pwd=9iw1lK0cjX7ihMDC2rVoqaUYHhIaYc.1&from=addon
To allow our speakers to prepare for specific questions or issues you are interested in in their respective field, please submit them to us via the following link:
https://forms.gle/YdrWJQUGzUeeZYqA9
By signing up, you will additionally receive session reminders with the corresponding Zoom-Link (which will also be posted on this website).
Date | Speaker | Title | Readings |
---|---|---|---|
Wednesday, 31 January, 9 am-10:30 am ET | Aron Lindberg | Combining Qualitative and Computational Methods for Theory Construction |
|
Thursday, 15 February, 9 am-10:30 am ET | Cynthia Beath | Publishing IS Research in Practitioner Outlets |
|
Tuesday, 12 March, 8 am-9:30 am ET | Emmanuelle Vaast | Process theorizing |
|
Tuesday, 16 April, 9 am-10:30 am ET | Nick Berente | Computationally intensive theory construction |
|
Tuesday, 21 May, 8 am-09:30 am ET | Oliver Mueller | Natural Language Processing for IS Research |
|
Tuesday, 18 June, 8 am-9:30 am ET | Anastasia Sergeeva | Ethnography |
|
Tuesday, 9 July, 8 am-09:30 am ET | Stefan Seidel | Video Games as a Research Setting |
|
Wednesday, 14 August, 9 am-10:30 am ET | Robert Gregory | Phenomenon-based Theorizing (Writing Theory Papers) |
|
Thursday, 5 September, 6 am-7:30 am ET | Shirley Gregor | Design Science Research in Information Systems |
|
October, TBD | Youngjin Yoo | Theorizing digital innovations - Process of developing conceptual ideas |
|
November, TBD | Hila Lifshitz Assaf | Pitfalls and advantages of case study research: When is it worth going to the wild? |
|
Presentation slides: Link
Lindberg, A. 2020. “Developing Theory through Integrating Human & Machine Pattern Recognition,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems (21:1), pp. 90–116.
Lindberg, A. 2023. “Analysis Chaining: Conceptual and Empirical Framing of Digital Traces,” in Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Information Systems, R. Davison (ed.), pp. 360–375.
Gaskin, J., Berente, N., Lyytinen, K., and Yoo, Y. 2014. “Toward Generalizable Sociomaterial Inquiry: A Computational Approach for Zooming In and Out of Sociomaterial Routines,” MIS Quarterly (38:3), pp. 849–871.
Markus, M. L., and Rowe, F. 2018. “Is IT Changing the World? Conceptions of Causality for Information Systems Theorizing,” Management Information Systems Quarterly (42:4), pp. 1255–1280. (https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/12903).
Davis, M. S. 1971. “That’s Interesting!: Towards a Phenomenology of Sociology and a Sociology of Phenomenology,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences (1:2), pp. 309–344. (https://doi.org/10.1177/004839317100100211).
Grover, V., Lindberg, A., Benbasat, I., Lyytinen, K., Banbasat, I., and Lyytinen, K. 2020. “The Perils and Promises of Big Data Research in Information Systems,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems (21:2), pp. 268–291.
Rivard, S., and Lapointe, L. 2012. “INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IMPLEMENTERS’ RESPONSES TO USER RESISTANCE: NATURE AND EFFECTS,” MIS Quarterly (36:3), pp. 897–920.
Howison, J., and Crowston, K. 2014. “Collaboration Through Open Superposition: A Theory of the Open Source Way,” MIS Quarterly (38:1), pp. 29–50.
Marino, A., Aversa, P., Mesquita, L., and Anand, J. 2015. “Driving Performance via Exploration in Changing Environments: Evidence from Formula One Racing,” Organization Science (26:4), pp. 1079–1100.
Lindberg, Berente, Howison, and Lyytinen (Forthcoming), Discursive Modulation in Open Source Software: How Communities Shape Novelty and Complexity, MIS Quarterly
Lindberg, Schecter, Berente, Lyytinen, and Hennel (Forthcoming), The Entrainment of Task Allocation and Release Cycles in Open Source Software Development, MIS Quarterly
Lindberg, A., Majchrzak, A., and Malhotra, A. 2022. “How Information Shared After an Idea May Shape New High-Quality Ideas in Online Ideation Contests,” MIS Quarterly (46:2), pp. 1195–2022. ( https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2022/15706 ).
Lindberg, A., Berente, N., Gaskin, J., and Lyytinen, K. 2016. “Coordinating Interdependencies in Online Communities: A Study of an Open Source Software Project,” Information Systems Research (27:4), pp. 751–772.
Vaast, E., Safadi, H., Lapointe, L., and Negoita, B. 2017. “Social Media Affordances for Connective Action: An Examination of Microblogging Use During the Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill,” MIS Quarterly (41:4), pp. 1179–1205.
Miranda, S. M., Kim, I., and Summers, J. D. 2015. “Jamming with Social Media: How Cognitive Structuring of Organizing Vision Facets Affects IT Innovation Diffusion,” MIS Quarterly (39:3), pp. 591–614. ( https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.3.04 ).
Miranda, S. M., Wang, D., and Tian, C. (Forthcoming). “Discursive Fields and the Diversity-Coherence Paradox: An Ecological Perspective on the Blockchain Community Discourse,” MIS Quarterly.
Leonardi, P. 2013. “When Does Technology Use Enable Network Change In Organizations? A Comparative Study of Feature Use and Shared Affordances,” MIS Quarterly (37:3), pp. 749–775.
Leonardi, P. 2007. “Activating the Informational Capabilities of Information Technology for Organizational Change,” Organization Science (18:5), pp. 813–831.
I’d like to recommend that the participants look at the “instructions to authors” pages for the following outlets:
Harvard Business Review: https://hbr.org/guidelines-for-authors
Sloan Management Review: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/authors/
MISQ Executive: https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/reviewprocess.html (see especially the Review Criteria)
California Management Review: https://cmr.berkeley.edu/resources/submit/ (see especially the Content Guidelines)
Vaast, E., & Pinsonneault, A. (2021). When Digital Technologies Enable and Threaten Occupational Identity: The Delicate Balancing Act of Data Scientists. MIS Quarterly , 45 (3).
Pentland, B., Vaast, E., & Wolf, J. R. (2021). Theorizing process dynamics with directed graphs: A diachronic analysis of digital trace data. MIS Quarterly , 45 (2).
If you only read one paper, read the following:
Miranda, S., Berente, N., Seidel, S., Safadi, H., & Burton-Jones, A. (2022). Editor's comments: Computationally intensive theory construction: A primer for authors and reviewers. MIS Quarterly , 46 (2), iii-xviii.
A recent example:
Lindberg, A., Schecter, A., Berente, N., Hennel, P., & Lyytinen, K. (2024). The Entrainment of Task Allocation and Release Cycles in Open Source Software Development. MIS Quarterly , 48 (1), 67-94.
Background:
Berente, N., Seidel, S., Safadi, H. (2019). Research Commentary—Data-Driven Computationally Intensive Theory Development. Information Systems Research , 30 (1), 50-64.
Code: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1kYWMnlvEBPYU_YwCy0ShXOGEUBqHV79j?usp=sharing
Manning, C. D. (2022). Human Language Understanding & Reasoning. Daedalus, 151 (2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01905
Schultze, U. (2000). A confessional account of an ethnography about knowledge work. MIS Quarterly , 24(1), 3-41.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes . University of Chicago press.
Sergeeva, A. V., Faraj, S., & Huysman, M. (2020). Losing touch: An embodiment perspective on coordination in robotic surgery. Organization Science , 31(5), 1248-1271.
Van den Broek, E., Sergeeva, A., & Huysman, M. (2021). When the Machine Meets the Expert: An Ethnography of Developing AI for Hiring. MIS Quarterly , 45(3).
Waardenburg, L., Huysman, M., & Sergeeva, A. V. (2022). In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king: Knowledge brokerage in the age of learning algorithms. Organization Science , 33(1), 59-82.
Massa, F. G., & O’Mahony, S. (2021). Order from chaos: How networked activists self-organize by creating a participation architecture. Administrative Science Quarterly , 66 (4), 1037-1083. (method of cyberethnography)
About Theory and Theorizing
DE Leidner, RW Gregory
Journal of the Association for Information Systems 25 (3), 501-521 , 2024
Cooperation Among Strangers: Algorithmic Enforcement of Reciprocal Exchange with Blockchain-Based Smart Contracts
RW Gregory, R Beck, O Henfridsson, N Yaraghi
Academy of Management Review , 2024
Data network effects: Key conditions, shared data, and the data value duality
RW Gregory, O Henfridsson, E Kaganer, H Kyriakou
Academy of Management Review 47 (1), 189-192 , 2022
The role of artificial intelligence and data network effects for creating user value
Academy of Management Review 46 (3), 534-551 , 2021
Bridging art and science: Phenomenon-driven theorizing
RW Gregory, O Henfridsson
Journal of the Association for Information Systems 22 (6), 1509-1523 , 2021
Further readings:
Alvesson, M. G. and J. Sandberg (2011). "Generating Research Questions Through Problematization." Academy of Management Review 36(2): 247-271. Bacharach, S., B. (1989). "Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation." Academy of Management Review 14(4): 496-515. Barley, S. R. (2006). "When I Write My Masterpiece: Thoughts on What Makes a Paper Interesting." Academy of Management Journal 49(1): 16-20. Baron, Reuben M., and David A. Kenny. (1986) “The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.” Journal of personality and social psychology 51(6): 1173. Barney, J. (2018). Editor’s Comments: Positioning a Theory Paper for Publication. Academy of Management Review, 43(3), 345-348 Bergh, D. D. (2003). "From the Editors: Thinking Strategically about Contribution." Academy of Management Journal 46(2): 135-136. Bundy, J., A. J. Shipp and S. Brickson 2022. “Demystifying and Normalizing the Psychological Experience of Writing for AMR: A Qualitative Analysis of the Highs, Lows, and Suggested Coping Strategies,” Academy of Management Review, 47(3), 341-357. Cowen, A. P., Rink, F., Cuypers, I. R., Grégoire, D. A., & Weller, I. (2022). “Applying Coleman’s boat in management research: Opportunities and challenges in bridging macro and micro theory.” Academy of Management Journal, 65(1): 1-10. Corley, K. G. and D. A. Gioia (2011). "Building Theory About Theory Building: What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?" Academy of Management Review 36(1): 12-32. Corneliessen, J. (2017). "Developing propositions, a process model or typology? Addressing the challenges of writing theory without a boilerplate." Academy of Management Review 42(1): 1-9. DiMaggio, P. (1995). "Comments on "What Theory is Not"." Administrative Science Quarterly 40(3): 391-397. Feldman, D. C. (2004). "What are We Talking About When We Talk About Theory?" Journal of Management 30(5): 565-567. Fisher, G., K. Mayer, and S. Morris (2021). “From the Editors—Phenomenon-Based Theorizing” Academy of Management Review 46(4): 631-639. Grant, A. M. and T. G. Pollock (2011). “Publishing in AMJ-Part 3: Setting the Hook.” Academy of Management Journal 54(5): 873-879. Gregory, R. W., and Henfridsson, O. 2021. "Bridging Art and Science: Phenomenon-Driven Theorizing," Journal of Association for Information Systems (22). Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication monographs, 85(1): 4-40. Higgins, Patricia A., and Moore M. Shirley (2000) “Levels of theoretical thinking in nursing.” Nursing outlook 48(4): 179-183. James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of applied psychology, 69(2), 307. Johns, G. (2006). "The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior." The Academy of Management Review 31(2): 386. Kilduff, M., A. Mehra and M. B. Dunn (2011). “From Blue Sky research to Problem Solving: A Philosophy of Science Theory of New Knowledge Production.” Academy of Management Review 36(2): 297-317. Lange, D. and M. D. Pfarrer (2017). "Editors’ Comments: Sense and Structure—The Core Building Blocks of an AMR Article." Academy of Management Journal 42(3): 407-416. Langley, A. (1999). "Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data." Academy of Management Review 24(4): 691-710. Leidner, D.; Gregory, R.W. (2024). “Theory and Theorizing.” Journal of Association for Information Systems Leidner, D. E. and O. Tona. 2021. “A Thought-Gear Model of Theorizing from Literature.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 22(4). Makadok, R. (2022). “From the Editors: Guidance for AMR Authors about Making Formal Theory Accessible,” Academy of Management Review 47(2): 193-205. Mohr, Lawrence B. (1982) “Approaches to explanation: Variance theory and process theory.” Explaining organizational behavior 2:35-70. Monteiro, E., P. Constantinides, S.V. Scott, M. Shaikh, A. Burton-Jones (2022). “Qualitative Research Methods in Information Systems: A Call for Phenomenon-Focused Problematization.” MIS Quarterly 46(4): iii-xix. Pentland, B. T. (1999). "Building process theory with narrative: from description to explanation." Academy of Management Review 24(4): 711-724. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate behavioral research, 42(1): 185-227. Rivard, S. (2021). “Theory building is neither an art nor a science. It is a craft.” Journal of Information Technology 36(3): 316-328. Rynes, S. (2002). "From the Editors: Some Reflections on Contribution." Academy of Management Journal 45(2): 311-313. Saetre, A.S.; Van de Ven, A. (2021). “Generating Theory by Abduction.” Academy of Management Review 46(4): 684-701 Shepherd, D. A. and K. M. Sutcliffe (2011). "Inductive Top-Down Theorizing: A Source of New Theories or Organization." Academy of Management Review 36(2): 361-380. Suddaby, R. (2010). "Editor’s Comments: Construct Clarity in Theories of Management and Organization." The Academy of Management Review 35(3): 356-357. Sutton, R. I. and B. M. Staw (1995). "What Theory is Not." Administrative Science Quarterly 40(3): 371-384. Thatcher, S. M. B. and G. Fisher (2022). "From the Editors—The Nuts and Bolts of Writing a Theory Paper: A Practical Guide to Getting Started." Academy of Management Review 47(1): 1-8. Tsang, Eric WK, and F. Ellsaesser (2011) “How contrastive explanation facilitates theory building.” Academy of Management Review 36(2):404-419. Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research. New York, Oxford University Press. Weick, K. E. (1995). "What Theory is not, Theorizing is." Administrative Science Quarterly 40(3): 385-390. Weick, Karl E. (1989). "Theory construction as disciplined imagination." Academy of management review 14(4): 516-531. Whetten, D. A. (1989). "What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution?" Academy of Management Review 14(4): 490-494.
Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly , 337-355.
Gregor, S. (2022). Reflections on the practice of design science in information systems. In Engineering the transformation of the enterprise: A design science research perspective (pp. 101-113). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Ranked #4 by U.S. News & World Report, the Michigan Ross BBA Program is one of the best undergraduate business program in the world. Explore what makes our inclusive community of learners so unique.
At Michigan Ross, you gain more than just a first-class business education. Our collaborative, supportive, inclusive community enriches your experience, and sets you up with a lifetime network of friends across the globe.
The work of Michigan Ross faculty influences the world’s largest companies and global economies. Every day we’re creating real-world solutions for the most pressing challenges in our world.
Follow a monthly poll co-created by Financial Times and Michigan Ross for insights on how American voters perceive key financial and economic issues in the lead-up to the 2024 U.S. presidential election.
Discover more about the history, people, milestones, and contributions that have shaped Michigan Ross.
Raise your “digital fitness” by exposing yourself to current and next practices related to information systems and digital strategies to become leaders in your field.
This course will introduce you to new business models and value-generating opportunities enabled by fourth industrial revolution (4IR) technologies such as artificial intelligence, digital interfaces, digital platforms, and big data. You will leave with applicable frameworks and practical examples on how to use digital innovation to gain a competitive advantage.
This five-week online course consists of eight asynchronous modules and the course concludes with a live synchronous session. The combination of the online platform, discussion groups and interactive live session foster a dynamic learning environment.
Time Commitment Duration: 5 weeks Weekly Coursework: 5-7 hours/week Format: Asynchronous & Synchronous sessions
* This sample schedule is intended to represent the program structure and content. Timing and session topics are illustrative and subject to change.
Nigel Melville Associate Professor of Technology and Operations
After successful program completion, you will earn 1 credit toward the Distinguished Leader Certificate from Michigan Ross Executive Education.
After the course, participants will be able to:
For more information, please contact: [email protected] | +1.734.763.1000.
Can be designed for teams. Learn more
Become a Michigan Ross Distinguished Leader. Learn more
By completing this form, I consent to Michigan Ross and its educational partners contacting me by email, telephone and/or SMS at the telephone number provided above regarding educational services. I understand this consent is not required to attend Michigan Ross. Your information will be kept confidential and you can opt-out at any time.
Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. Text STOP to stop receiving SMS messages. You can always opt-out of Michigan Ross email communications by using the unsubscribe link at the bottom of any email or by emailing [email protected] .
Contact Information
Connect with Us View all courses Exec Ed Locations
Discover the world's research
You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.
All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .
Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.
Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.
Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.
Original Submission Date Received: .
Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.
Please let us know what you think of our products and services.
Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.
How digitalization and sustainability promote digital green innovation for industry 5.0 through capability reconfiguration: strategically oriented insights.
2. theoretical analysis and research hypothesis, 2.1. digital sustainability orientation under a systematic framework, 2.2. digital sustainability orientation and corporate digital green innovation, 2.3. the mediating role of capability reconfiguration, 2.4. the moderating and moderated mediating effects of environmental scanning, 3. research design, 3.1. research methods and data collection, 3.2. measurement, 3.3. common method bias test, 4. empirical analysis and research results, 4.1. measurement and evaluation, 4.2. correlation analysis, 4.3. empirical test of hypotheses, 4.3.1. test of the main effect, 4.3.2. test of mediation, 4.3.3. test of moderation, 4.3.4. test of moderated mediation effect, 5. discussion and conclusions, 5.1. research conclusions, 5.2. theoretical contribution, 5.3. practical enlightenment, 5.4. research limitations and future research directions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.
DO | DO1. The company aims to lead in digital technology |
DO2. The company places significant emphasis on the research and development of digital technology, the construction of digital platforms, and digital innovation. | |
DO3. The company encourages the maximum use of digital technology in production and operations | |
DO4. The company uses digital technologies for internal processes and management | |
SO | SCO1. We believe that environmental protection is an important part of business development |
SCO2. We believe that prioritizing sustainability benefits our business. | |
SCO3. We attach importance to managing the carbon footprint of our products | |
SCO4. We believe that companies need to take on more social responsibility | |
SPO1. We actively participate in various environmental protection programs | |
SPO2. We often measure the sustainability progress of new products | |
SPO3. We often use the triple bottom line for product planning | |
SPO4. We select suppliers and partners based on sustainability criteria | |
CR | CER1. The company develops unprecedented skills and conducts systematic training |
CER2. The company explores new concepts or principles | |
CER3. The company can gain inspiration from new or different knowledge | |
CER4. The company adopts new methods or procedures | |
CSR1. The company makes simple adjustments to existing routines and regulations | |
CSR2. The company improves existing processes and procedures | |
CSR3. The company seeks new solutions based on existing knowledge | |
ES | ES1. The company frequently gathers customer feedback on green products. |
ES2. The company anticipates its competitors’ digital greening strategies and tactics. | |
ES3. The company forecasts sales, customer preferences for green products, and technological trends. | |
ES4. The company specializes in research on green marketing. | |
ES5. The company monitors trends, routines, and strategies in digital green technology both domestically and internationally. | |
ES6. The company monitors information on emerging trends in the digital green economy. | |
DGI | DGPI1. The company uses digital technology to effectively reduce the emission of harmful substances or waste during production or operation |
DGPI2. The company uses digital technology to recycle waste during production or operation, allowing it to be processed and reused | |
DGPI3. The company uses digital technology to rapidly reduce the consumption of energy such as water, electricity, coal, or oil during production or operation. | |
DGPI4. The company has reduced the use of raw materials in its production or operation process | |
DGPI1. The company uses digital technology to produce less polluting products during product development or design | |
DGPI2. The company uses digital technology to choose products that consume the least energy and resources during product development or design | |
DGPI3. The companies use digital technology to make products with the least amount of materials during product development or design | |
DGPI4. The company uses digital technology to improve product recycling, reuse, and decomposition during product development or design |
Click here to enlarge figure
Sample | Options | Sample Size | Percentage (%) | Sample | Options | Sample Size | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nature of property rights | Private | 101 | 33.115 | Age | Before 1990 | 48 | 15.738 |
State-owned | 85 | 27.869 | 1991–2000 | 44 | 14.426 | ||
Foreign-owned | 54 | 17.705 | 2001–2010 | 123 | 40.328 | ||
Joint venture | 65 | 21.311 | After 2011 | 90 | 29.508 | ||
Size | Under 300 | 57 | 18.689 | Industry | Machinery | 88 | 28.852 |
300–600 | 86 | 28.197 | Textiles | 65 | 21.311 | ||
600–900 | 53 | 17.377 | Information | 52 | 17.049 | ||
900–1200 | 58 | 19.016 | Automobile | 72 | 23.607 | ||
Over 1200 | 51 | 16.721 | Other | 28 | 9.18 |
Variable | Factor | Marker Code | Loadings | Cronbach’s α | AVE | CR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Digital Orientation (DO) | - | DO1 | 0.845 | 0.880 | 0.649 | 0.881 |
DO2 | 0.770 | |||||
DO3 | 0.777 | |||||
DO4 | 0.827 | |||||
Sustainable Orientation (SO) | Sustainable Culture Orientation (SCO) | SCO1 | 0.842 | 0.897 | 0.627 | 0.930 |
SCO2 | 0.768 | |||||
SCO3 | 0.769 | |||||
SCO4 | 0.872 | |||||
Sustainable Practice Orientation (SPO) | SPO1 | 0.766 | 0.876 | |||
SPO2 | 0.766 | |||||
SPO3 | 0.707 | |||||
SPO4 | 0.830 | |||||
Capability Reconfiguration (CR) | Capability Evolution Reconfiguration (CER) | CER1 | 0.779 | 0.874 | 0.678 | 0.936 |
CER2 | 0.837 | |||||
CER3 | 0.777 | |||||
CER4 | 0.833 | |||||
Capability Substitution Reconfiguration (CSR) | CSR1 | 0.864 | 0.872 | |||
CSR2 | 0.851 | |||||
CSR3 | 0.818 | |||||
Environmental Scanning (ES) | - | ES1 | 0.895 | 0.945 | 0.741 | 0.945 |
ES2 | 0.817 | |||||
ES3 | 0.852 | |||||
ES4 | 0.881 | |||||
ES5 | 0.859 | |||||
ES6 | 0.858 | |||||
Digital Green Innovation (DGI) | Digital Green Product Innovation (DGPI) | DGPI1 | 0.633 | 0.821 | 0.569 | 0.913 |
DGPI2 | 0.757 | |||||
DGPI3 | 0.766 | |||||
DGPI4 | 0.821 | |||||
Digital Green Process Innovation (DGPI) | DGPI1 | 0.785 | 0.838 | |||
DGPI2 | 0.753 | |||||
DGPI3 | 0.710 | |||||
DGPI4 | 0.793 |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. AGE | 1 | |||||||||
2. SIZE | −0.03 | 1 | ||||||||
3. TYPE | 0.024 | 0.163 ** | 1 | |||||||
4. INDUSTRY | 0.089 | 0.037 | 0.006 | 1 | ||||||
5. DO | 0.191 ** | −0.112 | −0.007 | 0.074 | 0.806 | |||||
6. SO | 0.096 | −0.105 | −0.129 * | 0.151 ** | −0.195 ** | 0.792 | ||||
7. DSO (DO × SO) | 0.215 ** | −0.170 ** | −0.121 * | 0.188 ** | 0.562 ** | 0.676 ** | − | |||
8. CR | 0.165 ** | −0.079 | −0.059 | 0.07 | 0.147 * | 0.121 * | 0.190 ** | 0.823 | ||
9. ES | 0.119 * | −0.047 | −0.127 * | 0.042 | 0.152 ** | 0.230 ** | 0.333 ** | −0.027 | 0.961 | |
10. DGI | 0.199 ** | −0.219 ** | −0.041 | 0.084 | 0.385 ** | 0.101 | 0.393 ** | 0.314 ** | 0.092 | 0.754 |
M | 2.272 | 2.869 | 2.836 | 2.63 | 3.416 | 3.18 | 10.669 | 3.586 | 3.536 | 3.407 |
SD | 1.136 | 1.37 | 1.022 | 1.356 | 0.96 | 1.052 | 4.62 | 3.586 | 3.536 | 3.407 |
Variable | DGI | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M5 | M 6 | |
Constant | 3.369 ** (14.305) | 2.261 ** (8.010) | 3.215 ** (10.960) | 2.629 ** (10.404) | 2.441 ** (8.335) | 1.911 ** (6.503) |
Nature of property rights | 0.186 ** (3.356) | 0.124 * (2.347) | 0.182 ** (3.268) | 0.119 * (2.225) | 0.143 ** (2.648) | 0.089 (1.699) |
Size | −0.215 ** (−3.847) | −0.178 ** (−3.365) | −0.210 ** (−3.750) | −0.162 ** (−3.041) | −0.197 ** (−3.648) | −0.152 ** (−2.928) |
Age | −0.011 (−0.198) | −0.013 (−0.248) | −0.005 (−0.092) | 0.023 (0.440) | 0.003 (0.054) | 0.032 (0.620) |
Industry | 0.076 (1.368) | 0.055 (1.052) | 0.068 (1.220) | 0.016 (0.296) | 0.060 (1.121) | 0.008 (0.155) |
DO | 0.337 ** (6.337) | |||||
SO | 0.050 (0.884) | |||||
DSO (DO × SO) | 0.340 ** (6.153) | 0.307 ** (5.673) | ||||
CR | 0.270 ** (5.007) | 0.230 ** (4.433) | ||||
R | 0.091 | 0.199 | 0.093 | 0.193 | 0.161 | 0.243 |
Ad-R | 0.079 | 0.185 | 0.078 | 0.180 | 0.147 | 0.228 |
F | 7.495 ** | 14.811 ** | 6.148 ** | 14.303 ** | 11.490 ** | 15.937 ** |
Variable | CR | |
---|---|---|
M7 | M8 | |
Constant | 3.440 ** (14.175) | 3.128 ** (11.424) |
Age | 0.159 * (2.789) | 0.130 * (2.263) |
Size | −0.068 (−1.183) | −0.046 (−0.794) |
Nature of property rights | −0.052 (−0.900) | −0.037 (−0.649) |
Industry | 0.059 (1.034) | 0.034 (0.584) |
DSO (DO × SO) | 0.143 ** (2.397) | |
R | 0.039 | 0.057 |
Ad-R | 0.026 | 0.041 |
F | 3.014 ** | 3.599 ** |
Effect | Path | Coefficient | SE | 95%Confidence Interval |
---|---|---|---|---|
direct effect | DSO → DGI | 0.307 | 0.012 | [0.043, 0.089] |
mediating effect | DSO → CR → DGI | 0.033 | 0.018 | [0.004, 0.074] |
total effect | DSO → DGI | 0.340 | 0.012 | [0.050, 0.097] |
Variable | CR | |
---|---|---|
M9 | M10 | |
Constant | 3.471 ** (10.567) | 3.267 ** (20.765) |
Age | 0.137 * (2.376) | 0.073 * (2.202) |
Size | −0.043 (−0.749) | −0.040 (−1.458) |
Nature of property rights | −0.048 (−0.832) | −0.018 (−0.479) |
Industry | 0.031 (0.541) | 0.016 (0.579) |
DSO (DO × SO) | 0.179 ** (2.863) | −0.009 (−0.974) |
ES | −0.112 (−1.874) | −0.021 (−0.504) |
DSO (DO × SO) × ES | 0.186 ** (20.003) | |
R | 0.068 | 0.603 |
Ad-R | 0.049 | 0.593 |
F | 3.609 ** | 64.399 ** |
Variable | Coefficient | SE | T | p | 95% Confidence Interval |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constant | 3.267 | 0.157 | 20.765 | 0.000 | [2.957, 3.576] |
DSO (DO × SO) | −0.009 | 0.009 | −0.974 | 0.331 | [−0.027, 0.009] |
ES | −0.021 | 0.041 | −0.504 | 0.615 | [−0.101, 0.060] |
DSO (DO × SO) × ES | 0.186 | 0.009 | 20.003 | 0.000 | [0.168, 0.205] |
Path: DSO → CR → DGI | |||
---|---|---|---|
Moderate Variable | Mediation Effect | SE | 95% Confidence Interval |
ES (Low) | −0.043 | 0.012 | [−0.067, −0.020] |
ES (middle) | −0.002 | 0.002 | [−0.007, 0.002] |
ES (High) | 0.039 | 0.011 | [0.018, 0.063] |
Mediated Index | 0.043 | 0.012 | [0.020, 0.066] |
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
Xu, G.; Zhang, J.; Wang, S. How Digitalization and Sustainability Promote Digital Green Innovation for Industry 5.0 through Capability Reconfiguration: Strategically Oriented Insights. Systems 2024 , 12 , 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12090341
Xu G, Zhang J, Wang S. How Digitalization and Sustainability Promote Digital Green Innovation for Industry 5.0 through Capability Reconfiguration: Strategically Oriented Insights. Systems . 2024; 12(9):341. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12090341
Xu, Guangping, Jinshan Zhang, and Shiqiang Wang. 2024. "How Digitalization and Sustainability Promote Digital Green Innovation for Industry 5.0 through Capability Reconfiguration: Strategically Oriented Insights" Systems 12, no. 9: 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12090341
Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.
Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals
Applications for the MPhil in Digital Humanities and PhD in Digital Humanities at Cambridge Digital Humanities (2025 entry) open on Thursday 4 September.
The MPhil in Digital Humanities at the University of Cambridge explores ways in which the humanities can engage with digitally enabled research approaches, considers the impact of digital innovations on cultural forms and practices, and explores digital futures. This one year taught masters programme is designed to be inter-disciplinary and caters for different skill levels in digital humanities methods and approaches.
The PhD in Digital Humanities, run by Cambridge Digital Humanities and based in the Faculty of English, is a research-intensive programme that will enable students to engage at doctoral level with projects demanding the use of digital methods, tools, or adopting critical/theoretical orientations. The programme expands the humanities offering at research postgraduate level at Cambridge by offering a route for cross-disciplinary engagement, responding to the growth of the field of Digital Humanities as a research area.
Prospective applicants are invited to register for the virtual information sessions taking place on 26 September and 21 November 2024.
For more information visit cdh.cam.ac.uk/mphil or cdh.cam.ac.uk/phd
Visit the applications page and find out more about postgraduate study at Cambridge .
Get in touch.
Cambridge Digital Humanities University of Cambridge 16 Mill Lane Cambridge CB2 1RX
Email: [email protected]
Receive our newsletter.
Sign up now
© 2024 Cambridge Digital Humanities. All RIghts Reserved.
Web Design by Chameleon Studios
Tel: +44 1223 766886 Email [email protected]
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
These essential cookies do things like: remembering the notifications you've seen so we do not show them to you again or your progress through a form. They always need to be on.
This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages.
Keeping this cookie enabled helps us to improve our website.
This fall, we will be featuring blog posts written by PhD students who participated in Career Services’ Career Exploration Fellowship (CEF), a program that helps doctoral candidates explore their career interests through networking opportunities with advanced degree professionals. Click here to learn more about CEF.
Describe your experience working with your host.
Collaborating with Stewart Varner at the Price Lab for Digital Humanities was highly informative. He connected me with key individuals at Price Lab, which was incredibly beneficial. I learned a great deal from people like J.D. Porter and Jajwalya Karajgikar. Through CEF, I gained access to these valuable connections, enhancing my overall experience and broadening my professional network.
What did you learn from this opportunity (about yourself, potential career fields, the job search, etc.)?
I gained a lot of insights. Networking emerged as the most crucial element in landing the right job. CEF provided numerous opportunities for PhDs in the humanities, showcasing diverse career paths. Additionally, I recognized the significant gap between traditional humanities academics and digital humanities practitioners and how this gap might be bridged in the future. It’s clear that starting the job search early, ideally mid-way through graduate school, is essential due to the lengthy application process. CEF’s guidance and resources made this process more manageable and less overwhelming.
How did the CEF experience benefit your future career plans?
I now have a clearer direction for my career path. CEF’s workshops and events provided me with valuable insights and practical advice, helping me to better understand my career options and how to pursue them effectively.
What was the most valuable part of your CEF experience?
Building friendships and networking at CEF’s social events was invaluable. Learning about the career pursuits of other PhDs across different fields was also highly beneficial. CEF’s support network and community events fostered a sense of camaraderie and encouragement, making the job search process feel less isolating and more collaborative.
Top reason PhD students should apply to the CEF program?
The job search process can be daunting, and CEF significantly eases this journey. CEF provides tailored resources, expert advice, and a supportive community that can help PhD students navigate the complexities of job hunting with greater confidence and success.
Sign up here.
Reporting by Nqobile Dludla, Editing by William Maclean
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. , opens new tab
At least 41 people were killed and more than 180 wounded on Tuesday when Russia hit a military institute in the central town of Poltava, President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said, in one of the deadliest single strikes of the war.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
You will be part of the Center for Digital Innovation, a college-level interdisciplinary research center on digital innovation that focuses on adding value and addressing high-impact problems in business and society.
Interdisciplinary Doctoral Seminar in Digital Transformation and Innovation II. 3 Units. 3 optional course units from the list of optional courses2. 3 Units. Comprehensive Examination: DTI 9998. Comprehensive Exam 3. Thesis Proposal: DTI 9997.
Technological Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Strategic Management (TIES) embraces two areas: the organization, development, and commercialization of technology-based innovation in existing firms; and the formation, development, and growth of technology-based new enterprises. Students can integrate these areas in their studies or approach ...
The PhD program is designed to develop theoretical and methodological competencies to investigate how digital innovation can address business and societal problems. In consultation with the PhD coordinator and other faculty, students configure a program of study that provides them with the theoretical and methodological background for the multi ...
Earn your doctoral degree with a focus on business strategy and innovation at the Scheller College of Business. Learn more about this business PhD program now.
Learn more about PhD in Digital Innovation program with J. Mack Robinson College of Business including the program fees, scholarships, scores and further course information
In the Digital Transformation Program, you'll learn the skills you need to become the critical link between business functions and the technology that enables them. With courses spanning digital transformation strategy and technical application, you'll build the well-rounded skillset you need to lead and execute an informed technology-enabled business transformation.
Harness the power of digital and technology transformation, unlock innovation and build market-leading strategies to step ahead in the digital era.
Digital innovations are changing the ways products and services are developed, produced and used. For instance, innovations using digital technologies enable the 'sharing' of inputs or resources, such as cars, tools, and accommodation.
We have a strong tradition of high-quality research, teaching and knowledge exchange in information systems and innovation, with specific expertise in digital ecosystems, organisational technologies, security and privacy, health and financial services.
Swedish Center for Digital Innovation offers a 7,5 credit PhD course on the Frontiers in Digital Innovation Research. To deliver varied, relevant, and contemporary content, we engage approximately 20 researchers active at our three institutions in Gothenburg, Umeå, and Stockholm. [/av_textblock]
The Doctor of Philosophy (DPhil) in Digital Transformation grows leaders to solve real-life challenges encountered by businesses and society. We equip our candidates with research methodology skills and lay the foundations underpinning digital transformation to ensure success.
Build a foundational understanding of the key technologies fueling digital transformation — from AI and machine learning to the internet of things, data analytics, sensors, and automation. Discover new capabilities and strategic opportunities enabled by digital technologies and identify what's right for your organization.
Join policymakers and academics with expertise in technology and innovation management, and benefit from a world-leading innovation study centre: SPRU.
A basic understanding of issues around organizational theories on digital technology & innovation incl. the importance of a socio-technical perspective.
The Digital Transformation and Innovation program is a multi-faculty collaboration between the Telfer School of Management, the Faculty of Arts, and the Faculty of Engineering to train highly qualified professionals to create, manage and research the profound change to our world that is happening as a result of electronic digital technology. At its heart, the technology enables the collection ...
The Digital Transformation and Innovation program is a multi-faculty collaboration between the Telfer School of Management, the Faculty of Arts.
This transition from physical product to digital service is very demanding: it requires new skills, value chains, and a customer-focused mindset. The suggested research would focus on these aspects of business model creation (using digital transformation) in varying contexts such as emerging markets, and traditional and new generation business ...
Third, existing research on digital transformation has remained dominantly focused on the role of managers and paid limited attention to other organizational actors in digital transformation.
AIS SIG DITE PhD Research Academy. In this series, senior scholars share practical tips and hands-on advice on their favorite types of research or research methods with interested PhD students and early-career researchers. Each session is split into a 30 minute presentation on the respective topic, followed by a maximum of 45 minutes of Q&A ...
Incorporate technology into your business strategy with applicable frameworks and practical examples of how to use digital innovation to gain a competitive advantage.
The aim of this dissertation is to explore the organizational and managerial challenges that arise from. systematic involvement of digital technologies in innovation. The work in this dissertation ...
The Digital and Data-Driven Innovation in Healthcare GRIP, a partnership between Monash University and the health service members of Monash Partners Academic Health Science Centre, will support 15 PhD students who will be addressing healthcare problems through digital and data-driven innovations and building their skills as the next generation ...
As environmental pressures intensify and digital technology advances rapidly, many countries, including China, are looking to more effectively heed social and environmental responsibilities by effectively integrating digital technology with traditional industries. Digital green innovation is gradually becoming a necessary direction for enterprises in various countries as they strive for high ...
Applications for the MPhil in Digital Humanities and PhD in Digital Humanities at Cambridge Digital Humanities (2025 entry) open on Thursday 4 September.. The MPhil in Digital Humanities at the University of Cambridge explores ways in which the humanities can engage with digitally enabled research approaches, considers the impact of digital innovations on cultural forms and practices, and ...
Hashimoto S, Mano T. Digital marketing innovation: directions in digital marketing innovation: a case study of new business models in cardiovascular pharmaceutical and medical device marketing. Int Pharm Intell 2024; 1248: 1-10. Google Scholar. Supplementary Material.
Hosted by the Price Lab for Digital Humanities. This fall, we will be featuring blog posts written by PhD students who participated in Career Services' Career Exploration Fellowship (CEF), a program that helps doctoral candidates explore their career interests through networking opportunities with advanced degree professionals.
Unravelling digital fictions. Simply put, this modern twist turns human data into digital profiles, created and controlled by algorithms. This ancient concept, now adapted for contemporary technology, can be examined through the field of Computational Rhetoric - a humanities field in conversation with mathematics and computer science.
Introduction. Approximately two years prior to this writing, we decided to launch an IJA special issue entitled: "How Digital Innovation has Changed Marketing: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly." The development of information and communication technologies, new media channels, and new formats are driving evolutions in advertising, or more generally, in marketing and marketing communication.
South African authorities should introduce regulatory 'sandboxes', or controlled testing grounds, to spur innovation in the country's growing digital platform sector, tech investor Naspers and ...