mcdonaldization of society in education

McDonaldization of Society: Definition and Examples

Charlotte Nickerson

Research Assistant at Harvard University

Undergraduate at Harvard University

Charlotte Nickerson is a student at Harvard University obsessed with the intersection of mental health, productivity, and design.

Learn about our Editorial Process

Saul McLeod, PhD

Editor-in-Chief for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MRes, PhD, University of Manchester

Saul McLeod, PhD., is a qualified psychology teacher with over 18 years of experience in further and higher education. He has been published in peer-reviewed journals, including the Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Olivia Guy-Evans, MSc

Associate Editor for Simply Psychology

BSc (Hons) Psychology, MSc Psychology of Education

Olivia Guy-Evans is a writer and associate editor for Simply Psychology. She has previously worked in healthcare and educational sectors.

On This Page:

Key Takeaways

• McDonaldization is a term used to describe the penetration of American cultural and economic products throughout the world. It is used symbolically and is drawn from the market and ideological success of Mcdonald’s fast-food franchises all over the world.
• McDonaldization is a process through which certain principles of fast food management, such as efficiency, come to dominate the ethos of various sectors of society. It was developed by sociologist George Ritzer in his 1995 book The McDonaldization of Society .
• McDonaldization is an updated version of Max Weber”s rationalization, which argues that the traditions, values, and emotions as motivators for behavior in society are being replaced with rational and calculated ones.
• The four characteristics of McDonaldized systems are efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control. In essence, McDonaldized systems are built to provide consistent services to many customers in a way that is often quick and low-cost.
• Critics have argued that McDonaldization spurs on effects contrary to its principles, in some cases decreasing efficiency, introducing costs that cannot be seen until far after the fact, and reducing the rights and wages of workers.

History and Overview

McDonaldization is the process by which the principles of the fast-food restaurant — efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control — come to dominate more and more sectors of American society as well as the rest of the world (Ritzer, 2018).

McDonaldization, as described by Ritzer (2013), is a reconceptualization of rationalization and scientific management.

Rationalization refers to the replacement of traditions, values, and emotions as motivators for behavior in society with rational and calculated ones.

Whereas the sociologist Max Weber (2015) used the model of bureaucracy to represent the direction of his changing society, Ritzer sees the fast-food restaurant as being more representative of how contemporary societies are changing.

What are the Four Principles of McDonaldization?

McDonaldization, according to George Ritzer (2018) has four key principles: efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control through non-human technology.

These lie at the heart of the success of McDonald”s, and, more generally, of all McDonaldized systems.

Ritzer argues that McDonald”s and other McDonaldized systems have succeeded because they offer consumers, workers, and managers the advantages of these.

Efficiency involves finding and using the optimum method for getting from one point to another.

McDonald”s drive-through, for example, provides one of the fastest possible ways to get from being hungry to being full. The fast-food model also offers other methods for satisfying needs.

A business fashioned on the McDonald”s model may offer, or claim to offer, efficiency in, say, exercising, losing weight, lubricating cars, getting new glasses, completing taxes, making online purchases, or ride-hailing.

The workers in a McDonaldized system function by following steps in a predesigned and generally well-choreographed process (Ritzer, 2018).

Calculability

Calculability emphasizes the quantitative aspects of the products sold — such as their portion size or price — and services offered (how quickly someone can get the product).

In McDonaldized systems, quantity is equivalent to quantity — services that provide a lot of something, or are inexpensive or very fast are automatically better.

For example, the McDonald’s “Dollar Menu” quantifies both a low cost and the feeling that people are getting a lot of food for a small sum of money (Ritzer, 2018).

Consumers can also make calculations in terms of time. They may calculate, consciously or not, how much time it would take to go to a McDonald”s, be served food, eat it, and return home in comparison to the time required to prepare food at home.

Ritzer argues that this is important to other food delivery chains — say, pizza restaurants — as well as brands that emphasize obtaining any good or service quickly, such as fast fashion.

Workers within McDonaldized systems emphasize the quantitative, rather than the qualitative aspects of their work. Because the quality of work must be uniform, workers focus on how quickly tasks can be accomplished.

Ritzer (2018) argued that digital services such as Facebook and Amazon are heavily McDonalized, and that the calculability aspect of McDonaldization has been enhanced by “big data.”

Predictability

McDonaldization is also built on predictability, meaning that the products and services will be more or less the same over time and in all locations.

McDonald” ‘s hamburgers should be virtually identical today in New York as they will be next week in London. Consumers, according to Ritzer, take comfort in knowing that McDonald’s offers no surprises.

The workers in McDonaldized systems also behave in predictable ways, by following corporate roles and the demands of the systems in which they work. What workers do and even say is highly predictable (Ritzer, 2018).

The fourth element of McDonaldization, control, is exerted over the people who enter a McDonald’s. The lines, limited options, and uncomfortable seats of a McDonald’s encourage its customers to eat quickly and leave.

Workers in McDonaldized organizations are also controlled, often in a more blatant way. These employees are trained to do a limited number of tasks in exactly the way they are told to do them.

This control is reinforced by both the technologies used by the company and the way the organization is set up (Ritzer, 2018).

Advantages of McDonaldization

McDonaldization has numerous advantages, both for consumers and businesses. According to Ritzer (2018), these include:

A wider range of goods and services available to a larger proportion of the population

Availability of goods and services depends less on time or geographic location.

People can acquire what they want or need near-instantaneously

Goods and services of more uniform quality

Widely-available and economical alternatives to high-priced, customized goods and services

Services for a population that has less time due to longer working hours

The comfort of stable, familiar, and safe products

Consumers can more easily compare competing products due to quantification

Some products, such as exercise and diet programs, become safer in a carefully regulated and controlled system

People are more likely to be treated similarly despite their race, sex, social class, and so on

Organizational and technological innovations can be diffused quickly and easily through networks of identical businesses

The most popular products and services of one society can be more easily disseminated to others.

Downsides of McDonaldization

Although McDonaldized systems can enable people to do many things they were not able to do in the past, these systems also keep them from doing things they otherwise could do.

Ritzer notes that McDonaldization brings with it a number of seemingly contradictory inconsistencies, such as:

Inefficiency (rather than efficiency);

High cost (despite the promise the McDonalized goods and services are inexpensive);

falseness in the way employees relate to consumers;

disenchantment;

health and environmental dangers;

homogenization;

dehumanization.

Ritzer argues that, Although there have been many benefits that have resulted from McDonaldization such as variety, round-the-clock banking and shopping, and often speedier service, these rationally built services can lead to irrational outcomes.

By this, Ritzer means that they “deny the basic humanity, the human reason, of the people who work within or are served by them” (Ritzer, 1996).

For instance, the lines at a fast-food restaurant can be very long, and waiting to get through the drive-through can take longer than going inside. This rational system does not save people money: while people may spend less, they may do more work in the form of waiting for food.

Additionally, the food that people eat at restaurants is often less nourishing and contains high levels of flavor enhancers, fats, salt, and sugar. This contributes to the downstream health problems of society, such as heart disease, diabetes, and obesity, ultimately costing more than was saved by the convenience of this fast food.

As children grow up within these systems, they can develop habits that ensure their increasing dependency upon the systems.

The packaging used in the fast food industry pollutes the environment. And the ritual of fast food may take the place of that of the communal meal, reducing quality social time (Ritzer, 1996).

Examples of McDonaldization

Worker’s rights and wages.

One notable criticism of McDonaldization is that it has, in many ways, replaced skilled work with workers who must engage in repetitive, routinized, highly focused, and compartmentalized tasks.

This, sociologists have observed, has reduced workers’ rights and wages throughout the world, as workers have become easier to replace and in higher supply due to the lack of skill required to do McDonalized jobs (Ritzer, 2013).

McDonaldization occurs when any institution follows its four principles: control, predictability, calculability, and efficiency. Amazon has a large database of items that they work with and sell. This includes groceries, electronics, and digital content.

With Amazon, consumers can order virtually any item online and these products will be delivered quickly and inspected carefully. This embodies the principle of efficiency.

Amazon also exhibits calculability — an emphasis on the quantitative aspects of products served and services offered. Amazon”s price listings provide the perception that one can seek out the best deal.

Amazon has also trained its employees to behave predictably. Customer service agents follow scripts when dealing with inquiries, and Amazon moderates what sellers can sell on their website. As a result, customers can make purchases, in theory, without worrying about whether or not sellers are trustworthy.

Finally, Amazon exerts control on both its consumers and employees. The company — albeit not without ethical criticism — emphasizes timing their workers when packaging goods to ensure that these are delivered within a specific amount of time.

Robots also automate the picking of some products from warehouses. In all, this allows the company to provide a reliable and uniform experience to customers throughout the world (Ritzer & Miles, 2019).

Essay Question

In a culture built on the diverse contributions of various immigrant groups over time and the development of innovative technology, what will be the long-term effect of increased McDonaldization?

Hartley, David. “ The ‘McDonaldization’of higher education: food for thought ?” Oxford Review of Education 21.4 (1995): 409-423.

Ritzer, George. “ An introduction to McDonaldization .” McDonaldization: The Reader 2 (2002): 4-25.

Ritzer, George. The McDonaldization of society: Into the digital age. Sage Publications, 2018.

Ritzer, George. The McDonaldization of society. Sage, 2013.

Ritzer, George. “The McDonaldization thesis: Is expansion inevitable?.” International Sociology 11.3 (1996): 291-308.

Ritzer, George, and Steven Miles. “The changing nature of consumption and the intensification of McDonaldization in the digital age.” Journal of Consumer Culture 19.1 (2019): 3-20.

Weber, Max. “Bureaucracy.” Working in America. Routledge, 2015. 29-34.

McDonaldization: Definition and Overview of the Concept

Guang Niu / Getty Images 

• Recommended Reading
• Key Concepts
• Major Sociologists
• News & Issues
• Research, Samples, and Statistics
• Archaeology

McDonaldization is a concept developed by American sociologist George Ritzer which refers to the particular kind of rationalization of production, work, and consumption that rose to prominence in the late twentieth century. The basic idea is that these elements have been adapted based on the characteristics of a fast-food restaurant—efficiency, calculability, predictability and standardization, and control—and that this adaptation has ripple effects throughout all aspects of society.

The McDonaldization of Society

George Ritzer introduced the concept of McDonaldization with his 1993 book,  The McDonaldization of Society.  Since that time the concept has become central within the field of sociology and especially within the sociology of globalization .

According to Ritzer, the McDonaldization of society is a phenomenon that occurs when society, its institutions, and its organizations are adapted to have the same characteristics that are found in fast-food chains. These include efficiency, calculability, predictability and standardization, and control.

Ritzer's theory of McDonaldization is an update on classical sociologist Max Weber's theory of how scientific rationality produced bureaucracy , which became the central organizing force of modern societies through much of the twentieth century. According to Weber, the modern bureaucracy was defined by hierarchical roles, compartmentalized knowledge and roles, a perceived merit-based system of employment and advancement, and the legal-rationality authority of the rule of law. These characteristics could be observed (and still can be) throughout many aspects of societies around the world.

According to Ritzer, changes within science, economy, and culture have shifted societies away from Weber's bureaucracy to a new social structure and order that he calls McDonaldization. As he explains in his book, there are four principles of McDonaldization.

• Efficiency  entails a managerial focus on minimizing the time required to complete individual tasks as well as that required to complete the whole operation or process of production and distribution.
• Calculability  is a focus on quantifiable objectives (counting things) rather than subjective ones (evaluation of quality).
• Predictability and standardization  are found in repetitive and routinized production or service delivery processes and in the consistent output of products or experiences that are identical or close to it (predictability of the consumer experience).
• Control within McDonaldization is wielded by management to ensure that workers appear and act the same on a moment-to-moment and daily basis. It also refers to the use of robots and technology to reduce or replace human employees wherever possible.

Ritzer asserts that these characteristics are not only observable in production, work, and in the consumer experience , but that their defining presence in these areas has a ripple effect on all aspects of social life. McDonaldization affects our values, preferences, goals, and worldviews, our identities, and our social relationships. Further, sociologists recognize that McDonaldization is a global phenomenon, driven by Western corporations, the economic power and cultural dominance of the West, and as such it leads to a global homogenization of economic and social life.

The Downside of McDonaldization

After laying out in his book how McDonaldization works, Ritzer explains that this narrow focus on rationality actually produces irrationality. He observed, "Most specifically, irrationality means that rational systems are unreasonable systems. By that, I mean that they deny the basic humanity, the human reason, of the people who work within or are served by them." Many people have no doubt encountered what Ritzer describes here, when the human capacity for reason seems to be not at all present in transactions or experiences are marred by rigid adherence to the rules and policies of an organization. Those who work under these conditions often experience them as dehumanizing as well.

This is because McDonaldization does not require a skilled workforce. Focusing on the four key characteristics that produce McDonaldization has eliminated the need for skilled workers. Workers in these conditions engage in repetitive, routinized, highly focused, and compartmentalized tasks that are quickly and cheaply taught, and thus easy to replace. This kind of work devalues labor and takes away workers' bargaining power. Sociologists observe that this kind of work has reduced workers' rights and wages in the U.S. and around the world, which is exactly why workers at places like McDonald's, Amazon, and Walmart are leading the fight for a living wage in the U.S. Meanwhile in China, workers who produce Apple products face similar, if not worse, conditions and struggles.

The characteristics of McDonaldization have crept into the consumer experience too, with free consumer labor folded into the production process. Ever bus your own table at a restaurant or café? Dutifully follow the instructions to assemble Ikea furniture? Pick your own apples, pumpkins, or blueberries? Check yourself out at the grocery store? Then you have been socialized to complete the production or distribution process for free, thus aiding a company in achieving efficiency and control.

Sociologists observe the characteristics of McDonaldization in other areas of life, like education and media too, with a clear shift from quality to quantifiable measures over time, standardization, and efficiency playing significant roles in both, and control too.

Look around, and you will be surprised to find that you will notice the impacts of McDonaldization throughout your life.

• Ritzer, George. "The McDonaldization of Society: 20th Anniversary Edition." Los Angeles: Sage, 2013.
• Definition of the Sociological Imagination and Overview of the Book
• Understanding Durkheim's Division of Labor
• Émile Durkheim: "Suicide: A Study in Sociology"
• The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life
• Malcolm Gladwell's "The Tipping Point"
• The Main Points of "The Communist Manifesto"
• The Social Transformation of American Medicine
• An Overview of the Book Democracy in America
• Overview of The History of Sexuality
• The Asch Conformity Experiments
• A Book Overview: "The Protestant Ethic and The Spirit Of Capitalism"
• Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity
• Savage Inequalities: Children in America’s Schools
• Famous Sociologists
• What Is Symbolic Interactionism?
• Major Sociological Theories

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Download Free PDF

The McDonaldization of higher education

2017 saw the publication of 'Beyond McDonaldization: Visions of Higher Education' (Routledge), the first chapter of which, 'Beyond the McDonaldization of Higher Education', develops and updates the ideas in this paper, which is an edited and revised version of the 'Introduction' to Dennis Hayes and Robin Wynyard’s book 'The McDonaldization of Higher Education' (Bergin and Garvey 2002). This well-received book introduced, and presented some criticisms of, the concept of 'McDonaldization' and examined the consequences of the process of McDonaldization to the university. A notable idea in the 2002 book was the concept of the 'therapeutic university' which, in part, explained the acquiescence of academics and students to the bureaucratising aspects of McDonaldization. The term is now widely used to describe a cultural climate in universities that sees today’s students as emotionally vulnerable and incapable of coping with challenging ideas.N/

Related papers

SAGE Open, 2018

Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8, 2019

The landscape of the contemporary university has changed radically because of the adoption of neoliberal policies and the emergence of knowledge societies driven by the global knowledge economy. According to Sutherland-Smith and Satmarsh (2011), contemporary universities have been reconfigured as engines of economic growth, which has led to the erosion of ethical principles, and conduct in universities is ‘now driven by corporate interest, competitive individualism, and the intensification of audit and surveillance regimes’. Ball (2003) points out that performativity produces fabrications, that is, the presentation of self within particular registers of meaning in which only certain possibilities of being have value. In the neoliberal university, we are witnessing a phenomenon coined by Haggerty (2004), called ‘ethics creep’. Ethics creep refers to the expansion of ethical regulation from the biomedical sciences to the human and social sciences – referred to by some as the biomedica...

This chapter is about the marketisation of the modern university and its transaction with students. It identifies opportunities for responding to the challenges associated with marketisation. While appealing to the idea of knowledge for its own sake as a public good is an important part of preserving the idea of a university, more needs to be done if there is to be an adequate response. Responding to the challenges of marketisation requires active and constructive engagement in means as well as ends while resisting their excesses. While the idea of the university is typically constructed as an end worth advocating for, there is growing separation between this and the reality of the contemporary means of engaging with students – in market terms, via the university–student transaction.

Using a Habermasian framework initially, the article discusses changes in the working lifeworld of academics as a result of colonisation by system imperatives, understood in the sense of a growing instrumentalism to control teaching, learning, assessment and course design. At the same time, 'crisis tendencies' affecting legitimation can also be detected. Substantive issues include the role of mythical accounts of organisations, both official managerial ones expressed in Change Academy documents, for example, and unofficial ones expressed surreptitiously by academic staff. These include stories about instrumental coping with quality regimes, scathing commentaries on various aspects of managerialism, and a tendency to 'teach to the test' (matching student instrumentalism) in order to square the circle of widening intakes without extra resources while maintaining 'standards'.

The Journal of Higher Education, 1972

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

SAGE Open, 4(2): 1-14., 2014

Solsko Polje, 2018

Perspectives in Education, 2021

Centre for Higher Education Futures, 2021

DIALOGUE AND UNIVERSALISM (Vol. XXV No. 2/2015): 256-68.

Through a Glass Darkly: The Social Sciences Look at the Neoliberal University, 2015

Http Dx Doi Org 10 1080 03075070902771879, 2009

Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2018

Organization, 2020

British Journal of Educational Studies, 1993

Encounters and conflicts in the city group, 2016

Related topics

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

The McDonaldization of Society

Into the Digital Age

Sociological Theory | Introductory Sociology | Sociology of Consumption | Contemporary Sociological Theory

• Request Instructor Sample
• DESCRIPTION

Chapter 1: Introduction

Chapter 2: efficiency and calculability: consumers 1, chapter 3: predictability and control: consumers 2, chapter 4: efficiency and calculability: mcjobs and other mcdonaldized occupations 1, chapter 5: predictability and control: mcjobs and other mcdonaldized occupations 2, chapter 6: irrationality: the basic dimensions.

• Ch. 1 and Ch. 2 from the previous edition have been combined to give a more streamlined introduction to McDonaldization past and present.
• Ch. 6, on the irrationality associated with highly rational McDonaldized systems, includes a new discussion of discrimination by McDonald’s against Black employees, store managers and franchise owners .
• Updated literature, data, and examples throughout provide students with a better reflection of current realities.
• A new Appendix, “McDonaldization in the Age of COVID-19 ,” offers insights into early attempts to apply rationality to a global pandemic that is among the most irrational of events.
• McDonaldization applies Max Weber's rationalization thesis to the contemporary era. While Weber focused on bureaucracies as the "iron cages" of rationalization in his time, the central premise of this book is that the fast food restaurant has become the model for the rationalization process today.
• The book examines ways in which fast food businesses have created a system of operation based on efficiency , calculability, predictability , and control , and how the same principles have been applied to other settings and contexts such as motel chains, “big box” stores, churches, child care centers, college rankings, health care providers, the internet, and political participation.

Session Timeout

McDonaldization of Society (Definition + Examples)

In recent years, many of us have noticed a change in the way our world functions. From the foods we eat to the way we shop, there's a certain predictability and standardization that seems to be taking over. But what is behind this shift, and why does it matter? Enter the concept of the "McDonaldization of Society."

McDonaldization of Society is the process by which principles of the fast-food industry—like efficiency, predictability, and control—have come to dominate almost every aspect of our lives, from education to entertainment and beyond. It's a term that captures how our modern society has adopted the practices of a fast-food restaurant, emphasizing speed, uniformity, and convenience.

This article aims to unpack this phenomenon, delving deep into its origins, dimensions, and the implications for our everyday lives. As we journey together, we'll explore both the allure and the challenges posed by a world increasingly molded by the McDonaldization process.

What is "McDonaldization"?

The global fast-food industry, characterized by its quick service and uniform products, has left an indelible mark on the modern world. Leading the charge in this industry transformation is the iconic McDonald’s , with its golden arches recognized in nearly every corner of the globe.

Rise of McDonald’s: A success story

McDonald's began as a humble drive-in restaurant in San Bernardino, California, in 1940. Founded by brothers Richard and Maurice McDonald, their business model prioritized speed, low costs, and a consistent product.

This model quickly attracted attention, and by 1955, Ray Kroc , an American salesman, saw the potential and collaborated with the brothers to begin franchising the brand. The rest, as they say, is history.

Today, there are over 39,000 McDonald’s outlets worldwide, serving millions of customers daily.

But the influence of McDonald's is not merely restricted to the ubiquity of its restaurants. The methodologies and principles employed by McDonald’s became a template for many other industries.

The success of the fast-food chain emphasized the value of efficiency , standardization , and scalability . It wasn't long before businesses across various sectors started adopting this approach, from retail and education to healthcare and entertainment.

How the principles of fast-food have seeped into other areas of society

Imagine going to a doctor's office and having a 'standardized' checkup, where every patient undergoes the same tests irrespective of individual needs—this is McDonaldization in healthcare.

Or think of modern education systems, where standardized tests dictate the value of a student's learning, often sidelining critical thinking and creativity.

The world of entertainment isn't immune either. Blockbuster movies are now frequently built on tried-and-true formulas, ensuring box office success but often sacrificing originality.

Similarly, shopping experiences have been transformed. No matter where you are in the world, walking into chain stores like Walmart or Ikea offers a strikingly familiar experience, with standardized products and layouts.

This permeation of fast-food principles into diverse sectors is no accident. Businesses saw the success of McDonald's and recognized an opportunity to replicate that success in their own domains. By ensuring predictability and efficiency, they could appeal to a broad audience while keeping costs down.

However, as we'll see in the upcoming sections, while there are undeniable benefits to this McDonaldization trend, there are also significant concerns about what we might be sacrificing in the name of efficiency and standardization.

The Four Dimensions of McDonaldization

To fully grasp the scope of McDonaldization, we need to delve into its four core dimensions as outlined by George Ritzer . These pillars not only serve as the foundation for the concept but also help us understand its widespread influence .

1. Efficiency

Efficiency refers to the optimum method for completing a task—the quickest and least costly way to achieve an end.

We see efficiency everywhere in modern life:

• Self-service kiosks in supermarkets and airports expedite the check-out process.
• Drive-thru services in restaurants and banks save consumers from leaving their vehicles.
• Automated customer support chats immediately provide answers to frequently asked questions.

While efficiency can save time and streamline experiences, it isn't without drawbacks. For instance, the efficiency of self-checkout lines might reduce waiting times but can also lead to job reductions. Similarly, while a drive-thru offers convenience, it can contribute to a more sedentary lifestyle.

2. Calculability

Calculability places emphasis on quantitative aspects over quality. It's the notion that bigger is better, and that numerical values can be an indicator of success or value.

Some examples include:

• Restaurants, especially fast-food chains, promoting large portion sizes as a measure of value for money.
• Educational systems increasingly focusing on grades and test scores, sometimes at the expense of genuine understanding and holistic development.
• The social media sphere counting followers, likes, and views as markers of popularity or content value.

By focusing on sheer numbers, we sometimes overlook the qualitative aspects. A meal might be large but nutritionally poor. A student might score high but lack critical thinking skills. A viral video might get views, but does it have lasting impact or value?

3. Predictability

Predictability is about uniform and standardized services or products, ensuring the consumer knows what to expect.

• A Big Mac tastes nearly the same whether you're in Tokyo or Toronto.
• Chain stores, like Gap or Starbucks, maintain similar layouts and offerings globally.
• Hollywood sequels or remakes offer familiar storylines, banking on previous success.

Predictability comforts consumers but stifles creativity and uniqueness. While predictability provides a sense of comfort and reduces risk for consumers, it can lead to a homogenized culture where local flavors and innovations are overshadowed by globalized, standardized offerings.

Control, in the context of McDonaldization, refers to the standardization and regimentation to ensure consistency. This is often achieved through automation or strict procedural guidelines.

• Scripted interactions and responses in customer service roles.
• Automation in industries, like car manufacturing or packaging, where robots perform tasks previously done by humans.
• The use of surveillance cameras and data analytics to monitor and control consumer behavior in stores.

The emphasis on control can limit personal autonomy, both for workers and consumers. While automation can lead to increased production efficiency, it also raises concerns about job displacement and the erosion of human skills.

As we continue to navigate our way through this McDonaldized world, it becomes increasingly important to weigh the conveniences it offers against the potential societal costs.

The next sections will delve deeper into the wider implications of this phenomenon and how society is responding to its challenges.

What are the Impacts of McDonaldization?

Max Weber’s theory of rationalization

Max Weber 's concept of "rationalization" profoundly impacts our understanding of modern society. Born in the latter half of the 19th century, Weber observed the rapid changes of the Industrial Revolution and the resultant shifts in societal structures.

Rationalization, for Weber, wasn't just about the mechanization of tasks; it was a broader cultural phenomenon.

In its essence, rationalization signified the rise of clear, calculable procedures and tasks in everyday life, steadily displacing traditions, values, and emotions. This shift wasn't just seen in industries; it permeated arts, religion, and even interpersonal relationships.

As societies championed logic and efficiency, many traditional practices and beliefs were rendered obsolete.

How McDonaldization is a form of Weber’s iron cage

Weber's "iron cage" is a haunting metaphor that beautifully encapsulates the dangers of unchecked rationalization.

As structures and systems prioritize efficiency, predictability, and calculability, there's an inadvertent sidelining of humanistic and emotional components. We become prisoners in a cage of our own making, constrained by the very systems meant to streamline our lives.

The global spread of McDonald's and its principles exemplify this concern. Its staggering success isn't just in its tasty burgers but in its ability to offer a predictable experience worldwide.

This global uniformity, while comforting to a traveler seeking a familiar meal in a foreign land, also means a dilution of local culinary practices and flavors.

In essence, McDonaldization can be seen as the embodiment of Weber's fears—a society so streamlined that it loses touch with its unique, local, and humanistic elements.

The danger of dehumanization in an overly rationalized society

Dehumanization, a significant concern in an excessively rationalized world, doesn't just refer to automation replacing human jobs . It encompasses the loss of human touch, warmth, and individuality in various societal sectors.

For instance, consider healthcare. In a rationalized medical system, patients might be seen as numbers or cases rather than individuals with unique stories. Quick, standardized tests could become the norm, sacrificing nuanced diagnoses and personalized care.

Education faces similar challenges. As systems emphasize standardized tests, there's less room for fostering creativity , critical thinking , and individual learning styles . Students become statistics, with success measured in grades rather than holistic development.

This shift can also impact personal relationships. In a world of online dating, people might be reduced to profiles—lists of attributes and interests—overshadowing the indescribable chemistry and connection that define human relationships.

Critiques of McDonaldization

In understanding these critiques, it becomes evident that while McDonaldization offers undeniable conveniences, it also presents complex challenges that modern societies must navigate.

Social implications:

Loss of cultural diversity: One of the most significant criticisms of McDonaldization is the eroding of local cultures. As global chains spread, local businesses, with their unique flavors and offerings, struggle to survive.

Cities worldwide start to look increasingly similar, with the same chain stores, restaurants, and entertainment options. This homogenization not only reduces the richness of local cultures but also diminishes the diversity of experiences for travelers and locals alike.

Shallow experiences replacing deep engagement: McDonaldization, while offering efficiency, often sacrifices depth. For instance, in the realm of entertainment, the rise of formulaic movies ensures box office success but often lacks original storytelling or character development. Or consider tourism: quick, packaged tours might hit all the popular spots but miss out on genuine cultural immersion.

Economic critiques:

Small businesses struggling against standardized giants: Local enterprises, from cafes to artisanal shops, often can't compete with the pricing, advertising budget, and brand recognition of global giants. This struggle is not just about economics but also about preserving local identities, traditions, and innovations.

Job losses due to automation: Automation is a double-edged sword. On one side, it offers unprecedented efficiency and precision. On the other, it threatens human jobs. As companies adopt automated systems, from manufacturing to customer service, there's growing concern about unemployment rates and the devaluation of human skills.

Environmental concerns:

Overconsumption and waste: The fast-food culture, with its emphasis on quick consumption, often leads to significant waste. Single-use packaging, disposable cutlery, and uneaten food contribute to burgeoning landfills. Moreover, the culture of "more for less" promotes overconsumption, whether it's oversized meals or impulse buying in mega-stores.

Environmental footprint of massive corporations: The sheer scale of operations for global giants means they have sizable environmental impacts. Resource extraction, production processes, transportation, and waste management—all these aspects can have detrimental effects on the planet.

Examples of McDonaldization

1) Fast Food Chains

The most obvious example, with McDonald's leading the charge. Consistent menus, decor, and experiences worldwide.

2) Supermarkets

Large chains like Walmart offer standardized shopping experiences with predictable layouts and products.

3) Coffee Shops

Starbucks, with its uniform drinks, sizes, and store design around the globe.

4) Streaming Platforms

Services like Netflix and Spotify offering algorithm-driven, standardized entertainment recommendations.

5) Online Retail

Amazon's efficient and predictable shopping system, from product search to checkout.

6) Education

Standardized testing systems like the SATs, focusing on uniform assessment criteria.

Global clothing chains like Zara or H&M with standardized designs sold worldwide.

Package tours offering fixed itineraries, hitting the most popular spots with little room for customization.

Chains like Planet Fitness or Gold's Gym offering standardized equipment and training modules.

10) Banking

Automated teller machines (ATMs) providing standardized banking services globally.

11) Healthcare

Quick, standardized health check-ups without comprehensive, personalized analysis.

12) Digital Communication

Platforms like WhatsApp or Facebook Messenger with uniform interfaces and functions.

13) Public Transportation

Subway systems in major cities with predictable routes, timings, and ticketing systems.

14) E-Commerce Platforms

Websites like eBay or Alibaba with standardized buying and selling procedures.

15) Hotel Chains

Brands like Hilton or Marriott offering predictable rooms and services worldwide.

16) Online Dating

Platforms like Tinder or Bumble reducing human connection to standardized profiles and swiping mechanics.

17) Self-Service Kiosks

In places like airports, fast-food chains, or movie theaters, replacing human interactions.

18) Subscription Boxes

Services like Blue Apron or Birchbox offering a predictable set of products on a regular schedule.

19) Mobile Operating Systems

iOS and Android's standardized user interfaces across devices.

20) Real Estate Platforms

Websites like Zillow or Rightmove offering standardized property listings.

21) Airlines

Most major airlines offer a very standardized booking, boarding, and in-flight experience.

22) Book Retail

Chains like Barnes & Noble or Waterstones with predictable store layouts and product offerings.

23) Music Festivals

Large-scale events offering similar line-ups, amenities, and experiences annually.

24) Car Rentals

Companies like Hertz or Enterprise providing a standardized vehicle rental process worldwide.

25) Delivery Services

Companies like FedEx or DHL offering standardized packaging, tracking, and delivery times.

These examples underline the widespread influence of McDonaldization across various industries and sectors, emphasizing efficiency, predictability, and scalability.

Pushing Back Against McDonaldization

While McDonaldization has significantly influenced various facets of society, it's essential to recognize that there have been conscious efforts by individuals, communities, and organizations to resist or counteract its effects. This section delves into the diverse responses that have arisen in the face of this pervasive trend.

1. Embracing Slow Movements

The "Slow Movement" advocates for a shift away from the hustle and rapidity of modern life to embrace a more measured, relaxed pace. Originating from the Slow Food movement in Italy during the 1980s, it was a direct response to the spread of fast food and the erosion of local culinary traditions.

Some examples:

• Slow Food: A global movement that promotes local ingredients, traditional cooking methods, and communal eating.
• Slow Travel: Encourages travelers to spend longer periods in one location to immerse themselves in the local culture, rather than rush through tourist hotspots.
• Slow Living: Focuses on mindfulness, being present, and savoring life's small moments, instead of constantly seeking the next big thing.

These slow movements, by championing quality over quantity and depth over breadth, have fostered communities that prioritize genuine experiences, deep connections, and sustainable practices.

2. Supporting Local and Artisanal Businesses

As a counter-response to global chains, there's been a burgeoning support for local artisans, farmers, and businesses.

• Farmers' Markets: They not only offer fresh, locally-sourced produce but also strengthen community ties and support sustainable agricultural practices.
• Independent Bookstores: In an era of e-readers and online retail giants, independent bookstores have made a comeback by offering curated selections, hosting community events, and providing a personal touch.
• Craft Breweries and Cafés: These establishments emphasize unique flavors, local ingredients, and a community-centric approach, standing in stark contrast to standardized global chains.

By supporting local, people invest in their communities, encourage diversity of products and services, and resist the homogenization brought about by McDonaldization.

3. Reviving Traditional Practices

In various sectors, there's been a resurgence of traditional methods and practices as a counterpoint to modern standardization.

• Education: Some schools are reintroducing arts, crafts, and holistic teaching methods to foster creativity and individuality.
• Medicine: There's a growing interest in alternative medicine, emphasizing holistic health, and treatments rooted in ancient practices.
• Architecture: Instead of generic skyscrapers, there's a movement to preserve and restore historic buildings, respecting local architectural traditions.

These efforts highlight the value of diverse traditions, wisdom passed down through generations, and the importance of preserving the cultural mosaic of societies.

4. Advocacy and Conscious Consumption

Armed with information and a desire for change, many consumers are pushing back against the detrimental aspects of McDonaldization.

• Ethical Consumption: Purchasing products that are sustainable, ethically-sourced, and environmentally-friendly.
• Digital Detox: Taking breaks from the digital world to reconnect with oneself, nature, and loved ones.
• Activism: Grassroots movements and campaigns that advocate against the negative impacts of large corporations, especially in the environmental realm.

This growing consciousness among consumers holds corporations accountable, promotes ethical practices, and paves the way for a more sustainable future.

While McDonaldization has deeply rooted itself in modern society, it's evident that many are not merely passive consumers of this trend. Across the globe, individuals and communities are actively seeking balance, valuing traditions, and promoting diverse, enriching experiences.

This pushback reminds us that while efficiency and predictability have their merits, there's immeasurable value in the unique, the slow, and the human.

The Future of McDonaldization

While we have assessed the breadth of McDonaldization and the various responses to it, it's crucial to understand its trajectory. What might the future look like in the face of this pervasive trend?

While it's challenging to predict the future with certainty, it's evident that McDonaldization, like all societal trends, will continue to evolve. It will be shaped by technological advancements, environmental concerns, cultural shifts, and economic changes.

As societies, it's crucial to be proactive, harnessing the benefits of McDonaldization while being mindful of its challenges. Whether it's through informed consumer choices, policy decisions, or grassroots movements, the power to shape the future trajectory of McDonaldization lies with us all.

Technological Advancements and Their Implications

The rapid progression of technology, especially artificial intelligence, robotics, and augmented reality, will play a significant role in how McDonaldization evolves.

Potential Outcomes:

• Personalization: While standardization is a hallmark of McDonaldization, advanced data analytics could lead to hyper-personalized experiences. For instance, streaming platforms like Netflix already curate content based on individual preferences, balancing standardization with personalization.
• Automation on Overdrive: As AI and robotics become more sophisticated, there's potential for even more sectors to become McDonaldized. Everything from driving to healthcare might be standardized, presenting both conveniences and challenges.
• Virtual Experiences: With the rise of virtual reality, standardized experiences might move from the physical to the virtual realm. Virtual fast food, anyone?

Environmental Concerns and Sustainability

As global awareness of environmental challenges grows, there will be increased scrutiny on McDonaldized industries for their environmental impact.

• Green McDonaldization: Companies may adopt sustainable practices, combining the efficiency of McDonaldization with eco-friendly processes. Think biodegradable packaging and renewable energy sources.
• Consumer Demand: As consumers demand sustainability, businesses that don't adapt might face backlash or become obsolete.

Cultural Shifts and Globalization

As cultures continue to intermingle and influence one another, McDonaldization will inevitably be shaped by these interactions.

• Hybrid Models: While global chains might spread, they could incorporate local flavors and preferences. We can already see this with McDonald’s adapting their menu for different countries, offering dishes like the Teriyaki Burger in Japan or the McSpicy in India.
• Rise of Local: While it may seem counterintuitive, globalization could also bolster local pride and lead to a renaissance of local businesses and traditions as a form of cultural preservation.

Economic Shifts

Economic changes, from recessions to the growth of new markets, will inevitably influence McDonaldization.

• Decentralization: As digital currencies and decentralized platforms rise, there might be a move away from giant conglomerates to more localized, individual enterprises.
• Economic Vulnerabilities: Over-reliance on McDonaldized industries might make economies vulnerable to systemic shocks. For instance, if a crucial standardized process fails, it can have cascading effects.

Balancing McDonaldization

1. conscious consumerism.

In an era where McDonaldization pervades various aspects of society, fostering a sense of conscious consumerism has become more significant than ever. By opting to educate themselves about the brands they support, consumers can uncover the values and practices that lie beneath the surface of polished advertisements and catchy slogans.

This knowledge empowers individuals, enabling them to make informed decisions about where they direct their resources, ultimately promoting ethical and sustainable business practices. In turn, this fosters a market environment where responsibility and ethics are rewarded, pushing even the largest corporations to reflect on their actions.

Additionally, by consciously choosing to allocate a portion of their budget to local businesses, consumers contribute to a diversified and resilient market landscape. Supporting local artisans, producers, and service providers not only helps in preserving local traditions and crafts but also in promoting economic diversity.

This symbiotic relationship between consumers and local enterprises acts as a bulwark against the homogenizing effects of McDonaldization, ensuring that the unique flavors of local culture continue to thrive amidst global brands.

2. Policy-making and Governance

The role of governments and regulatory bodies in balancing the effects of McDonaldization cannot be overstated. By implementing policies that encourage the growth and development of small businesses, governments can foster a diverse and robust economic landscape.

Through initiatives such as tax breaks, grants, and training programs, local enterprises are given the tools and resources they need to compete with larger, McDonaldized entities. This not only enhances economic stability by preventing the formation of monopolies but also aids in the preservation of local traditions and cultural heritage.

Furthermore, the regulation of large corporations is essential in ensuring ethical business practices and consumer protection. By holding corporations accountable for their actions, governments safeguard the interests of the public, ensuring that the pursuit of efficiency and profit does not come at the expense of societal well-being.

Such regulatory measures serve as a check against the potential pitfalls of McDonaldization, promoting a balanced and equitable economic environment.

3. Embracing Technological Advancements Responsibly

Technology, a driving force behind McDonaldization, presents both opportunities and challenges. Ensuring digital literacy through educational systems empowers individuals to navigate the digital landscape safely and responsibly.

A digitally literate populace is better equipped to make informed decisions , utilize technology for personal and communal benefit, and mitigate the risks associated with online platforms. This form of literacy acts as a foundational pillar in a society where technology and McDonaldization are intertwined.

Moreover, striking the right balance between automation and human labor is crucial. While automation enhances efficiency and reduces costs, it is imperative to assess its impact on employment.

Finding a middle ground ensures that the benefits of technological advancements are harnessed without leading to widespread job redundancies and economic disparities. It's a delicate equilibrium, wherein progress does not overshadow the value of human labor and contribution.

4. Promoting Cultural Exchanges

In a McDonaldized world where global brands dominate, fostering cultural exchanges provides a breath of fresh air. School and business exchange programs offer individuals the chance to immerse themselves in different cultures, fostering mutual understanding, appreciation, and respect. These interactions serve as a reminder of the richness of cultural diversity and the value of preserving unique traditions and customs.

Similarly, celebrating local festivals and traditions in urbanized settings contributes to the preservation of cultural identity. These celebrations act as a beacon of cultural pride and unity, offering both locals and visitors a taste of the richness that lies beyond standardized experiences. Such initiatives cultivate a sense of belonging and community, creating a vibrant tapestry of cultural expressions in a world marked by uniformity.

5. Advocating for Environmental Sustainability

As the McDonaldization model continues to spread, advocating for environmental sustainability becomes increasingly crucial. Encouraging businesses of all sizes to adopt eco-friendly practices is a step towards mitigating the environmental impact of large-scale, standardized industries.

Green initiatives, from waste reduction to energy conservation, contribute to the well-being of the planet and the sustainability of business operations.

Consumer demand for sustainable practices plays a pivotal role in steering companies towards greener paths. By voicing their preferences and expectations, consumers can influence corporate behavior, pushing even the largest conglomerates to reevaluate their environmental footprint.

This dynamic interaction between consumer demand and corporate responsibility paves the way for a future where McDonaldization and environmental stewardship coexist.

In a world increasingly characterized by the principles of McDonaldization—efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control—it’s essential to step back and assess how this phenomenon shapes our societies, economies, and cultures. The McDonaldization of society mirrors our fast-paced lives, where convenience is often prized above all else.

However, as we’ve explored, it’s crucial to acknowledge the multifaceted impacts this has on the diversity, authenticity, and richness of human experiences and environments.

Through conscious consumerism, individuals have the power to shape market dynamics, supporting businesses that uphold ethical, sustainable practices and celebrating the uniqueness of local offerings.

Governments and regulatory bodies can strike a balance by fostering an ecosystem where small enterprises flourish alongside large corporations, ensuring a diverse economic landscape and the preservation of cultural heritage.

Education plays a pivotal role in equipping the next generation with the critical thinking skills necessary to navigate and question the norms of a McDonaldized world. By fostering awareness, encouraging community engagement, and exploring alternatives, educational institutions can cultivate minds that value diversity and human connection.

The media, a powerful shaper of public discourse, has the responsibility to raise awareness, promote diverse narratives, and encourage responsible consumption.

The strategies and best practices outlined serve as a roadmap to navigating the complexities of McDonaldization. They highlight the importance of striking a balance between embracing the benefits of efficiency and standardization and preserving the values of diversity, authenticity, and environmental sustainability.

By taking collective and individual actions, society can mitigate the potential downsides of McDonaldization, ensuring a harmonious coexistence between the global and the local, the standardized and the unique.

The McDonaldization of society is not a force we are powerless against. Through awareness, thoughtful dialogue, and intentional action, we can shape a world where the principles of McDonaldization coexist with the diverse tapestry of human culture and experience. It is a continuous journey of reflection, adaptation, and balance, aiming for a future that harmoniously blends the conveniences of the modern world with the rich, varied heritage of our global community.

Resources for Self Education

These resources provide a wealth of information about the ethical, environmental, and social practices of businesses, helping consumers make informed and responsible choices. By utilizing these resources, individuals can contribute to fostering a more ethical and sustainable marketplace.

• Better Business Bureau (BBB) Website: https://www.bbb.org/ BBB provides information about businesses and charities to help consumers make informed decisions. It offers reviews, ratings, and accreditation status for a wide range of businesses.
• Ethical Consumer Website: https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/ This resource rates companies based on their ethical and environmental record, with categories including animal testing, product sustainability, workers' rights, and more.
• Good On You Website: https://goodonyou.eco/ Good On You rates fashion brands based on their impact on people, the planet, and animals, aiming to help consumers make ethical and sustainable fashion choices.
• Fair Trade Certification Website: https://www.fairtradecertified.org/ Fair Trade Certified products come from farmers and workers who are justly compensated, helping consumers make choices for the common good.
• B Corporation (B Corp) Certification Website: https://bcorporation.net/ B Corps are companies that meet the highest standards of verified social and environmental performance, public transparency, and legal accountability to balance profit and purpose.
• Rainforest Alliance Certification Website: https://www.rainforest-alliance.org/ The Rainforest Alliance works to conserve biodiversity and ensure sustainable livelihoods by transforming land-use practices, business practices, and consumer behavior.
• Greenpeace Website: https://www.greenpeace.org/international/ Greenpeace is a non-governmental environmental organization that acts to change attitudes and behavior to protect and conserve the environment.
• World Fair Trade Organization (WFTO) Website: https://wfto.com/ WFTO is a global network of organizations representing the Fair Trade supply chain, from farmers and workers to retailers.
• The Living Wage Foundation Website: https://www.livingwage.org.uk/ This foundation recognizes and celebrates employers that agree to pay their workers a real living wage, calculated based on the cost of living.
• Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Website: https://sdgs.un.org/goals The United Nations’ SDGs are a universal call to action to end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure that all people enjoy peace and prosperity.
• The Ethisphere Institute Website: https://worldsmostethicalcompanies.com/ The Ethisphere Institute annually publishes a list of the World’s Most Ethical Companies, recognizing companies that demonstrate ethical leadership and corporate behavior.
• U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) Website: https://www.usgbc.org/ USGBC is committed to a sustainable, prosperous future through LEED, the leading program for green buildings and communities.
• Consumer Reports Website: https://www.consumerreports.org/ Consumer Reports is an independent, nonprofit member organization that works to create a fair and just marketplace for all by testing products, highlighting superior products, and raising consumer awareness.

Related posts:

• Cultural Diffusion (Definition + 30 Examples)
• Ethnocentric Bias In Psychology (Examples + Solutions)
• Acculturation (Definition + 20 Examples)
• 49+ Tragedy of the Commons Examples (Definition + Solutions)
• 47+ Social Problem Examples (Issues In Society)

Reference this article:

About The Author

PracticalPie.com is a participant in the Amazon Associates Program. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow Us On:

Youtube Facebook Instagram X/Twitter

Psychology Resources

Developmental

Personality

Relationships

Psychologists

Serial Killers

Psychology Tests

Personality Quiz

Memory Test

Depression test

Type A/B Personality Test

© PracticalPsychology. All rights reserved

Privacy Policy | Terms of Use

Ethnography.com

~ a group blog on a variety of topics related to anthropology, sociology, and ordinary people ~

The McDonaldization of Higher Education

George Ritzer proposed one of the most significant contemporary sociological theories when he developed the theory of McDonaldization.

We have a tendency to McDonaldize, or rationalize traditional processes in Western culture. We like being able to bet on an outcome following a set pattern of small steps, that lead to a larger outcome. Through this rationalization process, we compartmentalize tasks, evaluate at each level, specialize skills and in the process de-skill individuals, which makes us better at our individual jobs, but less competent overall. It’s a fantastic model for building cars on an assembly line, as Henry Ford did a century ago. And when you make a billion hamburgers and oversee millions of workers, it’s a perfect business model that makes each worker replaceable at a moments notice, because the function of a worker is replaced, not the person him or herself. Ironically, in a highly specialized system, no one has a highly complex skill set. As an employer, having a perfectly McDonaldized work environment, where labor is cheap, tasks are completed more efficiently, production is more predictable, and we can prove our own worth by the number of hamburgers we sell in a given day, is the best scenario for financial success in America.

I’ve watched the McDonaldization of the Education system for the last 10 years or so, but the pace of the process of rationalization has accelerated in the last few years.

In higher education, this rationalization was first highly developed and very successful at for-profit universities. I considered teaching at a for-profit university many years ago and even completed the for-profit university’s instructor training, was assigned a class to teach, and after seeing the curriculum, realized I didn’t want to teach that way. Every day, every hour, and every 15 minutes was dictated by the course outline, every assignment was created by the university, and I was to follow a strict grading rubric that left no room for using my own judgment on what constituted a superior paper, and what was just mediocre. As long as a student completed X, Y, and Z, they would pass the assignment and the class. Quality didn’t matter, either in individual assignments or classes. Once a student completed enough of X,Y, and Z, they would complete the class; once they completed enough classes, they earned a degree.

Traditional universities used to balk at educating people this way. A few universities were so opposed that instead of traditional letter grades, professors wrote summaries of each student and recommended whether a student should move forward to a new class or not. Professors looked for quality, not quantity, when our system of higher education was first created.

As a child, I dreamed of being a college professor for many reasons. I had a vision of being able to read great works of literature, develop new ideas, write books and articles that changed the way people think, and guide students in their quest for knowledge. I craved information when I was a kid, and craved the conversations that my parents and aunts and uncles had around my grandmother’s dinner table every Sunday. I read the local newspaper every day by the time I was ten or so, and enjoyed debates with my teachers and catching people off guard with trivial bits of current events.

In short, I loved to learn, and I loved to help others see the world in a different way than they had before.

As an undergraduate student here at Chico State, even 20 years ago, we were expected to write in every general education class we were required to take, and we received extensive feed back from the majority of our professors, then would re-write, and resubmit. It was a give and take learning process that allowed the professor to gauge how well the student understood the course’s material. I fell in love with the process, the learning that could occur, the knowledge transfer, and every time a professor would say, “I never thought of it this way.”

I loved my college years, not for the social aspect, but for the knowledge and the quest. I got to take classes just because they sounded interesting. I spent nearly 9 years earning my undergraduate degree part time at a community college, then a university, earned over 200 semester units (a bachelor’s degree was 124 at the time), and I don’t regret one class in that time. The knowledge was the most important thing.

Today, the California State University system does not require writing in general education classes and fewer and fewer professors require writing in their classes as a result. There is very little back and forth interaction to gauge development and understanding. Assessing student progress and understanding of the material presented in class is completed largely through multiple-choice tests, and nothing more. If a student completes X, Y, and Z, then they pass.

This rationalization is the result of higher demand on faculty and campus resources and has changed education, from less quality to more quantity. In California, only about 35% of students complete their bachelor’s degree in 4 years, and just over 65% graduate within 6 year s. It is a rate that is unacceptable to the general taxpayer who subsidizes the tuition for California students, and to the Administration, who market the California State University system partially for how quickly a student will likely graduate. As a result, the Administration called upon the California State University system to increase the number of students we serve at each campus, and decrease the time it takes to complete a bachelor’s degree. At the same time of this demand from Administration, there has been a loss of approximately 600 full time faculty at the California State University system since 2008 , with a decrease of only 3,000 Full Time Equivalent Students [FTES] in the same period.

The only way to fulfill this request is through rationalization.

Rationalization is edging in on the California State University system through highly specialized professors with vast expertise in only one or two topics, downsizing bachelor degree requirements to fewer units, streamlining general education requirements and decreasing course options, increasing frequency of student assessment of teaching, and the removal of any subjective course assignments to gauge student comprehension of material.

We are doing okay with this model, changing the way we teach, adapting, as Darwin would say, to our environment in order to survive. We’re doing okay, but maybe not for long.

Our most significant issue throughout the university system is this fact: we have lost an enormous number of faculty since the Great Recession, and we are not replacing faculty at a fast enough rate to keep up with the current demand, let alone the projected increased demand in the next 5 years or so.

President Obama released a proposal in early 2015 that would provide free tuition at community colleges nationwide for 2 years for certain programs, so that our youth might have a better chance of having more opportunities for employment. As you can imagine, a presidential proposal that helps my own job security is something I support. There are problems with this proposal, though, especially in a place like California, where we have an inordinately high number of community colleges, and not enough faculty to serve those students today.

College and university faculty often teach at more than one institution, with part time faculty, especially, teaching 2 or 3 classes at each institution. If community colleges begin to offer faculty more classes each semester, the already stressed California State University system (and others like it in the state and across the nation) is likely to suffer since those faculty member may give up classes at the CSU. To make up for this demand, class sizes increase, number of classes increase (full time for lecturers at Chico State in 2005 was 4 classes; today, it’s 5), and faculty will burn out faster due to the increased stress of the job.

But here’s the big problem with President Obama’s proposal, one that cannot be quantified as easily, but will have many more long-term consequences: all colleges must adopt accelerated associate’s degree programs like the ASAP program at The City University of New York.

Accelerated programs have their place, I understand that, and in the President’s proposal for community colleges, he outlines funding for technical colleges, which is where acceleration fits well. Accelerated technical programs, where individuals learn invaluable skills such as computer engineering, auto collision repair, and my own history of paramedic and emergency medical technician, will be the basis for a large portion of jobs in the next 20 years in America.

But liberal arts colleges are not the place for accelerated learning, and McDonaldization, with the most emphasis placed on arbitrary evaluations, the number of students one professor can pack into a lecture hall, and the number of passing grades a professor assigns in one semester. Education at the college level should not be about rote memorization with regurgitation of facts 3 weeks later on an arbitrary exam. Learning, new ideas, innovation, and progress do not happen that way. The greatest lesson we teach through liberal arts colleges is to think critically, to question, to analyze. We cannot teach that, nor can students learn and create new ideas, in a system that emphasizes speed, efficiency, and completely rational thought above all else.

We must be allowed to continue to teach outside the box, rather than teach our students to fill in the circles of a test bubble. President Obama’s proposal undermines education and learning in the liberal arts tradition, it crushes innovation, and critical thought, and that is the last thing we need in America.

Marianne Paiva, recovering paramedic and adrenaline junky who comes to Ethnography.com after 4 years driving ambulances very, very fast. When she gave up life in the fast lane, she decided to study paramedics instead, and wrote the book, Breathe: Essays from a Recovering Paramedic, which every trauma junky and ambulance chaser should buy multiple copies of from Amazon.com.

A professor told her after she finished her B.A. at Chico State in 1999 that she could study paramedics as a vocation, if not a living. This she has done off and on for ten years or so, while also teaching Introduction to Sociology, First Year Experience, Sociology of Stress, Population, Ethnicity and Nationalism, and other courses for California State University, Chico. On slow days in class, she wakes students up with stories about ambulances, and funny stories about freshmen. In her spare time, she gardens, tends to her children, and writes creative Facebook postings, and Ethnography.com blogs. You can connect with Marianne at her website www.mariannepaiva.com and also purchase her collection of essays here from Amazon.com. Marianne Paiva is a lecturer in the department of Sociology at California State University, Chico. Currently an inactive author, awaiting a poke with a sharp stick.

• DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-734x.1983.0601_100.x
• Corpus ID: 264230442

The McDonaldization of Society

• Published in In the Mind's Eye 3 September 2021
• Sociology, Business
• In the Mind's Eye

28 Citations

Macdonaldization and disneyization as globalization trends, corporate sustainability and responsibility 2.0: moral foundations and implications, the increasing centrality of prosumption in the digital capitalist economy, debating labour process theory: the issue of subjectivity and the relevance of poststructuralism, ‘making’ the movement: a case study on the social forums as peculiar spaces of the counter-globalization movement, the ‘must-have’ tourist experience: an exploration of the motivations, expectations, experience and outcomes of volunteer tourists in siem reap, cambodia., book title: digitalization & society, globalization and the advertising industry in china, globalization and its new spaces for (alternative) accounting research, a critique of peter jarvis’s conceptualisation of the lifelong learner in the contemporary cultural context, 4 references, panic encyclopedia: the definitive guide to the postmodern scene, roadside empires : how the chains franchised america, the malling of america: an inside look at the great consumer paradise, grinding it out, related papers.

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

The McDonaldization of Society

• George Ritzer - University of Maryland, USA

Good, lively introduction to globalization that students can easily relate to

The classic text for any course exploring aspects of globalization, culture and consumption. The text provides an up-to-date analysis of the homogenisation (or McDonaldisation) of society, drawing on the most recent examples, which students can easily apply at any level of study. A fundamental and essential text for any course exploring globalisation in the context of Sociology, Geography, Politics or Economics.

This updated edition offers a new chapter which examines Starbucks. Students felt they could relate to many of the updated examples and support the ideas on environmental issues and McDonaldization

Thought provoking, helped make sense of many theories and myths around our changing society.

This is a book that applies classical sociological theory in a very interesting and wise way and so it is very insightful in explaining and understanding sociological theory in practice.

10 Examples of McDonaldization of Society

Chris Drew (PhD)

Dr. Chris Drew is the founder of the Helpful Professor. He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. He is the former editor of the Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education. [Image Descriptor: Photo of Chris]

Learn about our Editorial Process

McDonaldization refers to the homogenization and standardization of the world as a result of globalization and capitalism .

The term was developed by the American sociologist George Ritzer  (b. 1940) in his bestselling work, The McDonaldization of Society (1993).

Rtizer compared the increasing homogenization of global cultures to a fast-food restaurant where efficiency, speed, and uniformity are prized over diversity and quality.

Ritzer showed that the world is increasingly becoming like a McDonald’s outlet where standardization, efficiency, and quantity are valued over diversity, variety, and quality.

The 4 Principles of McDonaldization

The 4 principles of McDonaldization are efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control.

• Efficiency – Efficiency means the most optimal means of doing something. In the context of a McDonald’s, efficiency can be defined as the fastest way hunger can be satisfied. Thus, a McDonaldized entity seeks to achieve a solution in the shortest time possible.
• Calculability – Calculability means that the desired outcome should be objectively quantifiable. In the context of a McDonald’s, this means sales numbers. A McDonald’s outcome seeks to maximize an objective value such as sales rather than aim to fulfil a subjective criterion such as taste and aesthetics that a more upscale restaurant might hanker after. 
• Predictability – Predictability is the standardization of products and services. Customers at all McDonald’s outfits can expect the same service and for the most part, the same menu the world over. Thus, any McDonalidized entity aims for standardization so that its customers know what to expect. 
• Control – Finally, a McDonaldized entity seeks to exert rational-bureaucratic control in order to maximize its output and objectives. This can take the form of providing the same kind of training to all its employees or even replacing humans with non-human systems wherever possible in order to increase efficiency and lower costs. 

McDonaldization Examples

1. mcuniversities.

A McUniversity is a university or college that delivers standardized course material in a fast-tracked delivery mode to a mass audience. It has the aim of maximizing revenues at the expense of quality and diversity of offerings.

Today, this often takes the form of “online degree” where course material is created in advance via videos and students have minimal interaction with professors, allowing the universities to save money on staff.

McUniversities are characterized by greater bureaucratic powers vested in the management and diminished autonomy for academics (Parker & Jary, 1995) .

Just like how McDonald’s has a standard menu across locations, different McUniversities offer the same curriculum to their students.  This minimizes the differences between universities and reduces choice.

Sociologists warn that excessive McDonaldization of education could have adverse effects in the long term, stifling creativity and critical thinking among learners (Hayes & Wynyard, 2002).

2. Junk-food News

Junk food news refers to sensational and  homogenized news that is often of little consequence. It is churned out by media portals at the expense of serious, meticulous journalism.

Such news is typically produced by portals  focused on mass producing news items in the most cost-effective manner in order to maximize views. (Jensen, 2001) This is usually done by following a fixed template in which to package and present news. Much like a McDonald’s then, such news too is the result of efficient production processes meant to deliver news that appeals to the widest possible audience in the shortest possible time. 

A related phenomenon is the proliferation of content farms. Content farm or a content mill is a web portal that churns out high-volume, low-quality, SEO optimized  content in a short period of time with the sole purpose of maximizing page views, and hence maximizing advertising revenue from the web page. Content farms typically employ a large number of low-paid freelance writers, or in many cases, even automated content generation software that mass produce low-value content.

The term McJobs refers to low-skilled, low-paying jobs with a high employee turnover rate that offer bleak career prospects.

The term was coined in the 1980s with the sociologist Amitai Etzioni being among the first to use it in a Washington Post op-ed published in 1986 (Etzioni, 1986).

It was also popularized by the Canadian novelist Douglas Coupland in his influential international bestseller, Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture published in 1994. 

Both Etzioni and Coupland were critical of McJobs, comparing them to junk food that is low on nutrition but is easy to mass-produce. 

Goos and Manning (2003) contrasted McJobs with MacJobs:

• McJobs: Low-skilled, low-paying jobs with high turnover and low career prospects.
• MacJobs: High-skilled and prestigious jobs. This term is derived from Apple Inc’s line of computers and operating systems. Apple Macs are noted for their high-end design and development, representing the state-of-the-art in technology and aesthetics. Similarly, MacJobs have prestige and are state-of-the-art.

The two kinds of jobs symbolized by two of the most instantly recognizable symbols of 21st century consumerism – McDonald’s & Apple Inc – represent opposite ends of the occupational spectrum.

Where a McJob is low paying, low-skilled, and low-prestige, a MacJob is high paying, high-skilled, and prestigious. 

See Also: Types of Blue Collar Jobs and Types of White Collar Jobs

4. McChurch

McChurch is a term applied to religious groups that attempt to apply the principles of corporate consumerism to “sell” themselves, or gain more followers.

In doing so, a church may try to blend in elements of element and spectacle, along with the classic ingredients of efficiency, predictability, and homogeneity.

An example of McChurch are multi-site churches. A multi-site church is one that has multiple branches in a single city, state, country, or even the world.

While the sermon is presented to the gathering at the primary site, the same sermon is broadcast digitally to all the other sites simultaneously, thereby ensuring uniformity. 

In Franchising McChurch: Feeding Our Obsession With Easy Christianty , Thomas White and John Yeats argue that McChurches defeat the very purpose of a church, which is to serve as a place for physical congregation. 

Further, such multi-site churches go against what many Christian theologians go against the fundamental principle of church planting – that new churches should be autonomous and serve the local congregation (White & Yeats, 2009).

5. McDojo/Degree Mill

Dojo is a Japanese term used to refer to a meditation hall. McDojos are low-quality versions of Dojos designed to quickly churn through clients.

With the spread of Japanese martial arts to the west, the term Dojo came to denote a school or institute where training in the martial arts is provided. 

Mastering the martial arts is a process that requires immense self-discipline and patience.

But a number of imitators began to mushroom, promising to offer short-cuts to martial arts experts by offering watered-down training.

Such McDojos typically offer their own certifications or black belts that can be achieved without the years of painstaking effort and training that is required to attain such a qualification from a traditional dojo.

The term McDojo is also sometimes applied to degree mills or diploma mills which are institutions that similarly award fraudulent degrees or diplomas in exchange for money.

6. McMansions

A McMansion is a cheaply designed house that imitates older, more classical architectural forms.

What it lacks in character, it attempts to make up in size.

The term was coined in the 1980s to describe a large number of similar looking suburban houses in the North America that resembled, in the words of one critic: “vinyl Georgian estates and foam Mediterranean villas” (Wagner, 2017).

In their attempt to distinguish themselves from their surroundings, McMansions end up looking similarly outlandish and out of sync with their environment.

McMansions are also sometimes referred to as Garage Mahals, a pun on the Taj Mahal. 

A related and more recent phenomena are McModerns, houses that resemble McMansions in all respects, except that they do not attempt to imitate architectural forms from the distant past.

McModerns are large houses built in a modernist style with usually cheap construction material, similar layouts, and prices going up to a few million dollars.

The term McWorld was coined by the American political scientist Benjamin Barber in 1992 to describe two dominant but opposing forces pulling the world in different directions.

These are: tribal fundamentalism and global homogenization (Barber, 1992).

The McWorld, according to Barber, is the logical culmination of the process of McDonaldization. In the McWorld, the whole world is homogenized, rationalized, and bureaucratized.

A McWorld is characterized by towns that lack unique identifying features, are full of big box stores and mega warehouses rather than cute, quaint, and quirky townships.

8. McLanguage

This couldrefers to the usage of a standardized, overly simplified version of a language diminishing diversity in exchange for efficiency, predictability, and calculability.

Businesses, particularly in the fast-food sector, have played a significant role in globalizing English, thus creating a homogeneous, standardized form of communication that allows for cross-cultural understanding but diminishes linguistic variety.

For instance, the lexical creations of McDonald’s such as ‘McNugget’, ‘McFlurry’, ‘McChicken’, have spread worldwide and have entered everyday English vocabulary.

9. Homogenizaed Internet

A ‘McInternet’ migh refers to the phenomenon of the internet becoming a platform with commodified, uniform content.

This echoes the principles of McDonaldization in which efficiency and predictability govern the net. Companies like Facebook and Google follow the McInternet model, delivering template-based services to a large audience.

For example, Google’s search engine provides immediate, efficient information, yet it can also create a homogeneous experience for its billions of users by serving nearly identical search results, worldwide.

10. McTravel

The McTravel refers to the growing standardization in travel and tourism practices.

The search for efficiency, predictability, and calculability in the tourism sector mirrors the principles of McDonaldization.

This is exhibited in the dominance of budget airlines that offer standardized services, and the prevalence of globally uniform hotel franchises such as Marriott or Hilton.

The rise of ‘cookie-cutter’ holiday packages also illustrates this trend, where trips are pre-planned and prepackaged leaving little room for authentic, individual experiences.

Criticisms of McDonaldization

The main criticism of McDonaldization is that it causes the world to become faceless, impersonal, and rule-based.

Ritzer built his thesis on Max Weber’s earlier theory of rationalization and bureaucratization .

Weber proposed that the modern world is transitioning towards a system of rational-legal authority (such as that wielded by bureaucrats). By contrast, the medieval world was characterized by charismatic authority ( such as that wielded by kings, queens, and warlords). 

Like Ritzer, Weber was critical of this rational-bureaucratic model of society, believing that it would eventually trap individuals in an “iron-cage” of faceless, impersonalized, rule-based governance. In Weber’s own words, the end result of such homogenization would be a world in which:

“not summer’s bloom lies ahead of us, but rather a polar night of icy darkness and hardness” (Weber, 1956).

Nevertheless, others think that as quickly as the world homogenizes, local and indigenous cultures adapt the global to their local needs in a process called glocalization .

“Quantity has a quality all its own”, Joseph Stalin is famously believed to have remarked when his poorly equipped but numerically greater Soviet forces were forced to confront the vastly better trained and equipped Nazi forces during the Second World War.

In the end, the Soviets prevailed. 

McDonaldization works on a similar logic.

Any process that aims to increase output by mass-producing homogenized products or services in the shortest possible time (leading to a dilution of quality, but maximizing of profit) can be conceived of as an example of McDonaldization. 

Barber, B. (1992, March). Jihad vs. McWorld The Atlantic https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1992/03/jihad-vs-mcworld/303882/  

Etzioni, Amitai (1986, August 24). The fast-food factories: McJobs are bad for kids.  The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1986/08/24/the-fast-food-factories-mcjobs-are-bad-for-kids/b3d7bbeb-5e9a-4335-afdd-2030cb7bc775/  

Goos M., & Manning A. (2003) McJobs and MacJobs: The growing polarisation of jobs in the UK. In R. Dickens, P.Gregg, & J.Wadsworth (eds) The Labour Market Under New Labour (pp. 70-85) Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230598454_6  

Hayes, D. & Wynyard, R. (2002) The McDonaldization of higher education Praeger Publishers.

Jensen, Carl (2001). Junk Food News 1877-2000. In Phillips, Peter (ed.). Censored 2001 . (pp. 251–264) Seven Stories Press. 

Parker, M., & Jary, D. (1995). The McUniversity: Organization, management and academic subjectivity. Organization , 2(2), 319–338. 

Ritzer, G. (1993) The McDonaldization of society Sage.

Wagner, K. (2017, June 30) The rise of the McModern Curbed https://archive.curbed.com/2017/6/30/15893836/what-is-mcmansion-hell-modern-suburbs-history  

Weber, M. (1946/1958). Essays in Sociology. In M. Weber, H. Gerth, & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber. New York: Oxford University Press.

White, T. & Yeats, J. (2009)  Franchising McChurch: Feeding our obsession with easy Christianity David C. Cook Publishing.

• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 10 Reasons you’re Perpetually Single
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 20 Montessori Toddler Bedrooms (Design Inspiration)
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 21 Montessori Homeschool Setups
• Chris Drew (PhD) https://helpfulprofessor.com/author/chris-drew-phd-2/ 101 Hidden Talents Examples

1 thought on “10 Examples of McDonaldization of Society”

Thank you very much. This is very helpful for my class.

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

• Politics & Social Sciences
• Social Sciences

Sorry, there was a problem.

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required .

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

Image Unavailable

• To view this video download Flash Player

Follow the author

The McDonaldization of Society: Revised New Century Edition Revised Edition

• ISBN-10 0761988122
• ISBN-13 978-0761988120
• Edition Revised
• Publisher SAGE Publications, Inc
• Publication date January 21, 2004
• Language English
• Dimensions 6.25 x 0.75 x 11 inches
• Print length 328 pages
• See all details

Editorial Reviews

"The book provides a theoretical and analytical framework that both reflects reality and helps college students understand the reality of the world in which they grew up, live in, and are likely to continue to experience not only in the United States but throughout the world."

“I love this book; it is a contemporary classic. . . . I would certainly use this book in an undergraduate theory course.”

“From my viewpoint, what I need is a book that spurs debate and stimulates critical thinking among my students, particularly on the societal consequences of rationalization. Ritzer’s book does exactly this. The strengths of the book are its connection to “real life” as well as the possibility of using it as a platform for discussing business practices seen from the viewpoint of citizens, rather than managers. . . . I would surely adopt its new edition and use it in a wide range of courses.”

“I use this book in an introductory level social problems and public policy course. The book is also used in my department in many sections of introduction to sociology. It works well in introductory level courses. . . . It is a good book and has been a great teaching tool. I find the book helps students to see rationalized environments where they could not see them before. Vision is a good thing. . . the book still has a long shelf life ahead.”

“This is an important book. Its wide recognition is well deserved. Its central strength is the clarity and brevity with which it makes accessible an extraordinarily important and complex process shaping the postmodern world.”

“I am impressed with the amount of examples the author has gathered from around the world for the book. Examples are current, interesting, and illustrative. They mesh well with the text and help enormously in explicating complex processes underlying McDonaldization.”

“I have enjoyed using this book. I recommend it to other education professionals and, on occasion, have given copies of this book to friends and relatives as gifts. The strengths are obvious.”

“The opening chapters are very strong. I very much like the way Weber’s ideas are brought to life. . . . This is such a good opportunity to bring more theory into awareness for students. . . . It is very engaging and brings the reader into the content in a wonderful way.”

About the Author

George Ritzer is Distinguished University Professor at the University of Maryland, where he has also been a Distinguished Scholar-Teacher and won a Teaching Excellence Award. He was awarded the Distinguished Contributions to Teaching Award by the American Sociological Association, an honorary doctorate from LaTrobe University in Australia, and the Robin Williams Lectureship from the Eastern Sociological Society. His best-known work, The McDonaldization of Society (8th ed.), has been read by hundreds of thousands of students over two decades and translated into over a dozen languages. Ritzer is also the editor of McDonaldization: The Reader ; and author of other works of critical sociology related to the McDonaldization thesis, including Enchanting a Disenchanted World , The Globalization of Nothing , Expressing America: A Critique of the Global Credit Card Society , as well as a series best-selling social theory textbooks and Globalization: A Basic Text . He is the Editor of the Encyclopedia of Social Theory (2 vols.), the Encyclopedia of Sociology (11 vols.; 2nd edition forthcoming), the Encyclopedia of Globalization (5 vols.), and is Founding Editor of the Journal of Consumer Culture . In 2016 he will publish the second edition of Essentials of Sociology with SAGE.

Product details

• Publisher ‏ : ‎ SAGE Publications, Inc; Revised edition (January 21, 2004)
• Language ‏ : ‎ English
• Paperback ‏ : ‎ 328 pages
• ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0761988122
• ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0761988120
• Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 15.2 ounces
• Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6.25 x 0.75 x 11 inches
• #1,269 in Sociology (Books)
• #4,681 in Professional

About the author

George ritzer.

George Ritzer is Distinguished University Professor at the University of Maryland, where he has been a Distinguished Scholar-Teacher and won a Teaching Excellence award by the American Sociological Association, and in 2004, he was awarded an honorary doctorate by LaTrobe University, Melborune, Australia. He has served as Chair of the American Sociological Association's Sections on Theoretical Sociology and organizations and Occupations. He held the UNESCO Chair in Social Theory at the Russian Academy of Sciences, a Fulbright-Hay Chair at York University in Canada, and a Fulbright-Hays award to the Netherlands. He has been Scholar-in-Residence at the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study and the Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study in the Social Sciences. Dr. Ritzer's main theoretical interests lie in metatheory as well as applied social theory. In metatheory, his contributions include Metatheorizing in Sociology(Lexington Books, 1991), Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science (Allyn and Bacon, 1975, 1980), and Toward an Integrated Sociological Paradigm (Allyn and Bacon). Professor Ritzer is perhaps best known for the McDonaldization of Society (4/e, 2004); translated into more than a dozen languages) and several related books (also with a number of translations, including Expressing America: A Critique of the Global Credit Card Society (1995), Enchanting a Disenchanted World: Revolutionizing the Means of Consumption (2/e, 2005),The Globalization of Nothing (2/e, 2007), and (with Craig Lair) Outsourcing: Globalization and Beyond. He edited the Encyclopedia of Social Theory (2005), and is the founding editor of the Journal of Consumer Culture. He just completed editing the eleven-volume Encyclopedia of Sociology (2007) and The Blackwell Companion to Globalization (2007). In 2006, McGraw-Hill published the second edition of Professor Ritzer's Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classic Roots: The Basics. In 2007, McGraw-Hill will publish the seventh edition of Modern Sociological Theory, and the fifth edition of Classical Sociological Theory. The latter texts, as well as this one, have been translated into a number of languages.

Customer reviews

• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 5 star 78% 7% 9% 2% 5% 78%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 4 star 78% 7% 9% 2% 5% 7%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 3 star 78% 7% 9% 2% 5% 9%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 2 star 78% 7% 9% 2% 5% 2%
• 5 star 4 star 3 star 2 star 1 star 1 star 78% 7% 9% 2% 5% 5%

Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.

To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.

• Sort reviews by Top reviews Most recent Top reviews

Top reviews from the United States

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. please try again later..

Top reviews from other countries

• About Amazon
• Investor Relations
• Amazon Devices
• Amazon Science
• Sell products on Amazon
• Sell on Amazon Business
• Sell apps on Amazon
• Become an Affiliate
• Advertise Your Products
• Self-Publish with Us
• Host an Amazon Hub
• › See More Make Money with Us
• Amazon Business Card
• Shop with Points
• Reload Your Balance
• Amazon Currency Converter
• Amazon and COVID-19
• Your Account
• Your Orders
• Shipping Rates & Policies
• Returns & Replacements
• Manage Your Content and Devices

• Conditions of Use
• Privacy Notice
• Consumer Health Data Privacy Disclosure
• Your Ads Privacy Choices