how to write case study law

ARE LAW SCHOOL RANKINGS REALLY IMPORTANT?

How to Write a Case Brief: Essential Skills for Law Students

Ever been in a courtroom, or watched one on TV and wondered how attorneys keep track of all those cases? Imagine trying to recall each fact, rule, or precedent at the drop of a gavel! It’s enough to make your brain whirl!

Welcome to the world of case briefs – an attorney’s secret weapon. They’re like maps guiding lawyers through the complex labyrinth that is law. Writing them well can be daunting though, right?

We’ve got you covered! You’ll soon master writing clear and concise case briefs. We’ll dissect every component from facts to conclusions while helping you avoid common pitfalls.

The best part? This isn’t just for future Atticus Finches out there; anyone looking for enhanced understanding of legal principles will find this handy too!

Ready? Court is now in session…

Jump Ahead To:

Understanding the Importance of a Case Brief

Imagine you’re a chef preparing to whip up a gourmet meal. A case brief is your recipe – it outlines the ingredients (facts), method (legal principles), and expected outcome (judgment). Without this ‘recipe’, you might miss an important step or ingredient, resulting in a less-than-stellar dish.

A case brief plays much the same role for law students and professionals alike. It’s an essential tool that helps dissect complex legal cases into manageable chunks. Think of it as your roadmap through dense legal jungles filled with precedent-setting decisions, intricate arguments, and landmark judgments. Litigators especially find them handy when they need to recall specific details from previous cases.

The Beauty of Brevity:

In law school, time is gold but so are words. You’ll be dealing with hefty textbooks and long-winded court rulings – more than enough reason why brevity becomes beautiful. A well-written case brief distills these verbose documents into their core elements: facts, procedural history, issue at hand, rule applied by the court (the holding) , rationale behind it (the reasoning) , decision reached (the judgment) , along with any concurring or dissenting opinions.

A Lifeline for Legal Eagles:

Ever heard of the phrase ‘standing on the shoulders of giants’? That’s exactly what you’re doing when you use a case brief. You’re leveraging past knowledge to build your own understanding, and perhaps even contribute something new. By analyzing how previous cases were argued and decided, budding lawyers can sharpen their critical thinking skills – an invaluable asset in this profession.

Essential Elements of a Case Brief

A well-structured case brief is like a blueprint for understanding complex legal cases. Just as architects use blueprints to visualize and construct buildings, law students and professionals use case briefs to break down intricate details of court rulings.

First off, every robust case brief begins with the case name . It’s your marker in the vast sea of legal proceedings. Identifying it correctly allows you not only to distinguish between cases but also to recall them quickly when needed.

Facts: The Foundation Stones

The facts are what make each case unique. They’re like foundation stones on which entire arguments rest. Including essential information about who did what and why can help lay this foundation strong in your mind, helping you understand how laws apply in real-world scenarios.

Procedural History: Tracing Legal Footsteps

The procedural history traces all steps taken by lower courts before reaching its current status. Think of it as tracking footprints left behind during previous stages – knowing where they lead can give valuable insight into how decisions were made along the way.

The Issue & Rule: Navigating Through Complexity

In every case lies an issue—a specific question asked within the context of these detailed facts—and corresponding rules or principles applied by courts answer this query.

Analysis & Conclusion: Drawing Lessons

The analysis discusses how courts apply rules to specific facts. The conclusion ties everything together with a clear, concise statement of who won and why.

Becoming adept at identifying these elements will help you become an expert case brief writer – because every great building starts with a well-drawn blueprint.

Steps to Writing an Effective Case Brief

To craft an effective case brief, you should begin by reading the entire court document. This lets you get a grasp on the context and details.

Dig Into The Facts

After reading, start by noting down all important facts. Identify who’s involved, what happened, and why it matters in legal terms. Make sure not to miss out on any crucial information here because this forms your foundation.

Note Down Procedural History

The next step is jotting down procedural history: where did this dispute start? Which courts heard it before reaching its current state? Remember – each stage influences how laws are interpreted.

Identify The Issue At Hand

Moving forward from there is identifying issues at hand. What specific legal question does this case pose? Get into detective mode.

This helps clarify what rule or precedent will be applied.

Catch That Rule of Law.

Your fourth task is spotting that elusive rule of law being used in the judgment process.

Analyze And Conclude:

The fifth move involves analyzing how judges apply rules identified earlier in these particular circumstances. They might interpret them differently based on various factors; see if you can pinpoint these variations.

Last but definitely not least, draw your conclusions. What is the result of this situation? How does it impact future legal scenarios?

Following these steps ensures you have a well-structured and comprehensive case brief that will be invaluable in understanding complex cases.

Tips for Writing a Clear and Concise Case Brief

Writing a clear and concise case brief is much like preparing a recipe. You need to gather all the right ingredients, follow the steps meticulously, and in the end, you have something palatable that everyone can understand.

Choose Your Words Wisely

The first step is choosing your words wisely. Avoid legal jargon when simpler language will do just as well.

Maintain Focus on Key Points

Next up – maintain focus on key points. Stick strictly with facts directly related to resolving the issue at hand in your case briefs. Avoid irrelevant details because they cloud understanding rather than enhancing it – stay focused.

Fine-Tune Your Formatting Skills

Last but not least: formatting matters too. Consider using bullet points or numbered lists where appropriate so information stands out clearly (remember our recipe analogy?).

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Writing a Case Brief

As law students, we often make mistakes while drafting our first few case briefs. But remember, errors are stepping stones to learning. Here’s a rundown of common blunders and how you can sidestep them.

Failing to Understand the Facts Fully

Sometimes, in an effort to keep things concise, important details may be overlooked or misunderstood. To prevent this from happening, understand your case thoroughly. You might find that re-reading helps uncover missed nuances.

Omitting Legal Precedents

We tend to focus on the current case at hand and forget about previous rulings that set precedents. These play a pivotal role in judicial decisions. Research past cases to strengthen your understanding and enhance your argument.

Lack of Clarity and Precision

The purpose of writing a case brief is not just for academic evaluation but also as a tool for future reference. It should therefore be clear enough for others (and future you) to get the gist quickly without needing further explanation . Make sure every sentence counts.

Relying Too Heavily on Templates or Examples

Tailor-made solutions always outshine one-size-fits-all approaches. While templates can guide you, don’t be a slave to them. Rather than conforming to an existing template, it is essential to bring out the distinctive elements and perspectives of your case.

Misplacing Focus

A common pitfall is overemphasizing less critical aspects while sidelining key issues. Always keep sight of what matters most: the legal issue at hand and how it was resolved. Writing a solid case brief isn’t just about skill – it’s an art form.

The Role of Precedent in Case Briefs

Precedents play a significant role in case briefs, acting as guiding lights for legal reasoning. But what exactly are precedents? Simply put, they are past judicial decisions used to help interpret and apply the law to new cases.

Analyzing Legal Precedence in Your Case Brief

In your case brief, analyzing the relevant precedent will involve examining prior rulings on similar issues or facts. This process lets you predict how a court might rule based on established patterns.

But remember not every old decision serves as good illumination; only those from higher courts within the same jurisdiction do so. For instance, if we consider U.S Federal Courts system hierarchy, U.S District Court rulings don’t bind Appellate Courts or the Supreme Court.

Using Precedent to Craft Strong Arguments

Beyond predicting potential outcomes, using precedent can also help build robust arguments. When a previous ruling aligns with your case, citing it can strengthen your argument. Conversely, if an unfavorable precedent exists, you might argue why it shouldn’t apply to your situation.

Understanding and effectively using precedents in case briefs isn’t just helpful; it’s essential. They give context for decisions and offer predictability in the legal process – all while lighting up that otherwise dark path of legal reasoning.

Reviewing and Revising Your Case Brief

So, you’ve written your case brief. But are you done? Not quite. Revisiting and refining your work is an essential part of the process to ensure accuracy. Ensure that your brief is a precise representation of the case by thoroughly examining it.

Meticulous Examination for Accuracy

To start with, check if all elements in your case brief template are correctly filled out. Make sure that each point, from facts to legal principles applied, lines up perfectly with what was in the actual case document.

If any discrepancies arise between your summary and the original text during this review stage, take steps to fix them right away.

Critical Evaluation for Clarity

Beyond accuracy lies clarity – does your briefing make sense not only to you but also to others who might read it?

The Power of Peer Reviews

This brings us onto peer reviews: they can be invaluable here. A fresh set of eyes often catches things we miss, after all.

Ask a fellow law student or even your professor to review your brief and provide feedback. Their perspectives can help you spot any gaps in explanation, unclear language, or legal inaccuracies.

A Continuous Process

Last but not least, remember that revising is an ongoing process – it’s rare for anything to be perfect on the first go. As you learn more about the law and develop as a lawyer, come back and revise older case briefs with fresh insights.

The Impact of a Well-Written Case Brief

A well-crafted case brief not only gives you a sense of direction and understanding, but also helps to simplify intricate legal concepts.

Imagine walking into a courtroom with an encyclopedia’s worth of knowledge condensed into easily digestible notes. It’s like having your very own toolbox, filled with precisely what you need to make compelling arguments.

A robust case brief is more than just an outline; it’s a roadmap that guides you through the labyrinthine world of law. Each section—facts, procedural history, issue, rule analysis—is not merely informative but instructive too.

Improved Legal Understanding

Diving deep into past cases lets us swim around legal precedents and understand their impact on current laws. A detailed summary allows us to examine these influences from various angles which ultimately sharpens our analytical skills and broadens our perspectives about the law itself.

In essence, preparing comprehensive case briefs isn’t simply busywork—it’s mental gymnastics for future lawyers. So don’t think twice before rolling up those sleeves because as we say at The Art of Law School: No pain (in this case reading lots.), no gain.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the primary purpose of writing a case brief in law school? The primary purpose of writing a case brief is to condense and synthesize complex legal cases into a manageable format. It helps law students and professionals understand and recall key aspects of cases, such as facts, legal issues, and judgments, which is crucial for classroom discussions, exams, and legal practice.

2. What are the key components of an effective case brief? An effective case brief typically includes the case name, relevant facts, procedural history, the legal issue(s) at hand, the rule of law applied, the court’s analysis, and the final judgment or conclusion. Each component provides a structured overview of the case, making it easier to understand and remember.

3. How can a case brief help in legal studies and practice? Case briefs help in legal studies by facilitating better comprehension and recall of complex cases, improving critical thinking and analytical skills, and preparing students for class participation and exams. In legal practice, they serve as quick references to legal precedents and assist in formulating legal strategies and arguments.

4. What are common mistakes to avoid while writing a case brief? Common mistakes include missing out on crucial facts or legal issues, overly summarizing the case to the point of losing important details, failing to clearly articulate the rule of law, and not aligning the case analysis with the conclusion. Avoiding these errors ensures the brief is both accurate and useful.

5. How does technology aid in writing case briefs? Technology, particularly legal research tools and AI-powered applications, aids in writing case briefs by providing easy access to a vast database of legal cases and precedents, enabling efficient research, and offering analytical insights that can enhance the quality of case briefs.

Mastering the art of case briefing is a pivotal step in your legal education journey, and now, equipped with the right techniques and insights, it’s within your reach. These skills are more than academic necessities; they are crucial in demystifying the complexities of legal cases, helping you transition from classroom theory to real-world application seamlessly.

As you delve into each case, remember the importance of accurately capturing the case name, facts, and the ruling. These key elements form the backbone of your legal analysis, guiding you through the nuances of each case. With the strategies and tips provided, you’re well-prepared to craft briefs that are both precise and insightful. Embrace this skill as a continuous learning process, refining and honing with each brief you compose. Stay dedicated, and watch as your ability to dissect and understand complex legal scenarios reaches new heights, setting the stage for a successful legal career.

Stephen Metellus

I am a 3L law student in Washington D.C and owner of theartoflawschool.com! I started law school with a lot of hopes and expectations, and it has certainly been a wild ride from the start! My goal is writing articles that help you in navigating through law school.

create an account

Writing Effective Legal Case Briefs for Law Students

How to write a case brief, complete with examples.

tl;dr - Case briefs help your understanding of legal concepts and enable you to better prepare for exams. Here are some example case briefs .

As a new law student, one of the essential skills you need to develop is the ability to write effective legal case briefs. A case brief is a concise summary of a legal case that highlights the key issues, legal principles, and holdings of the court. Writing a good case brief can help you better understand the law, prepare for class discussions and exams, and become a more effective legal professional. In this article, we'll explore the key elements of a good legal case brief and provide some tips on how to write one effectively.

Legal case briefs are an essential tool for you as a law student, as they provide a concise and organized summary of a court case. Case brief examples serve as a means for you to understand the facts, issues, and legal principles underlying a court decision, and are crucial in helping you develop analytical and critical thinking skills.

One of the primary reasons why case briefs are important for you is that they help you understand the law in a practical and applied manner. In law school, you study legal principles and concepts in a theoretical sense. However, case briefs provide a means for you to see how these principles are applied in real-world situations. By analyzing and dissecting court decisions, you are able to gain a better understanding of how legal principles and concepts are applied in practice. For example, case brief examples of landmark cases like Marbury v. Madison or Brown v. Board of Education can help you understand the historical and legal significance of these cases.

Understand the Structure of a Legal Case Brief

Before we dive into the details of how to write a good legal case brief, it's important to understand its structure. A typical legal case brief, such as the examples of case briefs available on LSD , includes the following sections:

Title and Citation: This section includes the name of the case, the court that decided the case, and the citation (i.e., the reference that identifies where the case is published).
Facts: This section provides a brief summary of the key facts of the case, including who the parties are, what they did, and how the case came to court.
Issues: This section identifies the legal issues that the court was asked to decide, and focuses on the questions that the court addressed in its decision.
Holding: This section summarizes the court's decision on the legal issues presented in the case.
Analysis: This section provides an explanation of the court's reasoning in arriving at its holding, including the legal principles and rules that the court relied on.

Focus on the Key Facts and Issues

When writing a case brief, it's important to focus on the key facts and legal issues presented in the case. You should avoid including unnecessary details or information that is not relevant to the legal issues. Instead, focus on the facts and issues that are essential to understanding the court's decision. This is evident in many examples of case briefs written by legal professionals.

Identify the Legal Principles and Rules

In addition to focusing on the key facts and issues, it's important to identify the legal principles and rules that the court relied on in arriving at its decision. This will help you understand the court's reasoning and the legal principles that are relevant to the case. Many examples of case briefs available online also highlight the legal principles and rules that were applied in a particular case.

Use Clear and Concise Language

A good legal case brief should be written in clear and concise language, as seen in examples of case briefs written by legal professionals. You should avoid using legal jargon or technical terms that may be difficult for a layperson to understand. Instead, use plain language that accurately conveys the meaning of the court's decision.

Be Organized and Structured

To make your case brief more effective, it's important to be organized and structured in your writing. Use headings and subheadings to separate different sections of your brief, and make sure that each section flows logically from one to the next. This is evident in many examples of case briefs available online, which are organized and structured in a clear and logical manner.

So, what’s the point?

Developing analytical and critical thinking skills.

Writing case briefs helps you develop analytical and critical thinking skills. By analyzing court decisions and identifying key facts, issues, and legal principles, you are practicing your ability to think critically and to identify relevant legal issues. Case briefs provide a practical way to develop these skills and apply them to real-world legal problems.

To further develop your analytical and critical thinking skills, you can practice writing your own case briefs. Take a recent court decision and write a brief that summarizes the key facts, issues, and legal principles involved. This will help you become more proficient at identifying relevant information and organizing it in a structured manner.

Preparing for Class and Exams

In addition to being a valuable tool for developing analytical skills, case briefs also help you prepare for class discussions and exams. As you read cases and write briefs, you are gaining a deeper understanding of the law and the reasoning behind court decisions. This knowledge will help you participate more effectively in class discussions and will also help you prepare for law school exams.

To get the most out of case briefs when preparing for exams, you can practice writing case briefs for cases that you studied throughout the year, or to hypotheticals from past exams. This will help you apply the analytical skills you've developed to new situations and ensure that you are able to communicate your understanding of legal principles effectively.

In conclusion, case briefs are an essential tool for law students as they provide a practical application of legal principles, help develop analytical and critical thinking skills, and aid in preparing for class discussions and exams. By studying case brief examples, practicing writing your own briefs, and developing a deep understanding of the law in context, you can become a more proficient and effective student and legal professional. For examples, check out LSD's case brief database .

Tech-focused creator of LSD.Law. I built LSD while applying to law school. I saw unequal access to knowledge and built LSD to level the playing field and help applicants make thoughtful, well-informed decisions in the application process.

Data download

Help us make LSD better!

How To Write a Case Brief for Law School

Excerpt reproduced from introduction to the study of law: cases and materials.

Third Edition (LexisNexis 2009) by Michael Makdisi & John Makdisi

HOW TO BRIEF

The previous section described the parts of a case in order to make it easier to read and identify the pertinent information that you will use to create your briefs. This section will describe the parts of a brief in order to give you an idea about what a brief is, what is helpful to include in a brief, and what purpose it serves. Case briefs are a necessary study aid in law school that helps to encapsulate and analyze the mountainous mass of material that law students must digest. The case brief represents a final product after reading a case, rereading it, taking it apart, and putting it back together again. In addition to its function as a tool for self-instruction and referencing, the case brief also provides a valuable “cheat sheet” for class participation.

Who will read your brief? Most professors will espouse the value of briefing but will never ask to see that you have, in fact, briefed. As a practicing lawyer, your client doesn’t care if you brief, so long as you win the case. The judges certainly don’t care if you brief, so long as you competently practice the law. You are the person that the brief will serve! Keep this in mind when deciding what elements to include as part of your brief and when deciding what information to include under those elements.

What are the elements of a brief? Different people will tell you to include different things in your brief. Most likely, upon entering law school, this will happen with one or more of your instructors. While opinions may vary, four elements that are essential to any useful brief are the following:

(a) Facts (name of the case and its parties, what happened factually and procedurally, and the judgment)

(b) Issues (what is in dispute)

(d) Rationale (reasons for the holding)

If you include nothing but these four elements, you should have everything you need in order to recall effectively the information from the case during class or several months later when studying for exams.

Because briefs are made for yourself, you may want to include other elements that expand the four elements listed above. Depending on the case, the inclusion of additional elements may be useful. For example, a case that has a long and important section expounding dicta might call for a separate section in your brief labeled: Dicta. Whatever elements you decide to include, however, remember that the brief is a tool intended for personal use. To the extent that more elements will help with organization and use of the brief, include them. On the other hand, if you find that having more elements makes your brief cumbersome and hard to use, cut back on the number of elements. At a minimum, however, make sure you include the four elements listed above.

Elements that you may want to consider including in addition to the four basic elements are:

(e) Dicta (commentary about the decision that was not the basis for the decision)

(f) Dissent (if a valuable dissenting opinion exits, the dissent’s opinion)

(g) Party’s Arguments (each party’s opposing argument concerning the ultimate issue)

(h) Comments (personal commentary)

Personal comments can be useful if you have a thought that does not fit elsewhere. In the personal experience of one of the authors, this element was used to label cases as specific kinds (e.g., as a case of vicarious liability) or make mental notes about what he found peculiar or puzzling about cases. This element allowed him to release his thoughts (without losing them) so that he could move on to other cases.

In addition to these elements, it may help you to organize your thoughts, as some people do, by dividing Facts into separate elements:

(1) Facts of the case (what actually happened, the controversy)

(2) Procedural History (what events within the court system led to the present case)

(3) Judgment (what the court actually decided)

Procedural History is usually minimal and most of the time irrelevant to the ultimate importance of a case; however, this is not always true. One subject in which Procedure History is virtually always relevant is Civil Procedure.

When describing the Judgment of the case, distinguish it from the Holding. The Judgment is the factual determination by the court, in favor of one party, such as “affirmed,” “reversed,” or “remanded.” In contrast, the Holding is the applied rule of law that serves as the basis for the ultimate judgment.

Remember that the purpose of a brief is to remind you of the important details that make the case significant in terms of the law. It will be a reference tool when you are drilled by a professor and will be a study aid when you prepare for exams. A brief is also like a puzzle piece.

The elements of the brief create the unique shape and colors of the piece, and, when combined with other pieces, the picture of the common law takes form. A well-constructed brief will save you lots of time by removing the need to return to the case to remember the important details and also by making it easier to put together the pieces of the common law puzzle.

EXTRACTING THE RELEVANT INFORMATION: ANNOTATING AND HIGHLIGHTING

So now that you know the basic elements of a brief, what information is important to include under each element? The simple answer is: whatever is relevant. But what parts of a case are relevant? When you read your first few cases, you may think that everything that the judge said was relevant to his ultimate conclusion. Even if this were true, what is relevant for the judge to make his decision is not always relevant for you to include in your brief. Remember, the reason to make a brief is not to persuade the world that the ultimate decision in the case is a sound one, but rather to aid in refreshing your memory concerning the most important parts of the case.

What facts are relevant to include in a brief? You should include the facts that are necessary to remind you of the story. If you forget the story, you will not remember how the law in the case was applied. You should also include the facts that are dispositive to the decision in the case. For instance, if the fact that a car is white is a determining factor in the case, the brief should note that the case involves a white car and not simply a car. To the extent that the procedural history either helps you to remember the case or plays an important role in the ultimate outcome, you should include these facts as well.

What issues and conclusions are relevant to include in a brief? There is usually one main issue on which the court rests its decision. This may seem simple, but the court may talk about multiple issues, and may discuss multiple arguments from both sides of the case. Be sure to distinguish the issues from the arguments made by the parties. The relevant issue or issues, and corresponding conclusions, are the ones for which the court made a final decision and which are binding. The court may discuss intermediate conclusions or issues, but stay focused on the main issue and conclusion which binds future courts.

What rationale is important to include in a brief? This is probably the most difficult aspect of the case to determine. Remember that everything that is discussed may have been relevant to the judge, but it is not necessarily relevant to the rationale of the decision. The goal is to remind yourself of the basic reasoning that the court used to come to its decision and the key factors that made the decision favor one side or the other.

A brief should be brief! Overly long or cumbersome briefs are not very helpful because you will not be able to skim them easily when you review your notes or when the professor drills you. On the other hand, a brief that is too short will be equally unhelpful because it lacks sufficient information to refresh your memory. Try to keep your briefs to one page in length. This will make it easy for you to organize and reference them.

Do not get discouraged. Learning to brief and figuring out exactly what to include will take time and practice. The more you brief, the easier it will become to extract the relevant information.

While a brief is an extremely helpful and important study aid, annotating and highlighting are other tools for breaking down the mass of material in your casebook. The remainder of this section will discuss these different techniques and show how they complement and enhance the briefing process.

Annotating Cases

Many of you probably already read with a pencil or pen, but if you do not, now is the time to get in the habit. Cases are so dense and full of information that you will find yourself spending considerable amounts of time rereading cases to find what you need. An effective way to reduce this time is to annotate the margins of the casebook. Your pencil (or pen) will be one of your best friends while reading a case. It will allow you to mark off the different sections (such as facts, procedural history, or conclusions), thus allowing you to clear your mind of thoughts and providing an invaluable resource when briefing and reviewing.

You might be wondering why annotating is important if you make an adequate, well-constructed brief. By their very nature briefs cannot cover everything in a case. Even with a thorough, well-constructed brief you may want to reference the original case in order to reread dicta that might not have seemed important at the time, to review the complete procedural history or set of facts, or to scour the rationale for a better understanding of the case; annotating makes these tasks easier. Whether you return to a case after a few hours or a few months, annotations will swiftly guide you to the pertinent parts of the case by providing a roadmap of the important sections. Your textual markings and margin notes will refresh your memory and restore specific thoughts you might have had about either the case in general or an individual passage.

Annotations will also remind you of forgotten thoughts and random ideas by providing a medium for personal comments.

In addition to making it easier to review an original case, annotating cases during the first review of a case makes the briefing process easier. With adequate annotations, the important details needed for your brief will be much easier to retrieve. Without annotations, you will likely have difficulty locating the information you seek even in the short cases. It might seem strange that it would be hard to reference a short case, but even a short case will likely take you at least fifteen to twenty-five minutes to read, while longer cases may take as much as thirty minutes to an hour to complete. No matter how long it takes, the dense material of all cases makes it difficult to remember all your thoughts, and trying to locate specific sections of the analysis may feel like you are trying to locate a needle in a haystack. An annotation in the margin, however, will not only swiftly guide you to a pertinent section, but will also refresh the thoughts that you had while reading that section.

When you read a case for the first time, read for the story and for a basic understanding of the dispute, the issues, the rationale, and the decision. As you hit these elements (or what you think are these elements) make a mark in the margins. Your markings can be as simple as “facts” (with a bracket that indicates the relevant part of the paragraph). When you spot an issue, you may simply mark “issue” or instead provide a synopsis in your own words. When a case sparks an idea — write that idea in the margin as well — you never know when a seemingly irrelevant idea might turn into something more.

Finally, when you spot a particularly important part of the text, underline it (or highlight it as described below).

With a basic understanding of the case, and with annotations in the margin, the second read-through of the case should be much easier. You can direct your reading to the most important sections and will have an easier time identifying what is and is not important. Continue rereading the case until you have identified all the relevant information that you need to make your brief, including the issue(s), the facts, the holding, and the relevant parts of the analysis.

Pencil or pen — which is better to use when annotating? Our recommendation is a mechanical pencil. Mechanical pencils make finer markings than regular pencils, and also than ballpoint pens. Although you might think a pencil might smear more than a pen, with its sharp point a mechanical pencil uses very little excess lead and will not smear as much as you might imagine. A mechanical pencil will also give you the freedom to make mistakes without consequences. When you first start annotating, you may think that some passages are more important than they really are, and therefore you may resist the urge to make a mark in order to preserve your book and prevent false guideposts. With a pencil, however, the ability to erase and rewrite removes this problem.

Highlighting

Why highlight? Like annotating, highlighting may seem unimportant if you create thorough, well-constructed briefs, but highlighting directly helps you to brief. It makes cases, especially the more complicated ones, easy to digest, review and use to extract information.

Highlighting takes advantage of colors to provide a uniquely effective method for reviewing and referencing a case. If you prefer a visual approach to learning, you may find highlighting to be a very effective tool.

If annotating and highlighting are so effective, why brief? Because the process of summarizing a case and putting it into your own words within a brief provides an understanding of the law and of the case that you cannot gain through the process of highlighting or annotating.

The process of putting the case into your own words forces you to digest the material, while annotating and highlighting can be accomplished in a much more passive manner.

What should you highlight? Similar to annotating, the best parts of the case to highlight are those that represent the needed information for your brief such as the facts, the issue, the holding and the rationale.

Unlike annotating, highlighting provides an effective way to color code, which makes referring to the case even easier. In addition, Highlighters are particularly useful in marking off entire sections by using brackets. These brackets will allow you to color-code the case without highlighting all the text, leaving the most important phrases untouched for a more detailed highlight marking or underlining.

Highlighting is a personal tool, and therefore should be used to the extent that highlighting helps, but should be modified in a way that makes it personally time efficient and beneficial. For instance, you might combine the use of annotations in the margins with the visual benefit of highlighting the relevant text. You may prefer to underline the relevant text with a pencil, but to use a highlighter to bracket off the different sections of a case. Whatever you choose to do, make sure that it works for you, regardless of what others recommend. The techniques in the remainder of this section will describe ways to make full use of your highlighters.

First, buy yourself a set of multi-colored highlighters, with at least four, or perhaps five or six different colors. Yellow, pink, and orange are usually the brightest. Depending on the brand, purple and green can be dark, but still work well. Although blue is a beautiful color, it tends to darken and hide the text.

Therefore we recommend that you save blue for the elements that you rarely highlight.

For each different section of the case, choose a color, and use that color only when highlighting the section of the case designated for that color. Consider using yellow for the text that you tend to highlight most frequently. Because yellow is the brightest, you may be inclined to use yellow for the Conclusions in order to make them stand out the most. If you do this, however, you will exhaust your other colors much faster than yellow and this will require that you purchase an entire set of new highlighters when a single color runs out because colors such as green are not sold separately. If instead you choose to use yellow on a more frequently highlighted section such as the Analysis, when it comes time to replace your yellow marker, you will need only to replace your yellow highlighter individually. In the personal experience on one of the authors, the sections of cases that seemed to demand the most highlighter attention were the

Facts and the Analysis, while the Issues and Holdings demanded the least. Other Considerations and

Procedural History required lots of highlighting in particular cases although not in every case.

Experiment if you must, but try to choose a color scheme early on in the semester and stick with it. That way, when you come back to the first cases of the semester, you will not be confused with multiple color schemes. The basic sections of a case for which you should consider giving a different color are:

Procedural History

Issue (and questions presented)

Holding (and conclusions)

Analysis (rationale)

Other Considerations (such as dicta)

Not all of these sections demand a separate color. You may find that combining Facts and Procedural History or Issues and Holdings works best. Furthermore, as mentioned above, some sections may not warrant highlighting in every case (e.g., dicta probably do not need to be highlighted unless they are particularly important). If you decide that a single color is all that you need, then stick to one, but if you find yourself highlighting lots of text from many different sections, reconsider the use of at least a few different colors. Highlighters make text stand out, but only when used appropriately. The use of many colors enables you to highlight more text without reducing the highlighter’s effectiveness. Three to four colors provides decent color variation without the cumbersomeness of handling too many markers.

Once you are comfortable with your color scheme, determining exactly what to highlight still may be difficult. Similar to knowing what to annotate, experience will perfect your highlighting skills. Be careful not to highlight everything, thus ruining your highlighters’ effectiveness; at the same time, do not be afraid to make mistakes.

Now that we have covered the basics of reading, annotating, highlighting, and briefing a case, you are ready to start practicing. Keep the tips and techniques mentioned in this chapter in mind when you tackle the four topics in the remainder of this book. If you have difficultly, refer back to this chapter to help guide you as you master the case method of study and the art of using the common law.

Have questions about law school? Check out our Facebook page , follow us on Twitter or start networking with law students and lawyers on LexTalk .

Follow LexisNexis for Law Schools

Your subscription to our Lexis Legal Advantage Online Community is confirmed !

LexisNexis, a division of RELX Inc., takes your privacy seriously. As detailed in our Privacy Policy we will use your personal information to administer your account and provide the products and services that you are requesting.

US South Carolina

This site uses various technologies, as described in our Privacy Policy, for personalization, measuring website use/performance, and targeted advertising, which may include storing and sharing information about your site visit with third parties. By continuing to use this website you consent to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use .

COVID-19 Update: To help students through this crisis, The Princeton Review will continue our "Enroll with Confidence" refund policies. For full details, please click here.

The Law School Case Method

In the majority of your law school courses, and probably in all of your first-year classes, your only texts will be casebooks—collections of written judicial decisions in actual court cases.

The case method eschews explanation and encourages exploration. In a course that relies entirely on the casebook, you will never come across a printed list of "laws."

Indeed, you will learn that in many areas of law there is no such thing as a static set of rules, but only a constantly evolving system of principles. You are expected to understand the law—in all of its ambiguity—through a critical examination of a series of cases that were decided according to such principles. You may feel lost, groping for answers to unarticulated questions. This is not merely normal, it is intended.

How the Case Method Works

In practical terms, the case method works like this: For every class meeting, you will be assigned a number of cases to read. The cases are the written judicial opinions rendered in court cases that were decided at the appellate level. (The reason for reading cases from courts of appeals or supreme courts is that such cases turn on issues of law, not of fact. If you are charged, tried, and convicted of murder and wish to appeal your case, you do not simply get a whole new trial at a higher level. You must argue that your conviction was improper, not that it was inaccurate.)

Your casebook will contain neither instructions nor explanations. Your assignments simply will be to read the cases and be in a position to answer questions based on them. There will be no written homework assignments, just cases, cases, and more cases.

You will write, for your own benefit, briefs of these cases. Briefs are your attempts to summarize the issues and laws around which a particular case revolves and to make sense of the court's findings in terms of similar cases. One way or another, your law school probably will tell you how to brief a case. If there's an optional seminar, you really ought to attend. In the event that you are left in the dark, it's utterly imperative that you find out how to brief a case. Google it. Ask a second year. Unless you are insanely brilliant, good briefing is really a key to getting good grades. Over the course of a semester, you will try to integrate the content of your case-briefs and your notes from in-class lectures, discussions, or dialogues into some kind of cohesive whole.

From Briefs to Outlines

Typically, you will take your copious briefs and class-notes and create an outline from which you will study for your final exams. Since almost all of your grade for a particular course will rest on your performance on the final, it is essential to establish a system that will allow you to recall the case appropriate for a given legal circumstance within an exam period.

This is especially true since most of your exams will be open book. Once you've see your case-books, you'll understand why having them on the day of the test will not be particularly helpful. Unless, of course, you have your outline handy. Outlines, whether you write your own, create them in a study group, or buy the commercial variety, will be an intrinsic part of this system. Don't neglect them. Your academic success rests on it.

Explore Graduate Programs for You

Explore our featured graduate schools & programs to find those that both match your interests and are looking for students like you.

Best Online JD Programs

Online JD programs offer flexibility, affordability, access to innovative technologies, students from a diversity of career backgrounds, and global opportunities.

Best Online MSL Programs

Master of Studies in Law (MSL) programs are for non-lawyers whose careers in their organizations will benefit from legal training even though they are not required to be practicing attorneys.

Find MBA Programs Matched to Your Interests

Explore our featured business schools to find those that are looking for students like you.

Free MCAT Practice Test

I already know my score.

MCAT Self-Paced 14-Day Free Trial

Enrollment Advisor

1-800-2REVIEW (800-273-8439) ext. 1

1-877-LEARN-30

Mon-Fri 9AM-10PM ET

Sat-Sun 9AM-8PM ET

Student Support

1-800-2REVIEW (800-273-8439) ext. 2

Mon-Fri 9AM-9PM ET

Sat-Sun 8:30AM-5PM ET

Partnerships

Teach or Tutor for Us

College Readiness

International

Advertising

Affiliate/Other

Enrollment Terms & Conditions
Accessibility
Cigna Medical Transparency in Coverage

Local Offices: Mon-Fri 9AM-6PM

SAT Subject Tests

Academic Subjects

Social Studies

Find the Right College

College Rankings
College Advice
Applying to College
Financial Aid

School & District Partnerships

Professional Development
Advice Articles
Private Tutoring
Mobile Apps
Local Offices
International Offices
Work for Us
Affiliate Program
Partner with Us
Advertise with Us
International Partnerships
Our Guarantees
Accessibility – Canada

TPR Education, LLC (doing business as “The Princeton Review”) is controlled by Primavera Holdings Limited, a firm owned by Chinese nationals with a principal place of business in Hong Kong, China.

Legal Research & Writing Guide

Legal Abbreviations
Shepard's Citations
Citation Examples
How to Find State Statutes
The U.S. Supreme Court
Constitutional Law

How to Read a Case

How to brief a case, recommended videos.

Case Page Numbering
Using Nexis Uni Citation Tools

Research Help

Need further assistance email us or make an appointment., email: [email protected], helpful youtube channels.

The following online resources offer guidance for reading case law and court decisions.

How to Read a Court Decision This guide from Roosevelt University describes the different parts of a court decision.
LexisNexis: How to Read a Law School Casebook Features an excerpt from Guide to the Study of Law: An Introduction, 2nd ed. (LexisNexis 2001) by L.H. LaRue.

The following online resources provide useful tips for writing case briefs and outlines.

How to Brief a Case Features an excerpt from "How to Study Law and Take Law Exams in a Nutshell" with a step-by-step guide to briefing cases
LexisNexis: How to Write a Case Brief Features an excerpt reproduced from Introduction to the Study of Law: Cases and Materials.
Case Briefing: The Law School Playbook
Case Reading: The Law School Playbook
Introduction to Cases / Anatomy of a Case
How To Write A Case Brief or Case Outline for Law School (With An Example)
How to Read a Case: And Understand What it Means

<< Previous: Constitutional Law
Next: Case Page Numbering >>
Last Updated: Sep 13, 2023 1:34 PM
URL: https://egcc.libguides.com/legal-research

Barrista Solutions

Philippine Bar Exam Preparation Guide

[email protected]

Mar 3, 2021

Law School 101: Tips on How to Effectively Write Case Digests

By: Archiebald Faller Capila

Barrista Solutions lists effective tips on how to digest cases.

Aside from the common works of memorizing codal provisions, understanding legal doctrines, and reading the annotations of legal luminaries, there are still some tasks in law school that law students need to finish.

Among the additional works required to be submitted are the written or type-written case digests in different subjects. Most, if not all professors, require their students to submit specific sets of digests in order to improve the memory of those writing them. It is a proven fact that retention is better if and when students write what they are reading. Accordingly, professors see this as a tool in order to help their students learn more about various topics.

Case digests have been in law school since time immemorial. They have been said to be additional tasks for law students so that the latter may have a better understanding of the landmark cases which explain several laws and doctrines our legal system has adopted. While some law students see this as a task without a point, law professors from all over the country beg to disagree. For professors of the law, case digests must be submitted in order to inculcate discipline to law students—a character which is eventually carried out in practice.

However, most law students have a hard time writing them. Not only because some cases are kilometric in nature, but also because understanding such text-heavy materials is a different kind of burden. In several interviews with some students of the law, they see case digests as assignments that only give additional burden in the study. However, some law students believe that these case digests help them better understand an assigned case and even help them craft a good understanding of the facts, issues, and decision of an important cause. Accordingly, according to them, they better understand a case if it is them who crafted the digest and if it is them who fully discussed a case for a specific subject.

But, as mentioned, writing a case digests is not for everyone. In line with our advocacy to help students in several aspects of the study of law, we compiled some tips which would help you finish such a daunting task. In order to write an effective case digest, Barrista Solutions came up with a shortlist of tips on how to help law students write an effective case digest. Take a look at the steps on how to ease the burden of finishing the said task.

Know the syllabus first

Cases decided by the Supreme Court often explain a multitude of topics and doctrines. If you are a beginner in reading a full-text of the case and eventually writing a digest, it will be hard to determine what your professor wants to see. Accordingly, a case includes several subject matters that may not even be related to the topic of the syllabus.

In order to be effective, you must first read the syllabus and look at the topic where the case is included before reading the full text. In that way, you will be able to know what the relevant details are.

If the professor did not give a syllabus, take a look at the prescribed textbook of your professor and look at the Table of Contents of the same. More often than not, this will point out the specific topic or the most relevant topic to which the case is assigned. If there are multiple topics in which the case is designated, jot them all down and compare the same to where you are with respect to the discussion and recitations of the professor. In that way, you will know if whether your topics are behind or ahead. This is the first thing you should do before engaging in the next steps of writing a digest.

Read the full-text of the case

One of the misconceptions in reading the full-text of the case is that one needs to understand the whole of the text. This is not entirely true. As mentioned, a case decided by the Supreme Court has a multitude of topics that are discussed exhaustively. From substantive to procedural aspects, these topics are more often than not taxing and text-heavy.

Go back to tip number one and know the syllabus. If you know the topic which is related to the case you are studying, then it is now easy to read through the text of the case. In reading the full-text, it is not necessary that you memorize word for word the pronouncement of the Supreme Court. What is important is that you are able to single out specific facts, issues, and ruling that are related to the topics assigned for you to read.

Upon knowing the issue which you are assigned to read, it will already be easy to spot the proper facts and issues of the case. Understanding the full text before proceeding with writing the digest is important for you to retain the proper knowledge and wisdom behind the decision.

In short, do not rush into writing the digest. Understand first the topics of the case assigned so you can write your case digest effectively and efficiently. Accordingly, you will be able to retain in full what you have read and what you will eventually write. It will help you better understand your reading assignments as well.

Divide your digest into three parts

There are only three important parts in a case digest: the FACTS, the ISSUE, and the RULING. Upon knowing the topic you are looking for, you must be able to pinpoint these three elements in what you are reading. Remember that you must only write the relevant details pertaining to the assigned topic.

For the FACTS, you must take into consideration the pertinent discussions of the Court. Irrelevant and minute details should be dispensed with. Only write or type those which are important under your assigned topic. Backstories are not necessary UNLESS they are relatively connected to the outcome of the case. For the ISSUE, check on whether or not the topic of the case assigned is under a substantive or procedural discussion. Remember that the Supreme Court discusses these two aspects of a case. If the subject in which the case is assigned focuses on the substantive aspect of the law, then the issue of the case digest must focus on the same. If the subject in which the case is assigned focuses on the procedural aspect of the law, then the issue of the case digest must focus on the same. Do not include in your case digest issues not related to the topic. For the RULING, answer the issue you posited in the case digest.

For example, the issue is “Whether or not X is an employee of Y”

The decision or ruling should only discuss that issue. In answering the same, you must point out the elements of an employer-employee relationship, the relevant facts of the case, and the explanation of the Supreme Court in ruling the same. You do not have to include other circumstances not related to the issue you just wrote or included.

Avoid including irrelevant details

The essence of a case digest is that it is a shortened version of the actual decision. Refrain from including in your case digest irrelevant details such as the history of the case, backgrounders on the topics at hand, and matters not related to the main issue of the case.

A case digest is only effective if it summarizes the FACTS, ISSUES, and the RULING. By including irrelevant details, you will be destroying the purpose of a case digest which is to put into perspective the most important facets of the case assigned. The point of a case digest is to present in a concise manner what the case is all about and what should eventually be highlighted for a particular topic. Unless required by a professor, a law student should refrain from including in his work unnecessary words which would not only lengthen the digest but make it ineffective as well

Don’t change the text of the case

One of the common misconceptions in writing a digest is paraphrasing the decision. One must remember that the text of the case is binding. One misplaced word could change the very essence of the decision. Remember to write in verbatim what you want to include in your digest. Don’t take shortcuts. Don’t change the wordings of the Court.

In several cases decided by the Court, it was held that what is binding is not only the thought of the Supreme Court but the words written as well. If a law student tries to change or inadvertently deletes or adds a word, he or she is already committing a mistake. The word of the Supreme Court must be quoted as is where is every time there arises an opportunity to do so. In case digests, considering that these are shortened versions of the full-text decision, they must mirror the words the Supreme Court used.

One wrong word or punctuation mark could lead to an entire change in the decision. As discussed in several cases of Statutory Construction, these minute but important details must be given due attention so as to avoid altering what the Supreme Court means to discuss in a particular topic of the case.

Limit it to one or two pages

As mentioned earlier, the essence of writing a case digest is to shorten the actual decision of the Court. It would be contrary to the essence if you will be writing or producing a case digest with a lot of pages. Limiting your work to one or two pages would be appropriate not only for the professor reading your work but for you as well.

Do not listen to those who are saying that the longer the digest, the better. The essence of a case digest is to mirror the Supreme Court’s words as short as possible, without sacrificing the integrity of the case. If you really followed the steps mentioned before this last tip, then you will be able to streamline your reading assignment in a manner that it would not exceed two pages.

A better understanding of the case would lead to a short but effective case digest.

These are just some of the basic tips on how to effectively write a case digest. To all those law students who will be applying this strategy, may you all be able to grasp the essence of our means, and may this help you in your journey to become a lawyer.

For more tips, view more articles on Law School 101 .

Law School and Bar Review Tips
Law School 101

Writing a Case Note: The Ultimate Guide

How to Write a First-Class Case Note

Being able to write case-notes is crucial to your success studying law. As well as being a common form of assignment, they make very handy revision aids. Common law cases are often long-winded and dense, and sometimes it can be difficult to see the wood for the trees – let along remember the key parts! This post will provide you the ultimate guide to writing first-class case summaries using the FIRODA Case-Note Method.

The FIRODA Method

The FIRODA Method is an excellent way of structuring your case notes so that you summarise and remember all the key elements. Start by noting down the name of the case and the court which decided it. We’ll use Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner as an example.

Give a brief overview of the key facts of the case. The key facts are those which are relevant to the outcome of the case – the facts which the judge actually took into account when reaching their legal conclusions. If a fact is not relevant to the outcome, you probably do not need to include it. In some cases there might be a relevant dispute over what the facts were: note this down too.

Any given case will involve deciding one or more points of law, or applying one or more legal principles to a particular set of facts. Work out what the court was actually being asked to do in the case, and summarise it.

For each issue you have identified, read the majority judgments of the court to determine the ratio decidendi . The ratio decidendi is the application of the legal rule which leads the court to reach the case’s outcome. It is distinguished from obiter dicta , which is everything else in the judgment.

Not sure whether a statement is the ratio decidendi or obiter dicta ? There is no clear cut method for deciding, unfortunately, but here is a useful guide. Ask yourself: if the judge had not made this finding of fact, or used this particular legal principle, would they have reached the particular conclusion they did? If it would make no difference to the outcome, then you are probably looking at obiter dicta. Otherwise, it is probably ratio decidendi .

For example, it is common for judges to decide a case based on a particular legal principle or finding of fact, but then say ‘if I am wrong’ or ‘I would reach the same conclusion if…’ and then consider how the case would be decided if the facts or legal principles were different. The first part of such a judgment is usually the ratio decidendi , and everything afterwards is usually obiter .

In some cases, there may not be a unified ratio decidendi . For example, in Re Baden (No 2) [1972] EWCA Civ 10, the three judges all agreed on what the outcome of the case should be. However, they all reached their conclusions using completely different reasoning. If you are writing a note on a case where the majority judges disagree, explain the ratio decidendi of each judge’s decision. Compare and contrast them.

O: Obiter Dicta

While most of the obiter dicta in a case can safely be forgotten by the average law student, sometimes judges say interesting things obiter that can influence how future cases are decided. For example, the judge might:

Speculate on how the law might apply to a novel set of facts;
Discuss how future courts ought to decide related areas of law;
Disapprove of a past case, but not overrule it;
Approve of a past case.

If you think the judge has said anything in the obiter dicta which gives you insight into the law beyond the case, note it down in this section.

In some cases, a judge dissents from the majority of the court and disagrees with the outcome. Often these dissents are ignored by the legal community, but sometimes they become a powerful argument that the case was wrongly decided. If you are reading a case with a dissenting judge, note down the points on which they disagree with the majority, and why. Consider whose argument you think is stronger.

A: Assessment

Finally, assess and evaluate the decision. It may help you to read academic commentary on the case in law journals or case-books. You should be looking to answer questions such as:

How does it fit with previous and subsequently decided cases in the same area?
What policy, principle and social factors might have influenced how the judges decided the case?
Do you agree with how the law was decided and applied to the facts? If not, how would you have decided this case?

With that, you will have a solid case-note. This will not only help you get top marks in your assignments, but will also make it much easier to remember principles of law for your exams. Got any personal tips for writing case notes? Leave us a message in the comments!

[download id=”3337″]

How to Analyze Case Law

Last Updated: January 21, 2023 Fact Checked

This article was written by Jennifer Mueller, JD . Jennifer Mueller is an in-house legal expert at wikiHow. Jennifer reviews, fact-checks, and evaluates wikiHow's legal content to ensure thoroughness and accuracy. She received her JD from Indiana University Maurer School of Law in 2006. There are 7 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page. This article has been fact-checked, ensuring the accuracy of any cited facts and confirming the authority of its sources. This article has been viewed 125,926 times.

When you hear the word "law," you may assume the word refers to statutes passed by Congress and state legislatures. But a major portion of American law actually is case law – the rules appellate judges distill from their interpretation of statutes and other sources. Accordingly, much of law school is spent learning how to analyze case law. However, attending law school isn't strictly necessary to acquire this valuable skill. You can teach yourself how to analyze case law, which begins – but doesn't end – with a thorough reading of the court's written opinion.

Summarizing the Facts

The first time you read through a case, don't worry about trying to understand it. Just read for a sense of what's happening, who the major parties are, and what they want the court to do.
Keep in mind that legal opinions aren't written for laypeople, or even for law students or attorneys – they are written for other judges. If you don't understand something (assuming you're not an appellate court judge), there's nothing wrong with that.
You may have to go outside the opinion itself and look at other articles about the case, and then come back to it. For example, if you're reading a case that caused quite a stir in the media when it was decided, there will no doubt be newspaper and magazine articles about it. Reading those can help you better understand the court opinion.
Many cases have summaries that appear before the case and let you know the basics of what happened, the issue before the court, and how the court resolved that issue. The summary can be helpful, but don't use it as a substitute for an initial read-through of the case.

To make party identification even more confusing, party names may switch sides of the "v." in the case caption depending on who appealed. For example, suppose when a case began, Sally Sunshine sued Marvin Moon. The case's caption would be "Sunshine v. Moon." The trial court found in favor of Ms. Sunshine – but Mr. Moon appealed. The caption then became "Moon v. Sunshine."
To continue the example, suppose the appellate court found in favor of Mr. Moon, but Ms. Sunshine appealed that ruling to a higher court. Now the case's caption is "Sunshine v. Moon" again.
Since litigants in written opinions typically are only identified by their roles – appellant and appellee, for example – their names may only be mentioned once.

Step 3 Outline the case's procedural history.

Since the procedural history determines the role of the litigants, and thus what each of them is called throughout the written opinion, understanding how the case moved through the court system – who sued whom, and who appealed – is paramount to understanding the case.
At the same time, you don't need to go into too much detail here. You just need to understand who filed the original lawsuit (which will help you understand the facts of the case), the decision at trial, and who appealed and why.

At the appellate level, the courts are concerned with legal issues, not questions of fact. So, for example, if you are reading a case that came about as a result of a bar fight, the factual question of whether one party assaulted the other has already been resolved.
In many cases, the initial facts that prompted the dispute may be summarized in a sentence or two. Often, what's really important is what happened afterward.
Keep in mind that not all judges are the best writers. While you may be tempted to believe a particular fact is important because the judge who wrote the opinion spent several paragraphs discussing it, this is not necessarily the case.
As you read more and more cases, particularly if the cases you read are focused on a particular court, you will become familiar with the styles of individual judges. This can make it easier for you to immediately notice when the judge is focusing on facts he or she believes are central to the case's holding.

Identifying the Issue and Decision

Step 1 Determine the legal issue raised by the facts.

Essentially, you're looking for what the person who appealed the lower court's ruling wanted to happen, that didn't. To find the issue, you must figure out what that person thought the lower court did wrong, and why.
This usually isn't about something as simple as one person believing he should have been awarded more money, or a criminal defendant not wanting to go to jail. That might be part of an appellant's personal motivation, but to have a legitimate appeal you must be able to point to some way that the lower court made a legal error.
In many cases, the legal error isn't an obvious error. The lower court may have applied the law correctly – but the appellant is arguing that her case is different from the cases that developed the rule the lower court used, or that the lower court should have used a different rule.
Often in Supreme Court cases, there isn't a rule that can be handed down from previous cases and applied in this case, because no court has ever decided a case like this one. In these situations, it's up to the court to figure out how to tackle this new issue, and where it fits in to the long line of American jurisprudence.

Step 2 Phrase the issue as a yes/no question.

In some cases, the issue before the court involves multiple yes/no questions, or a follow-up question that is conditional on the answer to the first.
This usually happens when a particular factual situation present in the case has never been explored by any other court. The court must first determine whether a particular law applies to that factual situation at all before it can decide how the law applies.
For example, suppose a baker has been fined by the local government for creating cupcakes with expletives written in icing. The court may first have to determine whether icing on cupcakes is the sort of speech or expression protected by the First Amendment, before it can reach the real issue of whether the baker's First Amendment rights have been violated.

Step 3 Provide the court's answer to the question.

Some judges have a very clear, straightforward writing style, and they'll phrase the issue as a question and answer it directly. However, this isn't usually the case. In most written opinions, you should expect to dig for the question and answer, which you'll have to craft yourself.
When more than one question is asked, sometimes the answer to the first takes care of all the others. To look at the earlier cupcake-icing example, if the court had determined that no, icing on cupcakes is not protected by the First Amendment, the second question disappears. You don't have to consider whether the baker's First Amendment rights were violated by the fine, because she didn't have any First Amendment rights in the first place.
When the answer is qualified with a "sometimes," any conditional questions that follow likewise will have qualifications. #Note any significant dissents. In many cases, particularly at the Supreme Court level, a justice who disagrees with the majority will issue a dissent. As time passes and court interpretation evolves, a significant dissent may end up being a majority opinion later on when the court reverses or overturns an earlier decision. [12] X Research source
There also may be concurrences, which are separate opinions written by justices who agree with the ultimate outcome of the case, but not with the reasoning the majority applied to get there. Often a concurrence can help you understand the majority's reasoning, particularly if it seemed convoluted on first read.
Unless you understand where the case you're reading falls in the history and development of that particular area of law, you may not be able to recognize which other opinions are important until you do further research.
If you're unsure, it's best to simply note other opinions – be they dissents or concurrences – and the key difference between them and the majority's opinion.
Especially if you're reading a Supreme Court case, you also should note which justice authored the dissent or concurrence. As justices leave the court and are replaced, the values and judicial temperament of the majority also can change.
A dissent from a decade ago may become a majority opinion tomorrow – often written by the same justice, now carrying the majority where he or she once held a minority view.

Understanding the Reasoning

Step 1 Identify the legal rules used by the court.

Make note of the case from which the rule came, although typically it's not necessary for you to go back and read the case itself to understand the rule.
However, if a significant portion of the opinion discusses the previous case, you may want to go back and read it as well so you have a better understanding of what the court is talking about.
In some opinions (especially those penned by judges with straightforward writing styles), the rule used by the court will follow trigger phrases such as "the rule we apply is" or "we decide this case by applying the rule from" – phrases that alert you the court is about to tell you exactly what rule they used.
Most opinions won't be this direct, and require a closer analysis of the language to ascertain the rule the court used. Sometimes you can figure this out by working backwards. Read the court's decision, and then follow the court's train of logic in reverse until you reach the rule.

Step 2 Apply the rule to the facts of the case.

The application of a legal precedent to the facts of a case is the heart of legal analysis. This typically is done using similes. Seldom has the exact issue been presented before – to make a decision, the court must determine that this case is like a different case, and therefore the same rule should apply.
Keep in mind that, especially if you're analyzing a Supreme Court case, the court wouldn't have accepted that case on appeal if it didn't present a new issue that had not already been decided in an earlier case.
For this reason, there likely won't be a precedent that is entirely on point, or a previous case with the same fact pattern in which the same issue was raised and decided.
Rather, the court must compare cases to find a rule that applies closely and is based on a similar situation that is analogous to the dispute presented.

Step 3 Highlight facts the court found most important.

Sometimes the easiest way to locate the court's pivotal fact or facts is to consider what would have happened if they'd chosen to focus on a different fact.
For example, if the court in the case of the beleaguered baker had decided to focus on the fact that cupcakes are food, and food has never been protected under the First Amendment, it might have arrived at a different decision than it did. Because the court focused instead on the fact that the baker wrote words with icing, just as writers write words in ink, and concluded that written words inarguably enjoy First Amendment protection.
Although many other facts may be relevant, or important to some other aspect of the case, those aren't the facts that made the court rule the way it did.

Step 4 Consider how the rule would apply to different facts.

No court case exists in isolation. Once a court issues a decision, the legal interpretation and rules it establishes become part of the larger body of law devoted to that particular issue. Each opinion helps future courts understand more about the statute or constitutional provision at the heart of the case.
You don't have to wait for future courts to apply the rule you've just learned to other cases, however. Take the facts in the original case and twist them slightly, then apply the rule yourself.
Law professors call these imaginary cases "hypotheticals," and spend a good portion of class churning them out and asking their students to apply the rule they've learned to sometimes bizarre and convoluted stories.

Expert Q&A

About This Article

Case law refers to the decisions appellate judges make from their interpretations of former cases. To analyze specific case law, you’ll need to read the case through and try to get a feel for how the court made their decision. It can be pretty complex when you’re first reading a case, so jot down the main parties, the main dispute, and a brief history of the case to help yourself keep track. Once you understand the case, try to identify the legal rules the court used to make their decision. It’s also helpful to imagine different scenarios where the rule the case established could be applied, and whether or not the outcome would be the same. To learn how to focus on the most important facts of a case, read more from our Legal co-author! Did this summary help you? Yes No

Send fan mail to authors

Reader Success Stories

Ibrahim Abubakar

May 8, 2021

Did this article help you?

Feb 6, 2019

Busisiwe Nyezi-Zikizela

Feb 9, 2020

Isreal Van de vaar

Mar 30, 2020

Sep 4, 2020

Featured Articles

Watch Articles

Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Do Not Sell or Share My Info
Not Selling Info

Get all the best how-tos!

Trinity College Law Review (TCLR) | Trinity College Dublin

First Year Tip Series: Introduction to Case Notes

Ben conlon, senior editorial board (online editor).

A case note is something that every law student is asked to write at some point in their studies and, without some direction, can be a daunting task. This article aims to briefly explain what a case note is, what the benefits of writing a case note are, and how to actually write a case note. Further information is also included at the end of the piece about the Gernot Biehler Case Note competition.

What is a Case Note?

A case note is a summary and analysis of a single case, as opposed to an article, which examines an area of law. A case note should outline the facts of the case, as well as its ratio decedendi , and also provide a critical analysis of the decision. The analysis should concern the correctness of the decision, with reference to case law, accepted logic and academic opinion. A good case note usually contains analysis of the effect that the decision may have on future cases, especially if the decision is a departure from a previously settled point of law.

What to Keep in Mind when Selecting a Case

If you have the option of selecting the case you would like to write on, below are some factors you should keep in mind:

Try to pick an area of significant concern or a topical issue
Does the case seem to ignore reason/common sense?
Is there a recent case where the court departs from precedent or a position accepted in other jurisdictions?
Does the decision which may have significant extra-legal repercussions.
Will this decision prompt interesting results in future cases?
Was this the first case in a newly-legislated area?
Has there already been substantial academic commentary written on this case? Often it may be better, for originality’s sake to write on a new case, or one that has not been subject to as much discussion.

How to Write a Case Note

(A) Research

As with any piece of legal writing, the first step in writing a case note is conducting the necessary research. Read the case multiple times and note down the facts and the ratio decedendi . The case should be read in the context of the area of law as a whole; understanding how the case relates to existing principles and case law is key in forming a critique and analysis. Further consideration should be given to whether the law is still relevant, and whether it is still considered to be a strong precedent. While a case note tends not to rely on academic sources as much as a legal essay, it is still worth exploring academic commentary around the case, from which a greater perspective can be gleaned.

(B) Writing

There is no rigid structure for how a case note should be written, but this article will attempt to lay out a basic structure and guide for writing the case note itself. It is worth noting that many brilliant case notes do not follow this structure, and can often depart from it dramatically, so there is no pressure to follow this structure.

As is the case in most legal writing, it is generally recommended that the piece is broken down into separate headings. This can make the case note easier to follow, and direct the reader to the important elements of the piece. When writing a case note for a legal journal or a university assignment, regard should be had for the word-count when deciding on how specific the headings are; if there is a lower word-count, it might make sense to merge some of the headings together.

(i) The Introduction

The introduction of a case note should introduce the case and indicate the court in which it was decided. It should lay out the structure of the case note, explain the significance of the case (i.e. the change in the law brought about by the case), and briefly outline your opinion of the case.

(ii) The Facts of the Case

The second section of the case note should briefly outline the facts of the case. It is important to keep in mind that a case note is not simply a summary of a case; the facts simply set out the background for your analysis. Due to this, this section of the case note should not be too long, and the aim should be to illustrate the facts that were relevant in the court’s reasoning, rather than the entirety of the factual circumstances. This is generally a good place to mention the decisions of the lower courts in relation to the case at hand.

(iii) The Decision and the Ratio Decidendi

This section of the case note should deal with the reasoning that lead to the court’s decision, and specific emphasis should be placed on the key decisions and the ratio decedendi . Here, detail should be provided on the case law that the court either relied on or moved away from, and a short explanation of the reasoning behind such moves should be given. The way that the decision was handled should also be mentioned (e.g. was the judgment suspended to allow the government to amend the issue?), as this is often indicative of the attitude of the courts in relation to the issue at hand.

(iv) Critical Analysis/Further Discussion

The primary aim of a case note is to critically analyse a particular decision and the effect it has on the law. “Critically analyse” can be a confusing phrase, so considering some of the following questions may be a useful starting point:

Is the logic of the judgment sound? Do you agree with it? Why or why not?
Does the judgment differ or depart from previous decisions? Does it follow some aspects but not others?
How does the judgment compare with international precedent?
Does the judgment reflect political/economic/cultural tensions?
Does the judgment fail to acknowledge any legal or extralegal repercussions it may have?
Has the judgment failed to address any important questions?
Do you agree with the decision? Why?

It is worth noting that “critically analyse” does not mean you have to disagree with a judgment; the best critical analysis praises some aspects of a judgment, and attacks others. Commentary on previous related decisions may help to inform your opinion on a case, and help with the critical analysis. It is recommended that some thought is given to how the case may have a lasting impact, and it should be acknowledged whether or not the case might be open to appeal. However, as in any legal piece, it is advisable that a certain degree of critical analysis is woven throughout the piece, rather than isolated to one section.

(v) Conclusion

The conclusion should very briefly summarise the decision, the flaws and achievements that have been discussed throughout the case note, and your overall opinion. A general rule for any piece of writing is that new substantive arguments that have not been discussed in the body of the piece should not be introduced in the conclusion. Finally, some concluding remarks could be offered about the effect of the case on that area of law, and how future cases may be influenced by it.

Some Final Tips

As is the case with any piece of legal writing, there should be a cohesive thread of argument that runs through the case note, but this may be difficult to pick up on after several hours of writing by yourself. As a result, the argument you have crafted might make sense to you, but not to a new reader. One of the best ways to deal with this is to ask someone else to read over the piece and offer some of their own comments.

While it is always advised to read through previous academic pieces written on your chosen area, make sure when citing academics that you are also evaluating their arguments to the reader. Do you agree with what the academic has said? How does their argument bolster yours? Or, how would you refute what the academic has argued? Analysing the academic commentary you have utilised is key to presenting critical analysis in your piece.

In the same vein, when presenting your arguments, it is recommended that you recognise ‘the other side.’ This is particularly important in controversial areas of law, like socio-economic rights, where presenting a one-sided argument will reflect poorly on the author’s critical analysis.

As a final note, the TCLR Online has published many case notes, and reading over these can help you to form a picture of what a case note looks like, and what a case note should contain. Many longer case notes have also been published in the print version of the TCLR, which can be found on the legal article database Heinonline.

The Gernot Biehler Case Note Competition

The Trinity College Law Review runs an annual case note competition in honour of Dr. Gernot Biehler. Dr. Biehler was a distinguished fellow of Trinity College and a lecturer in international law and conflicts of law, who died aged 48. Dr. Biehler was a keen supporter of the work of the Law Review.

The competition is open to first and second year undergraduate students from all universities. Case notes are subject to a word limit of 3,000 words excluding footnotes, and the deadline for submitting your entry is the 17th January 2020. The winning entry is published in the print journal of the Trinity College Law Review, and the winner receives a cash prize of €250. More information on the competition can be found at www.trinitycollegelawreview.org/submissions/ .

Shop by Author

Sabrineh Ardalan
Robert Bordone
Robert Clark
John Coates
Susan Crawford
Alonzo Emery
Heidi Gardner
Philip B. Heymann
Howell E. Jackson
Wendy Jacobs
Adriaan Lanni
Jeremy McClane
Naz Modirzadeh
Catherine Mondell
Ashish Nanda
Charles R. Nesson
John Palfrey
Bruce Patton

Todd D. Rakoff

Lisa Rohrer
Jeswald W. Salacuse
James Sebenius
Joseph William Singer
Holger Spamann
Carol Steiker
Guhan Subramanian
Lawrence Susskind

David B. Wilkins

Jonathan Zittrain

Shop by Brand

Howell Jackson
Ashish Nanda and Nicholas Semi Haas
Chad M. Carr
John Coates, Clayton Rose, and David Lane
Ashish Nanda and Lauren Prusiner
Ashish Nanda and Lisa Rohrer
Ashish Nanda and Monet Brewerton
View all Brands
$0.00 - $1.00
$1.00 - $2.00
$2.00 - $2.00
$2.00 - $3.00
$3.00 - $4.00

Legal Writing

Published Old-New
Published New-Old

Lotus v. Borland: A Case Study in Software Copyright

Ben Sobel, under the supervision of Jonathan Zittrain

Algorithmic Allegories (version 1.0)

Marcus Comiter, Ben Sobel, and Jonathan Zittrain

From Sony to SOPA: The Technology-Content Divide Teacher's Manual

John Palfrey, Jonathan Zittrain, Kendra Albert, and Lisa Brem

The Case of Cross-Deputization

Joseph William Singer, Jeremy McClane, and Nicholas Price

Sue the Consumer: Digital Copyright in the New Millennium

Charles Nesson and Sarah Jeong

In the Stadium and in the Street: The Brazil Soccer Riots

Cost-Benefit Analysis at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Howell Jackson and Kelley O'Mara

Ching Pow: Far East Yardies!!

Charles Nesson and Saptarishi Bandopadhyay

Balloon Boy

Todd D. Rakoff, Alex Whiting, and Kyle Virgien

From Sony to SOPA: The Technology-Content Divide

Game Changers: Mobile Gaming Apps and Data Privacy

Susan Crawford, Jonathan Zittrain and Lisa Brem

multi-panel code on black backlit computer screen

The WikiLeaks Incident: Background, Details, and Resources

Alan Ezekiel, under supervision of John Palfrey and Jonathan Zittrain

Drafting an IP Strategy at MNC (C): New Puzzles

John Palfrey and Lisa Brem

Drafting an IP Strategy at MNC (B): Getting Started

Drafting an IP Strategy at MNC (A)

The Case of the Anti-Bacterial Toys

Wendy Jacobs and David Abrams

Iqbal's Big Venture

Robert C. Bordone and Tobias C. Berkman

The Case of the Section 8 Housing Vouchers

Todd D. Rakoff, Paul Radvany, and Rebecca Goldberg

The Case of the Medical Stent

The Case of the Commissioner's Choice

Wendy Jacobs and Shaun Goho

The Case of the Lead Toys

Todd Rakoff and Joseph William Singer

Writing and Presenting Short Memoranda to Supervisors

University of Virginia School of Law

Studying for Law School Exams? Here Are 10 Ways To Prepare

Photo by Jesús Pino

As the spring semester winds down, students at the University of Virginia School of Law are starting to prepare for exams, which begin April 29. Here are the best tips and content about how to approach exams we’ve produced over the years.

1. What Law Professors Look for on Exams

Professor George Cohen offers advice on how to approach law school exams.

2. Professors Discuss Exam-Taking Strategies

Professors George Cohen, Anne Coughlin and Thomas Nachbar advise first-year students on best strategies for taking law school exams.

3. Exam Tips for First-Year Law Students

Stocked with the latest and greatest exam advice from Professor Alex Johnson and students Katie Barber ’15 and Zachary Ray ’16, this video covers all angles, from preparing for exams to taking them.

4. Inside the Mind of a Professor: How They Write Exams and How You Can Excel at Them

How and why do law professors write such challenging exams? Professor Kenneth S. Abraham and Dean Risa Goluboff discuss their process and offer tips for how students can master taking exams.

5. What’s Your Exam Advice?

We asked students, faculty and alumni for their best advice for prepping for and taking exams.

6. Been There, Passed That — Alumni Exam Tips

Twenty alumni advise students to take practice exams, know your professor, study your own way, and more.

7. Outlining Strategies and Techniques

Daniel Richardson, former editor-in-chief of the Virginia Law Review and the 2018 graduate with the highest GPA, provides law students with advice about preparing for mid-terms and finals.

8. How To Prepare for Exams

Faculty suggest starting by asking professors about the style and scope of their tests, and learning about what kind of answers they want.

9. Professors Discuss Exam Strategies

10. Exam Tips From Professor Anne Coughlin

There’s a reason why this video has more than 90,000 hits on YouTube.

Founded in 1819, the University of Virginia School of Law is the second-oldest continuously operating law school in the nation. Consistently ranked among the top law schools, Virginia is a world-renowned training ground for distinguished lawyers and public servants, instilling in them a commitment to leadership, integrity and community service.

Mike Fox Director of Media Relations Email

Academic Calendar
J.D. Curriculum
Current Courses
Concentrations
Academic Policies
Study Abroad
Graduate Studies (LL.M. and S.J.D.)
Dual-Degree Programs
Programs and Centers
Experiential Learning
Educating Legal Scholars
Faculty Scholarship
The Free Exchange of Ideas at UVA Law
Admissions Process
J.D. Application Information
Virginia Residency
Online Status Checker
Make Online Seat Deposit
Transfer Students
Brochures and Key Websites
ABA Required Disclosures
Diversity, Equity and Belonging
Admitted Students
Graduate Studies
Financial Aid
Karsh-Dillard Scholarships
Student Organizations
Academic Journals
Student Government
The Honor System
Living in Charlottesville
Awards, Fellowships and Honors
Moot Court and Trial Advocacy
Legal Writing Fellows
Student Affairs
Student Records
Career Development
Law IT/Computing
Courts & Commerce Bookstore
Employment Resources for Students
Office of Private Practice Staff
Resources for Private Practice Employers
Public Service Center Staff
Funding for Public Service
Program in Law and Public Service
Resources for Public Service Employers
Office of Judicial Clerkships Staff
The Pro Bono Program
About the School
Facts & Statistics
Consumer Information (ABA Required Disclosures)
Event Calendar
Video & Audio
Subscribe and Connect
University of Virginia

All You Wanted to Know About How to Write a Case Study

What do you study in your college? If you are a psychology, sociology, or anthropology student, we bet you might be familiar with what a case study is. This research method is used to study a certain person, group, or situation. In this guide from our dissertation writing service , you will learn how to write a case study professionally, from researching to citing sources properly. Also, we will explore different types of case studies and show you examples — so that you won’t have any other questions left.

What Is a Case Study?

A case study is a subcategory of research design which investigates problems and offers solutions. Case studies can range from academic research studies to corporate promotional tools trying to sell an idea—their scope is quite vast.

What Is the Difference Between a Research Paper and a Case Study?

While research papers turn the reader’s attention to a certain problem, case studies go even further. Case study guidelines require students to pay attention to details, examining issues closely and in-depth using different research methods. For example, case studies may be used to examine court cases if you study Law, or a patient's health history if you study Medicine. Case studies are also used in Marketing, which are thorough, empirically supported analysis of a good or service's performance. Well-designed case studies can be valuable for prospective customers as they can identify and solve the potential customers pain point.

Case studies involve a lot of storytelling – they usually examine particular cases for a person or a group of people. This method of research is very helpful, as it is very practical and can give a lot of hands-on information. Most commonly, the length of the case study is about 500-900 words, which is much less than the length of an average research paper.

The structure of a case study is very similar to storytelling. It has a protagonist or main character, which in your case is actually a problem you are trying to solve. You can use the system of 3 Acts to make it a compelling story. It should have an introduction, rising action, a climax where transformation occurs, falling action, and a solution.

Here is a rough formula for you to use in your case study:

Problem (Act I): > Solution (Act II) > Result (Act III) > Conclusion.

Types of Case Studies

The purpose of a case study is to provide detailed reports on an event, an institution, a place, future customers, or pretty much anything. There are a few common types of case study, but the type depends on the topic. The following are the most common domains where case studies are needed:

Historical case studies are great to learn from. Historical events have a multitude of source info offering different perspectives. There are always modern parallels where these perspectives can be applied, compared, and thoroughly analyzed.
Problem-oriented case studies are usually used for solving problems. These are often assigned as theoretical situations where you need to immerse yourself in the situation to examine it. Imagine you’re working for a startup and you’ve just noticed a significant flaw in your product’s design. Before taking it to the senior manager, you want to do a comprehensive study on the issue and provide solutions. On a greater scale, problem-oriented case studies are a vital part of relevant socio-economic discussions.
Cumulative case studies collect information and offer comparisons. In business, case studies are often used to tell people about the value of a product.
Critical case studies explore the causes and effects of a certain case.
Illustrative case studies describe certain events, investigating outcomes and lessons learned.

Need a compelling case study? EssayPro has got you covered. Our experts are ready to provide you with detailed, insightful case studies that capture the essence of real-world scenarios. Elevate your academic work with our professional assistance.

Case Study Format

The case study format is typically made up of eight parts:

Executive Summary. Explain what you will examine in the case study. Write an overview of the field you’re researching. Make a thesis statement and sum up the results of your observation in a maximum of 2 sentences.
Background. Provide background information and the most relevant facts. Isolate the issues.
Case Evaluation. Isolate the sections of the study you want to focus on. In it, explain why something is working or is not working.
Proposed Solutions. Offer realistic ways to solve what isn’t working or how to improve its current condition. Explain why these solutions work by offering testable evidence.
Conclusion. Summarize the main points from the case evaluations and proposed solutions. 6. Recommendations. Talk about the strategy that you should choose. Explain why this choice is the most appropriate.
Implementation. Explain how to put the specific strategies into action.
References. Provide all the citations.

How to Write a Case Study

Let's discover how to write a case study.

Setting Up the Research

When writing a case study, remember that research should always come first. Reading many different sources and analyzing other points of view will help you come up with more creative solutions. You can also conduct an actual interview to thoroughly investigate the customer story that you'll need for your case study. Including all of the necessary research, writing a case study may take some time. The research process involves doing the following:

Define your objective. Explain the reason why you’re presenting your subject. Figure out where you will feature your case study; whether it is written, on video, shown as an infographic, streamed as a podcast, etc.
Determine who will be the right candidate for your case study. Get permission, quotes, and other features that will make your case study effective. Get in touch with your candidate to see if they approve of being part of your work. Study that candidate’s situation and note down what caused it.
Identify which various consequences could result from the situation. Follow these guidelines on how to start a case study: surf the net to find some general information you might find useful.
Make a list of credible sources and examine them. Seek out important facts and highlight problems. Always write down your ideas and make sure to brainstorm.
Focus on several key issues – why they exist, and how they impact your research subject. Think of several unique solutions. Draw from class discussions, readings, and personal experience. When writing a case study, focus on the best solution and explore it in depth. After having all your research in place, writing a case study will be easy. You may first want to check the rubric and criteria of your assignment for the correct case study structure.

Read Also: ' WHAT IS A CREDIBLE SOURCES ?'

Although your instructor might be looking at slightly different criteria, every case study rubric essentially has the same standards. Your professor will want you to exhibit 8 different outcomes:

Correctly identify the concepts, theories, and practices in the discipline.
Identify the relevant theories and principles associated with the particular study.
Evaluate legal and ethical principles and apply them to your decision-making.
Recognize the global importance and contribution of your case.
Construct a coherent summary and explanation of the study.
Demonstrate analytical and critical-thinking skills.
Explain the interrelationships between the environment and nature.
Integrate theory and practice of the discipline within the analysis.

Need Case Study DONE FAST?

Pick a topic, tell us your requirements and get your paper on time.

Case Study Outline

Let's look at the structure of an outline based on the issue of the alcoholic addiction of 30 people.

Introduction

Statement of the issue: Alcoholism is a disease rather than a weakness of character.
Presentation of the problem: Alcoholism is affecting more than 14 million people in the USA, which makes it the third most common mental illness there.
Explanation of the terms: In the past, alcoholism was commonly referred to as alcohol dependence or alcohol addiction. Alcoholism is now the more severe stage of this addiction in the disorder spectrum.
Hypotheses: Drinking in excess can lead to the use of other drugs.
Importance of your story: How the information you present can help people with their addictions.
Background of the story: Include an explanation of why you chose this topic.
Presentation of analysis and data: Describe the criteria for choosing 30 candidates, the structure of the interview, and the outcomes.
Strong argument 1: ex. X% of candidates dealing with anxiety and depression...
Strong argument 2: ex. X amount of people started drinking by their mid-teens.
Strong argument 3: ex. X% of respondents’ parents had issues with alcohol.
Concluding statement: I have researched if alcoholism is a disease and found out that…
Recommendations: Ways and actions for preventing alcohol use.

Writing a Case Study Draft

After you’ve done your case study research and written the outline, it’s time to focus on the draft. In a draft, you have to develop and write your case study by using: the data which you collected throughout the research, interviews, and the analysis processes that were undertaken. Follow these rules for the draft:

Your draft should contain at least 4 sections: an introduction; a body where you should include background information, an explanation of why you decided to do this case study, and a presentation of your main findings; a conclusion where you present data; and references.
In the introduction, you should set the pace very clearly. You can even raise a question or quote someone you interviewed in the research phase. It must provide adequate background information on the topic. The background may include analyses of previous studies on your topic. Include the aim of your case here as well. Think of it as a thesis statement. The aim must describe the purpose of your work—presenting the issues that you want to tackle. Include background information, such as photos or videos you used when doing the research.
Describe your unique research process, whether it was through interviews, observations, academic journals, etc. The next point includes providing the results of your research. Tell the audience what you found out. Why is this important, and what could be learned from it? Discuss the real implications of the problem and its significance in the world.
Include quotes and data (such as findings, percentages, and awards). This will add a personal touch and better credibility to the case you present. Explain what results you find during your interviews in regards to the problem and how it developed. Also, write about solutions which have already been proposed by other people who have already written about this case.
At the end of your case study, you should offer possible solutions, but don’t worry about solving them yourself.

Use Data to Illustrate Key Points in Your Case Study

Even though your case study is a story, it should be based on evidence. Use as much data as possible to illustrate your point. Without the right data, your case study may appear weak and the readers may not be able to relate to your issue as much as they should. Let's see the examples from essay writing service :

‍ With data: Alcoholism is affecting more than 14 million people in the USA, which makes it the third most common mental illness there. Without data: A lot of people suffer from alcoholism in the United States.

Try to include as many credible sources as possible. You may have terms or sources that could be hard for other cultures to understand. If this is the case, you should include them in the appendix or Notes for the Instructor or Professor.

Finalizing the Draft: Checklist

After you finish drafting your case study, polish it up by answering these ‘ask yourself’ questions and think about how to end your case study:

Check that you follow the correct case study format, also in regards to text formatting.
Check that your work is consistent with its referencing and citation style.
Micro-editing — check for grammar and spelling issues.
Macro-editing — does ‘the big picture’ come across to the reader? Is there enough raw data, such as real-life examples or personal experiences? Have you made your data collection process completely transparent? Does your analysis provide a clear conclusion, allowing for further research and practice?

Problems to avoid:

Overgeneralization – Do not go into further research that deviates from the main problem.
Failure to Document Limitations – Just as you have to clearly state the limitations of a general research study, you must describe the specific limitations inherent in the subject of analysis.
Failure to Extrapolate All Possible Implications – Just as you don't want to over-generalize from your case study findings, you also have to be thorough in the consideration of all possible outcomes or recommendations derived from your findings.

How to Create a Title Page and Cite a Case Study

Let's see how to create an awesome title page.

Your title page depends on the prescribed citation format. The title page should include:

A title that attracts some attention and describes your study
The title should have the words “case study” in it
The title should range between 5-9 words in length
Your name and contact information
Your finished paper should be only 500 to 1,500 words in length.With this type of assignment, write effectively and avoid fluff

Here is a template for the APA and MLA format title page:

There are some cases when you need to cite someone else's study in your own one – therefore, you need to master how to cite a case study. A case study is like a research paper when it comes to citations. You can cite it like you cite a book, depending on what style you need.

Citation Example in MLA ‍ Hill, Linda, Tarun Khanna, and Emily A. Stecker. HCL Technologies. Boston: Harvard Business Publishing, 2008. Print.

Citation Example in APA ‍ Hill, L., Khanna, T., & Stecker, E. A. (2008). HCL Technologies. Boston: Harvard Business Publishing.

Citation Example in Chicago Hill, Linda, Tarun Khanna, and Emily A. Stecker. HCL Technologies.

Case Study Examples

To give you an idea of a professional case study example, we gathered and linked some below.

Eastman Kodak Case Study

Case Study Example: Audi Trains Mexican Autoworkers in Germany

To conclude, a case study is one of the best methods of getting an overview of what happened to a person, a group, or a situation in practice. It allows you to have an in-depth glance at the real-life problems that businesses, healthcare industry, criminal justice, etc. may face. This insight helps us look at such situations in a different light. This is because we see scenarios that we otherwise would not, without necessarily being there. If you need custom essays , try our research paper writing services .

Get Help Form Qualified Writers

Crafting a case study is not easy. You might want to write one of high quality, but you don’t have the time or expertise. If you’re having trouble with your case study, help with essay request - we'll help. EssayPro writers have read and written countless case studies and are experts in endless disciplines. Request essay writing, editing, or proofreading assistance from our custom case study writing service , and all of your worries will be gone.

Don't Know Where to Start?

Crafting a case study is not easy. You might want to write one of high quality, but you don’t have the time or expertise. Request ' write my case study ' assistance from our service.

What Is A Case Study?

How to cite a case study in apa, how to write a case study, related articles.

[email protected]

Contract Law: Analyzing Real-Life Examples and Case Studies

Contract law task partner controls understandings, guaranteeing solidness and consistency in intelligence through guarantees making enforceable commitments for exchanges. Key components of a substantial contract incorporate offer, acknowledgment, thought, lawful capacity, and legal reason, managing enforceability and rights in case of breach. Different contract sorts incorporate express, inferred, one-sided, respective ascension, supporting in arrangement, and debate determination through translation, execution, breach, and cures. It advances belief, certainty in commerce, decency, and equity in lawful relations. Significant in financial exchanges, it maintains rights, and steadiness, and contributes to societal capacities, guaranteeing parties meet their commitments. Generally, Examples of contract law tasks offer assistance is principal in keeping up arrangements inside lawful frameworks, fundamental for businesses and people alike.

Significance in Legal Transactions

Contract law encourages trade exchanges by making understandings that oversee dangers and commitments for deals, administrations, and mergers.

Genuine bequest contracts layout terms like property exchanges, leases, and contracts to ensure buyer, vendor, and tenant interface.

Employment contracts clarify job terms to prevent conflicts and define the employer- employee relationship.

Consumer contracts promote fairness by protecting buyer rights with warranties and dispute resolutions.

Fundamental Concepts in Contract Law

A clear willingness to enter a contract with specific terms communicated to create a legal obligation.

Agreement to the offer with terms communicated to the offeror, forming a binding contract.

Value exchanged in a contract, such as promises or transfer of goods/services/money, is required for validity and enforcement.

Legal capacity is necessary for all parties in a contract, including age, mental competence, and absence of duress.

Contracts must have a legal purpose and cannot involve illegal activities.

Parties must have a genuine intention for a contract to be enforceable.

“Two case studies from real life that demonstrate how contract law principles are applied”

1. Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (Case Study Examples of Contract Law, 1893)

The Carbolic Smoke Ball Company advertised their flu-treating product offering a £100 reward for users who still feel ill. Mrs. Carlill used the product as directed but still got sick leading her to sue. The court ruled the ad as a unilateral offer accepted by Mrs. Carlill’s use of the smoke ball. This case highlights the importance of language and context in contract law when determining offer and acceptance validity from advertisements.

2. Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd. v. Williams (1991)

Williams was hired by Roffey Bros & Nicholls to renovate apartments and faced financial issues but didn’t finish on time. Roffey agreed to pay more for timely completion then refused. Consideration and Promissory Estoppel applied. Court inspected on the off chance that the guarantee of additional cash was substantial though. It ruled the guarantee may be substantial if it profited Roffey. The case recognized commonsense benefits as substantial thought extended thought teaching and emphasized promissory estoppel.

Students find contract law assignments difficult because of the complicated legal ideas and principles concerned. Understanding case regulation is vital for applying and interpreting precedent. Contracts vary from fundamental to complex involving more than one event. Legal studies capabilities are vital for locating applicable laws and courtroom rulings. Writing sturdy arguments and efficaciously communicating evaluations are crucial skills for success in settlement regulation assignments especially for college kids new to criminal research.

Introduction to Resources and Services Offering Assistance

Students dealing with challenges with contract regulation assignments can utilize diverse resources for help:

Google Scholar provides statutes, case regulations, and felony commentary online resources.
University libraries provide large felony collections and steerage from librarians for locating relevant materials.
Academic tutoring offerings offer personalized help with contract regulation ideas, case evaluation, research, and writing skills.
University writing centers assist with structuring arguments, refining writing style, and mentioning prison assets effectively.
Professional writing offerings online can offer custom-written contract law assignments helper that are tailor-made to students’ desires beneficial for tight time limits or additional help.

Exploration of different types of offers and their legal implications.

Examples of an offer in contract law take specific paperwork with specific criminal outcomes. Advertisements, process offers, public sale bids, buy offers, reward gives and negotiation gives all have awesome implications. Advertisements may be presented with specific terms processes are examples of offers in contract law to create employment contracts when typical auction bids are finalized with the aid of the auctioneer’s statement and purchase and praise form binding contracts upon popularity. Understanding these versions is important for clean and enforceable contracts.

Examination of consideration as a crucial element in contract formation through examples.

Consideration is an essential element of agreement law and may take numerous bureaucracy. Examples of Consideration in Contract Law would possibly contain economic prices for items or offerings like buying a telephone. It may also involve acting services consisting of a house owner hiring a contractor for renovations. Mutual guarantees or forbearance like no longer suing in alternate for debt reimbursement also matter as attention. Surrendering criminal rights or pleasant present duties underneath new phrases are further times. Consideration is crucial for developing enforceable contracts by way of making certain price changes between events.Understanding Types of Contracts in Business Law

Contracts in enterprise law alter commercial interactions of numerous sorts for specific purposes. Express contracts have simply said terms through verbal or written agreements.

Different types of contracts in business law, for example, rent-implied contracts are inferred from moves which include a client buying items at checkout. Unilateral contracts involve one birthday party’s promise for every other birthday celebration’s unique act like imparting praise. Bilateral contracts include mutual guarantees like a provider handing over goods to a store. Executed contracts have all parties fulfill obligations like a dressmaker finishing a challenge. Executory contracts have responsibilities pending like a contractor building an office. Voidable contracts may be voided for legal motives like a minor voiding a vehicle purchase Understanding. Types of Contracts is important for companies in prison agreements for readability and safety of rights.

Analysis of cases involving misrepresentation and its consequences in contract law

Misrepresentation occurs whilst one birthday party gives the alternative the incorrect impression of a fact in an attempt to get them to signal a contract. Here are a few instances of examples of misrepresentation in contract law cases and their respective outcomes:

Case 1: A vs B (Example of Innocent Misrepresentation) Details: A miscalculated the mileage of a used car that B purchased claiming it had simply driven 20,000 miles due to an odometer blunders.

Consequences: Based on A’s sincere perception in the fake statement, B may additionally cancel the agreement if the misrepresentation is fabricated and damages will also be granted.

Case 2: Example of Negligent Misrepresentation: X v. Y Details: Y, a real property broker falsely states that a residence has by no means flooded. On the premise of this record X purchases the land. Johnson reveals later that the assets flooded within the beyond because of Y’s negligent misrepresentation.

Consequences: X can also request the cancellation of the settlement and pursue damages for any losses brought on by way of Y’s deception.

Detailed examination of examples showcasing fraud, duress, and undue impact in settlement law.

Contracts are voidable with the aid of fraud, coercion, and undue affect. The following are instances of fraud, duress, and undue affect that exhibit each idea:

Examples of fraud in contract law: A providing false financial statements to B during business negotiations, hiding debts and liabilities. If B can show A intended to deceive and induce him, the partnership contract may be voided for fraud.

Examples of duress in contract law: X threatened harm unless Y sold property at a reduced price. Y can void the contract if duress is proven, seeking relief to cancel it in court.

Undue Influence

Examples of undue influence in contract law: A financial advisor exploited their relationship with an elderly client to manipulate him into signing over most of his estate. If D can show this abuse of trust, the contract may be voided for undue influence, giving him back control of his estate.

Explanation of invitation to treat and representation with relevant examples

An example of an invitation to treat in contract law is not a binding offer in contract law but an invitation to negotiate or make an offer. Examples of offers in contract law include advertisements or displays of goods. On the other hand, a representation is a statement of fact during negotiations that leads to contract formation. Unlike contract terms, representations are not automatically part of the agreement unless stated. Examples of representation in contract law, an automobile sales clerk misleadingly claiming low mileage to make a sale. Examining Invitation to Treat and representation is crucial in determining a legally binding agreement and parties’ responsibilities.

Case studies illustrate situations where mutual mistake affects contract validity

In terms of agreement law, mutual mistake takes place when events misunderstand a crucial element that is vital to the settlement. Case research exhibits how it influences the validity of contracts.

Examples of Mutual Mistakes in Contract Law

In S v. K, the agreement became void because both events misunderstood the fee of the cow, believing it to be barren when in reality it changed into pregnant.

A miscommunication concerning the ship to which the contract pertained resulted in a null and void agreement in R v. W. According to D v. B, a rent was voidable due to the fact both parties concept the mill’s machinery became nevertheless operational. To avoid legal pitfalls in contract law , it’s miles vital to recognize agreements, as these examples demonstrate.

Important components of contract regulation are giving attention, an invitation to treat, illustration, mutual mistake, fraud, duress, and undue impact. Understanding these concepts is essential for effective felony agreements. Further exploration of settlement law can beautify comprehension of rights and duties. Seek professional guidance for deeper knowledge and help with assignments in this dynamic field.

Get LAW & UG Entrance Exams Updates

Judiciary Exams » How To Write A Case Study In Law Exam: Expert Guide

How To Write A Case Study In Law Exam: Expert Guide

Writing a case study can be a challenging task for law students as it requires a lot of thinking. The situation gets worse when you have to write a case study for a law exam. As it is a part and parcel of law exams, it is impossible to evade it. Hence, you should do everything possible to master this subject and write it excellently.

How To Write A Case Study In Law Exam

To curate any case study, you should consider the following facts:

In-depth analysis: You should study a subject in-depth which is quintessential. Deep analysis of a subject ensures that you don’t miss out on any part of the subject unturned.

Take Notes: It is always important to note down the important points and facts of the subject that you study.

Gather facts: To ensure the accuracy of your study, it is necessary that you make a note of the facts.

Get perfect solutions: Your first step is to identify the problem and look out for ways to get perfect solutions.

A law case study is a detailed and intensive study of a person, group, or social phenomenon. Usually, you conduct a study on a case that is solved by a judge. It investigates a problem, analyses solutions with supporting evidence. A case study helps you determine the success or failure of a case. You can use the law to solve various case scenarios. Check civil judge salary .

While you have an overview of case studies in law exams, now it’s time to understand how to write a case study in a law exam.

[Download Free Study Material For Judiciary Exams by Judiciary Gold]

How to write a case study in a law exam?

Read to understand

Once you identify the case, the next step is to study the case. You need to check if your case meets the following criteria:

Provides insights into the subject you are studying.
Challenge the existing theories.

To write a case study, the candidate should have proper knowledge of the subject. The candidate should read the case study opinions and facts, later analyze the situation carefully. He/she should take short notes and highlight the points that are important.

Concentrate on Analysis

While analyzing, the candidate should focus on 2 to 5 fundamental problems of the case. It can include questions like Why do they exist? What are the impacts, and who’s responsible for these problems? At the start of the paragraph, the candidate should introduce the protagonists, then include the topic of the case.

Check Also: Judiciary Exam Subjects

Describe the synopsis

Drafting a summary of the case is important to completely understand the case. The candidate should describe all the characters of the story chronologically and also the problems included.

Curate the best solutions

Candidates should perform trial and error methods to find the best solutions that fit the problem. Reviewing course readings, recalling discussions, and candidates’ own experiences can help find the best solutions. Brainstorming is one of the best possible ways to find the solution.

Choose the Best solution

In the brainstorming session list out all the possible solutions and choose the best one. To choose the best, the candidate should examine the strengths and weaknesses of the answers listed. Considering strong evidence and its pros and cons can help in finding the right solution.

Read More: Judiciary Eligibility Criteria 2024

Use IRAC rule

IRAC stands for Issue, the Rule of Law, Analysis, and Conclusion. In this method, the candidate should first discover and identify issues in the case. Let’s understand each part of the rule below:

Issues will not be visible sometimes, so the candidate should look for the issue carefully. Problems vary based on the matter for example they include negligence, malpractice, abuse of power, several liabilities, amongst other subjects. One case can have several issues, so it’s better to discuss the problems separately. Before moving ahead, the candidate should confirm if he/she has spotted the issue that the model writer intended.

Check Also: Judiciary Books List 2024

The Rule of Law

The candidate should determine the rule of law that should be incorporated in the case study. For every issue discovered, the candidate should find the best rule of law. Ensure that they are relevant. There is no need to note down every rule of law while writing a case study. The candidate should only review each rule of law cautiously.

The candidate should analyze the case study to discover the possible solutions to the problem. He/she should relate the practical part with the theory part while writing a case study in the law exam. The candidate should not only suggest a solution but also present some facts to support the suggested solutions.

The candidate should ensure that they have chosen a relevant rule of law. After selecting the rule of law, they can apply it to the situations discovered. The candidate should make lawyerly arguments on behalf of the defendant and also the plaintiff. Imagining what the plaintiff would argue and what the defendant would say on their part will help analyze the case study.

The candidate should be more creative while making any arguments. Candidates should argue based on the facts and how they integrate them in one way or another. Also, the candidate can state the policy reason and why the case should turn one way and not the other. Candidates can also argue based on why one should use the model rule instead of the traditional rule.

The conclusion is the final part of writing a case study. It should be based on the reasons why the issue was raised based on the rule of law and use the judgment of relevant use case laws. While finalizing the case study, the candidate should write the final verdict of each situation. Preferably, the candidate can state that the plaintiff is likely to win for the defendant.

Read Also: How To Prepare For Judiciary Exams 2024

Frequently Asked Questions

Q). What is the full form of IRAC?

A). IRAC stands for Issue, the Rule of Law, Analysis, and Conclusion.

Q). How to choose the best solution to a problem?

A). To choose the best, the candidate should examine the strengths and weaknesses of the answers listed. Considering strong evidence and its pros and cons can help in finding the right solution.

Q). How to find the problems?

A). While analyzing, the candidate should focus on 2 to 5 fundamental problems of the case. It can include questions like Why do they exist? What are the impacts, and who's responsible for these problems?

Q). Why is in-depth analysis necessary?

A). Deep analysis of a subject ensures that you don’t miss out on any part of the subject unturned.

SSC Exams 2020-21 Check Complete List of Exams
CLAT 2025 Exam Date, Notification & Registration [Latest Updates]
Judiciary Exam Pattern 2023
West Bengal Judiciary Exam 2023: Notification, Exam Dates
Rajasthan Judiciary Recruitment 2024
Punjab Judiciary Syllabus 2024 [Prelims & Mains]
Punjab Judiciary Recruitment 2024 Check Vacancies & Exam Dates
CLAT Preparation Strategy & Tips 2025
NRA CET Exam 2021 Eligibility,Selection Process & Exam Dates
NLU Entrance Exams 2023 [Check List of NLU Exams]

Law’s Sharona Hoffman and Cassandra Burke Robertson write legal case study on cognitive decline in elderly drivers

With a growing elderly population, cognitive decline in drivers has become a significant public safety concern. More than 32 million individuals who are 70 or older have driver’s licenses, and that number is growing quickly. In addition, almost 10% of U.S. seniors (those 65 and older) have dementia, and an additional 22% have mild cognitive impairment. Between a quarter and a half of individuals with mild to moderate dementia still drive. As cognitive abilities such as memory, attention, and decision‐making skills deteriorate, a driverʹs ability to operate a vehicle safely can be compromised, putting drivers, passengers, other motorists and pedestrians at risk.

Case Western Reserve University School of Law faculty members Sharona Hoffman, the Edgar A. Hahn Professor of Law, and Cassandra Burke Robertson, the John Deaver Drinko – BakerHostetler Professor of Law, wrote a legal case study assessing this topic in a forthcoming article for UC Irvine Law Review .

Titled “Patient Autonomy, Public Safety, and Drivers with Cognitive Decline,” they explored how the challenges of cognitive decline in relation to driving is crucial for maintaining elderly individuals’ quality of life

Their article is available to read through SSRN.

Skip to main content
Keyboard shortcuts for audio player

Your Health
Treatments & Tests
Health Inc.
Public Health

Reproductive rights in America

What's at stake as the supreme court hears idaho case about abortion in emergencies.

Selena Simmons-Duffin

The Supreme Court will hear another case about abortion rights on Wednesday. Protestors gathered outside the court last month when the case before the justices involved abortion pills. Tom Brenner for The Washington Post/Getty Images hide caption

The Supreme Court will hear another case about abortion rights on Wednesday. Protestors gathered outside the court last month when the case before the justices involved abortion pills.

In Idaho, when a pregnant patient has complications, abortion is only legal to prevent the woman's death. But a federal law known as EMTALA requires doctors to provide "stabilizing treatment" to patients in the emergency department.

The Biden administration sees that as a direct conflict, which is why the abortion issue is back – yet again – before the Supreme Court on Wednesday.

The case began just a few weeks after the justices overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, when the federal Justice Department sued Idaho , arguing that the court should declare that "Idaho's law is invalid" when it comes to emergency abortions because the federal emergency care law preempts the state's abortion ban. So far, a district court agreed with the Biden administration, an appeals court panel agreed with Idaho, and the Supreme Court allowed the strict ban to take effect in January when it agreed to hear the case.

Supreme Court allows Idaho abortion ban to be enacted, first such ruling since Dobbs

The case, known as Moyle v. United States (Mike Moyle is the speaker of the Idaho House), has major implications on everything from what emergency care is available in states with abortion bans to how hospitals operate in Idaho. Here's a summary of what's at stake.

1. Idaho physicians warn patients are being harmed

Under Idaho's abortion law , the medical exception only applies when a doctor judges that "the abortion was necessary to prevent the death of the pregnant woman." (There is also an exception to the Idaho abortion ban in cases of rape or incest, only in the first trimester of the pregnancy, if the person files a police report.)

In a filing with the court , a group of 678 physicians in Idaho described cases in which women facing serious pregnancy complications were either sent home from the hospital or had to be transferred out of state for care. "It's been just a few months now that Idaho's law has been in effect – six patients with medical emergencies have already been transferred out of state for [pregnancy] termination," Dr. Jim Souza, chief physician executive of St. Luke's Health System in Idaho, told reporters on a press call last week.

Those delays and transfers can have consequences. For example, Dr. Emily Corrigan described a patient in court filings whose water broke too early, which put her at risk of infection. After two weeks of being dismissed while trying to get care, the patient went to Corrigan's hospital – by that time, she showed signs of infection and had lost so much blood she needed a transfusion. Corrigan added that without receiving an abortion, the patient could have needed a limb amputation or a hysterectomy – in other words, even if she didn't die, she could have faced life-long consequences to her health.

Attorneys for Idaho defend its abortion law, arguing that "every circumstance described by the administration's declarations involved life-threatening circumstances under which Idaho law would allow an abortion."

Ryan Bangert, senior attorney for the Christian legal powerhouse Alliance Defending Freedom, which is providing pro-bono assistance to the state of Idaho, says that "Idaho law does allow for physicians to make those difficult decisions when it's necessary to perform an abortion to save the life of the mother," without waiting for patients to become sicker and sicker.

Still, Dr. Sara Thomson, an OB-GYN in Boise, says difficult calls in the hospital are not hypothetical or even rare. "In my group, we're seeing this happen about every month or every other month where this state law complicates our care," she says. Four patients have sued the state in a separate case arguing that the narrow medical exception harmed them.

"As far as we know, we haven't had a woman die as a consequence of this law, but that is really on the top of our worry list of things that could happen because we know that if we watch as death is approaching and we don't intervene quickly enough, when we decide finally that we're going to intervene to save her life, it may be too late," she says.

2. Hospitals are closing units and struggling to recruit doctors

Labor and delivery departments are expensive for hospitals to operate. Idaho already had a shortage of providers, including OB-GYNS. Hospital administrators now say the Idaho abortion law has led to an exodus of maternal care providers from the state, which has a population of 2 million people.

Three rural hospitals in Idaho have closed their labor-and-delivery units since the abortion law took effect. "We are seeing the expansion of what's called obstetrical deserts here in Idaho," said Brian Whitlock, president and CEO of the Idaho Hospital Association.

Since Idaho's abortion law took effect, nearly one in four OB-GYNs have left the state or retired, according to a report from the Idaho Physician Well-Being Action Collaborative. The report finds the loss of doctors who specialize in high-risk pregnancies is even more extreme – five of nine full time maternal-fetal medicine specialists have left Idaho.

Administrators say they aren't able to recruit new providers to fill those positions. "Since [the abortion law's] enactment, St. Luke's has had markedly fewer applicants for open physician positions, particularly in obstetrics. And several out-of-state candidates have withdrawn their applications upon learning of the challenges of practicing in Idaho, citing [the law's] enactment and fear of criminal penalties," reads an amicus brief from St. Luke's health system in support of the federal government.

"Prior to the abortion decision, we already ranked 50th in number of physicians per capita – we were already a strained state," says Thomson, the doctor in Boise. She's experienced the loss of OB-GYN colleagues first hand. "I had a partner retire right as the laws were changing and her position has remained open – unfilled now for almost two years – so my own personal group has been short-staffed," she says.

ADF's Bangert says he's skeptical of the assertion that the abortion law is responsible for this exodus of doctors from Idaho. "I would be very surprised if Idaho's abortion law is the sole or singular cause of any physician shortage," he says. "I'm very suspicious of any claims of causality."

3. Justices could weigh in on fetal "personhood"

The state of Idaho's brief argues that EMTALA actually requires hospitals "to protect and care for an 'unborn child,'" an argument echoed in friend-of-the-court briefs from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and a group of states from Indiana to Wyoming that also have restrictive abortion laws. They argue that abortion can't be seen as a stabilizing treatment if one patient dies as a result.

Thomson is also Catholic, and she says the idea that, in an emergency, she is treating two patients – the fetus and the mother – doesn't account for clinical reality. "Of course, as obstetricians we have a passion for caring for both the mother and the baby, but there are clinical situations where the mom's health or life is in jeopardy, and no matter what we do, the baby is going to be lost," she says.

The Idaho abortion law uses the term "unborn child" as opposed to the words "embryo" or "fetus" – language that implies the fetus has the same rights as other people.

Shots - Health News

The science of ivf: what to know about alabama's 'extrauterine children' ruling.

Mary Ziegler , a legal historian at University of California - Davis, who is writing a book on fetal personhood, describes it as the "North Star" of the anti-abortion rights movement. She says this case will be the first time the Supreme Court justices will be considering a statute that uses that language.

"I think we may get clues about the future of bigger conflicts about fetal personhood," she explains, depending on how the justices respond to this idea. "Not just in the context of this statute or emergency medical scenarios, but in the context of the Constitution."

ADF has dismissed the idea that this case is an attempt to expand fetal rights. "This case is, at root, a question about whether or not the federal government can affect a hostile takeover of the practice of medicine in all 50 states by misinterpreting a long-standing federal statute to contain a hidden nationwide abortion mandate," Bangert says.

4. The election looms large

Ziegler suspects the justices will allow Idaho's abortion law to remain as is. "The Supreme Court has let Idaho's law go into effect, which suggests that the court is not convinced by the Biden administration's arguments, at least at this point," she notes.

Trump backed a federal abortion ban as president. Now, he says he wouldn't sign one

Whatever the decision, it will put abortion squarely back in the national spotlight a few months before the November election. "It's a reminder on the political side of things, that Biden and Trump don't really control the terms of the debate on this very important issue," Zielger observes. "They're going to be things put on everybody's radar by other actors, including the Supreme Court."

The justices will hear arguments in the case on Wednesday morning. A decision is expected by late June or early July.

Correction April 23, 2024

An earlier version of this story did not mention the rape and incest exception to Idaho's abortion ban. A person who reports rape or incest to police can end a pregnancy in Idaho in the first trimester.

Abortion rights
Supreme Court

IMAGES

Best legal case study example by robert hook
️ Legal case study format. Contract Law Case Study. Sample Case Study
A Quick PDF Guide with Law Case Study Tips and Examples by ryecarter9
😍 How to write a case analysis law. How To Write Case Analysis Law
😍 How to write a case analysis law. How To Write Case Analysis Law
40 Case Brief Examples & Templates

VIDEO

HOW TO WRITE CASE STUDY QUESTIONS?
TIPS ON HOW TO DEAL WITH NEW CASE STUDY IN EXAM II ECONOMIC LAW ll PAPER 6D ll CA CS CMA #casestudy
How to Write Case Study Begini Caranya #tirtamursitama #binusuniversity
How to write case study in law l#cafoundation #cafoundationlaw
How to write Case study ?Law/CA /CA foundation /Detailed explaination with example
How to write Case Study|| How to do Case Study|| Case Study|| কেস স্টাডি ||Case Study on ASA

COMMENTS

How to Write a Case Brief for Law School
First, buy yourself a set of multi-colored highlighters, with at least four, or perhaps five or six different colors. Yellow, pink, and orange are usually the brightest. Depending on the brand, purple and green can be dark, but still work well. Although blue is a beautiful color, it tends to darken and hide the text.
How to Write a Case Brief: Essential Skills for Law Students
An effective case brief typically includes the case name, relevant facts, procedural history, the legal issue (s) at hand, the rule of law applied, the court's analysis, and the final judgment or conclusion. Each component provides a structured overview of the case, making it easier to understand and remember. 3.
How to Write a Case Brief for Law School
Here is a step-by-step guide on how to write a case brief for law school: Step 1: Carefully read the case. The first step in writing a case brief is to read the case carefully. Understand the context, facts, and procedural history of the case. Identify the key legal issues raised in the case. Step 2: Identify the parties involved.
PDF Writing case studies
Case: the material that goes to the students. Presents in narrative form, from the perspective of a specific protagonist, a problem that is addressed by applying the material taught in the section. Specific documents and detailed information is placed in exhibits. Length: main text usually 5-10 pages; exhibits vary widely (from 0 to >100 pp.)
Writing Effective Legal Case Briefs for Law Students
As a new law student, one of the essential skills you need to develop is the ability to write effective legal case briefs. A case brief is a concise summary of a legal case that highlights the key issues, legal principles, and holdings of the court. Writing a good case brief can help you better understand the law, prepare for class discussions ...
How To Write A Case Brief or Case Outline for Law School (With An
In this video, we'll explain how to write a case brief or case outline for law school.We'll introduce you to the following elements:-Title (Parties, Caption)...
How To Write a Case Brief for Law School
Therefore we recommend that you save blue for the elements that you rarely highlight. For each different section of the case, choose a color, and use that color only when highlighting the section of the case designated for that color. Consider using yellow for the text that you tend to highlight most frequently.
The Case Study Teaching Method
The Case Study Teaching Method. It is easy to get confused between the case study method and the case method, particularly as it applies to legal education. The case method in legal education was invented by Christopher Columbus Langdell, Dean of Harvard Law School from 1870 to 1895. Langdell conceived of a way to systematize and simplify legal ...
Case Study Resources
The Case Studies at Harvard Law School offers access for students, educators, for-profit and non-profit to legal cases. The website also features a blog, as well as teaching and learning resources for educators using cases. ... This article provides information on writing, teaching, and discussing case studies in a legal education setting. The ...
Harvard Law School
The Case Study Teaching Method; Harvard Law Case Studies A-Z; Free Materials; Blog; Shop By Category; Harvard Law Case Studies A-Z; Free Materials; Program; Role Play; Workshop-Based Case Study; Discussion-Based Case Study; DVD; Subject; Sabrineh Ardalan; Sharon Block; Robert Bordone; Emily M. Broad Leib; Chad Carr; Robert Clark; John Coates ...
The Law School Case Method
The case method eschews explanation and encourages exploration. In a course that relies entirely on the casebook, you will never come across a printed list of "laws." Indeed, you will learn that in many areas of law there is no such thing as a static set of rules, but only a constantly evolving system of principles.
PDF HOW TO BRIEF A CASE
After you have read a case, re-read and brief it using the following format for briefing a case. 1. Name of Case. Write the name of the case at the beginning of your brief so that you will be able to identify it later. The case name usually contains the names of the plaintiff and the defendant, who are the parties to the lawsuit.
CaseBriefs
FREE. All content is free for all to use, as we are supported by our strategic partners who utilize Casebriefs ™ to connect to the Higher Education and Professional Markets. Access the world's largest database of Free Case Briefs for Law Students. Curated from law school case books, includes links for optimal case understanding.
PDF WRITING CASE NOTES AND CASE COMMENTS1
It uses discursive argument to synthesise a wider body of material to establish a position on some law-related point. Case notes are short pieces of writing of between 300-800 words. Case comments are pieces of around 2000 - 3000 words. The writing of case notes tends to follow a specific pattern.
How to Read and Brief Cases
The following online resources offer guidance for reading case law and court decisions. ... Features an excerpt from Guide to the Study of Law: An Introduction, 2nd ed. (LexisNexis 2001) by L.H. LaRue. ... This video from the Business Law Institute reviews how to write a case brief. How to Read a Case: And Understand What it Means ...
Law School 101: Tips on How to Effectively Write Case Digests
Organize your team effectively with Todoist. Divide your digest into three parts. There are only three important parts in a case digest: the FACTS, the ISSUE, and the RULING. Upon knowing the topic you are looking for, you must be able to pinpoint these three elements in what you are reading.
Writing a Case Note: The Ultimate Guide
The FIRODA Method is an excellent way of structuring your case notes so that you summarise and remember all the key elements. Start by noting down the name of the case and the court which decided it. We'll use Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner as an example. Give a brief overview of the key facts of the case.
6 Steps To Write A Flawless Legal Case Study
Step 3: Identify the relevant facts. At the basis of every legal case, there has to be a story of a dispute between two parties. However, not all of the facts and circumstances associated with ...
How to Analyze Case Law: 11 Steps (with Pictures)
1. Read the case. You should read the case through at least once from beginning to end until you attempt to figure out which facts are most important or analyze the court's holding. It's difficult to correctly determine what was central to the court's reasoning until you've read it all the way through.
First Year Tip Series: Introduction to Case Notes
A case note is something that every law student is asked to write at some point in their studies and, without some direction, can be a daunting task. This article aims to briefly explain what a case note is, what the benefits of writing a case note are, and how to actually write a case note.
PDF IRAC: How to Write about Legal Cases
an opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant (if the case at hand is a criminal one). But these opinions must be subordinate to the logical conclusions that follow from the careful. application of rules to facts. The selections that follow demonstrate this process of application of rule to fact. We.
Subject
The Case Study Teaching Method; Harvard Law Case Studies A-Z; Free Materials; Blog; Shop By Category; Harvard Law Case Studies A-Z; Free Materials; Program; Role Play; Workshop-Based Case Study; Discussion-Based Case Study; DVD; Subject; Sabrineh Ardalan; Sharon Block; Robert Bordone; Emily M. Broad Leib; Chad Carr; Robert Clark; John Coates ...
Case Summaries
Case Summaries. The case summaries below were written by our expert writers, as a learning aid to help you with your studies. If you are looking for help with your case summary then we offer a comprehensive writing service provided by fully qualified academics in your field of study. Law Essay Writing Service
How to Write a Legal Case Study to Build Trust
If you're new to creating legal case studies, learn below how writing a case study builds client trust, as well as tips for writing a compelling case study, including: Getting permission from your client. Choosing the right case. Making your case study easy to read. Providing easy access to your case study. Telling a compelling story.
Studying for Law School Exams? Here Are 10 Ways To Prepare
Twenty alumni advise students to take practice exams, know your professor, study your own way, and more. 7. Outlining Strategies and Techniques. Daniel Richardson, former editor-in-chief of the Virginia Law Review and the 2018 graduate with the highest GPA, provides law students with advice about preparing for mid-terms and finals.
How to Write a Case Study: from Outline to Examples
Explain what you will examine in the case study. Write an overview of the field you're researching. Make a thesis statement and sum up the results of your observation in a maximum of 2 sentences. Background. Provide background information and the most relevant facts. Isolate the issues.
Contract Law: Analyzing Real-Life Examples and Case Studies
Case studies illustrate situations where mutual mistake affects contract validity. In terms of agreement law, mutual mistake takes place when events misunderstand a crucial element that is vital to the settlement. Case research exhibits how it influences the validity of contracts. Examples of Mutual Mistakes in Contract Law. In S v.
How To Write A Case Study In Law Exam: Expert Guide
Challenge the existing theories. To write a case study, the candidate should have proper knowledge of the subject. The candidate should read the case study opinions and facts, later analyze the situation carefully. He/she should take short notes and highlight the points that are important. Concentrate on Analysis.
Law's Sharona Hoffman and Cassandra Burke Robertson write legal case
Case Western Reserve University School of Law faculty members Sharona Hoffman, the Edgar A. Hahn Professor of Law, and Cassandra Burke Robertson, the John Deaver Drinko - BakerHostetler Professor of Law, wrote a legal case study assessing this topic in a forthcoming article for UC Irvine Law Review.
What's at stake as the Supreme Court hears case about abortion in
Mary Ziegler, a legal historian at University of California - Davis, who is writing a book on fetal personhood, describes it as the "North Star" of the anti-abortion rights movement. She says this ...

How to Write a Case Brief: Essential Skills for Law Students

Understanding the Importance of a Case Brief

The Beauty of Brevity:

A Lifeline for Legal Eagles:

Essential Elements of a Case Brief

Facts: The Foundation Stones

Procedural History: Tracing Legal Footsteps

The Issue & Rule: Navigating Through Complexity

Analysis & Conclusion: Drawing Lessons

Steps to Writing an Effective Case Brief

Dig Into The Facts

Note Down Procedural History

Identify The Issue At Hand

Catch That Rule of Law.

Analyze And Conclude:

Tips for Writing a Clear and Concise Case Brief

Choose Your Words Wisely

Maintain Focus on Key Points

Fine-Tune Your Formatting Skills

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Writing a Case Brief

Failing to Understand the Facts Fully

Omitting Legal Precedents

Lack of Clarity and Precision

Relying Too Heavily on Templates or Examples

Misplacing Focus

The Role of Precedent in Case Briefs

Analyzing Legal Precedence in Your Case Brief

Using Precedent to Craft Strong Arguments

Reviewing and Revising Your Case Brief

Meticulous Examination for Accuracy

Critical Evaluation for Clarity

The Power of Peer Reviews

A Continuous Process

The Impact of a Well-Written Case Brief

Improved Legal Understanding

Frequently Asked Questions

Recent Posts

create an account

Writing Effective Legal Case Briefs for Law Students

Understand the Structure of a Legal Case Brief

Focus on the Key Facts and Issues

Identify the Legal Principles and Rules

Use Clear and Concise Language

Be Organized and Structured

So, what’s the point?

Preparing for Class and Exams

Help us make LSD better!

How To Write a Case Brief for Law School

Follow LexisNexis for Law Schools

Recently viewed courses

The Law School Case Method

How the Case Method Works

From Briefs to Outlines

Explore Graduate Programs for You

Best Online JD Programs

Best Online MSL Programs

Find MBA Programs Matched to Your Interests

Free MCAT Practice Test

MCAT Self-Paced 14-Day Free Trial

Legal Research & Writing Guide

How to Read a Case

Research Help

Barrista Solutions

Law School 101: Tips on How to Effectively Write Case Digests

Recent Posts

Writing a Case Note: The Ultimate Guide

How to Write a First-Class Case Note

The FIRODA Method

O: Obiter Dicta

A: Assessment

Share this:

How to Analyze Case Law

Summarizing the Facts

Identifying the Issue and Decision

Understanding the Reasoning

Expert Q&A

About This Article

Reader Success Stories

Did this article help you?

Featured Articles

3. Exam Tips for First-Year Law Students