scientific writing bachelor thesis

• Press Enter to activate screen reader mode.

ETH Library

Scientific writing.

Are you writing your Bachelor’s, Master’s or doctoral thesis, or any other kind of scientific text? The tasks associated with research range from finding a topic and formulating the research question, searching and managing references, reading scientific texts, structuring the paper, using scientific language, revising the text to finally publishing it. Correct citation to avoid plagiarism as well as good time and project management are also central.

We are happy to support you in your writing process and have put together an extensive range of courses and advisory services for this purpose:

• Academic project and time management: from planning to publishing
• Citing correctly – avoiding plagiarism: the safe way to the scientific text
• Discover smart note taking
• Get writing – overcome your writer’s block
• Mastering scientific writing with AI-based tools
• Ready for Take-off: how to start your Bachelor's and Master's thesis
• Revising scientific texts
• Screen, scan, search: reading scientific texts
• Your scientific text – convincing and relevant

Moodle self-study courses

The course Ready for take-off: how to start your Bachelor’s or Master’s thesis is also available on the Moodle teaching and learning platform ! There you will also find all the information, in German and English.

Are you a group of students or doctoral students or do you supervise a course and would like input on one of the subject areas listed here? If so, please get in contact with us: we will work with you to put together a tailor-made course.

• chevron_right myPath (Catalogue for extracurricular activities and initiatives at ETH Zurich)
• external page call_made Language Center of UZH und ETH Zurich
• chevron_right Master Your Doctorate – Student portal | ETH Zurich

Please check the course catalogue and Moodle to see if there are any lectures on scientific writing in your course or department. 

You can find information on Bachelor’s and Master’s theses in the student portal and on doctoral theses by visiting the website of the relevant department .  

In addition, the following courses and information are available to those involved in teaching:

• Courses in continuing education in teaching and learning at UZH and ETH Zurich: Didactica

Do you prefer advice tailored to your requirements? We will be happy to assist you:

• Scientific writing (Book a Librarian)
• Avoid plagiarism by knowing how to cite correctly (Book a Librarian)

Or book a external page consultation with a writing expert of the Language Center of UZH and ETH Zurich to obtain feedback on a selection of a few pages of your English text.

Below, you will find – sorted by subject area – points of contact, courses and references to further information provided by the ETH Library and ETH Zurich:

Check out our courses:

• Ready for take-off: how to start your Bachelor’s or Master’s thesis
• Moodle course Ready for take-off: how to start your Bachelor’s or Master’s thesis
• Time and project management for the Bachelor’s and Master’s thesis

Information on the topic:

• Tools for daily student life provided by the Counselling & Coaching specialist office of ETH Zurich
• Reading scientific texts
• Information and courses on the topic of Managing references
• Writing scientific papers and theses  

Check out the courses of other providers:

• Semester courses external page Academic/Scientific writing in English of the Language Center of UZH and ETH Zurich
• Seminars on academic writing provided by the Doctoral Administration of ETH Zurich
• Introduction to LaTeX of Compicampus of IT Services of ETH Zurich
• external page Academic Phrasebank , University of Manchester
• Download Checklist revising scientific texts (PDF, 151 KB) provided by the ETH Library
• Language style guides and glossaries provided by Corporate Communications

Check out our courses and advisory services:

• Course: Citing correctly – avoiding plagiarism: the safe way to the scientific text
• Advice: Avoid plagiarism by knowing how to cite correctly (Book a Librarian)

Avoiding plagiarism, good scientific practice

• Plagiarism: Citation Etiquette and Declaration of Originality  (Student portal of ETH Zurich)
• Prevention of plagiarism
• Disciplinary procedures regarding plagiarism  (Academic Services of ETH Zurich)
• Scientific integrity  (Office of Research of ETH Zurich)

Citations, references, bibliographies

• external page Cite Them Right (access only for members of ETH Zurich)
• external page Chicago Manual of Style (access only for members of ETH Zurich)
• external page Citation Guide of the University Library, Technical University Munich
• external page Avoiding Plagiarism of the Excelsior Online Writing Lab
• external page Plagiarism Overview of the Purdue Online Writing Lab

Image rights, image licences

• ETH Library Image Archive

Publication

• Information and guidelines regarding the publication of doctoral theses
• Services related to electronic publishing provided by the ETH Library
• Information on open-access publishing provided by the ETH Library
• Information on scientific publishing provided by Corporate Communications

Communication, presentations

• Offers on media work and communications consulting provided by Corporate Communications
• Communication Academy of Corporate Communications

Career planning, letters of application

• Offers of the ETH Zurich Career Center: CV-Workshop and CV-Checks as well as video on interview training

Many universities offer extensive information about scientific writing. We have compiled a selection for you:

• external page Advise on Academic Writing , Writing Center at the University of Toronto
• external page Materials & Tips , provided by the Writing Center of TU Dresden
• external page Purdue Online Writing Lab , Purdue University
• external page Research Writing , Australian National University
• external page Researcher Academy , Elsevier
• external page Study Hub learning resources , The University of Edinburgh
• external page Thesis Writer , ZHAW
• external page Tips & tools for learning , Learning Center of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 
• external page Tips & tools for writing , Writing Center of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
• external page Knowledge Base , Scribbr
• external page Writing Resources , Writing Center of the George Mason University
• external page Reading Centre , University of Teacher Education, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (FHNW)

Please find literature on the following topics in ETH Library @ swisscovery

• external page call_made Scientific writing and presentation techniques
• external page call_made Scientific working techniques
• external page call_made Starting a career and career planning

Writing@ETH Network

Writing@ETH is a network for people from the ETH Domain who deal with topics related to scientific writing. These include reading, citation, plagiarism prevention, scientific English, publishing and other aspects.

The network has the following goals:

• To promote contact and utilise synergies
• To share experiences and best practices
• To present current issues and projects
• To follow trends and discuss developments
• To develop new services and evaluate tools
• To form a pool of experts

These activities also help to attract attention to this subject within the university.

Our next events: in planning

Members include staff from libraries, the Rectorate, the administrative department Educational Development and Technology (LET), the Language Center of UZH and ETH Zurich and educational developers from the departments.

We would of course be delighted if you would like to get involved in one of the working groups as well.

The ETH Library is responsible for coordinating the network.  

• Phone phone +41 44 632 64 77

Thesis FAQs

Thesis writing faqs, q: is writing a thesis the only way to get involved in research.

A. No. Each semester (including summer), you can apply to do any of the following: 1) volunteer in a lab, 2) receive funding to work in a lab, or 3) receive course credit for working in a lab (through Neurobiology 91; only possible after Junior Fall). All of these options are open to thesis writers and non-thesis writers.

**See the Neurobio Guides page for info on how to find a lab and find research funding.

Q: Do I need to take Neurobiology 91 and 99 to write a thesis?

A:  It depends on your track.

MBB Track : students are required to take one semester of both Neurobiology 91 and Neurobiology 99.

Neurobiology Track : Neurobiology 91 and 99 are optional; however, one semester of Neurobiology 91r is required to be eligible for Departmental Honors.

Q: Why should I write a senior thesis?

A: Writing a thesis allows you to complete a scientific study: conception, planning, research, troubleshooting, analysis, interpretation, and formal communication. Arguably, it is the best way to develop and deepen your understanding of science. First, through your research and the thesis writing process, you will become an expert in a small area of neurobiology. Second, through the difficulties of conducting, analyzing and interpreting your results, you will discover how knowledge is generated and critiqued. Third, through formally presenting your results, you will develop argumentative writing skills and experience how new information and ideas are first communicated.

Here at Harvard College you have truly an amazing range of world-class laboratories and research centers that provide some of the most stimulating intellectual opportunities on planet earth. Writing a thesis allows you to take full advantage of these resources, and participate in the mission of these groups.

For all these reasons, writing a thesis is also required for highest distinction in Departmental Honors (Highest Honors).

Q: When do I have to decide if I am going to write a thesis?

A: There is no deadline or “decision” that commits you to writing a thesis, as you can decide not to write a thesis at any point. However, to remain eligible to write a thesis you must complete all the thesis checkpoints, which start junior year spring semester

Q: How do I sign up to take a tutorial class?

A: This year we are using the online survey tool to make all tutorial assignments (see  Tutorials Sectioning page).  To be considered for a tutorial, you must enter your tutorial preferences by 11 PM the day before study card day. Popular tutorials will need to be lotteried so you should enter at least 3 choices.  Priority is given to Neurobiology concentrators.  If you have to miss tutorial during shopping period (not advisable), you should contact the instructor before study card day.

Since some of our tutorials do not meet until Wednesday evening (the day before study card day), we cannot determine final enrollment until late that night.  You will be emailed your assignment by 10 AM the next morning -- Study Card Day (Thursday).  You can then enroll in the course and the instructor will give you permission.

Q: Do I need to formally present or defend my thesis work?

A:  No, there is not an oral component to the thesis. However, we hold a prestigious (and fun!) event to celebrate our thesis writers in late April: The ‘Annual Thesis Awards in Neurobiology’. During this event thesis writers present their research findings in 60 seconds through any creative medium (song, skit, poem, presentation, interpretative dance, puppetry, etc). There is also an optional poster session to present your completed work in mid-April.

Q: What are the basic requirements for a thesis?

A:  The thesis is a 30-50 page (double spaced) document, which includes: acknowledgements, contributions, table of contents, abstract, introduction, methods, results, figures, discussion and references. Specific guidelines and examples of how to write each sections will be presented senior year to all potential thesis writers. Additionally, thesis writers will be invited to a series of writing workshops designed to help improve and guide their scientific writing during junior and senior year. If you wish to see examples of theses from previous years, they are available in the Neurobiology advising office (Biolabs 1082). Check out a list of titles and abstracts online :

Q: What labs can I work in? What projects can I work on?

A:  Neurobiology students may work in any of the many Harvard affiliated Institutions and Hospitals around Boston. This includes labs on the Harvard College campus, as well as those at Harvard Medical School, Children’s Hospital Boston, Mass General Hospital, Mclean Psychiatric Hospital and more.

As a Neurobiology student, your research must involve the study of neurons. For students interested in working in cognitive science, sleep, immunology, or psychology labs, your project must meet any one of the following criteria:

1. Involve brain imaging (fMRI, EEG, etc) to assess and correlate neuronal function in your study.

2. Involve a diseased group of patients so that you can link what is known in the literature about the neurobiology underlying the disorder to your study.

3. Involve work on an animal model, so that you can link what is known in the literature about the neurobiology of brain (organization, connectivity, activity patterns, structure, etc) to your study.

Q: How is the thesis evaluated? How will it affect my grades?

A: Your thesis will be evaluated by two anonymous Neurobiology faculty members who will comment specifically on 1) the depth of your background knowledge, 2) the clarity of your writing 3) the quality and rigor of your methods, 4) the presentation of your figures, 5) your understanding of how your results relate to the literature, 6) the logic and analysis of your conclusions, and 7) the accomplishments, weaknesses and difficulty of your work.   

As an undergraduate, you may need to stop doing experiments before you have a complete story because of looming thesis deadlines.  The completeness of the experiments is a major difference between the undergraduate thesis and a doctoral thesis.  It is understood that undergraduate theses often are not able to fully complete their intended story.  How well the thesis is written, presented, and analyzed is the major determinant of its grade.

Your thesis will receive a grade: no credit, commendable, cum, high cum, magna, high magna, or summa. This Latin grade affects your Departmental Honors determination only (English Honors); it is not recorded on your transcript. You will be notified of your grade (including the review comments) along with your Honors recommendation several weeks after you turn in your completed Thesis.

Additionally, if you are enrolled in Neurobiology 99, you will receive a course grade by your research lab director, similar to Neurobiology 91 (ie, based on your performance and diligence in the lab).

Q: How independent should my research be?

A: Independence varies greatly from lab to lab.   On one extreme some rare students are able to spend several years in a laboratory and have free reign to design and carry out experiments completely on their own.  More commonly though, students work fairly closely with a postdoc or graduate student in the lab.  It is perfectly acceptable for you to work closely with someone in the lab, but it is important that you take ownership of some aspect of the project, whether it is the day-to-day experiments, reading the literature and suggesting new models to incorporate, or independent statistical analyses.  This will likely also make the project more interesting to you.  The writing of the thesis should be done entirely on your own, with feedback and editing suggestions from your lab director or others.

Q: Whom can I talk to about my thesis?

A:  Your concentration advisers (Dr. Ryan Draft and Dr. Laura Magnotti) are always available to discuss any issues or questions you have about your thesis in general, and any issues related to formatting or deadlines.

You should also be in touch with your daily supervisor and your lab research director to discuss specific questions about your research results, ideas about your project, and get feedback on your writing.

For additional writing help, the Writing Center at Harvard has resources available for thesis writers (senior thesis writing tutors available by appointment through the Writing Center website).

Potential thesis writers will also be invited to workshops throughout junior and senior year that focus on writing the Junior Thesis Proposal, Introduction, and Figures.

• Neuroscience Contact Us
• Neuroscience Requirements

BS Thesis Guidelines and Timeline

Bachelor of science in biological sciences.

Bachelor of Science (BS): The BS is designed for students who wish to delve more deeply into the field of their major through additional electives, participation in scientific research, and completion of a BS thesis that summarizes their research. Successful BS students will (1) learn how scientists design and conduct scientific experiments; (2) collect data as part of a research effort; (3) evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of that data; (4) interpret the data in the context of a specific scientific discipline; and (5) describe their work in a BS Thesis

Students can earn a Bachelor of Science (BS) degree in Biological Sciences in any of the tracks by:

(1) completing three upper-level elective courses in Biological Sciences beyond those required for the BA degree, including  BIOS 28900  Undergraduate Bachelor of Science Research (or both quarters of  BIOS 00296  Undergraduate Honors Research if also pursuing Biology Research Honors)

(2) writing a BS thesis under the supervision of an adviser who is a member of the Biological Sciences Division research faculty.

Guidelines and Timeline for the BS in Biological Sciences

If you are participating in the BSCD honors program or a specialization that requires a thesis, you do not need to prepare a separate proposal (or thesis) for the BS degree, but you should submit copies of these materials to the BS program. Honors and specialization students are required to submit the BS Faculty Consent form in Spring of the 3rd year as directed below. You should adhere to the honors or specialization guidelines as you prepare your proposal, select faculty readers, and write your thesis. BS students who are writing a specialization thesis but are not in the BSCD Honors program are required to register for the BS research course (BIOS 28900) as directed below.

Spring of 2nd year

Declare your major as BA or BS in Biological Sciences. Remember that, in addition to the thesis, a BS requires three upper-level BIOS courses (numbered BIOS 21xxxx through 28xxx) beyond the five required for the BA degree. One of these courses must be BIOS 28900 unless you are taking BIOS 00296 for Research Honors.

Autumn of 3rd year

Start looking for a member of the BSD research faculty to serve as your thesis adviser and start developing ideas for your thesis research.

Description of the BS thesis

BS students will write a thesis based on original research. The topic must be a current issue in Biology, including basic science, medicine, and other applied fields, be described in a compelling thesis proposal, and be supported by a willing and appropriate Mentor. In most cases the thesis will present and analyze primary data collected by the student during their time in a mentor's lab. Students may also conduct critical and novel analysis of existing primary data (e.g., a critique of a healthcare policy such as methadone maintenance, a meta-analysis of recent clinical trials of antidepressants, or an argument against punctuated equilibria based on a fossil collection or genomic data). In either case, the work must be hypothesis driven and present evidence that tests the hypothesis. Topics related to global and public health will be accepted only for majors in the global and public health track. Please contact Chris Andrews if you have questions about the appropriateness of your topic. The thesis should follow the format of a published paper in a target journal appropriate for your topic but should include more extensive literature review and context in the introduction and conclusion.  A typical BS thesis is approximately 30 pages of double-spaced text (not including figures, tables and references).

Spring of 3rd year

To declare your interest in pursuing the BS in Biological Sciences, please submit the BS Faculty Consent Form  by 11:59 PM on Friday of finals week. If you have not already done so, please make sure you have officially declared your major as a BS in Biological Sciences so your college adviser can correctly slot courses into your degree program.

All BS students who will not be registered for BIOS 00296 (Undergraduate Honors Research) must register to take the BS research course (BIOS 28900 Undergraduate BS Research) in Autumn of their 4th year. We will add BIOS 00296 students to the BIOS 28900 Canvas site as unregistered students so they will receive announcements and can submit their materials for the BS degree. BS students who are writing a specialization thesis but are not in the BSCD Honors program are required to register for BIOS 28900.

Summer between 3rd and 4th year

BS students will typically conduct the bulk of their thesis research during this summer.

Autumn of 4th year

Unless you are in the BSCD Honors program and registered for BIOS 00296, make sure you are registered for the BS research course (BIOS 28900, Undergraduate BS Research) and have access to the associated Canvas site. BS students who are writing a specialization thesis but are not in the BSCD Honors program are required to register for the BS research course.

Submit a 1-2 page (single-spaced) thesis proposal (approved by your thesis adviser) as an assignment on the BIOS 28900 Canvas site by the end of Week 1.

Minimally, this proposal should include:

• the name, e-mail address, and department of your thesis adviser.
• a working title for your thesis.
• one introductory paragraph giving the background and rationale for your project.
• three to five paragraphs outlining your research question, hypotheses, predictions, and proposed methods.
• a few sentences regarding your proposed research timeline.
• a list of references cited in the proposal.

Winter of 4th year (by end of quarter)

During finals week , submit the names and e-mail addresses of two faculty readers from BSD research departments (other than your thesis adviser) to review your thesis in the spring. You will submit these names as an assignment on the BIOS 28900 Canvas site.

Spring of 4th year

By 11:59 PM on Friday of Week 4

Submit your thesis to your thesis adviser, who must approve it before you send it to readers for review. You do not need to submit this version of the thesis to the BSCD. This checkpoint allows your adviser to confirm that your thesis is in acceptable shape to send to readers.

By 11:59 PM on Friday of Week 5

Submit your thesis, approved by your thesis adviser, to your two faculty readers, along with the faculty review form (make a copy of the review form to share with readers here ). You should request that these readers return their reviews to you by Wednesday of Week 7 so you have time to respond to their feedback by the final deadline at the end of Week 8.

Between Weeks 7 and 8

In collaboration with your thesis adviser, revise your thesis in accordance with the feedback from your faculty reviewers. Both your thesis adviser and your two readers must sign off on the revisions before your final submission.  

By 11:59 PM on Friday of Week 8 

Submit the final version of the approved thesis, with confirmation of approval by your thesis adviser and two additional readers. You may collect signatures on a cover page ( here's the TEMPLATE)  or ask your adviser and readers to provide confirmation of approval by email to: [email protected]. 

• Study programmes

Guideline to scientific writing

You can download a sample file (DOC format) for the preparation of a seminar, bachelor or master thesis   here .

In addition, we have compiled a series of notes for the preparation of seminar papers, bachelor or master theses.

In addition, it should be noted that a comprehensive picture of a thesis is only visible when it can be read in one piece. Even if all of the advisors' hints to the editor of a thesis are always intended to improve the work, these hints must always be classified as non-binding.

It is therefore not possible to refer to the supposed "blessing" of certain passages of the work!

Plagiarism check at all professorships of the department

From now on all submitted seminar, bachelor and master theses will be tested with a plagiarism software (turnitin.com). The thesis must be submitted there by the student. Without the submission no grading of the thesis can be done. You can register for the plagiarism software here . A short instruction how it works can be found here . Further information and registration data (course name and password) can be obtained from your supervisor. IMPORTANT: Please print out and submit the "digital receipt" and the form for agreement!

Templates and useful links

Declaration of honour

Notes for seminar, bachelor and master theses

Sample file for seminar, bachelor and master theses

How to- Guideline for scientific writing

Templates & Instructions

How do I find a topic for my course work or thesis? How do I find helpful literature? And what should the finished work look like?

Writing a scientific paper involves more than just writing the text. On this page you will find an overview of all questions related to the preparation and writing of scientific papers.

The most important things in a nutshell

• Find a topic you enjoy and discuss it with your tutor beforehand.
• Read and quote relevant specialist literature.
• Select specific quotations and reference all your sources.
• Look out for formal guidelines and give your text a clear structure.

The expert tips of the GRIN editorial team

We have also collected our best tips and tricks in two e-books for you:

Template for course work etc.

In our template, all default settings are already pre-saved, so you can start writing right away.

Link to the page

How do I write an academic paper?

Step by step, from conceptualizing to submitting your paper: Our tips on organization, research, citation styles, scientific writing and much more.

Link to the shop

Template for MS Word 2007

A template for scientific texts with all the important presets!

Template for OpenOffice

Write your scientific papers easily with OpenOffice.

Template for instructions

Create your instructions and instruction drafts for the aptitude test for instructors with Microsoft Word.

Template for coursework for law studies

Use our Microsoft Word template to write your papers for your law studies.

Writing assignments for your law studies with OpenOffice

This template helps write papers for your law studies with OpenOffice.

Tips for using Microsoft Word

Learn about the useful ways of formatting and automation.

Finding a topic

With these steps you can easily find your own research question for your assignment. First, the topic of your seminar limits possible areas and, at the same time, it can be a good starting point.

• Which topics were discussed?
• Which topics were you interested in the most?
• Are you personally interested in a topic of the seminar?
• Were there any presentations that you found particularly intriguing?
• Was there, perhaps, a particular hypothesis that you would like to examine more closely?

The answers to these questions already provide you with a direction for your paper. Asking yourself similar questions can also help you write the final paper:

• Which courses or seminars did you find particularly interesting?
• Which lecturer inspired you during your studies?
• Did you write any papers that you would like to develop further?

In addition, the GRIN shop gives you an insight into the topics and questions from other students from your field.

Literature research

At the beginning of a seminar, you will often receive a bibliography which includes compulsory reading and provides a good starting point for your literature research. Before you start researching, you should at least have one meeting with your instructor. Such a meeting can also be used to ask your lecturer for literature tips – especially if there is no bibliography given to the seminar.

Tip: Usually it is not necessary to read the entire work or the entire text. For an initial orientation, a glance at the table of contents is often enough to find the relevant chapters.

In the subsequent literature research, you have several options:

A library catalog lists all the works you can find in the respective library.

With search engines like Google, Bing, etc., you will find many sources that fit the topic you are looking for. The publications in the GRIN shop can also help you find inspiration for your own work or draw your attention to interesting literature.

In a newspaper archive you will find many sources, especially for historical and social topics.

In the so-called "snowball system", you look for other authors within the literature listed in the footnotes or in the bibliography.

Certain institutions often publish free literature lists, which specifically fit a topic.

Many universities issue indices, which containing newly acquired books and publications.

Online, you will find various databases such as Google Scholar, WorldCat or the Electronic Journal Library ECB, which contain essays, studies, etc.

The formatting of a scientific paper

A scientific paper always consists of the same elements:

• Table of contents
• Introduction
• Bibliography
• If necessary, Appendix

Basics of scientific writing

The foundation of a scientific text is the conclusive and comprehensible justification of the hypothesis and the arguments.

• The research question should always be considered throughout the whole text.
• The reasoning should be systematic and logical.
• The work must always be put into persepective of current state of research.
• You must first give definitions to key terms so that they can form a basis for further the development of your paper.

Important: You must provide sufficient evidence for any hypothesis you propose in your text. In addition, direct quotations or paraphrasing are possible. In both cases, you must reference a source.

Scientific papers are written in the present tense. When writing a scientific paper, you should avoid colloquial expressions or implicit evaluations.

Get to know practical possibilities for formatting and automation.

Make more of your books

With our Premium Service, the quality of your books, and hence your sales opportunity, is improved.

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Dissertation

Prize-Winning Thesis and Dissertation Examples

Published on September 9, 2022 by Tegan George . Revised on July 18, 2023.

It can be difficult to know where to start when writing your thesis or dissertation . One way to come up with some ideas or maybe even combat writer’s block is to check out previous work done by other students on a similar thesis or dissertation topic to yours.

This article collects a list of undergraduate, master’s, and PhD theses and dissertations that have won prizes for their high-quality research.

Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text

Upload your document to correct all your mistakes in minutes

Table of contents

Award-winning undergraduate theses, award-winning master’s theses, award-winning ph.d. dissertations, other interesting articles.

University : University of Pennsylvania Faculty : History Author : Suchait Kahlon Award : 2021 Hilary Conroy Prize for Best Honors Thesis in World History Title : “Abolition, Africans, and Abstraction: the Influence of the “Noble Savage” on British and French Antislavery Thought, 1787-1807”

University : Columbia University Faculty : History Author : Julien Saint Reiman Award : 2018 Charles A. Beard Senior Thesis Prize Title : “A Starving Man Helping Another Starving Man”: UNRRA, India, and the Genesis of Global Relief, 1943-1947

University: University College London Faculty: Geography Author: Anna Knowles-Smith Award:  2017 Royal Geographical Society Undergraduate Dissertation Prize Title:  Refugees and theatre: an exploration of the basis of self-representation

University: University of Washington Faculty:  Computer Science & Engineering Author: Nick J. Martindell Award: 2014 Best Senior Thesis Award Title:  DCDN: Distributed content delivery for the modern web

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

University:  University of Edinburgh Faculty:  Informatics Author:  Christopher Sipola Award:  2018 Social Responsibility & Sustainability Dissertation Prize Title:  Summarizing electricity usage with a neural network

University:  University of Ottawa Faculty:  Education Author:  Matthew Brillinger Award:  2017 Commission on Graduate Studies in the Humanities Prize Title:  Educational Park Planning in Berkeley, California, 1965-1968

University:  University of Ottawa Faculty: Social Sciences Author:  Heather Martin Award:  2015 Joseph De Koninck Prize Title:  An Analysis of Sexual Assault Support Services for Women who have a Developmental Disability

University : University of Ottawa Faculty : Physics Author : Guillaume Thekkadath Award : 2017 Commission on Graduate Studies in the Sciences Prize Title : Joint measurements of complementary properties of quantum systems

University:  London School of Economics Faculty: International Development Author: Lajos Kossuth Award:  2016 Winner of the Prize for Best Overall Performance Title:  Shiny Happy People: A study of the effects income relative to a reference group exerts on life satisfaction

University : Stanford University Faculty : English Author : Nathan Wainstein Award : 2021 Alden Prize Title : “Unformed Art: Bad Writing in the Modernist Novel”

University : University of Massachusetts at Amherst Faculty : Molecular and Cellular Biology Author : Nils Pilotte Award : 2021 Byron Prize for Best Ph.D. Dissertation Title : “Improved Molecular Diagnostics for Soil-Transmitted Molecular Diagnostics for Soil-Transmitted Helminths”

University:  Utrecht University Faculty:  Linguistics Author:  Hans Rutger Bosker Award: 2014 AVT/Anéla Dissertation Prize Title:  The processing and evaluation of fluency in native and non-native speech

University: California Institute of Technology Faculty: Physics Author: Michael P. Mendenhall Award: 2015 Dissertation Award in Nuclear Physics Title: Measurement of the neutron beta decay asymmetry using ultracold neutrons

University:  Stanford University Faculty: Management Science and Engineering Author:  Shayan O. Gharan Award:  Doctoral Dissertation Award 2013 Title:   New Rounding Techniques for the Design and Analysis of Approximation Algorithms

University: University of Minnesota Faculty: Chemical Engineering Author: Eric A. Vandre Award:  2014 Andreas Acrivos Dissertation Award in Fluid Dynamics Title: Onset of Dynamics Wetting Failure: The Mechanics of High-speed Fluid Displacement

University: Erasmus University Rotterdam Faculty: Marketing Author: Ezgi Akpinar Award: McKinsey Marketing Dissertation Award 2014 Title: Consumer Information Sharing: Understanding Psychological Drivers of Social Transmission

University: University of Washington Faculty: Computer Science & Engineering Author: Keith N. Snavely Award:  2009 Doctoral Dissertation Award Title: Scene Reconstruction and Visualization from Internet Photo Collections

University:  University of Ottawa Faculty:  Social Work Author:  Susannah Taylor Award: 2018 Joseph De Koninck Prize Title:  Effacing and Obscuring Autonomy: the Effects of Structural Violence on the Transition to Adulthood of Street Involved Youth

If you want to know more about AI for academic writing, AI tools, or research bias, make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples or go directly to our tools!

Research bias

• Survivorship bias
• Self-serving bias
• Availability heuristic
• Halo effect
• Hindsight bias
• Deep learning
• Generative AI
• Machine learning
• Reinforcement learning
• Supervised vs. unsupervised learning

 (AI) Tools

• Grammar Checker
• Paraphrasing Tool
• Text Summarizer
• AI Detector
• Plagiarism Checker
• Citation Generator

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

George, T. (2023, July 18). Prize-Winning Thesis and Dissertation Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved August 29, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/examples/

Is this article helpful?

Tegan George

Other students also liked, how to choose a dissertation topic | 8 steps to follow, checklist: writing a dissertation, thesis & dissertation database examples, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

Use of "I", "we" and the passive voice in a scientific thesis [duplicate]

Possible Duplicate: Style Question: Use of “we” vs. “I” vs. passive voice in a dissertation

When the first person voice is used in scientific writing it is mostly used in the first person plural, as scientific papers almost always have more than one co-author, such as

We propose a new method to study cell differentiation in nematodes.

Often the "we" also includes the reader

We may see in Figure 4.2 that...

However, I am writing a thesis which means I am the only author and I even have to testify in writing that the work is my own and I did not receive any help other than from the indicated sources. Therefore it seems I should use "I", but this seems to be very unusual in scientific writing and even discouraged as one may sound pretentious or self-absorbed. However, the alternative is to use the passive voice, which seems to be even more discouraged as it produces hard to read writing and indeed an entire thesis in the passive voice may be indigestible for any reader.

So far, I used the second form of "we" extensively that includes me and the reader. This form is often natural when describing mathematical derivations as the truth is objective and it suggests that I am taking the reader by the hand and walking her through the process. Still, I'm trying not do overdo this form.

However, eventually I will need to refer to methods that I propose and choices that I have made. Should I just follow scientific convention and use "we" although it is factually inaccurate or indeed write in the scorned-upon "I"?

• writing-style
• mathematics
• passive-voice
• personal-pronouns

• 3 In your particular case, an inclusive we could be used to recognize the nematodes collaboration :) –  Dr. belisarius Commented May 10, 2011 at 13:01
• 3 I find the use of "we" odd if there is only one author. I read a paper by a single author recently and he consistently wrote things like "we propose...", "we then present..." and I kept thinking, wait, who did you work with? –  Flash Commented May 10, 2011 at 14:08
• 2 @Andrew: Seriously? You read academic papers, and you're not at least aware of the convention? You might not endorse it, but you could just accept it as something some people do. –  FumbleFingers Commented May 10, 2011 at 22:05
• 1 @oceanhug: Probably saying nothing you don't already know, but bear in mind this sort of question could become a bit of a 'poll'. And there will be plenty of people who actively dislike using the effectively 'singular we' in any context. Because of associations with the 'academic old guard', the 'regal we', whatever. Or in solidarity with the march towards 'individualism' that marks Western civilisation. You, on the other hand, have a thesis to write. –  FumbleFingers Commented May 10, 2011 at 22:58
• I have seen academic papers by a single author using I . However I agree with FumbleFingers that most of the time you would use we , and that I sounds strange in an academic paper. Personally, if I were to read your thesis and saw we , I wouldn't find it as an implication that you were not the only author of the work. Also, I assume you will have a thesis supervisor, who is also responsible to check (and possibly approve) your work, so you can include him/her in the we . –  nico Commented May 11, 2011 at 6:47

6 Answers 6

I tried to use "I" in the first version of my thesis (in mathematics). When my advisor suggested corrections, the most detailed and strongly-worded of them was to use "we"; later, I asked another young professor whether one could use "I" and she said "Only if you want to sound like an arrogant bastard", and observed that only old people with established reputations can get away with it.

My extremely informal recollection of some articles that are more than, say, forty years old is that the singular is used more often, so what she says may be true but for a different reason than simple pride. The modern culture may disparage apparent displays of ego simply because of the greater prevalence of collaboration, whether or not your paper is a product of it. This is complete speculation, though.

I disagreed with the change at the time but acquiesced anyway, and now, with distance, I realize that it was a good idea. Scattering the paper with "I" draws attention to the author, and especially in mathematical writing, the prose is filled with impersonal subjects (that is, you often don't mean "I" literally, as in "If y = f(x), then we have an equation..."). Using "we" allows it to simply sink into the background, where it belongs. If it's your thesis, you don't have to put any special effort into reminding the reader who is talking, just like in an essay, they used to tell me not to say "in my opinion" before stating it.

EDIT: Oh, I forgot entirely about "the author". I hate that phrase, because it is just as inconsistent with "we" as with "I" and disingenuous to boot. If you have to make a truly personal remark, just say "I", and perhaps set off the entire comment by "Personally..." or something like that.

• 3 Excellent answer. I totally agree on all points, which you express well. Egalitarianism, individualism, or whatever may push for the first person singular, but it's distracting in serious academic texts. Though I don't have a big problem with ' the author ' once (maybe twice). –  FumbleFingers Commented May 10, 2011 at 22:14
• 7 We think you’ve hit the nail on the head with your speculation. –  Konrad Rudolph Commented May 11, 2011 at 14:23
• 1 -1; I strongly disagree. Moreover, the APA (and perhaps other) style manuals disagree. The persistence of using the passive voice to minimize the use of first person pronouns is a historical affectation that most of us have been trained from a young age to slavishly employ. However, it tends to yield awkward prose that is hard to read. If the greatest crime that must be committed is either "egotism" or "lack of clarity", I certainly choose to be egotistic. –  russellpierce Commented Oct 23, 2012 at 16:06
• 6 @RyanReich: You know that a down-vote is not a personal criticism right? –  russellpierce Commented Dec 24, 2012 at 14:45
• 2 @russellpierce. There are enough people around saying "never use passive voice" that they need to be argued against. The passive voice should be used whenever it improves your prose, and this happens moderately often. If you look at some early scientific papers, the incessant use of the first person pronoun can be really distracting, and many of these uses can be avoided using the passive voice. –  Peter Shor Commented Oct 16, 2017 at 16:00

I don't think there's anything wrong with using we in single-author scientific journal papers. It's the tradition, and if you use I in scientific papers it stands out, not necessarily in a good way. On the other hand, a PhD thesis is not a scientific journal paper, but a PhD thesis, and if you want to use I in it I don't see anything wrong with that.

The passive voice should not be used to avoid writing I or we . If the entire thesis is written in the passive voice, it is much harder to read, and the sentences within it 1 have to be reworded awkwardly so that some good transitions between the sentences within a paragraph are lost. On the other hand, if some sentences seem to require the passive voice, by all means those sentences should be written in the passive voice. But the passive voice should only be used where it is justified, that is, where its use improves readability of the thesis.

1 See how much better your sentences would read here.

• Shor: In the end I mostly go with @Ryan Reich's answer, but you and @Rafael Beraldo make additional important points. I'm minded to say that - probably with no concious effort on your part - you only used I once in your second paragraph. And that was only to quote the word. When I compare my sentences here with yours, I think yours look more authoritative, academic, educational, etc. You say you don't see anything wrong with I, but I bet you wouldn't use it in OP's position lol –  FumbleFingers Commented May 10, 2011 at 22:47
• 3 @FumbleFingers: The lack of pronouns I and you in my second paragraph was quite deliberate, and took some effort. –  Peter Shor Commented May 11, 2011 at 1:30
• Shor: Ah. Well, it was worth the effort from my point of view, if that's any recompense for your labours. But I notice you don't deny you'd avoid using I in a thesis yourself, even if you wouldn't think of that as particularly wrong on the part of someone else. –  FumbleFingers Commented May 11, 2011 at 2:40
• @FumbleFingers: I've only written one thesis, and the pronoun we is the one I mainly used in it. –  Peter Shor Commented May 11, 2011 at 10:30
• 1 some authors use I instead of we when only one author: link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00114-008-0435-3 –  Tomas Commented Apr 13, 2016 at 10:39

By all means write "I". By an amusing coincidence, I have in front of me the article Deformations of Symmetric Products , a proceedings article published by Princeton University Press. The author is the late George R. Kempf, a distinguished algebraic geometer, and on the very first page I read [not we read:-)]: "My proof uses heavily the deformation theory..." . And on the second page "I will use without particular references standard facts from deformation theory". I could give any number of examples: this usage is quite widespread.

• 1 The very example you give supports the opposite view. As a ' distinguished algebraic geometer ', of course Kempf could get away with "I" if he wanted to be self-indulgent. It may become less noticed in future, but in the here and now many (including perhaps those who will assess OP's thesis) both notice and deplore it. –  FumbleFingers Commented May 10, 2011 at 22:22
• 1 @FumbleFingers: I just gave a factual reference to show that "I" is indeed used. Calling the late George Kempf self-indulgent is rather insulting. –  Georges Elencwajg Commented May 11, 2011 at 9:52
• 1 I have no opinion on Kempf. Perhaps I should have used less loaded phrasing. I just meant that what's appropriate / acceptable for distinguished academicians isn't necessarily the best option for a somewhat more humble thesis-writer. Okay, it was OTT to baldly say your example supports the opposite view. But depending how you look at things, it supports either or neither position. –  FumbleFingers Commented May 11, 2011 at 13:44

Many people in academia encourage the use of “we” instead of “I”, although many other people don’t — I can easily remember that Chomsky, at least in Aspects of the Theory of Syntax , do use the first-person singular. Personally, I prefer to use “I”, if I’m the only author. I believe that it sounds much better, not to mention, humbler.

If you have an adviser, then you should really ask him. If you’re writing for a journal, see if they have published articles in which the author use “I” instead of “we”.

• 1 I like @Ryan Reich's answer better, to be honest. But you make the important additional point that much academic output can and should be guided by what's expected in context . Ask your advisor, mentor, editor or whatever if you don't already know that context. Don't do the 'unexpected' without being aware you're doing it, and having some idea how it'll go down. That would hardly be a rigorous academic approach. –  FumbleFingers Commented May 10, 2011 at 22:33
• @FumbleFingers, thank you. For some reason, I find the use of “we” to be conservative. Although science is not a solo task,there is nothing bad in remembering the reader that this is only your interpretation and findings about the subject. This is less obvious when reading seminal books on any area — by saying “I”, the author reminds us that he is human, and not a king ruling. –  rberaldo Commented May 10, 2011 at 22:54
• I think it's a finely-balanced thing, and all your arguments carry weight. The bottom line for OP should be 'ask the man', but we can afford to have our own personal positions. I only wrote one thesis, decades ago, and I bet I never used "I" once. Since then I've been in programming, and I nearly always use "we" in comments (in code that I wrote alone), even though most of that code was never likely to even be read by anyone except me. YMMD –  FumbleFingers Commented May 10, 2011 at 23:19

Remember that in situations like this, it is common for the author to refer to himself as "this author," e.g., "This author proposes a novel solution to the problem of X."

• In general this author is used only for personal opinions. "This author believes that the statistical tools used in most previous articles on this topic are inadequate" , but not "this author collected samples ..." –  Peter Shor Commented Nov 1, 2018 at 11:45

How about using neither? What about using factual voice instead :

"A new method to study cell differentiation in nematodes is proposed.""A new method to study cell differentiation in nematodes will be proposed." or "Figure 4.2 shows that..."

"A new method to study cell differentiation in nematodes will be proposed."

Was Replaced with :

"A new method to study cell differentiation in nematodes is proposed."

in accordance with suggestions (details in comments below).

• 4 That is passive. Nothing wrong with it, but that's what it is. –  Cerberus - Reinstate Monica Commented May 10, 2011 at 12:09
• 1 Nix the "will be" with "has been". I recommend using positive and factual statements, and not futuristic promises. By the time someone reads this, the works has already been done, and has been reported on. –  John Alexiou Commented May 10, 2011 at 16:33
• 2 "Figure 4.2 shows that..." Good: definitely an improvement over the original. "A new method to study cell differentiation in nematodes will be proposed." Terrible: this kind of use of the passive voice to avoid writing we or I makes papers much harder to read. –  Peter Shor Commented May 10, 2011 at 18:19
• #Peter : Thanks , What about "A new method to study cell differentiation in nematodes is proposed."? –  jimjim Commented May 10, 2011 at 22:27
• 2 @ja72: Not will be , not has been , A new method to study ... is proposed. You're proposing it as you write; the fact that the reader reads it later is completely immaterial; if you say has been , you are saying that you (or somebody else) proposed it in a previous paper. –  Peter Shor Commented Nov 1, 2018 at 11:36

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged writing writing-style mathematics passive-voice personal-pronouns or ask your own question .

• Featured on Meta
• Bringing clarity to status tag usage on meta sites
• Announcing a change to the data-dump process

Hot Network Questions

• Why does my shifter say the wrong gear?
• How do I backup only changed files on an external hard drive?
• In 1982 Admiral Grace Hopper said "I still haven't found out why helicopter rotors go the way they do". If she were here today, how might one answer?
• What kind of polymeric anions can be made of boron and sulfur?
• Fast way to test if an argument is an integer in LaTeX3?
• Which hash algorithms support binary input of arbitrary bit length?
• Generate vectors with a certain property
• decode the pipe
• Does it pay to put effort in fixing this problem or better reinstall Ubuntu 24.04 from scratch?
• Is it illegal to use a fake state ID to enter a private establishment even when a legitimate ID would've been fine?
• Doesn't counting hole and electron current lead to double-counting of actual current?
• Is this measure of how insincere my path marker is always differentiable?
• What did Horace say about combining Latin and Greek roots?
• A coordinate free interpretation of the "lowering the indices" operation
• Journal keeps messing with my proof
• What is happening when a TV satellite stops broadcasting during an "eclipse"?
• Tikz-cd labels not appearing when using "to path"
• Defining functions as other functions
• All four children have England birth index page changes
• What is this 3 terminal white + grey surface mount device?
• A SF novel where one character makes a "light portrait" of another one, with huge consequences
• Why are IC and IE different? Aren't the two 1k ohm resistors in series and thus the current through them should be the same?
• How to prepare a superposed state?
• If you switch to a non-orthogonal basis, are vectors that were previously orthogonal still orthogonal?