term paper about educational leadership

REVIEW article

Strategy and strategic leadership in education: a scoping review.

• 1 Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Research Centre for Human Development, Porto, Portugal
• 2 Universidade de Évora, Évora, Portugal

Strategy and strategic leadership are critical issues for school leaders. However, strategy as a field of research has largely been overlooked within the educational leadership literature. Most of the theoretical and empirical work on strategy and strategic leadership over the past decades has been related to non-educational settings, and scholarship devoted to these issues in education is still minimal. The purpose of this scoping review was to provide a comprehensive overview of relevant research regarding strategy and strategic leadership, identifying any gaps in the literature that could inform future research agendas and evidence for practice. The scoping review is underpinned by the five-stage framework of Arksey and O’Malley . The results indicate that there is scarce literature about strategy and that timid steps have been made toward a more integrated and comprehensive model of strategic leadership. It is necessary to expand research into more complex, longitudinal, and explanatory ways due to a better understanding of these constructs.

Introduction

Strategy and strategic leadership are critical issues for school leaders ( Davies and Davies, 2006 ; Davies and Davies, 2010 ; Eacott, 2010a ; Eacott, 2011 ). However, strategy as a field of research has largely been overlooked in educational leadership literature ( Davies and Davies, 2006 ; Eacott, 2008a ; Eacott, 2008b ; Davies and Davies, 2010 ; Eacott, 2011 ). Most of the theoretical and empirical work on strategy and strategic leadership over the past decades has been related to non-educational settings, and scholarship devoted to these issues in education is still very limited ( Cheng, 2010 ; Eacott, 2011 ; Chan, 2018 ).

The concept of strategy appeared in educational management literature in the 1980s; however, little research was produced until the 1990s (cf. Eacott, 2008b ). Specific educational reforms led to large amounts of international literature mostly devoted to strategic planning ( Eacott, 2008a ; Eacott, 2008b ; Eacott, 2011 ). For a long period, the concept of strategy was incomplete and confusing. The word “strategy” was often used to characterize different kinds of actions, namely, to weight management activities, to describe a high range of leadership activities, to define planning, or to report to individual actions within an organization ( Eacott, 2008a ).

Strategy and strategic planning became synonymous ( Eacott, 2008b ). However, strategy and planning are different concepts, with the strategy being more than the pursuit of a plan ( Davies, 2003 , Davies, 2006 ; Eacott, 2008a ; Eacott, 2008b ; Quong and Walker, 2010 ). Both phases of plans’ design and plans’ implementation are related, and the quality of this second phase highly depends on planning’ quality ( Davies, 2006 ; Davies, 2007 ; Eacott, 2008a ; Eacott, 2008b ; Eacott, 2011 ; Meyers and VanGronigen, 2019 ). Planning and acting are related and must emerge from the strategy. As stated by Bell (2004) .

Planning based on a coherent strategy demands that the aims of the school are challenged, that both present and future environmental influences inform the development of the strategy, that there should be a clear and well-articulated vision of what the school should be like in the future and that planning should be long-term and holistic (p. 453).

Therefore, it is necessary to adopt a comprehensive and holistic framework of strategy, considering it as a way of intentionally thinking and acting by giving sense to a specific school vision or mission ( Davies, 2003 , 2006 ; Eacott, 2008a ; Eacott, 2008b ; Quong and Walker, 2010 ).

The works of Davies and colleagues ( Davies, 2003 ; Davies, 2004 ; Davies and Davies, 2004 ; Davies and Davies, 2006 ; Davies and Davies, 2010 ) and Eacott (2008a , 2008b) , Eacott (2010a , 2011) were essential and contributed to a shift in the rationale regarding strategy by highlighting a more integrative and alternate view. Davies and colleagues ( Davies, 2003 ; Davies, 2004 ; Davies and Davies, 2004 ; Davies and Davies, 2006 ; Davies and Davies, 2010 ) developed a comprehensive framework for strategically focused schools , comprising strategic processes, approaches, and leadership. In this model, the strategy is conceptualized as a framework for present and future actions, sustained by strategic thinking about medium to long term goals, and aligned to school vision or direction.

Strategic leadership assumes necessarily a relevant role in strategically focused schools. Eacott (2006) defines strategic leadership as “leadership strategies and behaviors relating to the initiation, development, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of strategic actions within an educational institution, taking into consideration the unique context (past, present, and future) and availability of resources, physical, financial and human” (p. 1). Thereby, key elements of strategic leadership can be identified as one that: 1) acts in a proactive way to contextual changes; 2) leads school analysis and response to changing environment; 3) leads planning and action for school effectiveness and improvement in face of contextual challenges and; 4) leads monitoring and evaluation processes to inform decision making strategically ( Cheng, 2010 ). This brings to the arena a complex and dynamic view of strategic leadership as it is a complex social activity that considers important historical, economic, technological, cultural, social, and political influences and challenges ( Eacott, 2011 ).

Along with these authors, this paper advocates a more comprehensive and contextualized view of strategy and strategic leadership, where strategy is the core element of any leadership action in schools ( Davies and Davies, 2010 ; Eacott, 2011 ). Here, strategic leadership is not seen as a new theory, but an element of all educational leadership and management theories ( Davies and Davies, 2010 ). Even so, these concepts can inform and be informed by diverse leadership theories, a strategy-specific framework is needed in the educational field.

Considering all the above, strategy can be identified as a topic that is being researched in education, in the recent decades. Nonetheless, there is still scarce educational literature about this issue ( Davies and Davies, 2006 ; Davies and Davies, 2010 ; Cheng, 2010 ; Eacott, 2011 ; Chan, 2018 ). After 10 years of Eacott’s analysis of literature on strategy in education, it seems that this educational construct is being overlooked as there is still no consensual definition of strategy, different studies are supported in diverse conceptual frameworks and empirical studies about this topic are scarce ( Cheng, 2010 ; Eacott, 2011 ; Chan, 2018 ). Moreover, despite the interest of a multidisciplinary vision of strategy and strategic leadership, we agree with Eacott (2008b) about the need for a meaningful definition of strategy and strategic leadership in education, as it is a field with its specifications. Hence, research is needed for a clear definition of strategy, an integrated and complete framework for strategic action, a better identification of multiple dimensions of strategy and a comprehensive model of strategic leadership that has strategic thinking and action as core elements for schools improvement (e.g., Eacott, 2010a ; Hopkins et al., 2014 ; Reynolds et al., 2014 ; Harris et al., 2015 ; Bellei et al., 2016 ). This paper aims to contribute to the field offering a scoping review on strategy and strategic leadership in the educational field.

A clear idea of what strategy and strategic leadership mean and what theory or theories support it are of great importance for research and practice. This scoping review is an attempt to contribute to a strategy-specific theory by continuing to focus on ways to appropriately develop specific theories about strategy and strategic leadership in the educational field, particularly focusing on school contexts.

This study is a scoping review of the literature related to strategy and strategic leadership, which aims to map its specific aspects as considered in educational literature. Scoping reviews are used to present a broad overview of the evidence about a topic, irrespective of study quality, and are useful when examining emergent areas, to clarify key concepts or to identify gaps in research (e.g., Arksey and O’Malley, 2005 ; Peters et al., 2015 ; Tricco et al., 2016 ). Since in the current study we wanted to explore and categorize, but not evaluate, information available concerning specific aspects of strategy in educational literature, we recognize that scoping review methodology serves well this purpose.

In this study, Arksey and O’Malley (2005) five-stage framework for scoping reviews, complemented by the guidelines of other authors ( Levac et al., 2010 ; Colquhoun et al., 2014 ; Peters et al., 2015 ; Khalil et al., 2016 ), was employed. The five stages of Arksey and O’Malley’s framework are 1) identifying the initial research questions, 2) identifying relevant studies, 3) study selection, 4) charting the data, and 5) collating, summarizing and reporting the results. In the sections below, the process of this scoping review is presented.

Identifying the Initial Research Questions

The focus of this review was to explore key aspects of strategy and strategic leadership in educational literature. The primary question that guided this research was: What is known about strategy and strategic leadership in schools? This question was subdivided into the following questions: How should strategy and strategic leadership in schools be defined? What are the main characteristics of strategic leadership in schools? What key variables are related to strategy and strategic leadership in schools?

Identifying Relevant Studies

As suggested by Arksey and O’Malley (2005) , keywords for the search were defined, and databases were selected. Key concepts and search terms were developed to capture literature related to strategy and strategic leadership in schools, considering international perspectives. The linked descriptive key search algorithm that was developed to guide the search is outlined in Table 1 .

TABLE 1 . Key search algorithm.

Considering scoping review characteristics, time and resources available, inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed. Papers related to strategy and strategic leadership, published between 1990 and 2019, were included. Educational literature has reported the concepts of strategy and strategic leadership since the 1980s ( Eacott, 2008a ; 2008b ). However, it gained expansion between 1990 and 2000 with studies flourishing mostly about strategic planning ( Eacott, 2008b ). Previous research argues that strategy is more than planning, taking note of the need to distinguish the concepts. Considering our focus on strategy and strategic leadership, studies about strategic planning were excluded as well as papers specifically related to other theories of leadership than strategic leadership. A full list of inclusion and exclusion criteria is outlined in Table 2 .

TABLE 2 . Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

The following six electronic databases were searched to identify peer-reviewed literature: ERIC, Education Source, Academic Search Complete, Science Direct, Emerland, and Web of Science. Additionally, a manual search of the reference lists of identified articles was undertaken, and Google Scholar was utilized to identify any other primary sources. The review of the literature was completed over 2 months, ending in August 2019.

Study Selection

The process of studies’ selection followed the Preferred Reporting of Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement ( Moher et al., 2009 ). Figure 1 illustrates the process of article selection.

FIGURE 1 . PRISMA chart outlining the study selection process.

With the key search descriptors, 1,193 articles were identified. A further number of articles were identified using Google Scholar. However, a large number of articles were removed from the search, as they were duplicated in databases, and 231 studies were identified as being relevant.

The next phases of studies’ selection were guided by the inclusion and exclusion criteria presented above. A screening of the titles, keywords, and abstracts revealed a large number of irrelevant articles, particularly those related to strategic planning (e.g., Agi, 2017 ) and with general ideas about leadership (e.g., Corral and Gámez, 2010 ). Only 67 studies were selected for full-text access and analyses.

Full-text versions of the 67 articles were obtained, with each article being reviewed and confirmed as appropriate. This process provided an opportunity to identify any further additional relevant literature from a review of the reference lists of each article (backward reference search; n = 2). Ultimately, both with database search and backward reference search, a total of 29 articles were included to be analyzed in the scoping review, considering inclusion and exclusion criteria. During this process of study selection, several studies were excluded. As in the previous phase, examples of excluded papers include studies related to strategic planning where the focus is on the planning processes (e.g., Bennett et al., 2000 ; Al-Zboon and Hasan, 2012 ; Schlebusch and Mokhatle, 2016 ) or with general ideas about leadership (e.g., FitzGerald and Quiñones, 2018 ). Additionally, articles that were primarily associated with other topics or related to specific leadership theories (e.g., instructional leadership, transformational leadership) and that only referred briefly to strategic leadership were excluded (e.g., Bandur, 2012 ; Malin and Hackmann, 2017 ). Despite the interest of all these topics for strategic action, we were interested specifically in the concepts of strategy, strategic leadership, and its specifications in educational literature.

Data Charting and Collation

The fourth stage of Arksey and O’Malley (2005) scoping review framework consists of charting the selected articles. Summaries were developed for each article related to the author, year, location of the study, participants, study methods, and a brief synthesis of study results related to our research questions. Details of included studies are provided in the table available in Supplementary Appendix S1 .

Summarising and Reporting Findings

The fifth and final stage of Arksey and O’Malley (2005) scoping review framework summarises and reports findings as presented in the next section. All the 29 articles were studied carefully and a content analysis was taken to answer research questions. Research questions guided summaries and synthesis of literature content.

In this section, results are presented first with a brief description of the origin and nature of the studies, and then as answering research questions previously defined.

This scoping review yielded 29 articles, specifically devoted to strategy and strategic leadership in education, from eleven different countries (cf. Figure 2 ). The United Kingdom and Australia have the highest numbers of papers. There is a notable dispersion of literature in terms of geographical distribution.

FIGURE 2 . Number of papers per country.

A large number of these articles were published by Brent Davies and colleagues ( N = 9) and Scott Eacott ( N = 6). Without question, these authors have influenced and shaped the theoretical grounding about strategy and strategic leadership in educational literature. While Davies and colleagues have contributed to design a framework of strategy and strategic leadership, influencing the emergence of other studies related to these topics, Eacott provided an essential contribution by exploring, systematizing, and problematizing the existing literature about these same issues. The other authors have published between one and two papers about these topics.

Seventeen papers are of conceptual or theoretical nature, and twelve are empirical research papers (quantitative methods–7; qualitative methods–4; mixed methods–1). The conceptual/theoretical papers analyze the concepts of strategy and strategic leadership, present a framework for strategic leadership, and discuss implications for leaders’ actions. The majority of empirical studies are related to the skills, characteristics, and actions of strategic leaders. Other empirical studies explore relations between strategic leadership and other variables, such as collaboration, culture of teaching, organizational learning, and school effectiveness.

How should Strategy and Strategic Leadership in Schools be Defined?

The concept of strategy is relatively new in educational literature and, in great part, related to school planning. In this scoping review, a more integrated and comprehensive view is adopted ( Davies, 2003 ; Davies, 2006 ; Eacott, 2008a ; Eacott, 2008b ; Quong and Walker, 2010 ). Davies (2003) defined strategy as a specific pattern of decisions and actions taken to achieve an organization’s goals (p. 295). This concept of strategy entails some specific aspects, mainly that strategy implies a broader view incorporating data about a specific situation or context ( Davies, 2003 ; Dimmock and Walker, 2004 ; Davies, 2006 ; Davies, 2007 ). It is a broad organizational-wide perspective , supported by a vision and direction setting , that conceals longer-term views with short ones ( Davies, 2003 ; Dimmock and Walker, 2004 ; Davies, 2006 ; Davies, 2007 ). It can be seen as a template for short-term action . However, it deals mostly with medium-and longer-term views of three-to 5-year perspectives ( Davies, 2003 ; Davies, 2006 ; Davies, 2007 ). In this sense, a strategy is much more a perspective or a way of thinking that frames strategically successful schools ( Davies, 2003 ; Davies and Davies, 2005 ; Davies, 2006 ; Davies and Davies, 2010 ).

Eacott (2008a) has argued that strategy in the educational leadership context is a field of practice and application that is of a multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary nature. More than a single definition of strategy, what is needed is a conceptual understanding and articulation of its fundamental features, which removes the need to answer, “what is a strategy?” Understanding strategy as choosing a direction within a given context, through leadership, and articulating that direction through management practices ( Eacott, 2008a , p. 356) brings to the arena diverse elements of strategy from both leadership and management. From this alternative point of view, a strategy may be seen as leadership ( Eacott, 2010a ). More than an answer to “what is a strategy?”, it is crucial to understand “when and how does the strategy exist?” ( Eacott, 2010a ), removing the focus on leaders’ behaviors and actions per se to cultural, social, and political relationships ( Eacott, 2011 ). Hence, research strategy and strategic leadership oblige by acknowledging the broader educational, societal, and political contexts ( Dimmock and Walker, 2004 ; Eacott, 2010a ; Eacott, 2010b ; Eacott, 2011 ).

Strategic leadership is a critical component of school development ( Davies and Davies, 2006 ). However, to define leadership is challenging considering the amount of extensive, diverse literature about this issue. Instead of presenting a new categorization about leadership, the authors most devoted to strategic leadership consider it as a key dimension of any activity of leadership ( Davies and Davies, 2004 ; Davies and Davies, 2006 ; Eacott, 2010a ; Eacott, 2010b ; Eacott, 2011 ). Barron et al. (1995) stressed the idea of change. As mentioned by the authors, implementation of strategic leadership means change: change in thinking, change in the way schools are organized, change in management styles, change in the distribution of power, change in teacher education programs, and change in roles of all participants ( Barron et al., 1995 , p. 180). Strategic leadership is about creating a vision, setting the direction of the school over the medium-to longer-term and translating it into action ( Davies and Davies, 2010 ; Eacott, 2011 ). In that sense, strategic leadership is a new way of thinking ( Barron et al., 1995 ) that determines a dynamic and iterative process of functioning in schools ( Eacott, 2008b ).

In their model of strategic leadership, Davies and Davies (2006) consider that leadership must be based on strategic intelligence, summarised as three types of wisdom: 1) people wisdom, which includes participation and sharing information with others, developing creative thinking and motivation, and developing capabilities and competencies within the school; 2) contextual wisdom, which comprises understanding and developing school culture, sharing values and beliefs, developing networks, and understanding external environment; and 3) procedural wisdom, which consists of the continuous cycle of learning, aligning, timing and acting. This model also includes strategic processes and strategic approaches that authors define as the centre of this cycle ( Davies and Davies, 2006 , p. 136).

To deeply understand strategic leadership, it is necessary to explore strategic processes and approaches that leaders take ( Davies and Davies, 2010 ). In this sense, strategic leadership, strategic processes, and strategic approaches are key elements for sustainable and successful schools, which are found to be strategically focused. Davies (2006) designed a model for a strategically focused school that may be defined as one that is educationally effective in the short-term but also has a clear framework and processes to translate core moral purpose and vision into an excellent educational provision that is challenging and sustainable in the medium-to long-term (p.11). This model incorporates 1) strategic processes (conceptualization, engagement, articulation, and implementation), 2) strategic approaches (strategic planning, emergent strategy, decentralized strategy, and strategic intent), and 3) strategic leadership (organizational abilities and personal characteristics). Based on these different dimensions, strategically focused schools have built-in sustainability, develop set strategic measures to assess their success, are restless, are networked, use multi-approach planning processes, build the strategic architecture of the school, are strategically opportunistic, deploy strategy in timing and abandonment and sustain strategic leadership ( Davies, 2004 , pp.22–26).

What Are the Main Characteristics of Strategic Leadership in Schools?

Davies (2003) , Davies and Davies (2005) , Davies and Davies (2006) , Davies and Davies (2010) discuss what strategic leaders do (organizational abilities) and what characteristics strategic leaders display (personal characteristics). The key activities of strategic leaders, or organizational abilities, are 1) create a vision and setting a direction, 2) translate strategy into action, 3) influence and develop staff to deliver the strategy, 4) balance the strategic and the operational, 5) determine effective intervention points ( what, how, when, what not to do and what to give up ), 6) develop strategic capabilities, and 7) define measures of success ( Davies and Davies, 2006 ; Davies and Davies, 2010 ). The main characteristics that strategic leaders display, or their characteristics, are 1) dissatisfaction or restlessness with the present, 2) absorptive capacity, 3) adaptive capacity, and 4) wisdom.

Two specific studies explored the strategic leadership characteristics of Malaysian leaders ( Ali, 2012 ; Ali, 2018 ), considering the above-mentioned model as a framework. For Malaysian Quality National Primary School Leaders, the results supported three organizational capabilities (strategic orientation, translation, and alignment) and three individual characteristics of strategic leadership (dissatisfaction or restlessness with the present, absorptive capacity, and adaptive capacity). For Malaysian vocational college educational leaders, the results were consistent with seven distinct practices of strategic leadership, such as strategic orientation, strategic alignment, strategic intervention, restlessness, absorptive capacity, adaptive capacity, and leadership wisdom.

Other studies were also focused on the characteristics of strategic leadership with different populations and countries. Chatchawaphun et al. (2016) identified the principles, attributes, and skills of the strategic leadership of secondary school administrators from Thailand. The principles identified within the sample of principals included appropriate values, modern visionary, future focusing strategy, empirical evidence focus, intention toward accomplishment, decency, and making relationships. The attributes found were strategic learning, strategic thinking, and value push up. The skills were learning, interpretation, forecasting, planning, challenge, and decision making. Chan (2018) explored strategic leadership practices performed by Hong Kong school leaders of early childhood education and identified effective planning and management, reflective and flexible thinking, and networking and professional development as variables. Eacott (2010c) investigated the strategic role of Australian public primary school principals concerning the leader characteristics of tenure (referring to the time in years in their current substantive position) and functional track (referring to the time in years spent at different levels of the organizational hierarchy). These demographic variables have moderating effects on the strategic leadership and management of participants. These five studies seem to be outstanding contributions to solidify a framework of strategic leadership and to test it with different populations in different countries.

Additionally, Quong and Walker (2010) present seven principles for effective and successful strategic leaders. Strategic leaders are future-oriented and have a future strategy, their practices are evidence-based and research-led, they get things done, open new horizons, are fit to lead, make good partners and do the “next” right thing—these seven principles of action seem related to the proposal of Davies and colleagues. Both authors highlighted visions for the future, future long-term plans, and plans’ translation into action as important characteristics of strategic leaders.

One other dimension that is being explored in research relates to ethics. Several authors assert that insufficient attention and research have been given to aspects related to moral or ethical leadership among school leaders ( Glanz, 2010 ; Quong and Walker, 2010 ; Kangaslahti, 2012 ). The seventh principle of the Quong and Walker (2010) model of strategic leadership is that leaders do the “next” right thing. This relates to the ethical dimension of leadership, meaning that strategic leaders recognize the importance of ethical behaviors and act accordingly. For some authors, ethics in strategic leadership is a critical issue for researchers and practitioners that needs to be taken into consideration ( Glanz, 2010 ; Quong and Walker, 2010 ). Glanz (2010) underlined social justice and caring perspectives as required to frame strategic initiatives. Kangaslahti (2012) analyzed the strategic dilemmas that leaders face in educational settings (e.g., top-down strategy vs. bottom-up strategy process; leadership by authority vs. staff empowerment; focus on administration vs. focus on pedagogy; secret planning and decision making vs. open, transparent organization; the well-being of pupils vs. well-being of staff) and how they can be tackled by dilemma reconciliation. Chen (2008) , in case study research, explored the conflicts that school administrators have confronted in facilitating school reform in Taiwan. The author identified four themes related to strategic leadership in coping with the conflicts accompanying this school reform: 1) educational values, 2) timeframe for change, 3) capacity building, and 4) community involvement. These studies reinforce the idea that school improvement and success seem to be influenced by the way leaders think strategically and deal with conflicts or dilemmas. Researchers need to design ethical frameworks or models from which practitioners can think ethically about their strategic initiatives and their dilemmas or conflicts ( Chen, 2008 ; Glanz, 2010 ; Kangaslahti, 2012 ).

Despite the critical contribution of Davies’ models ( Davies, 2003 ; Davies, 2004 ; Davies and Davies, 2006 ; Davies and Davies, 2010 ) and subsequent works, Eacott (2010a) questions the production of lists of behaviors and traits. This is likely one of the main differences between Davies’ and Eacott’s contributions in this field. While Davies and colleagues include organizational abilities and personal characteristics in their model of strategic leadership, Eacott (2010a , 2010b) emphasizes the broader context where strategy occurs. These ideas, however, are not contradictory but complementary in the comprehension of strategy as leadership in education since both authors present a comprehensive and integrated model of strategic leadership. Even though Davies and colleagues present some specific characteristics of leaders, these characteristics are incorporated into a large model for strategy in schools.

What Are Other Key Variables Related to Strategy and Strategic Leadership in Schools?

Other studies investigated the relationship between strategic leadership and other key variables, such as collaboration ( Ismail et al., 2018 ), the culture of teaching ( Khumalo, 2018 ), organizational learning ( Aydin et al., 2015 ) and school effectiveness ( Prasertcharoensuk and Tang, 2017 ).

One descriptive survey study presented teacher collaboration as a mediator of strategic leadership and teaching quality ( Ismail et al., 2018 ). The authors argue that school leaders who demonstrate strategic leadership practices can lead to the creation of collaborative practices among teachers and thus help to improve the professional standards among them, namely, teaching quality ( Ismail et al., 2018 ). One cross-sectional study identified positive and significant relations among the variables of strategic leadership actions and organizational learning. Transforming, political, and ethical leadership actions were identified as significant predictors of organizational learning. However, managing actions were not found to be a significant predictor ( Aydin et al., 2015 ). One other study establishes that strategic leadership practices promote a teaching culture defined as the commitment through quality teaching for learning outcomes ( Khumalo, 2018 ). These three studies provide essential highlights of the relevance of strategic leadership for school improvement and quality. Nonetheless, it is interesting to note that in a research survey that examined the effect of leadership factors of administrators on school effectiveness, the authors concluded that the direct, indirect, and overall effects of the administrators’ strategic leadership had no significant impact on school effectiveness ( Prasertcharoensuk and Tang, 2017 ). These studies introduce important questions that need to be explored both related to strategy and strategic leadership features and its relations and impacts on relevant school variables. Such studies stimulate researchers to explore these and other factors that relate to strategic leadership.

The knowledge about strategy and strategic leadership is still incomplete and confusing ( Eacott, 2008a ; Eacott, 2008b ). From the 29 studies selected, divergent data and multiple concepts of strategy can be identified which reinforces the confusion about these issues. Some integrative clarification is still needed about the concepts of strategy and strategic leadership as about its core features. In this section, it is intended to contribute to the clarification and integration of the concepts considering the studies selected.

The emergence of politics and reforms related to school autonomy and responsibility in terms of efficacy and accountability brings the concept of strategy to the educational literature ( Eacott, 2008b ; Cheng, 2010 ). It first appeared in the 1980s but gained momentum between 1990 and 2000. However, the main focus of the literature was on strategic planning based upon mechanistic or technical-rational models of strategy. Authors have criticized the conceptualization of strategy as a way for elaborating a specific plan of action for schools ( Davies, 2003 ; Davies, 2006 ; Eacott, 2008a ; Eacott, 2008b ; Quong and Walker, 2010 ). These same authors adopted a more comprehensive and holistic model of strategy. The concepts have been developed from a more rational and mechanistic view related to planning processes to a more comprehensive and complex view of strategy and leadership that take into consideration a situated and contextual framework. Considering the contribution of these studies, strategy incorporates three core dimensions, articulated with a schoolwide perspective 1) Vision, mission and direction (e.g., Davies, 2003 ; Dimmock and Walker, 2004 ; Davies, 2006 ; Davies and Davies, 2006 ; Davies, 2007 ; Eacott, 2008a ) 2) Intentional thinking (e.g., Barron et al., 1995 ; Davies, 2003 ; Davies and Davies, 2005 ; Davies, 2006 ; Davies and Davies, 2010 ): and; 3) Articulated decision-making and action (e.g., Davies, 2003 ; Dimmock and Walker, 2004 ; Davies and Davies, 2006 ; Davies, 2006 ; Davies, 2007 ; Eacott, 2008a ; Eacott, 2010a ; Eacott, 2010b ; Eacott, 2011 ).

Strategic leaders have an important role in strategy but, even considering this comprehensive and holistic concept of strategy, research poses the question of what are the main characteristics of strategic leaders in schools? From the literature reviewed, specific abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics may be identified. Looking for an integrated picture of strategic leadership, Table 3 represents the main contributions of the studies selected.

TABLE 3 . Strategic leadership: Main features.

Despite the contribution of these studies to deep knowledge about strategic leadership, the discussion here considers whether it is worthwhile to produce lists of behaviors and traits for strategic leaders in the absence of an integrated model that acknowledges the broader educational, societal and political context ( Dimmock and Walker, 2004 ; Eacott, 2010a ; Eacott, 2010b ; Eacott, 2011 ). Eacott (2011) argues that strategy, as constructed through analysis, is decontextualized and dehumanized and essentially a vacuous concept with limited utility to the practice that it seeks to explain (p. 426). Without a comprehensive and contextual model of strategy and strategic leadership, supported by research, the topics may still be overlooked and misunderstood. With this in mind, Figure 3 attempts to represent the core dimensions of strategy from a comprehensive perspective.

FIGURE 3 . Strategy and core dimensions from a comprehensive perspective.

As this is a scoping review, we tried to display a general view of the literature that can serve as a basis for a specific strategy theory in education and to more in-depth studies related to strategy and strategic leadership in schools. Nevertheless, we need to identify some methodological limitations of this study. As a scoping review, methods and reporting need improvement ( Tricco et al., 2018 ) and we are aware of this circumstance. Also, our search strategy may have overlooked some existing studies, since grey documents (e.g., reports) and studies from diverse languages than English were not included, that can misrepresent important data. Besides, inclusion criteria focused only on studies specifically devoted to strategy (not strategic planning) and strategic leadership (no other theories of leadership), but we acknowledge important contributions from this specific literature that were excluded. Finally, in our study there is no comparative analysis between the western and eastern/oriental contexts. However, we are aware that these contexts really differ and a context-specific reflection on strategy and strategic leadership in education would be useful. More research is needed to overcome the limitations mentioned.

Besides, the pandemic COVID19 brought new challenges in education, and particularly, to leaders. This study occurred before the pandemic and this condition was not acknowledged. However, much has changed in education as a consequence of the pandemic control measures, these changes vary from country to country, and schools’ strategies have changed for sure. Future research needs to explore strategy and strategic leadership in education considering a new era post pandemic.

With this scoping review, the authors aimed to contribute to enduring theories about strategy and strategic leadership in education. From our findings, it appears that this issue is being little explored. Despite the important contributions of authors cited in this scoping review ( Aydin et al., 2015 ; Chatchawaphun et al., 2016 ; Prasertcharoensuk and Tang, 2017 ; Ali, 2018 ; Chan, 2018 ; Ismail et al., 2018 ; Khumalo, 2018 ), minor advances seem to have been made after 2010. This is intriguing taking into account the leaders’ role in the third wave of educational reform, where strategic leadership pursues a new vision and new aims for education due to maximizing learning opportunities for students through “ triplisation in education’ (i.e., as an integrative process of globalization, localization and individualization in education)” ( Cheng, 2010 , p. 48). It was expected that research moved from rational planning models towards a more complex view of strategy in education ( Eacott, 2011 ). This review brings the idea that some timid and situated steps have been made.

Since the important review by Eacott, published in 2008, a step forward was made in the distinction between strategy and planning. Despite the significant number of papers about planning that were found during this review, the majority were published before 2008 (e.g., Nebgen, 1990 ; Broadhead et al., 1998 ; Bennett et al., 2000 ; Beach and Lindahl, 2004 ; Bell, 2004 ). Also, most of the papers selected adopt a more integrative, comprehensive, and complex view of strategy and strategic leadership (e.g., Eacott, 2010a ; Eacott, 2010b ; Davies and Davies, 2010 ; Eacott, 2011 ; Ali, 2012 ; Ali, 2018 ; Chan, 2018 ). More than identifying the “best of” strategy and strategic leadership, alternative models understand strategy as a way of thinking ( Davies and Davies, 2010 ) and a work in progress ( Eacott, 2011 ).

This also resonates with the educational literature about loosely coupled systems . There is evidence that loosely coupled educational organizations continue to exist and that resistance to change is a characteristic of school organizations ( Hautala et al., 2018 ). Strategic leadership gains relevance since leaders need to consider how to manage their loose and tight configurations and, hence, reinforce simultaneous personal and organizational dimensions related to school improvement. It is time to expand the research into more complex, longitudinal, and explanatory ways due to a better understanding of the constructs. This scoping review was an attempt to contribute to this endeavor by integrating and systematizing educational literature about strategy and strategic leadership.

Author Contributions

MC-collected and analyzed data, write the paper IC, JV, and JA-guided the research process and reviewed the paper.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) for the support to this publication (Ref. UIDB/04872/2020).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2021.706608/full#supplementary-material

Agi, U. (2017). School Development Planning: A Strategic Tool for Secondary School Improvement in Rivers State, Nigeria. J. Int. Soc. Teach. Educ. 21 (1), 88–99.

Google Scholar

Al-Zboon, W., and Hasan, M. (2012). Strategic School Planning in Jordan. Education 132 (4), 809–825.

Arksey, H., and O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 8 (1), 19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aydin, M., Guclu, N., and Pisapia, J. (2015). The Relationship between School Principals’ Strategic Leadership Actions and Organizational Learning. Am. J. Educ. Stud. 7 (1), 5–25.

Bandur, A. (2012). School‐based Management Developments: Challenges and Impacts. J. Educ. Admin 50 (6), 845–873. doi:10.1108/09578231211264711

Barron, B., Henderson, M., and Newman, P. (1995). Strategic Leadership: A Theoretical and Operational Definition. J. Instructional Psychol. 22, 178–181.

Beach, R. H., and Lindahl, R. (2004). A Critical Review of Strategic Planning: Panacea for Public Education?. J. Sch. Leadersh. 14 (2), 211–234. doi:10.1177/105268460401400205

Bell, L. (2004). Strategic Planning in Primary Schools. Manag. Educ. 18 (4), 33–36. doi:10.1177/08920206040180040701

Bellei, C., Vanni, X., Valenzuela, J. P., and Contreras, D. (2016). School Improvement Trajectories: An Empirical Typology. Sch. Effectiveness Sch. Improvement 27 (3), 275–292. doi:10.1080/09243453.2015.1083038

Bennett, Megan Crawford, Rosalind L, N., Crawford, M., Levačić, R., Glover, D., and Earley, P. (2000). The Reality of School Development Planning in the Effective Primary School: Technicist or Guiding Plan? Sch. Leadersh. Manag. 20 (3), 333–351. doi:10.1080/13632430050128354

Broadhead, P., Hodgson, J., Cuckle, P., and Dunford, J. (1998). School Development Planning: Moving from the Amorphous to the Dimensional and Making it Your Own. Res. Pap. Educ. 13 (1), 3–18. doi:10.1080/0267152980130102

Chan, C. W. (2018). Leading Today's Kindergartens. Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh. 46 (4), 679–691. doi:10.1177/1741143217694892

Chatchawaphun, P., Julsuwan, S., and Srisa-ard, B. (2016). Development of Program to Enhance Strategic Leadership of Secondary School Administrators. Ies 9 (10), 34–46. doi:10.5539/ies.v9n10p34

Chen, P. (2008). Strategic Leadership and School Reform in Taiwan. Sch. Effectiveness Sch. Improvement 19 (3), 293–318. doi:10.1080/09243450802332119

Cheng, Y. (2010). A Topology of Three-Wave Models of Strategic Leadership in Education. Int. Stud. Educ. Adm. 38 (1), 35–54.

Colquhoun, H. L., Levac, D., O'Brien, K. K., Straus, S., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L., et al. (2014). Scoping Reviews: Time for Clarity in Definition, Methods, and Reporting. J. Clin. Epidemiol. , 67(12), 1291–1294. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013

Corral Granados, A., and Granados Gámez, G. (2010). Sustainability and Triple Bottom Line: Key Issues for Successful Spanish School Principals. Intl Jnl Educ. Mgt. , 24(6), 467–477.doi:10.1108/09513541011067656

Davies, B. (2004), Developing the Strategically Focused School, Sch. Leadersh. Manag. , 24(1), 11–27. doi:10.1080/1363243042000172796

Davies, B., and Davies, B. J. (2005). Strategic Leadership Reconsidered. Leadersh. Pol. Schools , 4(3), 241–260. doi:10.1080/15700760500244819

Davies, B., and Davies, B. (2010). The Nature and Dimensions of Strategic Leadership. Int. Stud. Educ. Adm. , 38(1), 5–21.

Davies, B. (2007). Developing Sustainable Leadership. Manag. Educ. , 21(3), 4–9. doi:10.1177/0892020607079984

Davies, B. J., and Davies, B.(2004), Strategic Leadership, Sch. Leadersh. Manag. , 24(1), 29–38. doi:10.1080/1363243042000172804

Davies, B. J., and Davies, B. (2006). Developing a Model for Strategic Leadership in Schools. Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh. , 34(1), 121–139. doi:10.1177/1741143206059542

Davies, B. (2006). Processes Not Plans Are the Key to Strategic Development. Manag. Educ. , 20(2), 11–15. doi:10.1177/089202060602000204

Davies, B. (2003). Rethinking Strategy and Strategic Leadership in Schools. Educ. Manag. Adm. , 31(3), 295–312. doi:10.1177/0263211x03031003006

Dimmock, C., and Walker, A. (2004). A New Approach to Strategic Leadership: Learning‐centredness, Connectivity and Cultural Context in School Design, Sch. Leadersh. Manag. , 24(1), 39–56. doi:10.1080/1363243042000172813

Eacott, S. (2006). Strategy: An Educational Leadership Imperative, Perspect. Educ. Leadersh. , 16(6), 1–12.

Eacott, S. (2008b). An Analysis of Contemporary Literature on Strategy in Education. Int. J. Leadersh. Educ. , 11(3), 257–280. doi:10.1080/13603120701462111

Eacott, S. (2010b). Lacking a Shared Vision: Practitioners and the Literature on the Topic of Strategy. J. Sch. Leadersh. , 20, 425–444. doi:10.1177/105268461002000403

Eacott, S. (2011) Leadership Strategies: Re-conceptualising Strategy for Educational Leadership. Sch. Leadersh. Manag. , 31 (1), 35–46. doi:10.1080/13632434.2010.540559

Eacott, S. (2010a). Strategy as Leadership: an Alternate Perspective to the Construct of Strategy. Int. Stud. Educ. Adm. , 38(1), 55–65.

Eacott, S. (2008a). Strategy in Educational Leadership: In Search of unity, J. Educ. Admin. , 46(3), 353–375. doi:10.1108/09578230810869284

Eacott, S. (2010c). Tenure, Functional Track and Strategic Leadership. Intl Jnl Educ. Mg.t , 24(5), 448–458. doi:10.1108/09513541011056009

FitzGerald, A. M., and Quiñones, S. (2018). The Community School Coordinator: Leader and Professional Capital Builder. Jpcc , 3(4), 272–286. doi:10.1108/JPCC-02-2018-0008

Glanz, J. (2010). Justice and Caring: Power, Politics, and Ethics in Strategic Leadership. Int. Stud. Educ. Adm. , 38(1), 66–86.

Harris, A., Adams, D., Jones, M. S., and Muniandy, V. (2015). System Effectiveness and Improvement: The Importance of Theory and Context. Sch. Effectiveness Sch. Improvement , 26(1), 1–3. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.987980

Hautala, T., Helander, J., and Korhonen, V. (2018). Loose and Tight Coupling in Educational Organizations - an Integrative Literature Review. Jea , 56(2), 236–255. doi:10.1108/JEA-03-2017-0027

Hopkins, D., Stringfield, S., Harris, A., Stoll, L., and Mackay, T. (2014). School and System Improvement: A Narrative State-Of-The-Art Review. Sch. Effectiveness Sch. Improvement , 25(2), 257–281. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.885452

Ismail, S. N., Kanesan, A., Kanesan, A. G., and Muhammad, F. 2018). Teacher Collaboration as a Mediator for Strategic Leadership and Teaching Quality. Int. J. Instruction , 11(4), 485–498. doi:10.12973/iji.2018.11430a

Kangaslahti, J. (2012). Mapping the Strategic Leadership Practices and Dilemmas of a Municipal Educational Organization. Euromentor J. - Stud. about Educ. , 4, 9–17.

Khalil, H., Peters, M., Godfrey, C. M., McInerney, P., Soares, C. B., and Parker, D., (2016). An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews. Worldviews Evid. Based Nurs. , 13(2), 118–123. doi:10.1111/wvn.12144

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khumalo, S. (2018). Promoting Teacher Commitment through the Culture of Teaching through Strategic Leadership Practices. Gend. Behav. , 16(3), 12167 -12177.

Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., and O'Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping Studies: Advancing the Methodology. Implement Sci. , 5(1), 69–9. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1748-5908-5-69.pdf . doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

Malin, J. R., and Hackmann, D. (2017). Urban High School Principals' Promotion of College-And-Career Readiness. Jea , 55(6), 606–623. doi:10.1108/JEA-05-2016-0054

Meyers, C. V., and VanGronigen, B. A. (2019). A Lack of Authentic School Improvement Plan Development, J. Educ. Admin , 57(3), 261–278. doi:10.1108/JEA-09-2018-0154

Mohd Ali, H. b., and Zulkipli, I. B. (2019). Validating a Model of Strategic Leadership Practices for Malaysian Vocational College Educational Leaders. Ejtd 43, 21–38. doi:10.1108/EJTD-03-2017-0022

Mohd Ali, H. (2012). The Quest for Strategic Malaysian Quality National Primary School Leaders. Intl Jnl Educ. Mgt. , 26 (1), 83–98. doi:10.1108/09513541211194392

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., and Altman, D. G. (2009) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA Statement. BMJ , 339, b2535–269. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535

Nebgen, M. K. (1990). Strategic Planning: Achieving the Goals of Organization Development. J. Staff Dev. , 11(1), 28–31.doi:10.1108/eum0000000001151

Peters, M., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Soares, C., Khalil, H., and Parker, D., (2015). Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews . The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual . Adelaide, South Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute .

Prasertcharoensuk, T., and Tang, K. N. (2017). The Effect of Strategic Leadership Factors of Administrators on School Effectiveness under the Office of Maha Sarakham Primary Educational Service Area 3. Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci. , 38(3), 316–323. doi:10.1016/j.kjss.2016.09.001

Quong, T., and Walker, A. (2010). Seven Principles of Strategic Leadership. Int. Stud. Educ. Adm. , 38(1), 22–34.

Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., Townsend, T., Teddlie, C., et al. (2014). Educational Effectiveness Research (EER): A State-Of-The-Art Review. Sch. Effectiveness Sch. Improvement , 25(2), 197–230. doi:10.1080/09243453.2014.885450

Schlebusch, G., and Mokhatle, M. (2016) Strategic Planning as a Management Tool for School Principals in Rural Schools in the Motheo District. Int. J. Educ. Sci. , 13(3), 342–348. doi:10.1080/09751122.2016.11890470

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K., Colquhoun, H., Kastner, M., et al. (2016). A Scoping Review on the Conduct and Reporting of Scoping Reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. , 16(15), 15–10. doi:10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., et al. 2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann. Intern. Med. , 169(7), 467–473. doi:10.7326/M18-0850

Keywords: strategy, strategic leadership, school leadership, scoping review, education

Citation: Carvalho M, Cabral I, Verdasca JL and Alves JM (2021) Strategy and Strategic Leadership in Education: A Scoping Review. Front. Educ. 6:706608. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.706608

Received: 07 May 2021; Accepted: 23 September 2021; Published: 15 October 2021.

Reviewed by:

Copyright © 2021 Carvalho, Cabral, Verdasca and Alves. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Marisa Carvalho, [email protected]

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Author Biographies
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

The intellectual evolution of educational leadership research: a combined bibliometric and thematic analysis using scimat.

1. Introduction

• What is the volume and growth trajectory of the ELR field?
• What is the nature of the ELR field in terms of “performance results”; that is, citation impacts, most influential authors, journals, and publications as well as their geographical distribution?
• How do prominent, emerging, and declining themes change over time?
• How have the conceptual and thematic strands evolved over time?

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. data search and extraction.

• Only journal articles were included because keywords were significant for the analysis. Many books and book chapters do not provide explicit keywords. We also excluded conference proceedings as we targeted rigorously peer-reviewed research.
• The articles included were all in English as it has become the language of science globally and the keywords used needed to be in the same language to produce meaningful results.
• Articles addressing K-12 schools were included while those addressing higher education were excluded due to diverse points of interest in these two fields.

2.2. Analysis and Interpretation of Maps

3. results and discussion, 3.1. bibliometric performance analysis, 3.2. science mapping analysis, 3.2.1. period 1 (1907–2004), 3.2.2. period 2 (2005–2012), 3.2.3. period 3 (2013–2019), 3.2.4. period 4 (2020–2023), 3.3. thematic evolution structure, 4. conclusions and implications, limitations of the study.

Authors cite other papers for all kinds of reasons: to refer to a particular methodology, to point out examples of other work done on the same topic, to reinforce a point they make in the text, to give credit to their mentors or experts in the field, or even to discuss examples of flawed methods or misleading results. Current bibliometric indicators cannot account for this variety; they count all citations equally, regardless of the actual reason for the citation (pp. 219–220).

Author Contributions

Institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Andersen, J.A. An old man and the “sea of leadership”. J. Leadersh. Stud. 2016 , 9 , 70–81. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Heck, R.H.; Hallinger, P. The study of educational leadership and management: Where does the field stand today? Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2005 , 33 , 229–244. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Murphy, J. Reculturing Educational Leadership: The ISLLC Standards Ten Years Out ; the National Policy Board for Educational Administration: Arlington, The USA, 2003; Paper Prepared for the National Policy Board for Educational Administration. Available online: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED481619 (accessed on 8 August 2023).
• Gunter, H.; Ribbins, P. The field of educational leadership: Studying maps and mapping studies. Brit. J. Educ. Stud. 2003 , 51 , 254–281. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hunt, J.G.; Dodge, G.E. Leadership déjà vu all over again. Leadersh. Q. 2000 , 11 , 435–458. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stewart, J. Transformational leadership: An evolving concept examined through the works of Burns, Bass, Avolio, and Leithwood. Can. J. Educ. Admin. Policy 2006 , 54 , 1–60. Available online: https://cdm.ucalgary.ca/index.php/cjeap/article/view/42735 (accessed on 5 May 2023).
• Hallinger, P.; Kovačević, J. A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Rev. Educ. Res. 2019 , 89 , 335–369. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tian, M.; Huber, S.G. Mapping educational leadership, administration and management research 2007–2016: Thematic strands and the changing landscape. J. Educ. Admin. 2020 , 58 , 129–150. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ahmed, E.I. Systematic review of research on educational leadership and management in Muslim societies. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2023 , 51 , 52–74. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bellibaş, M.Ş.; Gümüş, S. A systematic review of educational leadership and management research in Turkey: Content analysis of topics, conceptual models, and methods. J. Educ. Admin. 2019 , 57 , 731–747. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Castillo, F.A.; Hallinger, P. Systematic review of research on educational leadership and management in Latin America, 1991–2017. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2018 , 46 , 207–225. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hallinger, P. Science mapping the knowledge base on educational leadership and management from the emerging regions of Asia, Africa and Latin America, 1965–2018. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2020 , 48 , 209–230. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hallinger, P.; Bryant, D.A. Review of research publications on educational leadership and management in Asia: A comparative analysis of three regions. Oxf. Rev. Educ. 2013 , 39 , 307–328. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hammad, W.; Samier, E.A.; Mohammed, A. Mapping the field of educational leadership and management in the Arabian Gulf region: A systematic review of Arabic research literature. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2022 , 50 , 6–25. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Oplatka, I.; Arar, K. The research on educational leadership and management in the Arab world since the 1990s: A systematic review. Rev. Educ. 2017 , 5 , 267–307. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Daniëls, E.; Hondeghem, A.; Dochy, F. A review on leadership and leadership development in educational settings. Educ. Res. Rev. 2019 , 27 , 110–125. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hitt, D.H.; Tucker, P.D. Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Rev. Educ. Res. 2016 , 86 , 531–569. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Özdemir, N.; Gümüş, S.; Kılınç, A.Ç.; Bellibaş, M.Ş. A systematic review of research on the relationship between school leadership and student achievement: An updated framework and future direction. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2022 . early access . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wu, H.; Shen, J. The association between principal leadership and student achievement: A multivariate meta-meta-analysis. Educ. Res. Rev. 2022 , 35 , 100423. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Doğan, E.; Sönmez, E. An analysis of instructional leadership studies in Türkiye: A meta–synthesis study. J. Educ. Stud. Multidiscip. Approaches 2023 , 3 , 1–28. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gümüş, S.; Hallinger, P.; Cansoy, R.; Bellibaş, M.Ş. Instructional leadership in a centralized and competitive educational system: A qualitative meta-synthesis of research from Turkey. J. Educ. Admin. 2021 , 59 , 702–720. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hallinger, P. Reviewing reviews of research in educational leadership: An empirical assessment. Educ. Admin. Q. 2014 , 50 , 539–576. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, Y. The panorama of the last decade’s theoretical groundings of educational leadership research: A concept co-occurrence network analysis. Educ. Admin. Q. 2018 , 54 , 327–365. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Palmatier, R.W.; Houston, M.B.; Hulland, J. Review articles: Purpose, process, and structure. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2018 , 46 , 1–5. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Koseoglu, M.A.; Rahimi, R.; Okumus, F.; Liu, J. Bibliometric studies in tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 2016 , 61 , 180–198. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pereira, R.S.; Santos, I.C.; Oliveira, K.D.; Leao, N.C. Meta–analysis as a research tool: A systematic review of bibliometric studies in administration. RAM 2019 , 20 , eRAMG190186. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Radu, A.F.; Bungau, S.G.; Negru, P.A.; Marcu, M.F.; Andronie-Cioara, F.L. In-depth bibliometric analysis and current scientific mapping research in the context of rheumatoid arthritis pharmacotherapy. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022 , 154 , 113614. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pessin, V.Z.; Yamane, L.H.; Siman, R.R. Smart bibliometrics: An integrated method of science mapping and bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 2022 , 127 , 3695–3718. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gümüş, S.; Bellibaş, M.S.; Esen, M.; Gümüş, E. A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2018 , 46 , 25–48. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hallinger, P.; Kovačević, J. Mapping the intellectual lineage of educational management, administration and leadership, 1972–2020. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2022 , 50 , 192–216. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Moral-Munoz, J.A.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Santisteban-Espejo, A.; Cobo, M.J. Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. Prof. Inf. 2020 , 29 , 1699–2407. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. J. Informetr. 2011 , 5 , 146–166. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cobo, M.J.; López-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Tec. 2012 , 63 , 1609–1630. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cooper, I.D. What is a “mapping study?”. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 2016 , 104 , 76. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Chen, C. Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. J. Data Inf. Sci. 2017 , 2 , 1–40. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sott, M.K.; Furstenau, L.B.; Kipper, L.M.; Rodrigues, Y.P.R.; Lopez–Robles, J.R.; Giraldo, F.D.; Cobo, M.J. Process modeling for smart factories: Using science mapping to understand the strategic themes, main challenges and future trends. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2021 , 27 , 1391–1417. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hallinger, P.; Kulophas, D. The evolving knowledge base on leadership and teacher professional learning: A bibliometric analysis of the literature, 1960–2018. Prof. Dev. Educ. 2019 , 46 , 521–540. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009 , 151 , 264–269. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Sánchez-Camacho, C.; Martín-Consuegra, D.; Carranza, R. An analysis of the scientific literature produced on bank marketing through bibliometrics and scientific mapping–what has been the role of sales in banking? Int. J. Bank Mark. 2020 , 39 , 927–954. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• López-Robles, J.R.; Otegi-Olaso, J.R.; Gómez, I.P.; Cobo, M.J. 30 years of intelligence models in management and business: A bibliometric review. Int. J. Info. Manag. 2019 , 48 , 22–38. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bush, T.; Abdul Hamid, S.; Ng, A.; Kaparou, M. School leadership theories and the Malaysia education blueprint: Findings from a systematic literature review. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 2018 , 32 , 1245–1265. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Harris, A. COVID-19-school leadership in crisis? J. Prof. Cap. Community 2020 , 5 , 321–326. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fotheringham, P.; Harriott, T.; Healy, G.; Arenge, G.; Wilson, E. Pressures and influences on school leaders navigating policy development during the COVID-19 pandemic. Brit. Educ. Res. J. 2022 , 48 , 201–227. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Harris, A.; Jones, M. COVID-19-school leadership in disruptive times. Sch. Leadersh. Manag. 2020 , 40 , 243–247. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sott, M.K.; Bender, M.S.; Furstenau, L.B.; Machado, L.M.; Cobo, M.J.; Bragazzi, N.L. 100 years of scientific evolution of work and organizational psychology: A bibliometric network analysis from 1919 to 2019. Front. Psychol. 2020 , 11 , 598676. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Riehl, C.J. Mostly unpunctuated disequilibrium: A commentary on new directions in research and practice in education leadership. In Challenges and Opportunities of Educational Leadership Research and Practice: The State of the Field and Its Multiple Futures ; Bowers, A.J., Shoho, A.R., Barnett, B.G., Eds.; Information Age: New York, NY, USA, 2015; Volume 6, pp. 225–248. [ Google Scholar ]
• Robinson, V.M.; Lloyd, C.A.; Rowe, K.J. The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educ. Admin. Q. 2008 , 44 , 635–674. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leithwood, K.; Harris, A.; Hopkins, D. Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. Sch. Leadersh. Manag. 2008 , 28 , 27–42. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bossert, S.; Dwyer, D.; Rowan, B.; Lee, G. The instructional management role of the principal. Educ. Admin. Q. 1982 , 18 , 34–64. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hallinger, P.; Murphy, J. The social context of effective schools. Am. J. Educ. 1986 , 94 , 328–355. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leithwood, K.; Montgomery, D. The role of the elementary principal in program improvement. Rev. Educ. Res. 1982 , 52 , 309–339. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Glasman, N.S.; Heck, R.H. The changing leadership role of the principal: Implications for principal assessment. Peabody J. Educ. 1992 , 68 , 5–24. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hallinger, P. Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Camb. J. Educ. 2003 , 33 , 329–352. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Glickman, C. Has Sam and Samantha’s time come at last? Educ. Leadersh. 1989 , 46 , 4–9. Available online: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ej388734 (accessed on 21 August 2023).
• Hallinger, P.; Heck, R. Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1985. Educ. Admin. Q. 1996 , 32 , 5–44. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hallinger, P. Reshaping the Landscape of School Leadership Development: A Global Perspective ; Taylor & Francis: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003. [ Google Scholar ]
• Marks, H.M.; Printy, S.M. Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educ. Admin. Q. 2003 , 39 , 370–397. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Murphy, J.; Hallinger, P.; Mitman, A. Problems with research on educational leadership: Issues to be addressed. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 1983 , 5 , 297–305. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fullan, M. Leading in a Culture of Change , 1st ed.; Jossey-Bass: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001. [ Google Scholar ]
• Darling-Hammond, L.; Goodwin, A.L. Progress towards professionalism in teaching. In Challenges and Achievements of American Education: The 1993 ASCD Yearbook ; Cawelti, G., Ed.; Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development: Alexandria, VI, USA, 1993; pp. 19–52. [ Google Scholar ]
• Smylie, M.A.; Denny, J.W. Teacher leadership: Tensions and ambiguities in organizational perspectives. Educ. Admin. Q. 1990 , 26 , 235–259. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leithwood, K.; Jantzi, D. Principal and teacher leader effects: A replication. Sch. Leadersh. Manag. 2000 , 20 , 415–434. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gibb, C.A. Leadership. In Handbook of Social Psychology ; Lindzey, G., Ed.; Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA, 1954; pp. 877–917. [ Google Scholar ]
• Gronn, P. Distributed properties: A new architecture for leadership. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2000 , 28 , 317–338. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Spillane, J.P.; Halverson, R.; Diamond, J.B. Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educ. Res. 2001 , 30 , 23–28. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Spillane, J.P.; Halverson, R.; Diamond, J.B. Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. J. Curric. Stud. 2004 , 36 , 3–34. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Murphy, J.; Hallinger, P. The superintendent as instructional leader: Findings from effective school districts. J. Educ. Admin. 1986 , 24 , 213–236. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• LaRocque, L.; Coleman, P. Quality control: School accountability and district ethos. In Educational Policy for Effective Schools ; Holmes, M., Leithwood, K., Musella, D., Eds.; OISE Press: Toronto, ON, Canada, 1990; pp. 168–191. [ Google Scholar ]
• Murphy, J.; Hallinger, P. Characteristics of instructionally effective districts. J. Educ. Res. 1988 , 81 , 175–181. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Busher, H.; Harris, A. Leading Subject Areas, Improving Schools ; Paul Chapman: London, UK, 2000. [ Google Scholar ]
• Brown, M.; Rutherford, D.; Boyle, B. Leadership for school improvement: The role of the head of department in UK secondary schools. Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 2000 , 11 , 237–258. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Glover, D.; Miller, D. The working day of the subject leader and the impact of interruptions on teaching and learning in secondary schools. Res. Educ. 1999 , 62 , 55–65. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hammersley-Fletcher, L. Becoming a subject leader: What’s in a name? subject leadership in English primary schools. Sch. Leadersh. Manag. 2002 , 22 , 407–420. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bennett, N.W.; Newton, C.W.; Woods, P.A.; Economou, A. The Role and Purpose of Middle Leaders in Schools ; Nottingham National College for School Leadership: London, UK, 2003. [ Google Scholar ]
• Eagly, A.H.; Johnson, B.T. Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bullet. 1990 , 108 , 233–256. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Eagly, A.H.; Karau, S.J.; Johnson, B.T. Gender and leadership style among school principals: A meta-analysis. Educ. Admin. Q. 1992 , 28 , 76–102. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bossert, S. School effects. In Handbook of Research on Educational Administration ; Boyan, N., Ed.; Longman: London, UK, 1988; pp. 341–354. [ Google Scholar ]
• Heck, R.; Larsen, T.; Marcoulides, G. Principal leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educ. Admin. Q. 1990 , 26 , 94–125. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Witziers, B.; Bosker, R.J.; Krüger, M.L. Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educ. Admin. Q. 2003 , 39 , 398–425. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hallinger, P. Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. J. Educ. Admin. 2011 , 49 , 125–142. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leithwood, K.; Jantzi, D. A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadersh. Policy Sch. 2005 , 4 , 177–199. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Theoharis, G. Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Toward a theory of social justice leadership. Educ. Admin. Q. 2007 , 43 , 221–258. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gronn, P. The future of distributed leadership. J. Educ. Admin. 2008 , 46 , 141–158. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hargreaves, A.; Fink, D. Distributed leadership: Democracy or delivery? J. Educ. Admin. 2008 , 46 , 229–240. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Harris, A. Distributed leadership: Conceptual confusion and empirical reticence. Int. J. Leadersh. Educ. 2007 , 10 , 315–325. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Harris, A. Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. J. Educ. Admin. 2008 , 46 , 172–188. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Spillane, J.P. Distributed leadership. Educ. Forum 2005 , 69 , 143–150. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hulpia, H.; Devos, G.; Rosseel, Y. Development and validation of scores on the distributed leadership inventory. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 2009 , 69 , 1013–1034. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nguni, S.; Sleegers, P.; Denessen, E. Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers’ job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: The Tanzanian case. Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 2006 , 17 , 145–177. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tschannen-Moran, M. Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust. Educ. Admin. Q. 2009 , 45 , 217–247. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wahlstrom, K.L.; Louis, K.S. How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educ. Admin. Q. 2008 , 44 , 458–495. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leithwood, K.; Patten, S.; Jantzi, D. Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educ. Admin. Q. 2010 , 46 , 671–706. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wenner, J.A.; Campbell, T. The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Rev. Educ. Res. 2017 , 87 , 134–171. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sun, J. Conceptualizing the critical path linked by teacher commitment. J. Educ. Admin. 2015 , 53 , 597–624. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Crow, G.; Day, C.; Møller, J. Framing research on school principals’ identities. International J. Leadersh. Educ. 2017 , 20 , 265–277. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Curtis, R. Finding a New Way: Leveraging Teacher Leadership to Meet Unprecedented Demands ; The Aspen Institute: Aspen, CO, USA, 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• Neumerski, C.M. Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here? Educ. Admin. Q. 2012 , 49 , 310–347. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ingersoll, R.; Perda, D. How high is teacher turnover and is it a problem? J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2012 . Available online: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)10982736/homepage/ForAuthors.html (accessed on 28 July 2023).
• Northouse, P.G. Leadership: Theory and Practice , 7th ed.; Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA, USA, 2016. [ Google Scholar ]
• Grissom, J.A.; Egalite, A.J.; Lindsay, C.A. How Principals Affect Students and Schools: A Systematic Synthesis of Two Decades of Research ; Wallace Foundation: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ng, D.; Nguyen, D.T.; Wong, B.K.S.; Choy, W.K.W. A review of Singapore principals’ leadership qualities, styles, and roles. J Educ. Admin. 2015 , 53 , 512–533. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Meyers, C.V.; Hitt, H.D. School turnaround principals: What does initial research literature suggest they are doing to be successful? J. Educ. Stud. Placed Risk. 2017 , 22 , 38–56. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Grissom, J.A.; Loeb, S. Triangulating principal effectiveness: How perspectives of parents, teachers, and assistant principals identify the central importance of managerial skills. Am. Educ. Res. J. 2011 , 48 , 1091–1123. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Grissom, J.A.; Loeb, S.; Mitani, H. Principal time management skills: Explaining patterns in principals’ time use, job stress, and perceived effectiveness. J. Educ. Adm. 2015 , 53 , 773–793. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Horng, E.; Loeb, S. New thinking about instructional leadership. Phi Delta Kappan 2010 , 92 , 66–69. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bush, T.; Glover, D. School leadership models: What do we know? Sch. Leadersh. Manag. 2014 , 34 , 553–571. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Moller, J. The construction of a public face as a school principal. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 2012 , 26 , 452–460. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Scribner, S.P.; Crow, G.M. Employing professional identities: Case study of a high school principal in a reform setting. Leadersh. Policy Sch. 2012 , 11 , 243–274. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wenger, E. Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning, and Identity ; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1998. [ Google Scholar ]
• Burke, P.J.; Stets, J.E. Identity Theory ; Oxford University Press: London, UK, 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ibara, E.C. Professional development of principals: A path to effective secondary school administration in Nigeria. Afr. Educ. Rev. 2014 , 11 , 674–689. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jacob, R.; Goddard, R.; Kim, M.; Miller, R.; Goddard, Y. Exploring the causal impact of the McREL Balanced Leadership Program on leadership, principal efficacy, instructional climate, educator turnover, and student achievement. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 2015 , 37 , 314–332. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tingle, E.; Corrales, A.; Peters, M.L. Leadership development programs: Investing in school principals. Educ. Stud. 2019 , 45 , 1–16. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Levine, A. Educating School Leaders ; The Annenberg Foundation, Ford Foundation, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation & the Wallace Foundation: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [ Google Scholar ]
• Darling-Hammond, L.; Meyerson, D.; LaPointe, M.; Orr, M.T. Preparing Principals for A Changing World: Lessons from Effective School Leadership Programs ; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [ Google Scholar ]
• Davis, S.H.; Darling-Hammond, L. Innovative principal preparation programs: What works and how we know. Plan. Chang. 2012 , 43 , 25–45. Available online: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ977545 (accessed on 12 August 2023).
• Murphy, J. The Landscape of Leadership Preparation: Reframing the Education of School Administrators ; Corwin Press: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1992. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mestry, R. Empowering principals to lead and manage public schools effectively in the 21st century. S. Afr. J. Educ. 2017 , 37 , 1–11. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-5cda88587 (accessed on 8 August 2023). [ CrossRef ]
• Naidoo, P. Perceptions of teachers and school management teams of the leadership roles of public-school principals. S. Afr. J. Educ. 2019 , 39 , 1–15. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nir, A.E.; Hameiri, L. School principals’ leadership style and school outcomes: The mediating effect of powerbase utilization. J. Educ. Admin. 2014 , 52 , 210–227. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Urick, A.; Bowers, A.J. What are the different types of principals across the United States? A latent class analysis of principal perception of leadership. Educ. Admin. Q. 2014 , 50 , 96–134. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, L.H.; Gurr, D.; Drysdale, L. Successful school leadership: Case studies of four Singapore primary schools. J. Educ. Admin. 2016 , 54 , 1–22. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Diamond, J.B.; Spillane, J.P. School leadership and management from a distributed perspective: A 2016 retrospective and prospective. Manag. Educ. 2016 , 30 , 147–154. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Day, C.; Gu, Q.; Sammons, P. The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educ. Admin. Q. 2016 , 52 , 221–258. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hou, Y.; Cui, Y.; Zhang, D. Impact of instructional leadership on high school student academic achievement in China. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 2019 , 20 , 543–558. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rodrigues, H.P.C.; de Lima, J.A. Instructional leadership and student achievement: School leaders’ perspectives. Int. J. Leadersh. Educ. early access . 2021 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Qadach, M.; Schechter, C.; Da’as, R. Instructional leadership and teachers’ intent to leave: The mediating role of collective teacher efficacy and shared vision. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2020 , 48 , 617–634. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leithwood, K.; Harris, A.; Hopkins, D. Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. Sch. Leadersh. Manag. 2020 , 40 , 5–22. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Heck, R.H.; Hallinger, P. Modeling the longitudinal effects of school leadership on teaching and learning. J. Educ. Adm. 2014 , 52 , 653–681. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Goddard, R.D.; Bailes, L.P.; Kim, M. Principal efficacy beliefs for instructional leadership and their relation to teachers’ sense of collective efficacy and student achievement. Leadersh. Policy Sch. 2021 , 20 , 472–493. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, Y.; Bellibas, M.S.; Gümüş, S. The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self–efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2021 , 49 , 430–453. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kemethofer, D.; Helm, C.; Warwas, J. Does educational leadership enhance instructional quality and student achievement? The case of Austrian primary school leaders. Int. J. Leadersh. Educ. 2022 . early access . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shaked, H. Instructional leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Israel. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2022 . early access . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Longmuir, F. Leading in lockdown: Community, communication and compassion in response to the COVID-19 crisis. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2021 . early access . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Forfang, H.; Paulsen, J.M. Linking school leaders’ core practices to organizational school climate and student achievements in Norwegian high-performing and low–performing rural schools. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2021 . early access . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Weiner, J.; Francois, C.; Stone-Johnson, C.; Childs, J. Keep safe, keep learning: Principals’ role in creating psychological safety and organizational learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Educ. 2021 , 5 , 618483. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lopez, A.E.; Hossain, F. Exploring possibilities and challenges of instructional leadership in challenging times. J. Sch. Leadersh. 2021 , 31 , 271–273. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Karakose, T.; Tülübaş, T.; Papadakis, S. The scientific evolution of social justice leadership in education: Structural and longitudinal analysis of the existing knowledge Base, 2003–2022. Front. Educ. 2023 , 8 , 1139648. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gümüş, S.; Bellibaş, M.Ş.; Pietsch, M. School leadership and achievement gaps based on socioeconomic status: A search for socially just instructional leadership. J. Educ. Admin. 2022 , 60 , 419–438. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Karakose, T.; Kardas, A.; Kanadlı, S.; Tülübaş, T.; Yildirim, B. How collective efficacy mediates the association between principal instructional leadership and teacher self-efficacy: Findings from a meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM) study. Behav. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 85–102. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Delcker, J.; Ifenthaler, D. Teachers’ perspective on school development at German vocational schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technol. Pedag. Educ. 2021 , 30 , 125–139. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Moyle, C.R. Principal leader behaviour and shared decision making. J. Educ. Admin. 1979 , 17 , 39–50. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ganon–Shilon, S.; Finkelstein, I.; Sela-Shayovitz, R.; Chen Schechter, C. Inclusive leadership in times of COVID-19 crises: The role of district and school leaders in fostering school sense–making processes within a National Inclusion and Integration Reform. Leadersh. Policy Sch. early access . 2022. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hallinger, P.; Heck, R.H. Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement? Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2010 , 38 , 654–678. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Berkovich, I.; Bogler, R. Conceptualising the mediating paths linking effective school leadership to teachers’ organisational commitment. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2021 , 49 , 410–429. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Karakose, T.; Tülübaş, T.; Papadakis, S.; Yirci, R. Evaluating the intellectual structure of the knowledge base on transformational school leadership: A bibliometric and science mapping analysis. Educ. Sci. 2023 , 13 , 708. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kaya, M.; Koçyigit, M. The relationship between transformational leadership and teacher self-efficacy in terms of national culture. Educ. Process Int. J. 2023 , 12 , 36–52. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kılınç, A.Ç.; Polatcan, M.; Savaş, G.; Er, E. How transformational leadership influences teachers’ commitment and innovative practices: Understanding the moderating role of trust in principal. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2022 . early access . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Thomas, L.; Tuytens, M.; Devos, G.; Kelchtermans, G.; Vanderlinde, R. Transformational school leadership as a key factor for teachers’ job attitudes during their first year in the profession. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2020 , 48 , 106–132. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zadok, A.; Benoliel, P. Middle-leaders’ transformational leadership: Big five traits and teacher commitment. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 2023 , 37 , 810–829. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kwan, P. Is transformational leadership theory passé? Revisiting the integrative effect of instructional leadership and transformational leadership on student outcomes. Educ. Admin. Q. 2020 , 56 , 321–349. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Vlachou, A.; Tsirantonaki, S.S. The importance of school principals’ values towards the inclusive education of disabled students: Associations between their values and knowledge, beliefs, attitudes and practices. Educ. Sci. 2023 , 13 , 360–381. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leithwood, K.; Jantzi, D.; Steinbach, R. Changing Leadership for Changing Times ; Open University Press: Berkshire, MA, USA, 1999. [ Google Scholar ]
• Connolly, M.; James, C.; Fertig, M. The difference between educational management and educational leadership and the importance of educational responsibility. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh 2019 , 47 , 504–519. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Day, C.; Sammons, P.; Gorgen, K. Successful School Leadership ; Education Development Trust: Reading, Berkshire, UK, 2020. [ Google Scholar ]
• Leithwood, K.; Seashore, K.; Anderson, S.; Wahlstrom, K. Review of Research: How Leadership Influences Student Learning ; University of Minnesota, Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement: Minneapolis, MI, USA, 2004. [ Google Scholar ]
• Huber, S.; West, M. Developing school leaders: A critical review of current practices, approaches and issues and some directions for the future. In Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership and Administration Part 2 ; Leithwood., K., Hallinger, P., Eds.; Kluwer Press: Baltimore, PA, USA, 2002; pp. 1071–1099. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition ; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2012. [ Google Scholar ]
• Oplatka, I. The field of educational administration: A historical overview of scholarly attempts to recognize epistemological identities, meanings and boundaries from the 1960s onwards. J. Educ. Adm. 2009 , 47 , 8–35. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Meuser, J.D.; Gardner, W.L.; Dinh, J.E.; Hu, J.; Liden, R.C.; Lord, R.G. A network analysis of leadership theories: The infancy of integration. J. Manag. 2016 , 42 , 1374–1403. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hoy, W.K. Recent developments in theory and research in educational administration. Educ. Admin. Q. 1982 , 18 , 1–11. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bridges, E.M. Research on the school administrator: The state of the art, 1967–1980. Educ. Admin. Q. 1982 , 18 , 12–33. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Shaked, H. Social justice leadership, instructional leadership, and the goals of schooling. Int. J. Educ. Manag. 2020 , 34 , 81–95. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Thornton, K. Leading through COVID–19: New Zealand secondary principals describe their reality. Educ. Manag. Admin. Leadersh. 2020 , 49 , 393–409. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zhao, Y. COVID-19 as a catalyst for educational change. Prospects 2020 , 49 , 29–33. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Belter, C.W. Bibliometric indicators: Opportunities and limits. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 2015 , 103 , 219–221. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Karakose, T.; Leithwood, K.; Tülübaş, T. The Intellectual Evolution of Educational Leadership Research: A Combined Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis Using SciMAT . Educ. Sci. 2024 , 14 , 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040429

Karakose T, Leithwood K, Tülübaş T. The Intellectual Evolution of Educational Leadership Research: A Combined Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis Using SciMAT . Education Sciences . 2024; 14(4):429. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040429

Karakose, Turgut, Kenneth Leithwood, and Tijen Tülübaş. 2024. "The Intellectual Evolution of Educational Leadership Research: A Combined Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis Using SciMAT " Education Sciences 14, no. 4: 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040429

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Educational leadership and management: theory, policy, and practice

There is great interest in educational leadership in the early part of the 21st century because of the widespread belief that the quality of leadership makes a significant difference to school and student outcomes. There is also increasing recognition that schools require effective leaders and man agers if the y are to provide the best po ssible edu cation f or their learn ers. Schools need trained and committed teachers but they, in turn, need the leadership of highly effective prin cipa ls and su pp ort from other senior an d m iddle managers. While the need for eff ective leaders is widely ack nowledged, there is much less certainty about which leadership behaviours are most likely to produce favourable outcomes. I examine the theoretic al u nd erpinn ing s f or the fie ld of ed uc atio na l lead ersh ip and management, assess different leadership models, and discuss the evidence of their relative effectiveness in developing successful schools.

Related Papers

It is generally perceived that the growth of nation converge on the quality of its educational leaders. The basic concern of this theoretical debate is to examine the wider context of leadership and its effectiveness towards improving school management. This paper analyses recent theoretical developments in the study of educational leadership in school management. Beginning with an overview of the concept of leadership in terms of research, theory, and practice, this paper examines theories of leadership and styles of leadership. An attempt is made on identification of contemporary issues and possible means of amelioration. This article concludes that success is certain if the application of the leadership styles, principles and methods is properly and fully applied in school management because quality educational leadership tradition offers great opportunity to further refine educational leadership and management policies and practices by accepting and utilizing the basic principles and styles of educational leadership.

lenka ramahali

Cross-Currents: An International Peer-Reviewed Journal on Humanities & Social Sciences

thembinkosi tshabalala

This present paper discusses the importance of leadership in educational management with specific reference to schools. Educational leadership has a critical role in the transformation of society, and for change to happen, effective leaders are key. Along with the widespread belief that the quality of leadership makes a significant difference to school and student outcomes. There is also increasing recognition that if effective school leaders and managers are developed they are most likely going to provide the best possible education for their learners. Effective leadership and management are essential if schools and colleges are to achieve the wide-ranging objectives set for them by their many stakeholders, notably the government which provide most of the funding for public educational institutions. Teachers and their leaders and managers are the people who are required to deliver higher educational standards. Management and leadership are important for the delivery of good educati...

Administração: Estudos organizacionais e sociedade 4

Tulio Barrios

As society develops new challenges and demands affect all areas of society. Thus, new forms of leadership are needed. This work revises influential contributions to the study of leadership in an attempt to identify traits, behaviours and styles current and future leaders need to develop to face the ever-increasing demands properly. The author applies the main findings to the field of Education, aiming to contribute to the development of an optimal style of leadership. Educational management is a complex and demanding activity; hence, school leaders need to exercise pedagogic leadership and develop new skills and competencies to support their practice. Accordingly, flexibility, capacity to adapt, openness, determination to overcome obstacles, collective participation, and shared decision-making processes become vital aspects of an optimal leader.

Oxford Bibliographies

Lorri J. Santamaría

Santamaría, L. J. (2016). Theories of educational leadership. Oxford Bibliographies, Oxford University Press, DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780199756810-0153 http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199756810/obo-9780199756810-0153.xml Introduction General Overview of Educational Leadership Styles and Related Theories Textbooks and Handbooks Journals and Professional Organizations Historical and Philosophical Foundations Conceptual Approaches and Frameworks Exemplars Large Data Sets and Empirical Evidence Complementary, Diverse, and Alternative Perspectives Critical, Global, and International Applications Introduction Prior to understanding theories of educational leadership, it is important to begin with a comprehensive definition of educational leadership. In this bibliographic entry, educational leadership is the professional practice of a leader (or leaders) in an administrative role(s) working with, guiding, and influencing educators in a particular context toward improving learning and other educational processes in early childhood education centers, elementary, secondary, and postsecondary institutions. These people are most often individuals or small teams employed as school site leaders, principals, assistant or associate administrators. In early childhood, higher education or other educational settings these individuals may serve as center director, head of school, department chair, academic dean, provost, or president. Theories of educational leadership have origins in the United States (U.S.) where frameworks have been largely drawn from industry and commerce management principles. Leadership theories and practices drawn from business-oriented frames of reference have been adopted and adapted for use in educational settings in the U.S. and similarly developed nations. Therefore, theories of educational leadership have been derived from a diversity of interdisciplinary conceptualizations and models over time. As a result, theories of leadership can be considered emergent, dynamic and subject to further evolution. In fact, every theory of educational leadership is subject to investigation by researchers in educational centers, schools and university settings who seek to better understand the dynamics of leadership in a variety of educational contexts. Beyond seminal notions and ideations of educational leadership, there are developing and sometimes ground-breaking theories contributing to the existing canonical literature in the field. Nonetheless, most theories of educational leadership comprise key elements, which often include capabilities, approaches, and practices. A closer look at these elements further reveals theoretical types of educational leadership (e.g., styles, traits, behaviors), characteristics of educational leadership (e.g., management vs. leadership, power, coercion, conceptual frameworks), or the activities or practices educational leaders engage as expressions of their leadership in action (e.g., approaches, ways of leading). Each element is dependent on the educational context within which it occurs and warrants the consideration of multiple and international perspectives for 21st century relevance in a diverse and global society. This bibliography therefore includes a representative sampling of influential textbooks, handbooks, journals, and relevant literature as exemplars of sources to explain, illuminate, introduce, interrogate, and evaluate a variety of educational leadership theories. Additionally, this entry provides historical and philosophical foundations, general overviews, conceptual frameworks, supporting literature on large data sets, and multiple complementary international perspectives of the theories considered. Pertinent examples are provided from each area for further reader exploration, consideration, and study.

World Journal of English Language

Dr. K Tara Shankar

According to this research, no country can advance above the level of education of its leaders. The goal of this philosophical debate is to look at leadership in a broader context and see how it may drastically enhance school administration. The academic evaluation examines existing theoretical advancements in the area of school administration educational administration. It begins with a brief overview of what leadership is or how research, philosophy, and practice might be used to describe it. After that, there is an examination of leadership theories, ideas, and styles. Every article comes to a close with a consideration of current issues and possible solutions. As a consequence, these writers argue that success may be secured if different types of leadership, principles, and techniques, as well as appropriate educational traditions, educational management, or business policies, are applied appropriately or totally in school administration. It also gives you a chance to fine-tune ...

Prof. Nwachukwu P . Ololube

Elmi Zulkarnain Osman, PhD Educational Leadership

Elmi Zulkarnain Osman

Only one leadership style actually derived from education; Instructional leadership. It was organic in that researchers wanted to find out how certain urban i.e. low-economic, high minority schools were having success. Researchers went in to identify the traits of the leaders, and then coined it “instructional leadership”. It should be noted that much of the research isolated the transformational traits exhibited by the leaders. This was in the mid-1960s. Prior to this, extensive research had not been done on actual educational leadership. The instructional leadership model dominated for at least 15 years. Then came the massive shift to transformational leadership.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Andreas Mitman

Over the past few years a good deal of writing has been compiled on the subject of school or educational leadership. The authors have had the opportunity to re-view much of this work in an attempt to define some of the major recurring prob-lems with the educational ...

International Handbook of Educational Research in the Asia-Pacific Region

Jacqueline Baxter

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Leadership, education, organization

H. Afandi, Afandi

David Mccabe

Mut Somoeun , MUT SOMOEUN

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Roger Murphy

Wing Web Site

John "Jack" States , Randy Keyworth

Viviane Robinson

Derek Glover

PATRICIA MAE MANTILLA

Intakhab A Khan

Childhood Education

Dorcas Dube

Carolyn Riehl

Sana Al Haddad

School Leadership & Management

Tony Townsend

Laboratory For Student Success the Mid Atlantic Regional Educational Laboratory

Kenneth Leithwood

dini irawati

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET 2020)

Ence Surahman

Natalija Ostojic

Victor Pangani

Online Submission

Jim Parsons

Leadership and Learning

Linda Bendikson

School Leadership & Management

Alma Harris

Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies

Prabath Withanage

Ayla Arseven

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Educational Leadership

• Reference work entry
• First Online: 01 January 2018
• pp 1581–1586
• Cite this reference work entry

• Wenfan Yan 2 &
• Yumei Han 3  

153 Accesses

1 Citations

Educational administration; Educational management; School leadership

Educational leadership is defined as the quality and competence of exerting leading influence on educational organization members, teachers and faculty, students, and diverse stakeholders within and beyond certain educational organizations and settings toward the achievement of educational visions and goals. According to organizational levels, educational leadership can be classified as personal leadership, classroom-level leadership, school-level leadership (including preschools, K-12 schools, and higher institutes), and system-level leadership. According to performance style and rationale, educational leadership can be classified as instructional leadership, transformational leadership, distributed leadership, and teacher leadership. Leaders are tending to perform a complexity of diverse leadership styles. The term “educational leadership” also indicates graduate programs in higher education...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Hallinger P (2003) Leading educational change: reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Camb J Educ 33(3):329–351

Article   Google Scholar  

Leithwood K (2012) The Ontario leadership framework 2012. A report by the Ontario Institute for Education Leadership

Google Scholar  

Leithwood K et al. (2006) Successful school leadership: what it is and how it influences pupil learning. National College for School Leadership, Research report RR800

Lord RG, Maher KJ (1993) Leadership and information processing. Routledge, London

Yukl G, Chavez C (2002) Influence tactics and leader effectiveness. In: Neider LL, Schriesheim C (eds) Leadership. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Leadership in Education, College of Education and Human Development, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA

University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenfan Yan .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA

Ali Farazmand

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Cite this entry.

Yan, W., Han, Y. (2018). Educational Leadership. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_2236

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_2236

Published : 16 June 2018

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-319-20927-2

Online ISBN : 978-3-319-20928-9

eBook Packages : Economics and Finance Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Share this entry

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Public ranks long-term challenges and health determinants as top priorities for new EU

To enhance public health, the post-election European Union (EU) should prioritise long-term challenges such as climate change and the ageing population, as well as factors that influence our health, according to a new report . The findings, derived from a seven-month public debate led by the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, highlight a collective call for the EU to play a more significant role in health.

The report, which is based on the public debate commissioned by the European Commission’s Directorate General for Health and Food Safety ( DG SANTE ), outlines the key priorities and actions desired by citizens and stakeholders from a wide range of sectors and mostly from Europe. The analysis included more than 800 responses in conference polls and a survey, plus comprehensive inputs across three webinars .

The large and participatory initiative allowed to collect public opinion on nine critical health topics: health security; determinants of health; health system transformation; the health workforce; universal health coverage; digital solutions and AI; performance and resilience; long-term challenges like climate change and ageing; and the EU’s global role in health.

The public’s calls for action – including across sectors

Participants called for the European Commission to coordinate across its different policy branches. Collaborating across sectors is considered key to deliver health priorities, making the concepts of ‘ Health in All Policies’ and ‘Health for All Policies ’ important tools for addressing the determinants of health. Interestingly, the topics which garnered the highest consensus in the discussion framework were those least controlled by the health sector alone.

Significant measures should be taken to mitigate the health impacts of environmental risks, including promoting environmental health and supporting health equity through integrated policies. Participants also considered addressing the needs of an ageing population essential, by improving health services and ensuring that health systems are prepared to meet the demands of older adults.

The public opinion suggested several actions to achieve universal health coverage (UHC) across the EU, such as ensuring equal access to comprehensive health care services for all EU citizens and financial protection for all. Other recommendations ranged from establishing a common minimum coverage package and a European health insurance scheme to focusing on underserved groups, improving health literacy, and including mental health in UHC policies.

What role for the EU?

Participants highlighted the importance of EU legal frameworks and instruments in promoting and safeguarding health, such as funding and technical support. They advocated both for new tools and for better implementation and coordination of existing mechanisms.

Aligning educational standards was raised as a key topic in the context of addressing shortages of health workers , regional disparities and managing the demands for new skills. Better addressing health workforce needs and improving their working conditions to mitigate existing gaps was also discussed. There was consensus on the need for EU approaches to health workforce issues, including better coordination of initiatives and pursuit of EU wide policies.

Digital solutions , health security and strengthening the EU’s global voice and leadership were widely discussed but ranked slightly lower. Possible explanations outlined in the report include the “transversal nature of digital solutions, which voters may have perceived as a means to achieving other priorities”. The COVID-19 pandemic and sustained EU action on health security may have elicited some voters to opt for other topics that have received less policy attention in recent years.

Survey, webinars, and conference polls

Media Contacts

Débora Miranda

Communications and Dissemination Officer

Subscribe to our newsletter

--> AGU