An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
Trending Articles
- Streptococcus anginosus promotes gastric inflammation, atrophy, and tumorigenesis in mice. Fu K, et al. Cell. 2024. PMID: 39461336 No abstract available.
- Tobacco Smoke Plays an Important Role in Initiation and Development of Lung Cancer by Promoting the Characteristics of Cancer Stem Cells. Lu L, et al. Cancer Manag Res. 2020. PMID: 33116833 Free PMC article. Review.
- Amino acid is a major carbon source for hepatic lipogenesis. Liao Y, et al. Cell Metab. 2024. PMID: 39461344
- CAR-Macrophage Therapy Alleviates Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Wang J, et al. Circ Res. 2024. PMID: 39465245
- Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement for Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis. Généreux P, et al. N Engl J Med. 2024. PMID: 39466903
Latest Literature
- Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1)
- J Biol Chem (9)
- J Clin Invest (4)
- Nature (53)
- PLoS One (96)
- Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (12)
- Science (41)
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Describes core standards and principles for systematic review and frequently encountered problems. Differentiates between literature reviews and reviewing literature. Addresses quantitative and qualitative research synthesis. Preferred reporting items for …
When systematic review principles are applied sensitively, systematic reviews have a clear advantage over traditional literature reviews. But they may not be as objective …
Whilst systematic reviews have become regarded as the highest standard of evidence synthesis, many literature reviews fall short of these standards and may end up presenting biased or incorrect conclusions. In this …
Recognizing the constraints that researchers can sometimes feel when attempting to plan, conduct and publish rigorous and comprehensive evidence syntheses, we aim here to identify …
So how are systematic reviews different from a normal (literature) review? Traditional literature reviews are often one individual’s opinion of the current state of knowledge. It is always easy …
Systematic reviews are receiving scrutiny and criticism, even from their proponents, for contributing to research waste [4, 5], varying massively in their reporting and/or …
Systematic reviews can be misleading, unhelpful, or even harmful when data are inappropriately handled; meta-analyses can be misused when the difference between a patient …