HRM practices and innovation: an empirical systematic review

International Journal of Disruptive Innovation in Government

ISSN : 2516-4392

Article publication date: 22 April 2020

Issue publication date: 28 January 2021

The relationship between human resource management practices (HRMP) and innovation has been described as a black box, where a lot still needs to be investigated. Thus, the aim of this paper is to investigate the nature of the link that exists between HRMP and innovation in both public and private organizations. To do so, theoretical underpinnings and existence of a mediating or a moderating mechanism is inspected.

Design/methodology/approach

Based on an empirical systematic review of research conducted between 2010 and 2018, content analysis has been conducted for 31 peer-reviewed articles in the English language.

Inspecting the nature of relations existed in the chosen articles, interesting findings are addressed relative to the nature of the human resource management systems (HRMS) used, practices encompassed and their different utility. HRMS has been shown to be associated with product innovation yet more evidence is needed for supporting process innovation.

Practical implications

The HRMS/HRMP and innovation relationship is inspected, important practices that would guide managers to induce innovation are highlighted. Usage of multiple HRMS and contingency in constructing such systems is indicated.

Originality/value

Contribution to comprehend the black box and areas for future research has been offered.

  • Systematic review
  • HRM practices
  • HRM systems

Easa, N.F. and Orra, H.E. (2021), "HRM practices and innovation: an empirical systematic review", International Journal of Disruptive Innovation in Government , Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 15-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDIG-11-2019-0005

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Nasser Fathi Easa and Hitham El Orra.

Published in International Journal of Disruptive Innovation in Government . Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode

Introduction

Human resource management practices (HRMP) have been gaining an increased attention especially in the fields of economics of the organization, strategic management and human resource management (HRM) ( Laursen and Foss, 2003 ). Moreover, the past two decades were characterized by noticeable progress in researching human resource management systems (HRMS) ( Wei and Lau, 2010 ). HRMS and innovation relationship in firms is growing as many researchers inspected this area (Vogus and Willbourne, 2003; Beugelsdijk, 2008 ; De Winne and Sels, 2010 ; Ma Prieto and Pilar Pérez-Santana, 2014 ; Chen et al. , 2018 ). This growing interest is because of the continuous search for having a competitive advantage in a highly turbulent environment ( Jimenez-Jimenez and Sanz-Valle, 2008 ; Shipton et al. , 2005 ).

Innovation can be promoted through proper management of people ( Shipton et al. , 2005 ). Moreover, firms intending to innovate consider HRMP as a precious resource ( Beugelsdijk, 2008 ). Furthermore, human capital when leveraged organizational expertizes are developed, thus innovation would emerge as new products and services ( Chen and Huang, 2009 ). Several ways can be adopted to inspect the HRMP and outcomes linkage. However, the current approach is the following: complementarities or bundle of practices or individual practice in isolation ( Wright and Boswell, 2002 ).

This study seeks to contribute for the comprehension of the HRM and innovation relationship. It has been identified as a black box by several researchers including ( Beugelsdijk, 2008 ; Laursen and Foss, 2003 ; Messersmith and Guthrie, 2011). Thus, this study tries to inspect the way by which HRM and innovation are linked. Moreover, if there is a need for a mediating or moderating mechanism to understand such a relation.

In what follows the paper is arranged accordingly, first the methodology of the papers selection is explained. Next, the papers are summarized according to the way that HRMP or human resources systems affect innovation. Then, the existence of mediators and moderators as an explaining mechanism is examined. Eventually, practical implication, directions for future research and conclusion of the study are presented.

Methodology of the review

The 31 studies analyzed were published from January 2003 to December 2018 in 18 Journals ( Table I ). The list is mainly based on high ranking journals with a proven history and impact in the HRM research. The database used includes the following: Academy of Management, Sage Journals, Wiley online library, Taylor and Francis online, science direct, Oxford Academic and Emerald insight.

As a start, the research objective is defined and the conceptual boundaries are set. HRMP and innovation are conceptualized according to the following dimensions: HRMP (bundle/single); characteristics of HRMP; definitions of innovation; dimensions of innovation; the existence of a moderator–mediator; outcomes of HRMP in an indication for innovation in all its forms. Moreover, the focus was on the firm level.

Data collection method

The database on HRMP and innovation in firms was built through specific inclusion criteria. Figure 1 resembles the selection process adopted; as a start, the AJG Academic journal guide for journal ranking was examined to select, which journals to include in the study. Second, the main concentration was on HRM and employment journals. Moreover, the secondary and supportive source of data were, namely, general management, organization studies, innovation, psychology, economics, international business and hospitality. Third, titles, abstracts and keywords are inspected within the selected journals using the following key terms: “HRMP;” innovation and firm.

Studies identified counted 3,118, however, those that were not listed in AJG (2018) academic guide for journal ranking was dropped. Moreover, books, reviews, case studies, introductions, editorials, proceedings and abstracts were also excluded; only empirical articles were taken into consideration. Studies that had zero citations, except those published in 2018 was dropped. Next, all articles published before 2010 and included in the study had at least 60 citations. Also, research papers having the workplace and the organization as their unit of study was dropped, leaving us with 29 articles. However, studies that used companies and firms interchangeably were adopted, which gave us an addition of 2 articles, leaving us with 31 articles.

Human resource management practices and innovation in firm research

The HRMP and innovation relationship in firms is tested in a variety of contexts in this systematic review. This review declares that HRMP and innovation in firms are being empirically explored and has an international appeal as different countries are encompassed.

Distribution of studies

Laursen and Foss (2003) declared that the attention to HRMP and innovation in firms goes back to the late nineties. Their paper is considered to be essential in inspecting the relationship between HRMP and innovation in firms. Thus, the current study took the year 2003 as a starting point to inspect the previously mentioned relationship. The variance of interest in such a relationship is quite noticed since 2010 ( Figure 1 ). The years 2010-2018 accounts for the most empirical output in the field of study ( n = 22). Moreover, the main journals in the study are the following: Human Resource Management (6 articles), The International Journal of Human Resource Management (6 articles), International Journal of Manpower (2 articles), Human Resource Management Journal (2 articles) and Journal of Management (2 articles). Two third of the articles were published in human resource management journals ( n = 20).

Furthermore, the quality of the journals used was distributed accordingly. Approximately 10 per cent of the studies used were published in Grade 4* journals; 41 per cent were published in Grade 4 journals; 31 per cent were published in Grade 3 journals and the remaining 18 per cent were published in Grade 2 journals.

In addition, articles revealed a spread over 15 countries, namely, China and Spain dominated the articles count, eight articles for China and seven for Spain, the USA, the UK and Korea counted for two articles each. The rest of the articles were distributed along 10 countries mainly located in Europe. Thus, suggesting an opportunity for a globalized research, if supported with more samples from different countries. Moreover, what has been noticed supports the claim that China is heading to be the world`s innovator ( Casey and Koleski, 2011 ).

Theoretical perspective

To identify the theories used, Nolan and Garavan (2016) approach is adopted, thus, relying on “what theory is not by” ( Sutton and Staw, 1995 ). Human resources theories were spotted such as, namely, human capital theory is used to explain the relationship between innovations and organizational culture; social context theory to explain the organizational culture and employee behavior relationship ( Lau and Ngo, 2004 ). Moreover, learning theories is noticed, for example: organizational learning theory used to explain the impact of knowledge enhanced on innovation ( Chang et al. , 2013 ; Shipton et al. , 2005 ); Upper echelon theory was used to stress the importance of managers’ knowledge in evoking innovation ( De Winne and Sels, 2010 ) ( Figure 2 ).

Furthermore, the resource-based view (RBV) usage is prominent either in isolation or in complementarities. As for the first, RBV has been deployed to explain, namely, the influence of competitive advantage, the support of the knowledge, skill and abilities and intellectual capital on innovation, respectively ( Jimenez-Jimenez and Sanz-Valle, 2008 ; Lopez‐Cabrales et al. , 2009 ; Donate et al. , 2016 ). While for the later, RBV has been combined with creativity theory as an antecedent for creativity, thus leading to innovation ( Beugelsdijk, 2008 ); institutional theory to grab a better understanding of the context as RBV alone fails to do so ( Cooke and Saini, 2010 ); and dynamic capabilities (DC) to enhance innovative performance ( Messersmith and Guthrie, 2010 ).

In addition, the social exchange theory was used in combination with equity theory. Both theories support the claim that employees value the relationship with organization relative to incentives and rewards received ( Jiang et al. , 2012 ). Thus, when employees are valued, they reciprocate the organization with an extra effort and novelty in doing things. Also, the job characteristics theory is used in combination with social cognitive theory to the support the impact of change-oriented HRMS ( Lee et al. , 2016 ). Job characteristics theory increases self-responsibility toward the change and social cognitive theory enhances self-efficacy. Also, organizational support theory was used to explain how managerial support and HRMP would enhance R&D activities, and thus innovation ( Stock et al. , 2014 ). Besides, the presence of knowledge-based view not to be ignored in explaining the importance of knowledge management's impact on innovation ( Andreeva et al. , 2017 ; Chen and Huang, 2009 ).

Finally, the usage of the ability, motivation, opportunity (AMO) framework developed by Bailey (1993) is noticed to be prominent after the year 2014. HRMP are declared to be channeled through, the ability enhancement, motivation and opportunity given for employees (Ma Prieto and Pilar Pérez-Santana, 2014 ; Fu et al. , 2015 ; Lee et al. , 2016 ; Diaz-Fernandez et al. , 2017 ).

Methodology

To analyze the methodology characteristics three aspects have been examined, namely, the industry, the unit of analysis and methods adopted.

The main industry that has been noticed in the chosen articles is the manufacturing sector as it is present in 11 articles. The information and communication technology, is present in 6 papers. The food and beverage, automotive and service industry is present in four research studies. The wholesale trade, computer software industry, electronics, chemical industry, construction and hotel industry was noticed to be covered in 3 articles. The catering, transportation, financial service and textile industry is allocated in two papers. The health and personal service, retail trade, internet and added values services, biotechnology and pharmaceutics and metallurgy industry were inspected in one article each. What is noticed of what been mentioned above that the focus is on the manufacturing industry and there are still some industries to be covered such as oil, education and advertising industries. However, what is interesting that one of the articles excluded the agriculture sector. This may raise some questions and would constitute an opportunity for future research.

Unit of analysis

The individual is the essential unit of investigation of HRMP and innovation in firm research. The human resource director (HRD) was exclusively the unit of analysis in five articles, the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) in one article and the manager. Top executives including (CEO, general manager) were the unit of analysis in three papers, the CEO and the HRD in two papers, the CEO, production manager and HRD in one paper. Moreover, the CEO, middle-level managers and local stake holders was the unit of analysis in one paper, the CEO, HRD and financial controller in one article. Furthermore, The HRD and owner/manager (entrepreneur), was the unit of analysis in two research studies, the HRD and technology manager in one paper, the HRD, operational manager and employee in one article, the HRD, strategic director, production manager and the employee in one paper. Also, the senior, middle and junior managers were the unit of analysis in one paper, the senior executives in one article and the marketing manager and R&D manager in one research. As noticed, almost all of papers have focused on either top or middle management to represent the firm without giving an attention to the lower level of employees. Thus, supporting the claim that employeès opinion and reaction to HR practices is usually not addressed in HRM literature ( Nolan and Garavan, 2016 ).

Methods used

The empirical systematic literature review revealed some aspects about the methodological trends used. In total, 27 studies used questioners or surveys (interchangeably) for data collection, only two of them were longitudinal, while the rest were cross-sectional. Moreover, two studies used a mixed approach of a questioner and an interview. Furthermore, the rest two articles have adopted an interview approach with a longitudinal nature, thus a total of four articles having a longitudinal approach.

Content analysis

The content analysis of HRMP and innovation in firms focused on the following aspects: HRMP (bundle/single); existence of a moderating or a mediating variable, namely, characteristics of HRMS; definitions of innovation; outcomes of HRMP in an indication for innovation in all its forms.

Human resource management systems or human resource management practices

Lado and Wilson (1994) defined an HRMS as “a set of distinct but interrelated activities, functions and processes that are directed at attracting, developing and maintaining or disposing of a firm’s human resources.” Thus, indicating for the complementary and interrelated nature of the practices formulating an HRMS that imposes a competitive advantage for the firm. Moreover, high-performance work systems (HPWS) in accordance with what have been mentioned earlier is defined as “a system of HRMP designed to enhance employees’ skills, commitment and productivity in such a way that employees become a source of sustainable competitive advantage” ( Pfeffer and Jeffrey, 1998 ).

Moreover, the majority of researchers have adopted HMR practices in isolation to inspect its impact on performance ( Wright and Boswell, 2002 ). However, there is a call for adopting sophisticated HRMS to induce product and technological innovation ( Shipton et al. , 2005 ). HRMP when adopted as a system, is expected to evoke innovation as noticed in many research studies, for example: De Winne and Sels (2010) , Lopez-Cabrales et al. (2009) and many others.

The notion of complementarities is essential for HRMP to induce innovation ( Laursen and Foss, 2003 ). However, it has been found that isolated HRMP induce innovation to a certain extent. However, their interactive impact will be more significant ( Beugelsdijk, 2008 ; Shipton et al. , 2006 ). Furthermore, the impact of a single practice of HRM on a firm`s performance is not beneficial ( Lau and Ngo, 2004 ). Additionally, Jimenez-Jemenez and Sanz-Valle (2005) in their study announced a lack of support for the claim that HRMP in isolation would induce innovation.

Moreover, the aspect of integration and fit is highlighted as; HRM system alone might not induce innovation unless accompanied by an organizational culture that supports innovation. Furthermore, the existence of an innovative strategy accompanied by the HRMP is essential for firm innovation (Jimenez-Jemenez and Sanz-Valle, 2005). On the other hand, the alignment of HRMP toward the same goal may have a negative effect ( Andreeva et al. , 2017 ).

In summary, papers that used HRMP as a bundle was ( n = 26); in isolation ( n = 4); a mixture of a bundle and isolation ( n = 1). It is noticed that most researchers agree on the notion of the bundle, however, lack of agreement is noticed relative to the type of practices to integrate in the system (Jimenez-Jemenez and Sanz-Valle, 2005).

Human resource management systems characteristics

A variety of HRMS is used in literature with different HRMP and purposes. HRMS are categorized according to their purpose, namely, innovation-oriented encompassing practices that help build an innovative culture ( Lau and Ngo, 2004 ); a learning supportive ( De Saa-Perez and Díaz-Díaz, 2010 ; Laursen and Foss, 2003 ; Shipton et al. , 2005 ; Shipton et al. , 2006 ); an exploration and behavior fit to strategy ( Cooke and Saini, 2010 ); flexibility and adaptive capability-oriented system to face the rapid environmental changes ( Chang et al. , 2013 ; Jimenez-Jimenez and Sanz-Valle, 2008 ; Martínez-Sánchez et al. , 2011 ; Wei and Lau, 2010 ); a system that allow firms to evoke knowledge and build expertize ( Andreeva et al. , 2017 ; Chen and Huang, 2009 ; De Winne and Sels, 2010 ; Lopez-Cabaralez et al. , 2009; Sung and Choi, 2018 ); high performance work systems used to motivate and build human and social capital ( Fu et al. , 2015 ; Donate et al. , 2016 ; Messersmith and Guthrie, 2010 ); commitment oriented that establish social relations and evokes employee commitment toward the organization and risk taking ( Ceylan, 2013 ; Chen et al. , 2018 ; Neives and Osorio, 2017; Zhou et al. , 2013 ); a collaboration HRMS that helps in the development of equality relationship ( Zhou et al. , 2013 ); high involvement work practices that induce management coworkers support ( Ma Prieto and Pérez-Santana, 2014 ); a change oriented that impact employee psychological status such as self-efficacy and responsibility to change ( Lee et al. , 2016 ); and a creativity inducing system ( Liu et al. , 2017 ).

In summary, HRMS that builds knowledge capabilities evokes flexibility and learning is highly used in research. Moreover, commitment systems are quite noticed, however, the concepts of fit, culture and collaboration need to be more research as few studies have been encountered. Additionally, the same systems encompassing different HRMP were used for different purposes. Furthermore, different systems have been used for the same purpose.

Systems used for different purposes are high performance work system, high commitment human resource system. The first was used to; motivate, build human and social capital ( Messersmith and Guthrie, 2010 ); to enhance adaptive capability ( Wei and Lau, 2010 ); and induce innovative work behavior ( Fu et al. , 2015 ). The latter, was used to support learning ( De Saa-Perez and Díaz-Díaz, 2010 ); enhance innovative capability ( Zhou et al. , 2013 ) and innovative behavior, evoke organizational commitment and employee risk-taking Chen et al. (2018) and alignment of strategy ( Cooke and Saini, 2010 ). This supports the notion that HRMS are used interchangeably especially HPWS, high involvement work system (HIWS) and high commitment work systems (HCWS) ( Chen et al. , 2018 ).

Human resource management practices in isolation

Utilization of HRMP in isolation is quite noticed and adopted in recent research studies. The practices used can be categorized according to their purpose of usage. Lau and Ngo (2004) used three practices directed toward mindfulness; Jiang et al. (2012) adopted eight practices to evoke employee creativity; Stock et al. (2014) used four innovation-oriented practices; and Diaz-Fernandez et al. (2017) incorporated four practices aiming at enhancing employee abilities, motivation and opportunity to innovate.

Innovation by definition

Different definitions of innovation have been encountered, thus a trial has been conducted to set a certain trend for the definitions adopted. The definition by West and Far, used by Jiang et al. (2012) , Shipton et al. (2005) and Shipton et al. (2006) . It captures the deliberate behavior directed toward new (products, ideas and processes), that is new to the adopting unit and beneficial for the organization and society. Moreover, its usage has been noticed to be mainly for the technological products and processes.

Next, the prominent author relied upon in defining innovation was Damanpour, as there has been three definitions established during the following years 1989, 1991 and 1998. The articles are developed by: Diaz-Fernandez et al. (2017) , Ceylan (2013) , Chang et al. (2011) , Chen and Huang (2009) , Fu et al. (2015) , Jemenez-Jemenez and Sanz Valle (2008), Wei and Lau (2010) and Zhou et al. (2013) . Such definitions consider innovation as a performance outcome. Moreover, it captures the innovative strategy, product, project, process and organizational innovation. Furthermore, the measuring scale of patents and the classification of radical and incremental innovation was realized.

Additionally, innovation as newness in products, services, work and practices is addressed relying on ( Rogers, 1983 ). In addition, innovation has been considered to be embedded in knowledge according to kogut and Zander (1992) , Nonaka (1994) and Smith et al. (2005) .

In summary, the definition of innovation adopted is mainly that of Damanpour, which states that, namely, “the adoption of an idea or behavior, whether a system, policy, program, device, process, product or service, that is new to the adopting organization” ( Damanpour et al. , 1989 ).

Mediator or moderator

Almost half the studies ( n = 17) have used a mediator or a moderator as an explaining tool for the indirect linkage between HRMP and innovation in firms ( Lau and Ngo, 2004 also Wei and Lau, 2010 ). The mediators used are as follows: Organizational culture, knowledge management capacity, unique knowledge, valuable knowledge, adaptive capability, innovation-oriented strategy, employee creativity, cross-functional research and development, absorptive capacity, innovative work behavior, human and social capital, firm ownership and middle managers innovative behavior. On the other hand, the moderators incorporated are, namely, environmental dynamism, strategic activities, compensation and benefits, employee creativity, work-family conflict and work climate.

In the following section, the outcomes of the articles included in the review are presented accordingly; and the HRMP and innovation relationship (direct/indirect). Moreover, the direct relationship is categorized into bundles, isolation and utilization of both approaches.

Human resource management systems

First, trying to find the best bundle of practices for product innovation in firms, Laursen and Foss (2003) adopted two systems, namely, the first composed of nine practices and the second composed of two; however, both having a learning objective. Their sample was 913 Danish firms with at least 100 employees. Results indicated that the complementarities effect between practices enhances their impact on innovation, however, only seven of the first system had a positive significant impact. Moreover, Shipton et al. (2005) examined the British context by sampling 32 firms having at least 70 employees. The system adopted is learning-oriented composed of six practices. Results indicated a significant impact on product production and technology innovation, however, no impact on the process. This notion was supported by Jiménez-Jiménez and Sanz-Valle (2008), when exploring the Spanish context, with a sample of 173 firms having more than 50 employees.

Also, De Winne and Sels (2010) , with a sample of 294 startup firms in Belgium inspected the impact of HRMP as a bundle on product, process and service innovation. The systems composed of five practices directed toward knowledge creation and retention. Results indicated high positive significance between the bundle of practices and the mentioned types of innovation. In addition, De Saa-Perez and Díaz-Díaz (2010) , while investigating the Canary Islands by sampling 157 firms having more than 10 employees. High commitment HRMP was used such as internal promotion, group-based performance appraisal among six practices. It was noticed the existence of a positive influence on product and process innovation, yet this influence varies relative to sectors.

Furthermore, Messermith and Gutherie (2010) handled a sample of 2018 firm in the USA having 20 to 100 employees. HPWS was adopted, it supported the emergence of product, organizational but not process innovation. Besides, Zhou et al. (2013) inspected two systems of HRMP, commitment and collaboration in the Chinese context of 125 firms having 50 employees and above. Both systems indicated a positive impact on organizational innovation, however, when implemented together, a negative interactions emerges this hindering innovation. The commitment-based system was used by Ceylan (2013) , which enhanced various forms of innovation This positive impact on innovation is also reflected when studying 109 firms with 50 employees or more in Spain ( Nieves and Osorio, 2017 ).

In summary, different usage of HRMP systems shown a positive association with product innovation, however, little evidence is provided to support the emergence of process innovation. Moreover, innovation level varies among sectors as some are influenced by specific types of system of practices. Thus, according to the sector, careful selection of practices should be adopted. Furthermore, it was noticed that when implementing two different types of systems, the impact of both systems on innovation is diminished. This is explained according to ambidexterity as there should be a balance if more than one system is adopted.

Next, Vogus and Wellborne (2003) examined the USA by a sample of 184 firms having an average of 238 employees. HRMP was used in isolation, results indicated that innovation output is strongly increased by these practices. Moreover, Beugelsdijk (2008) examined the Dutch context with a sample of 988 firms having a minimum of 5 employees. Outcomes highlighted the importance of adopting practices that stress training and incentives to induce incremental innovation such as follows: training, performance-based pay. While, for radical innovation the adopted practices should induce autonomy.

Combination

Then, Shipton et al. (2006) inspected the UK context through 22 firms having an average of 236 employees. They adopted a set of practices that evoke exploratory learning; results indicated that induction, appraisal, training and teamwork had a significant impact on product innovation yet; appraisal had no impact on technical system innovation. Moreover, contingent reward had no impact on both types of innovation, however, when combined with other practices as a system its impact becomes obvious. In addition, the combined influence had a stronger impact on technical innovation.

Moreover, Chang et al. (2011) when adopting selection and training practices in isolation both had a positive impact on incremental and radical innovation. However, the joint adoption had a negative impact on incremental innovation. Thus, a proper identification of practices so that, they won` t impact each other negatively. Besides, Andreeva et al. (2017) adopted 3 knowledge-oriented practices to inspect jointly and separately in 259 companies with at least 100 employees in Finland. The separate impact of rewards and appraisals was positive on incremental innovation, however, no interaction impact. While, for radical innovation rewards had a positive impact while the interactive impact was negative. This supports the notion of careful selection when combing practices.

In summary, various HRMP have been examined if being used would enhance innovation, surprisingly most studies revealed that single practices would evoke innovation. However, when combined with each other innovation will be hindered. Thus, contradicting what has been mentioned above relative to the impact of bundles of HRMP on innovation.

Mediators and moderators

Finally, the existence of a mediating or moderation mechanism to explain the HRMP and innovation linkage is noticed. Lau and Ngo (2004) used innovation-oriented HRMP as a bundle in 332 firms having more than 50 employees in Hong Kong. The system used to create cross-functional teams that support change. It had a positive impact on innovation through the organizational culture. Moreover, knowledge management capacity as a moderator was adopted by Chen and Huang (2009) while examining Taiwanese firms. Results supported the mediating impact between HRMP as a bundle and innovation (administrative and technical). Furthermore, Lopez-Cabrales et al. (2009) examined the Spanish context with a sample of 86 firms having more than 50 employees. Two types of bundles was adopted; knowledge-based and Collaborative HRMP mediated by valuable knowledge and unique knowledge respectively. Hence, both systems had no direct effect, while only collaborative HRMP has an impact on innovation mediated by unique knowledge.

In addition, partial support has been recognized when examining the HPWS and product innovation relationship mediated by adaptive capability ( Wei and Lau, 2010 ). Also, Cooke et al. (2010) inspected the impact of high commitment work practices on product, process and customer service innovation through alignment of strategy. Strong influence has been noticed, which was explained by the adoption of practices supporting each other. Also, Jiang et al. (2012) tested the impact of HRMP in isolation on technological and organizational innovation mediated by employee creativity. All practices indicated a positive mediation, however, training and performance appraisal were not.

Next, cross-functional R&D was inspected as a mediator between HRMP in isolation and product program innovativeness. The test conducted in the German context with a sample of 125 firms having 50 employees and above ( Stock et al. , 2014 ). Training and rewards had a strong influence on product program innovativeness, however, recruitment had no impact. Besides, the mediating role of absorptive capacity between flexibility-oriented HRMS and incremental innovation was inspected in China. Both systems indicated a significant association with firm innovativeness, however, when implemented together the positive impact fades ( Chang et al. , 2013 ).

Then, Ma Prieto and Pilar Pérez-Santana (2014) adopted a supportive work environment as a mediator between high involvement HRMP and innovative work behavior. The study was conducted in Spain handling sample of 198 firms. Outcomes indicated that direct and the mediated relationship between HRMP targeting employee’s abilities, skills and opportunities and innovative work behavior is significant. As well, Fu et al. (2015) when examining the Irish context adopted HWPS and organizational innovation relationship mediated by innovative work behavior. The sample included 120 firms and results supported the direct and the mediated relationship.

Subsequently, Donate et al. (2016) sampled 72 firms in Spain, where two systems are adopted. High profile performance systems composed of five practices and a collaborative system composed of seven practices. The relation with product and process innovation was examined through human and social capital. Results indicated that both systems positively impacted product and process innovation when mediated through human and social capital respectively. In addition, Lee et al. (2016) investigated the Korean context sampling 11 firms while adopting a change-oriented HRM system. The suggested relationship between HRM system and group innovation is through employee proactively. Primary results indicated a channeling effect of employee proactive behavior, however, no mediating effect.

As for the moderated relationship between HRMP and innovation, environmental dynamism was used by Martínez-Sánchez et al. (2011) in the Spanish context. The study encompassed two flexibility-oriented systems; internal and external numerical. Moreover, the internal system is composed by its turn from functional and numerical. Results indicated that for both direct and moderated relationship the following. The internal system with both its subsystems indicated a positive relationship with innovativeness, however, only consulting contracting firms in the external system is in positive relation.

Furthermore, Diaz-Fernandez et al. (2017) conducted a longitudinal study in the Spanish context encompassing a sample of 1,363 firms. He used four HRMP in isolation to be moderated by compensation and benefits. Results indicated that only employment security and investment in new training technologies had a significant impact on innovation as long as this relationship is moderated by high salaries. However, employment security, compensation when implemented in isolation had no impact on innovation. Moreover, the language training and training in new technologies had not impact.

Additionally, what is interesting is the existence of a mediator and a moderator in three studies encompassed in the review. First, Liu et al. (2017) investigated the Chinese context by sampling 57 firms. Two systems are adopted, the employee experienced performance HRM and employee experienced maintenance-oriented HRM. The two systems implemented with employee creativity as moderator and firm ownership as a mediator. The multilevel relationship indicated a positive impact on firm innovation. Next, Sung and Choi (2018) examined the Korean contest with a two-set of knowledge stock and flow-oriented practices. The mediators used firm knowledge flow and stock, while the moderator is the strategy. Flow and stock facilitating HRMP indicated a positive impact on firm innovation through firm knowledge flow. Moreover, the moderating effect is partial as innovation is impacted through knowledge stock. Thus there is a need for a proper implementation of high levels of firm knowledge flow if to make use of firm knowledge stock in inducing innovation.

Finally, Chen et al. (2018) inspected 113 firms in the Chinese context where a high commitment work system is used. The system impact on innovative behavior is studied through middle managers innovative behavior; this relation is moderated by work-family conflict and work climate. The managers’ innovative behavior successfully mediates the relationship between HCWS and firm innovative performance. However, the direct relationship was not significant, moreover work-family conflict had a negative impact on innovative behavior. Furthermore, the combined effect of HCWS with both moderating variables indicated a positive impact on innovative behavior.

In summary, the research is rich with trials to explain the relationship between HRMP and innovation through a mechanism. However, the mediating mechanism is more popular among research, thus, what would be beneficial is search for further moderators to explain the above-mentioned relationship. In what follows managerial implications for practice are presented.

Important practical implications are uncovered for managers that need to acquire human resources skills and competencies, which would enhance the firm`s survival rate. First, it has been noticed that the existence of training in most of the HRMS is present and plays a vital role in inducing innovation. Lack of training might be reflected in the absence of innovation, however, presence of training would prevent employees from being square minded. Thus, managers are required to focus on human capital development and adopt practices that foster knowledge and enrich employees` skills. Fostering knowledge includes the process of acquiring and sharing information among employees. Sharing information can be motivated through a bonus system that reward combined effort rather than individual ones. Moreover, managers can promote a learning environment by having the proper infrastructure needed and through nurturing social ties. On the other hand, it was noticed that training had no impact on innovation; this case needs to be investigated closely.

Second, managers have to be aware to what practices to use in the HRMS, as some practices when combined together would negatively impact the learning process in the organization. Just as the presence of individual appraisal and pay for performance. Such a case will result in conflict, which can be resolved by careful selection and proper fit among HRMP to be included in the system. Moreover, the fit is not restricted to the practices only, as the fit should take into consideration the company strategy. Third, managers who provide a secure working environment for their employees as replacing contracts with full-time schedules, tolerate and encourage risk-taking, will lead provoke innovation. Forth, cultural aspects should be treated carefully, as when ignored will have negative impact on innovation, as cultural changes require the adjustment of management approach.

Fifth, the importance of selecting and hiring employees with unique knowledge and high education and take the proper measures to retain talents and key persons that are considered vital. This can be done through career development, promotions, flexibility, autonomy, motivation and investment in leadership practices in a dynamic environment. Finally, managers would implement more than one HRM system, however, these systems should be implemented in synergy.

Future research

As noticed in the review the theoretical underpinning of the HRMP, innovation relationship is quite noticed. However, there is still a space to examine more theories to explain this relationship, for example. Trait theory can be adopted as it explains the individual-level factors, which might impact HRMS positively or negatively ( Tett and Burnett, 2003 ).

Moreover, regarding the methodology, sampling size in most studies was limited, thus, it would be beneficial to in large it. Furthermore, the impact of the context in which the practices were implemented should have been closely inspected ( Vogus and Welbourne, 2003 ). In addition, the sector was controlled for; however, it would of interest to inspect the type of practices that would impact each sector. Also, the longitudinal approach is scarce as noticed only four articles adopted it ( Diaz-Fernandez et al. , 2017 ; Shipton et al. , 2005 ; Shipton et al. , 2006 ; Sung and Choi, 2018 ). Hence, longitudinal studies could grab the impact of the HRMP on innovation in different time intervals. Moreover, the field lacks studies that examined the sample of investigation before and after implementing the HRMP. Finally, face to face interviews when conducted would yield more in-depth information about the field of study.

Furthermore, tow contradicting perspectives have been encountered regarding the parsimony of practices. As for the first, a call is noticed for a limited number of practices, thus inducing flexibility (Jimenez-Jemenez and Sanz-Valle, 2005). While, the latter the inclusion of enormous sets of practices is noticed ( Donate et al. , 2016 ; Martínez-Sánchez et al. , 2011 ; Zhou et al. , 2013 ). Moreover, substitution of practices or using alternative practices would be an area of interest to be inspected. Additionally, agreement on the type of practices that are aligned and fit is missing. Finally, the inclusion of more variables to portray the linkage between HRMP and innovation is appealing such as organizational structure, psychological contract and organizational capital.

The 31 empirical articles reviewed suggest some improvement toward understanding the HRMP and innovation relationship in firms. The context diversity in which the studies have been conducted reveals that the HRMP and innovation relationship is a rich field yet a lot to be discovered. Practical implication are indicated, which would act as guidance for what of practices would induce innovation if implemented. However, as noticed there no specific system to apply as firms and cultural has to be dealt with according to contingency. Moreover, it suggests some additional theories to be used for inspecting the HRMP and innovation relationship.

In addition, the study encompasses areas of strength and weaknesses, as for the first the types of journals selected are high ranking, which reflects reliability of review. While the latter, the study included only empirical articles, which can be considered a weakness, as many conceptual articles was dropped. Moreover, the studies interpreted the HRMP as a bundle in different ways, with different inclusion of practices for the same system. Furthermore, all unpublished studies, Grade 1 journals, books and abstracts were excluded.

research papers in hrm pdf

Chart of articles selection method

research papers in hrm pdf

Distribution of empirical HRMP and innovation publications

List of journals and ranking

Summary of HRMP and innovation publications

*The presence of a Moderator; **the presence of Mediator

Andreeva , T. , Vanhala , M. , Sergeeva , A. , Ritala , P. and Kianto , A. ( 2017 ), “ When the fit between HR practices backfires: exploring the interaction effects between rewards for and appraisal of knowledge behaviours on innovation ”, Human Resource Management Journal , Vol. 27 No. 2 , pp. 209 - 227 .

Bailey , T. ( 1993 ), “ Organizational innovation in the apparel industry ”, Industrial Relations , Vol. 32 No. 2 , pp. 30 - 48 .

Beugelsdijk , S. ( 2008 ), “ Strategic human resource practices and product innovation ”, Organization Studies , Vol. 29 No. 6 , pp. 821 - 847 .

Casey , J. and Koleski , K. ( 2011 ), Backgrounder: China’s 12th Five-Year Plan , US-China Economic and Security Review Commission .

Ceylan , C. ( 2013 ), “ Commitment-based HR practices, different types of innovation activities and firm innovation performance ”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management , Vol. 24 No. 1 , pp. 208 - 226 .

Chang , S. , Gong , Y. and Shum , C. ( 2011 ), “ Promoting innovation in hospitality companies through human resource management practices ”, International Journal of Hospitality Management , Vol. 30 No. 4 , pp. 812 - 818 .

Chang , S. , Gong , Y. , Way , S.A. and Jia , L. ( 2013 ), “ Flexibility-oriented HRM systems, absorptive capacity, and market responsiveness and firm innovativeness ”, Journal of Management , Vol. 39 No. 7 , pp. 1924 - 1951 .

Chen , C.J. and Huang , J.W. ( 2009 ), “ Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance – the mediating role of knowledge management capacity ”, Journal of Business Research , Vol. 62 No. 1 , pp. 104 - 114 .

Chen , Y. , Jiang , Y.J. , Tang , G. and Cooke , F.L. ( 2018 ), “ High‐commitment work systems and Middle managers’ innovative behavior in the Chinese context: the moderating role of work‐life conflicts and work climate ”, Human Resource Management , Vol. 57 No. 5 , pp. 1317 - 1334 .

Cooke , F.L. and Saini , D.S. ( 2010 ), “ (how) does the HR strategy support an innovation oriented business strategy? an investigation of institutional context and organizational practices in Indian firms ”, Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, the University of MI and in Alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management , Vol. 49 No. 3 , pp. 377 - 400 .

Damanpour , F. , Szabat , K.A. and Evan , W.M. ( 1989 ), “ The relationship between types of innovation and organizational performance ”, Journal of Management Studies , Vol. 26 No. 6 , pp. 587 - 602 .

De Winne , S. and Sels , L. ( 2010 ), “ Interrelationships between human capital, HRM and innovation in Belgian start-ups aiming at an innovation strategy ”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management , Vol. 21 No. 11 , pp. 1863 - 1883 .

Diaz-Fernandez , M. , Bornay-Barrachina , M. and Lopez-Cabrales , A. ( 2017 ), “ HRM practices and innovation performance: a panel-data approach ”, International Journal of Manpower , Vol. 38 No. 3 , pp. 354 - 372 .

De Saa-Perez , P. and Díaz-Díaz , N.L. ( 2010 ), “ Human resource management and innovation in the canary islands: an ultra-peripheral region of the European Union ”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management , Vol. 21 No. 10 , pp. 1649 - 1666 .

Donate , M.J. , Peña , I. and Sanchez de Pablo , J.D. ( 2016 ), “ HRM practices for human and social capital development: effects on innovation capabilities ”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management , Vol. 27 No. 9 , pp. 928 - 953 .

Fu , N. , Flood , P.C. , Bosak , J. , Morris , T. and O’Regan , P. ( 2015 ), “ How do high performance work systems influence organizational innovation in professional service firms? ”, Employee Relations , Vol. 37 No. 2 , pp. 209 - 231 .

Jiang , J. , Wang , S. and Zhao , S. ( 2012 ), “ Does HRM facilitate employee creativity and organizational innovation? A study of Chinese firms ”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management , Vol. 23 No. 19 , pp. 4025 - 4047 .

Jimenez-Jimenez , D. and Sanz-Valle , R. ( 2005 ), “ Innovation and human resource management fit: an empirical study ”, International Journal of Manpower , Vol. 26 No. 4 , pp. 364 - 381 .

Jimenez-Jimenez , D. and Sanz-Valle , R. ( 2008 ), “ Could HRM support organizational innovation? ”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management , Vol. 19 No. 7 , pp. 1208 - 1221 .

Kogut , B. and Zander , U. ( 1992 ), “ Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology ”, Organization Science , Vol. 3 No. 3 , pp. 383 - 397 .

Lau , C.M. and Ngo , H.Y. ( 2004 ), “ The HR system, organizational culture, and product innovation ”, International Business Review , Vol. 13 No. 6 , pp. 685 - 703 .

Lado , A.A. and Wilson , M.C. ( 1994 ), “ Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: a competency-based perspective ”, The Academy of Management Review , Vol. 19 No. 4 , pp. 699 - 727 .

Laursen , K. and Foss , N.J. ( 2003 ), “ New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance ”, Cambridge Journal of Economics , Vol. 27 No. 2 , pp. 243 - 263 .

Lee , H.W. , Pak , J. , Kim , S. and Li , L.Z. ( 2016 ), “ Effects of human resource management systems on employee proactivity and group innovation ”, Journal of Management , p. 149206316680029 .

Liu , D. , Gong , Y. , Zhou , J. and Huang , J.C. ( 2017 ), “ Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovation: the moderating role of firm ownership ”, Academy of Management Journal , Vol. 60 No. 3 , pp. 1164 - 1188 .

Lopez‐Cabrales , A. , Pérez‐Luño , A. and Cabrera , R.V. ( 2009 ), “ Knowledge as a mediator between HRM practices and innovative activity ”, Human Resource Management , Vol. 48 No. 4 , pp. 485 - 503 .

Ma Prieto , I. and Pérez-Santana , M.P. ( 2014 ), “ Managing innovative work behavior: the role of human resource practices ”, Personnel Review , Vol. 43 No. 2 , pp. 184 - 208 .

Martínez-Sánchez , A. , Vela-Jiménez , M.J. , Pérez-Pérez , M. and de-Luis-Carnicer , P. ( 2011 ), “ The dynamics of labour flexibility: relationships between employment type and innovativeness ”, Journal of Management Studies , Vol. 48 No. 4 , pp. 715 - 736 .

Messersmith , J.G. and Guthrie , J.P. ( 2010 ), “ High performance work systems in emergent organizations: implications for firm performance ”, Human Resource Management , Vol. 49 No. 2 , pp. 241 - 264 .

Nieves , J. and Osorio , J. ( 2017 ), “ Commitment-based HR systems and organizational outcomes in services ”, International Journal of Manpower , Vol. 38 No. 3 , pp. 432 - 448 .

Nolan , C.T. and Garavan , T.N. ( 2016 ), “ Human resource development in SMEs: a systematic review of the literature ”, International Journal of Management Reviews , Vol. 18 No. 1 , pp. 85 - 107 .

Nonaka , I. ( 1994 ), “ A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation ”, Organization Science , Vol. 5 No. 1 , pp. 14 - 37 .

OECD/Eurostat ( 2005 ), “ Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data ”, available at: www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/science-and-technology/oslomanual_9789264013100-en (accessed 8 August 2015 ).

Pfeffer , J. and Jeffrey , P. ( 1998 ), The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First , Harvard Business Press .

Rogers , M.E. ( 1983 ), Diffusion of Innovations , The Free Press .

Shipton , H. , Fay , D. , West , M. , Patterson , M. and Birdi , K. ( 2005 ), “ Managing people to promote innovation ”, Creativity and Innovation Management , Vol. 14 No. 2 , pp. 118 - 128 .

Shipton , H. , West , M.A. , Dawson , J. , Birdi , K. and Patterson , M. ( 2006 ), “ HRM as a predictor of innovation ”, Human Resource Management Journal , Vol. 16 No. 1 , pp. 3 - 27 .

Smith , K.G. , Collins , C.J. and Clark , K.D. ( 2005 ), “ Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms ”, Academy of Management Journal , Vol. 48 No. 2 , pp. 346 - 357 .

Stock , R.M. , Totzauer , F. and Zacharias , N.A. ( 2014 ), “ A closer look at cross‐functional R&D cooperation for innovativeness: innovation‐oriented leadership and human resource practices as driving forces ”, Journal of Product Innovation Management , Vol. 31 No. 5 , pp. 924 - 938 .

Sutton , R.I. and Staw , B.M. ( 1995 ), “ What theory is not ”, Administrative Science Quarterly , Vol. 40 No. 3 , pp. 371 - 384 .

Sung , S.Y. and Choi , J.N. ( 2018 ), “ Building knowledge stock and facilitating knowledge flow through human resource management practices toward firm innovation ”, Human Resource Management , Vol. 57 No. 6 , pp. 1429 - 1442 .

Tett , R.P. and Burnett , D.D. ( 2003 ), “ A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance ”, Journal of Applied Psychology , Vol. 88 No. 3 , p. 500 .

Vogus , T.J. and Welbourne , T.M. ( 2003 ), “ Structuring for high reliability: HR practices and mindful processes in reliability‐seeking organizations ”, Journal of Organizational Behavior , Vol. 24 No. 7 , pp. 877 - 903 .

Wright , P.M. and Boswell , W.R. ( 2002 ), “ Desegregating HRM: a review and synthesis of micro and macro human resource management research ”, Journal of Management , Vol. 28 No. 3 , pp. 247 - 276 .

Zhou , Y. , Hong , Y. and Liu , J. ( 2013 ), “ Internal commitment or external collaboration? The impact of human resource management systems on firm innovation and performance ”, Human Resource Management , Vol. 52 No. 2 , pp. 263 - 288 .

Further reading

Cano , C.P. and Cano , P.Q. ( 2006 ), “ Human resources management and its impact on innovation performance in companies ”, International Journal of Technology Management , Vol. 35 Nos 1-4 , pp. 11 - 28 .

Chowhan , J. ( 2016 ), “ Unpacking the black box: understanding the relationship between strategy, HRM practices, innovation and organizational performance ”, Human Resource Management Journal , Vol. 26 No. 2 , pp. 112 - 133 .

Curado , C. ( 2018 ), “ Human resource management contribution to innovation in small and medium‐sized enterprises: a mixed methods approach ”, Creativity and Innovation Management , Vol. 27 No. 1 , pp. 79 - 90 .

Gong , Y. , Law , K.S. , Chang , S. and Xin , K.R. ( 2009 ), “ Human resources management and firm performance: the differential role of managerial affective and continuance commitment ”, Journal of Applied Psychology , Vol. 94 No. 1 , p. 263 .

Li , Y. , Wang , M. , Van Jaarsveld , D.D. , Lee , G.K. and Ma , D.G. ( 2018 ), “ From employee-experienced high-involvement work system to innovation: an emergence-based human resource management framework ”, Academy of Management Journal , Vol. 61 No. 5 , pp. 2000 - 2019 .

Lin , C.H. and Sanders , K. ( 2017 ), “ HRM and innovation: a multi‐level organizational learning perspective ”, Human Resource Management Journal , Vol. 27 No. 2 , pp. 300 - 317 .

Wei , L.Q. and Lau , C.M. ( 2010 ), “ High performance work systems and performance: the role of adaptive capability ”, Human Relations , Vol. 63 No. 10 , pp. 1487 - 1511 .

Xiao , Z. and Björkman , I. ( 2006 ), “ High commitment work systems in Chinese organizations: a preliminary measure ”, Management and Organization Review , Vol. 2 No. 3 , pp. 403 - 422 .

Corresponding author

Related articles, we’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

The research–practice gap in the field of HRM: a qualitative study from the academic side of the gap

  • Review Paper
  • Published: 15 June 2020
  • Volume 15 , pages 1465–1515, ( 2021 )

Cite this article

research papers in hrm pdf

  • Jesús de Frutos-Belizón   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3194-6910 1 ,
  • Fernando Martín-Alcázar 1 &
  • Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey 1  

1712 Accesses

9 Citations

3 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

In recent studies, researchers agree that there is a substantial gap between research and practice in the field of human resource management (HRM). The literature exploring the causes and consequences of this gap does not represent a finely structured discourse; it has focused on analysing the gap from the practitioner side, and it is based on opinions and theoretical discussions rather than on empirical evidence. In this paper, we try to shed some light on this so-called “valley of death”. We attempt to identify the causes underlying the disconnect between academics and professionals in our field by drawing on empirical qualitative evidence obtained from interviews with 15 expert academics in the field of HRM. Thus, the approach presented in our work differs from that of the prior literature in that it is focused not on the opinions of individual authors but on the personal experiences of a larger expert sample composed of independent, experienced scholars in the area. Based on in-depth semi-structured interviews, we analyse the factors explaining why academics are not always willing to focus their research on professional needs or orientate their research outputs to the practitioner community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

research papers in hrm pdf

Similar content being viewed by others

research papers in hrm pdf

Research Methodology: An Introduction

research papers in hrm pdf

Ethical Issues in Research: Perceptions of Researchers, Research Ethics Board Members and Research Ethics Experts

research papers in hrm pdf

Qualitative Methodology

Relating to the theory of knowledge, especially with regard to its methods, validity, and scope, and the distinction between justified belief and opinion.

Abrahamson E (2009) Necessary conditions for the study of fads and fashions in science. Scand J Manag 25(2):235–239

Article   Google Scholar  

Agarwal R, Hoetker G (2007) A Faustian bargain? The growth of management and its relationship with related disciplines. Acad Manag J 50(6):1304–1322

Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211

Antonakis J (2017) On doing better science: from thrill of discovery to policy implications. Leadersh Quart 28(1):5–21

Armstrong M (2006) A handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page Publishers, London

Google Scholar  

Artés J, Pedraja-Chaparro F, del Mar Salinas-JiméneZ M (2017) Research performance and teaching quality in the Spanish higher education system: evidence from a medium-sized university. Res Policy 46(1):19–29

Bahuguna PC, Kumari P, Srivastava SK (2009) Changing face of human resource management: a strategic partner in business. Manag Labour Stud 34(4):563–581

Banks GC, Pollack JM, Bochantin JE, Kirkman BL, Whelpley CE, O’Boyle EH (2016) Management’s science–practice gap: a grand challenge for all stakeholders. Acad Manag J 59(6):2205–2231

Bansal P, Bertels S, Ewart T, MacConnachie P, O’Brien J (2012) Bridging the research–practice gap. Acad Manag Perspect 26(1):73–92

Barley SR (2016) 60th anniversary essay: ruminations on how we became a mystery house and how we might get out. Adm Sci Q 61(1):1–8

Barnacle R, Dall’Alba G (2014) Beyond skills: embodying writerly practices through the doctorate. Stud High Educ 39(7):1139–1149

Barney JB, Wright PM (1998) On becoming a strategic partner: the role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Hum Resour Manag 37(1):31–46

Bartunek JM (2011) What has happened to mode 2? Br J Manag 22(3):555–558

Bartunek JM, Rynes SL (2010) The construction and contributions of “implications for practice”: what’s in them and what might they offer? Acad Manag Learn Educ 9(1):100–117

Bartunek JM, Rynes SL (2014) Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: the paradoxes of academic–practitioner relationships. J Manag 40(5):1181–1201

Baum JA (2011) Free-riding on power laws: questioning the validity of the impact factor as a measure of research quality in organization studies. Organization 18(4):449–466

Bendig AW (1954) Reliability and the number of rating-scale categories. J Appl Psychol 38(1):38–40

Beyer JM, Trice HM (1982) The utilization process: a conceptual frame work and synthesis of empirical findings. Adm Sci Q 27(4):591–622

Bhatti MW, Ahsan A (2016) Global software development: an exploratory study of challenges of globalization, HRM practices and process improvement. RMS 10(4):649–682

Bryman A (1988) Doing research in organizations. Routledge, London

Bullinger B, Kieser A, Schiller-Merkens S (2015) Coping with institutional complexity: responses of management scholars to competing logics in the field of management studies. Scand J Manag 31(3):437–450

Butler L (2003) Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts. Res Policy 32(1):143–155

Butler D (2008) Crossing the valley of death. Nature 453(7197):840–842

Campbell JP, Dunnette MD (1968) Effectiveness of T-group experiences in managerial training and development. Psychol Bull 70(2):73–104

Carless SA, Rasiah J, Irmer BE (2009) Discrepancy between human resource research and practice: comparison of industrial/organisational psychologists and human resource practitioners’ beliefs. Aust Psychol 44(2):105–111

Chubb J, Reed MS (2018) The politics of research impact: academic perceptions of the implications for research funding, motivation and quality. Br Politics 13(3):295–311

Cohen DJ (2007) The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner publications in human resource management: reasons for the divide and concrete solutions for bridging the gap. Acad Manag J 50(5):1013–1019

Collins K, Shiffman D, Rock J (2016) How are scientists using social media in the workplace? PLoS One 11(10):e0162680. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162680

Community for Responsible Research in Business and Management (2016). A vision of responsible research in business and management: striving for credible and useful knowledge. Draft for targeted consultation, 30 November 2016

Davis GF (2015) Editorial essay: what is organizational research for? Adm Sci Q 60(2):179–188

De Jong SP, Muhonen R (2020) Who benefits from ex ante societal impact evaluation in the European funding arena? A cross-country comparison of societal impact capacity in the social sciences and humanities. Res Eval 29(1):22–33

Deadrick DL, Gibson PA (2007) An examination of the research–practice gap in HR: comparing topics of interest to HR academics and HR professionals. Hum Resour Manag Rev 17(2):131–139

Deadrick DL, Gibson PA (2009) Revisiting the research–practice gap in HR: a longitudinal analysis. Hum Resour Manag Rev 19(2):144–153

DORA Declaration (2012) The San Francisco declaration on research assessment. http://www.ascb.org/dora/

DeNisi AS, Wilson MS, Biteman J (2014) Research and practice in HRM: a historical perspective. Hum Resour Manag Rev 24(3):219–231

Dunbar RLM, Bresser RF (2014) Knowledge generation and governance in management research. J Bus Econ 84(1):129–144

Durette B, Fournier M, Lafon M (2016) The core competencies of PhDs. Stud High Educ 41(8):1355–1370

Eden C, Huxham C (1996) Action research for management research. Br J Manag 7(1):75–86

Espeland WN, Sauder M (2007) Rankings and reactivity: how public measures recreate social worlds. Am J Sociol 113(1):1–40

Festinger L (1962) Cognitive dissonance. Sci Am 207(4):93–106

Flickinger M, Tuschke A, Gruber-Muecke T, Fiedler M (2014) In search of rigor, relevance and legitimacy: what drives the impact of publications? J Bus Econ 84:99–128

Fochler M, Felt U, Müller R (2016) Unsustainable growth, hyper-competition, and worth in life science research: narrowing evaluative repertoires in doctoral and postdoctoral scientists’ work and lives. Minerva 54(2):175–200

Gill C (2018) Don’t know, don’t care: an exploration of evidence-based knowledge and practice in human resource management. Hum Resour Manag Rev 28(2):103–115

Goldfarb B, King AA (2016) Scientific apophenia in strategic management research: significance tests and mistaken inference. Strateg Manag J 37(1):167–176

Gordon RA, Howell JE (1959) Higher education for business. J Bus Educ 35(3):115–117

Guion RM (1965) Personnel testing. McGraw-Hill Companies, New York

Gulati R (2007) Tent poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: the rigor–relevance debate in management research. Acad Manag J 50(4):775–782

Hammarfelt B (2017) Recognition and reward in the academy: valuing publication oeuvres in biomedicine, economics and history. Aslib J Inf Manag 69(5):607–623

Hammarfelt B, De Rijcke S (2015) Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University. Res Eval 24(1):63–77

Hangel N, Schmidt-Pfister D (2017) Why do you publish? On the tensions between generating scientific knowledge and publication pressure. Aslib J Inf Manag 69(5):529–544

Hayes RH, Abernathy WJ (1980) Management minus invention (D2). The New York Times, NewYork

Hemlin S, Rasmussen SB (2006) The shift in academic quality control. Sci Technol Hum Values 31(2):173–198

Hicks D, Wouters P, Waltman L, De Rijcke S, Rafols I (2015) The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature 520(7548):429

Hodgkinson GP, Starkey K (2011) Not simply returning to the same answer over and over again: reframing relevance. Br J Manag 22(3):355–369

Hollingshead AB (1938) Ingroup membership and academic selection. Am Sociol Rev 3(6):826–833

Huff AS, Huff JO (2001) Re-focusing the business school agenda. Br J Manag 12(s1):S49–S54

Ibrahim AM, Lillemoe KD, Klingensmith ME, Dimick JB (2017) Visual abstracts to disseminate research on social media: a prospective, case–control crossover study. Ann Surg 266(6):e46–e48

Jiang K, Lepak DP, Hu J, Baer JC (2012) How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Acad Manag J 55(6):1264–1294

Kelemen M, Bansal P (2002) The conventions of management research and their relevance to management practice. Br J Manag 13(2):97–108

Khurana R (2007) From higher aims to hired hands: the social transformation of American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession. Princeton University Press, Princeton

Book   Google Scholar  

Kieser A, Leiner L (2009) Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. J Manag Stud 46(3):516–533

Kieser A, Leiner L (2012) Collaborate with practitioners: but beware of collaborative research. J Manag Inq 21:14–28

Kieser A, Nicolai A, Seidl D (2015) The practical relevance of management research: turning the debate on relevance into a rigorous scientific research program. Acad Manag Ann 9(1):143–233

Kvale S (2007) Doing interviews. Sage Publications, London

Langbert M (2005) The master’s degree in HRM: midwife to a new profession? Acad Manag Learn Educ 4(4):434–450

Lange T (2013). Evidence-based HRM: a scholarship perspective with a difference. In: Evidence-based HRM: a global forum for empirical scholarship, vol 1, No 1. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp 4–15

Larivière V, Gingras Y (2010) The impact factor’s Matthew effect: a natural experiment in bibliometrics. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 61(2):424–427

Lawler EE (2007) Why HR practices are not evidence-based. Acad Manag J 50(5):1033–1036

Lebel J, McLean R (2018) A better measure of research from the global south. Nature 559(7712):23

Lengnick-Hall ML, Lengnick-Hall CA, Andrade LS, Drake B (2009) Strategic human resource management: the evolution of the field. Hum Resour Manag Rev 19(2):64–85

Lewin AY, Chiu CY, Fey CF, Levine SS, McDermott G, Murmann JP, Tsang E (2016) The critique of empirical social science: new policies at management and organization review. Manag Organ Rev 12(4):649–658

Locke E (2011) Handbook of principles of organizational behavior: indispensable knowledge for evidence-based management. Wiley, New York

Markoulli MP, Lee CI, Byington E, Felps WA (2017) Mapping human resource management: reviewing the field and charting future directions. Hum Resour Manag Rev 27(3):367–396

Mayo E (1933) The human problems of an industrial organization. McMillan, New York

Mcculloch S (2017) Hobson’s choice: the effects of research evaluation on academics’ writing practices in England. Aslib J Inf Manag 69(5):503–515

Merton RK (1957) Priorities in scientific discovery: a chapter in the sociology of science. Am Sociol Rev 22(6):635–659

Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science: the reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159(3810):56–63

Merton RK (1973) The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Miles RE, Snow CC (1984) Designing strategic human resources systems. Org Dyn 13(1):36–52

Mulligan A, Mabe M (2011) The effect of the internet on researcher motivations, behaviour and attitudes. J Document 67(2):290–311

Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (1999) Knowing “what” to do is not enough: turning knowledge into action. Calif Manag Rev 42(1):83–108

Pieper R (1990) Human resource management: an international comparison. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

Pierson FC (1959) The education of American businessmen: a study of university college programs in business administration. McGraw-Hill, New York

Pindur W, Rogers SE, Suk Kim P (1995) The history of management: a global perspective. J Manag Hist 1(1):59–77

Quan W, Chen B, Shu F (2017) Publish or impoverish: an investigation of the monetary reward system of science in China (1999–2016). Aslib J Inf Manag 69(5):486–502

Rau H, Goggins G, Fahy F (2018) From invisibility to impact: recognising the scientific and societal relevance of interdisciplinary sustainability research. Res Policy 47(1):266–276

Roethlisberger FJ, Dickson WJ (1943) Management and the worker: an account of a research program conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Rousseau DM, Manning J, Denyer D (2008) Evidence in management and organizational science: assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Acad Manag Ann 2(1):475–515

Rybnicek R, Bergner S, Gutschelhofer A (2019) How individual needs influence motivation effects: a neuroscientific study on McClelland’s need theory. RMS 13(2):443–482

Rynes SL, Colbert AE, Brown KG (2002) HR professionals’ beliefs about effective human resource practices: correspondence between research and practice. Hum Resour Manag 41(2):149–174

Rynes SL, Giluk TL, Brown KG (2007) The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals in human resource management: implications for evidence-based management. Acad Manag J 50(5):987–1008

Sanders K, van Riemsdijk M, Groen B (2008) The gap between research and practice: a replication study on the HR professionals’ beliefs about effective human resource practices. Int J Hum Resour Manag 19(10):1976–1988

Seeber M, Cattaneo M, Meoli M, Malighetti P (2019) Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions. Res Policy 48(2):478–491  

Shani AB, Coghlan D (2014) Collaborate with practitioners: an alternative perspective a rejoinder to Kieser and Leiner (2012). J Manag Inq 23(4):433–437

Shapiro DL, Kirkman BL, Courtney HG (2007) Perceived causes and solutions of the translation problem in management research. Acad Manag J 50(2):249–266

Shibayama S, Baba Y (2015) Impact-oriented science policies and scientific publication practices: the case of life sciences in Japan. Res Policy 44(4):936–950

Sousa CAA, Hendriks PHJ (2008) Connecting knowledge to management: the case of academic research. Organization 15(6):811–830

Strauss AL, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

Taylor FW (1911) The principles of management. Harper, New York

Taylor EK, Wherry RJ (1951) A study of leniency in two rating systems. Pers Psychol 4(1):39–47

Tenhiälä A, Giluk TL, Kepes S, Simón C, Oh IS, Kim S (2016) The research–practice gap in human resource management: a cross-cultural study. Hum Resour Manag 55(2):179–200

Tijdink JK, Schipper K, Bouter LM, Pont PM, De Jonge J, Smulders YM (2016) How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers. BMJ Open 6(2):e008681

Tsui A (2016) Reflections on the so-called value-free ideal: a call for responsible science in the business schools. Cross Cult Strateg Manag 23(1):4–28

Van de Ven AH, Johnson PE (2006) Knowledge for theory and practice. Acad Manag Rev 31(4):802–821

Vosburgh RM (in press) Closing the academic-practitioner gap: Research must answer the “SO WHAT” question. Hum Resour Manag Rev

Wang J, Peters HP, Guan J (2006) Factors influencing knowledge productivity in German research groups: lessons for developing countries. J Knowl Manag 10(4):113–126

Watermeyer R, Chubb J (2019) Evaluating ‘impact’in the UK’s Research Excellence Framework (REF): liminality, looseness and new modalities of scholarly distinction. Stud High Educ 44(9):1554–1566

Wierzbicki AP, Nakamori Y (2006) Creative space. Springer, Berlin

Wonderlic EF, Hovland CI (1939) The personnel test: a restandardized abridgment of the Otis SA test for business and industrial use. J Appl Psychol 23(6):685–702

Wu L, Wang D, Evans JA (2019) Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature 566(7744):378–382

Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316(5827):1036–1039

Zizzo DJ (2010) Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments. Exp Econ 13(1):75–98

Zollo M, Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ Sci 13(3):339–351

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study has benefited from financing from the Research Project ECO2014-56580-R of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitively, and the Research Projects P12-SEJ-1810 from the Andalusia Government (Spain) and PR2016-018 (Research Projects University of Cadiz).

Author information

The authors appear in alphabetical order and have contributed equitably to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Business Management, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain

Jesús de Frutos-Belizón, Fernando Martín-Alcázar & Gonzalo Sánchez-Gardey

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesús de Frutos-Belizón .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

  • Notes: The academics interviewed appear in alphabetical order. This order is not related to the number assigned to each academic interviewed. All information about the interviewees was obtained through Elsevier’s Scopus database and public information in their CVs
  • *The Centre for Performance-led HR (CPHR) at Lancaster has been successful at bringing together world–class academic experts to work with top HR directors to overcome the most pressing issues facing senior HR specialists. It is a unique partnership between Lancaster University Management School and major corporations and was nominated as one of five Outstanding Employer Engagement Initiatives in the 2009 Times Higher Education Awards
  • **NIHR Patient Safety Translational Research Centres (PSTRCs) work to pull advances in basic research with potential relevance to patient safety into an applied research setting
  • ***The LINK Research Institute, based at Dublin City University Business School, sets out to understand the factors that contribute to successful organisations, both private and public, in Ireland and internationally. The LINK Research Institute enjoys mutually beneficial collaborations with a wide range of organisations. This includes various consulting projects with a wide range of organisations such as: Fáilte Ireland, Enterprise Ireland, The Electricity Supply Board, The Health Service Executive, The Department of Social Protection, Novartis, Intel, Mars, Airbus and Pfizer
  • ****The Global Future of World Foundation aims to help Business, Academia and Goverments around the globe to prepare the workforce of the future for a sustainable world by detecting and predicting trends and paradigms for successful transformation ( http://globalfutureofwork.com/ )
  • + The Institute for Business Research serves as the hub for externally funded business research within the Broad College of Business, and as part of the Michigan State University (MSU) campus-wide research infrastructure, collaborates with other MSU Colleges/Departments as well as the Offices of Regulatory Affairs, MSU Technology, Sponsored Programs, Business Connect and Contract and Grant Administration
  • ++ The People Management Center (PMC) is an organization located with the department of Human Resource Studies at Tilburg University, which serves as a platform for global HR excellence to connect staff and students of the department, TIAS Business School and the business partners in the HR field

Appendix 2: Interview guide

According to your research experience, do you consider that research is individual or collective? What individuals or agents do you collaborate with in the development of your research projects?

Could you say that you have a stable research group? Do you have stable relationships with agents outside the group?

Could you briefly describe how work is normally organized in the research projects in which you participate?

Do you engage with professional partners in the development of research? How was this experience? What difficulties and benefits did you find in these collaborations?

Normally, what motivates your choice of research topics?

Could you specify the different steps of the research processes conducted in your group?

Which of them do you think are more important?

Do you think your research is relevant to the professional community?

Have you ever carried out a research project collaboratively with the professional community?

Do you consider that research in our field must be produced only for academics? Is it considered possible or viable to produce research jointly with the professional community?

How much time would you say that the whole process takes, from the time you have a stimulus to research until the time an output is generated?

What specific steps of the process do you feel are more time-consuming?

Do you usually change your research ideas and initial impressions after contrasting them with the rest of the members of your research team? Do you also do this with non-academic agents?

Does your research group have formal procedures (such as regular meetings) established? Do they incorporate external agents?

Could you say that the group has established routines to develop research activities?

Does your research team have a strong shared culture?

What do you think are the skills, knowledge or experience necessary to carry out a successful academic career? How would you describe a successful researcher in terms of knowledge, skills and experience?

How are these skills distributed in your group? Are there members specialized in some specific activities or phases of the research process?

How would you describe internal relationships within your research team?

Have you ever had communication problems between the members of the unit? How would you describe your communication with external and/or professional agents?

How is your research normally funded?

Do you receive funding from non-academic institutions, such as firms or professional foundations?

How do you think that the prevalent academic culture affects the development of your research?

Could you describe the process through which your research results are disseminated?

What are the criteria used to select the specific means through which research results are disseminated? To what extent do you make use of non-academic or professional channels?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

de Frutos-Belizón, J., Martín-Alcázar, F. & Sánchez-Gardey, G. The research–practice gap in the field of HRM: a qualitative study from the academic side of the gap. Rev Manag Sci 15 , 1465–1515 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00397-x

Download citation

Received : 27 June 2017

Accepted : 01 June 2020

Published : 15 June 2020

Issue Date : August 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00397-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

  • Human resource management research
  • Valley of death
  • Research–practice divide
  • Rigor–relevance gap

JEL Classification

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

  • We're Hiring!
  • Help Center

paper cover thumbnail

Human Resources Management Theories, Policies and Practices: A Review of Literature

Profile image of Olive Egbuta

Related Papers

Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration

Sudhir Saha

research papers in hrm pdf

International Journal of Management Research and Emerging Sciences

Asian Social Science

Ahmed Alkali

Human Resource Management Review

Dianna Stone

Felipe Alejandro Torres Castro

480) matrix, we empirically explore the state of the art in human resource management (HRM) research. The data were obtained through a questionnaire directed to HRM scholars all over the world, in which they were asked about their particular theoretical and methodological approaches. The evidence obtained shows clearly that HRM scholars are progressively abandoning the universalistic perspective and completing their models with contingent and contextual variables. Trying to classify the different contributions proposed and discuss their integration, HRM is described as a field of research with three dimensions: subfunctional, strategic and international. The paper concludes that to provide reliable explanations and valid responses to professional problems, HRM research must advance simultaneously in these three dimensions. As follows from our analysis, there are certain HR issues that still need to be addressed: (1) the strategic use of HR practices, (2) their international applicability, (3) global HR strategies and (4) the synergic integration of HR activities. Nevertheless, to advance our knowledge in these issues, it seems necessary to integrate previous research in subfunctional, strategic and international aspects of HRM.

(F2G-HN) Nguyen Tien Minh Quan

Dian Damayanti

International Journal of Training and Development

Niki Kyriakidou

British Journal of Management

Fernando HR

Drawing on Snow and Thomas's (Journal of Management Studies, 31 (1994), pp. 457–480) matrix, we empirically explore the state of the art in human resource management (HRM) research. The data were obtained through a questionnaire directed to HRM scholars all over the world, in which they were asked about their particular theoretical and methodological approaches. The evidence obtained shows clearly that HRM scholars are progressively abandoning the universalistic perspective and completing their models with contingent and contextual variables. Trying to classify the different contributions proposed and discuss their integration, HRM is described as a field of research with three dimensions: subfunctional, strategic and international. The paper concludes that to provide reliable explanations and valid responses to professional problems, HRM research must advance simultaneously in these three dimensions. As follows from our analysis, there are certain HR issues that still need to be addressed: (1) the strategic use of HR practices, (2) their international applicability, (3) global HR strategies and (4) the synergic integration of HR activities. Nevertheless, to advance our knowledge in these issues, it seems necessary to integrate previous research in subfunctional, strategic and international aspects of HRM.

Human Resource Management Theories: Evaluation of their Significance on People Management Practices in Competitive Organisations

Makara Arthur

Abstract Human resources are at the centre of management of contemporary organisations in order for them to be both resilient to change and competitive. Managing people requires to be grounded in the attendant theories of Human Resources Management (HRM), hence the concept of Strategic Human Resources Management (SHRM). Whereas theories exist, there has been limited linkage of people management strategies and these theories. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate HRM theories and their significance in HRM in competitive organisation. Eleven (11) HRM theories were evaluated, and their strategic role in HRM documented. In addition, their strengths and weaknesses were also developed. It was concluded that HRM theories are very relevant and essential in SHRM in competitive organisations and all HRM ought to understand their relevance and applicability in people management for their organisations to be competitive. Keywords: human resources, theories, competitive organisations, human resources management

RELATED PAPERS

regina gentil

Res Publica

Pascal Verhoest

Julie di Martino

Linda daniele

Applied Sciences

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Muhammad Rajput Talha

Zhanjiang Liu

Reflexão e Ação

Diana Milstein

leonardo jimenez

Chinese Journal of Aeronautics

Vassilis Theofilis

María José Alonso Veloso

Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional

maria maeno

Llelka Vega Herrera

Journal of Lipids

Irina Stavrovskaya

ladan modir

EWU学位证 东华盛顿大学学位证

Journal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés

Memorias del VI Encuentro Provincial de Educación Matemática

Elizabeth Figueroa

UCF毕业证书 中佛罗里达大学学位证

The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

Vikrant Sudan

  •   We're Hiring!
  •   Help Center
  • Find new research papers in:
  • Health Sciences
  • Earth Sciences
  • Cognitive Science
  • Mathematics
  • Computer Science
  • Academia ©2024

Help | Advanced Search

Computer Science > Computation and Language

Title: chameleon: mixed-modal early-fusion foundation models.

Abstract: We present Chameleon, a family of early-fusion token-based mixed-modal models capable of understanding and generating images and text in any arbitrary sequence. We outline a stable training approach from inception, an alignment recipe, and an architectural parameterization tailored for the early-fusion, token-based, mixed-modal setting. The models are evaluated on a comprehensive range of tasks, including visual question answering, image captioning, text generation, image generation, and long-form mixed modal generation. Chameleon demonstrates broad and general capabilities, including state-of-the-art performance in image captioning tasks, outperforms Llama-2 in text-only tasks while being competitive with models such as Mixtral 8x7B and Gemini-Pro, and performs non-trivial image generation, all in a single model. It also matches or exceeds the performance of much larger models, including Gemini Pro and GPT-4V, according to human judgments on a new long-form mixed-modal generation evaluation, where either the prompt or outputs contain mixed sequences of both images and text. Chameleon marks a significant step forward in a unified modeling of full multimodal documents.

Submission history

Access paper:.

  • HTML (experimental)
  • Other Formats

license icon

References & Citations

  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar

BibTeX formatted citation

BibSonomy logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Code, data and media associated with this article, recommenders and search tools.

  • Institution

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

research papers in hrm pdf

Get Started Here:

  • Homeowners & Homebuyers

Search

  • Leadership & Organization
  • Reports & Plans
  • Do Business with Us
  • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
  • Equal Employment Opportunity / No FEAR Act
  • FOIA & Privacy
  • Information Quality
  • Budget, Finances, and Performance
  • Workforce Ombuds
  • FHFA Policies
  • Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac
  • Federal Home Loan Bank System
  • Examiner Resources
  • Legal Documents & Suspensions
  • Rulemaking & Federal Register
  • Advisory Bulletins
  • Dodd-Frank Act Stress Tests
  • LIBOR Transition
  • History of Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac Conservatorships
  • Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements

2024 Scorecard ​

  • FHFA Stats Blog
  • Meet the Experts
  • Mortgage Translations Home
  • Search or Browse Documents
  • COVID-19 Resources
  • Borrower Education Materials
  • Interpretive Services
  • Language Translation Disclosure

Skip Navigation Links.

Working Paper 24-05: Tracking Our Footprint: CO2 Emissions from US Single-Family Homes

​​​​​Becka Brolinson, Jessica Shui, and November Wilson

​​Ab​stract:

We estimate residential energy use and CO2 emissions for single-family homes using administrative data from approximately 45 million property appraisals, or 1.8 billion property-month observations. First, we find that from 2013 to 2021, CO2 emissions decreased by 11.5 percent in aggregate in our sample. Emissions from electricity use decreased by 20.8 percent, while emissions from natural gas use for home heating increased by 11 percent over the same time. Second, we estimate that the majority of the decline in CO2 emissions from properties in our sample can be attributed to the greening of US energy generation, rather than changes over time to property-level characteristics. Third, we show that aggregate emissions estimates from the property-level data closely align with aggregate emissions estimates using publicly available state-level data in 2020, providing validation of our approach using property-level data and demonstrating that for aggregate estimates, state-level data is sufficient.​

Want to Subscribe?

Federal Housing Finance Agency Text

© 2024 Federal Housing Finance Agency

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • View all journals
  • Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • Published: 14 May 2024

2023 summer warmth unparalleled over the past 2,000 years

  • Jan Esper   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3919-014X 1 , 2 ,
  • Max Torbenson   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2720-2238 1 &
  • Ulf Büntgen 2 , 3 , 4  

Nature ( 2024 ) Cite this article

7111 Accesses

3442 Altmetric

Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

  • Climate change
  • Palaeoclimate

Including an exceptionally warm Northern Hemisphere (NH) summer 1 ,2 , 2023 has been reported as the hottest year on record 3-5 . Contextualizing recent anthropogenic warming against past natural variability is nontrivial, however, because the sparse 19 th century meteorological records tend to be too warm 6 . Here, we combine observed and reconstructed June-August (JJA) surface air temperatures to show that 2023 was the warmest NH extra-tropical summer over the past 2000 years exceeding the 95% confidence range of natural climate variability by more than half a degree Celsius. Comparison of the 2023 JJA warming against the coldest reconstructed summer in 536 CE reveals a maximum range of pre-Anthropocene-to-2023 temperatures of 3.93°C. Although 2023 is consistent with a greenhouse gases-induced warming trend 7 that is amplified by an unfolding El Niño event 8 , this extreme emphasizes the urgency to implement international agreements for carbon emission reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

24,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

185,98 € per year

only 3,65 € per issue

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

research papers in hrm pdf

The economic commitment of climate change

research papers in hrm pdf

Urban development pattern’s influence on extreme rainfall occurrences

research papers in hrm pdf

The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979

Author information, authors and affiliations.

Department of Geography, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany

Jan Esper & Max Torbenson

Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic

Jan Esper & Ulf Büntgen

Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Ulf Büntgen

Department of Geography, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Esper .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Esper, J., Torbenson, M. & Büntgen, U. 2023 summer warmth unparalleled over the past 2,000 years. Nature (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07512-y

Download citation

Received : 16 January 2024

Accepted : 02 May 2024

Published : 14 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07512-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

research papers in hrm pdf

IMAGES

  1. (PDF) A review of human resources management research: The past 10

    research papers in hrm pdf

  2. (PDF) The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Job

    research papers in hrm pdf

  3. (PDF) Application of Artificial Intelligence in Human Resource

    research papers in hrm pdf

  4. (PDF) Green Human Resource Management: A Review

    research papers in hrm pdf

  5. 💣 Hr research papers. Sample Research Paper on Human Resources

    research papers in hrm pdf

  6. (PDF) HRM Practices Enhancing Research Performance

    research papers in hrm pdf

VIDEO

  1. RESEARCH ASSISTANT

  2. Spring Journal Project! Let’s Begin!

  3. 10वी बोर्ड सर्व विद्यार्थ्यांची टक्केवारी वाढणार! बोर्डाचा मोठा निर्णय ! SSC HSC board result 2024

  4. ELECTRIC TRUCK MATLAB SIMULINK SIMULATION ELECTRIC VEHICLE TRUCK

  5. Understanding Education: Formal vs. Informal vs. Non-formal #ugcnet #ugcnetexam #education

  6. 18 April 2024

COMMENTS

  1. Impact of human resource management on business performance: A review of literature

    Paper received: 20.01.2019.; Paper accepted: 25.03.2019. In this paper the influence of human resource management (HRM) on business performance is. analyzed. The main goal was to thoroughly and ...

  2. A Systematic Review of Human Resource Management Systems and Their

    papers. We would also like to thank David Allen and the two anonymous reviewers for the useful and construc-tive feedback during the review process. Dave Lepak passed away on December 7, 2017. He had an important role in developing the ideas in this paper. Dave's profound impact on the strategic HRM field will be long last-

  3. Innovation and human resource management: a systematic literature review

    When examining the research methods of the publications, we found that the majority, namely 20 studies (55.6%), were quantitative by nature, followed by 11 (30.6%) qualitative studies. Among them, four (11%) were conceptual, and one (2.8%) was a mixed-method study that applied qualitative and quantitative methods.

  4. The employee perspective on HR practices: A systematic literature

    1. Employee Perceptions of HRM as an Antecedent, Mediator, or Outcome. Nishii and Wright (Citation 2008) developed the SHRM process framework to unravel the link between HRM and performance to shed light on the processes through which HR practices impact organizational performance (Jiang et al., Citation 2013).The starting point of the SHRM process model is the concept of variation.

  5. Human Resource Management Journal

    The Human Resource Management Journal has published several research papers exploring various aspects of HR in contexts of change and turmoil from a number of perspectives. This virtual special issue on HRM in times of turmoil brings together a collection of papers which, when viewed together can help shed light on some of the challenges and ...

  6. Human Resource Management Review

    Conceptual Development for Future Research The Human Resource Management Review (HRMR) is a quarterly academic journal devoted to the publication of scholarly conceptual/theoretical articles pertaining to human resource management and allied fields (e.g. industrial/organizational psychology, human capital, labor relations, organizational behavior). ). HRMR welcomes manuscripts that focus on ...

  7. PDF Human resource management and human resource development: Evolution and

    Nicole Richman, MBA. George Fox University, doctoral student, [email protected]. Abstract. Research agrees that a high performance organization (HPO) cannot exist without an elevated value placed on human resource management (HRM) and human resource development (HRD). However, a complementary pairing of HRM and HRD has not always existed.

  8. Human Resource Management

    Human Resource Management has strong global recognition and readership, and is filled with conceptual and empirical articles that uniquely advance the academic literature as well as having clear practical implications. We accept cutting-edge research and thought leadership on micro-, macro-, or multi-level phenomena relating to all HRM topics and issues, and utilize the full range of ...

  9. HRM practices and innovation: an empirical systematic review

    The relationship between human resource management practices (HRMP) and innovation has been described as a black box, where a lot still needs to be investigated. Thus, the aim of this paper is to investigate the nature of the link that exists between HRMP and innovation in both public and private organizations.

  10. Agile human resource management: A systematic mapping study

    Over the last two decades, the relationship between human resources (HR) and organisational performance has been the dominant theme in the human resources management (HRM) literature (Nijssen and Paauwe, 2012).However, authors (e.g. Dyer and Shafer, 1998; Paauwe and Boselie, 2003) argue that HRM is not only about organisational performance, but also involves other capabilities like flexibility ...

  11. PDF The Role and Impact of Human Resource Management

    Figure 1. Model of the mediation design: HRM practices affect work engagement indirectly through relational psychological contracts. The present study contributes theoretically to research on HRM (Jiang et al., 2012) by examining HRM practices with work engagement as an outcome. Despite the high likelihood

  12. PDF AI in Human Resource Management: Literature Review and Research

    HRM practices refer to all management decisions and behaviors that affect organiza-tion-employee relationships (Beer et al., 1984), which, in turn, can affect productiv-ity and organizational sustainability (Ulrich et al., 2012). This paper focuses on six important modules of HRM that include human resource planning (HRP), recruit-

  13. Full article: Imprinting in HR process research: a systematic review

    Introduction. Strategic human resource management (HRM) research has traditionally adopted a firm-level, employer-focused approach to examine the relationship between (one or a set of) HR practices and employees and organisational outcomes (Wright & Ulrich, Citation 2017).Despite the body of valuable knowledge gleaned from this body of work (known as HR content research; Sanders et al ...

  14. Full article: Important issues in human resource management

    In this fourth annual review issue published by The International Journal of Human Resource Management (IJHRM), we are delighted to present five articles that cover some of the important areas in people management in contemporary work settings. Our review articles cover topics that are less well-researched, compared with some popular themes, as ...

  15. The research-practice gap in the field of HRM: a ...

    In recent studies, researchers agree that there is a substantial gap between research and practice in the field of human resource management (HRM). The literature exploring the causes and consequences of this gap does not represent a finely structured discourse; it has focused on analysing the gap from the practitioner side, and it is based on opinions and theoretical discussions rather than ...

  16. (Pdf) the Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational

    INSTITUTE OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH Business Administration Department THE IMPACT OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: Case Study of Private Banks in TRNC (MBA Thesis) Ugonna I. AGUTA Supervisor Assoc. Prof. Dr. Hasret BALCIOGLU Nicosia - 2013 CYPRUS INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF GRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH ABSTRACT In recent years, the Turkish ...

  17. (PDF) Human Resources Management Theories, Policies and Practices: A

    Academia.edu is a platform for academics to share research papers. Human Resources Management Theories, Policies and Practices: A Review of Literature ... Download Free PDF. Human Resources Management Theories, Policies and Practices: A Review of Literature ... Concepts, contexts, and mindsets: Putting human resource management vii. research in ...

  18. A Systematic Review of Human Resource Management Systems and Their

    Strategic human resource management (SHRM) research increasingly focuses on the performance effects of human resource (HR) systems rather than individual HR practices (Combs, Liu, Hall, & Ketchen, 2006).Researchers tend to agree that the focus should be on systems because employees are simultaneously exposed to an interrelated set of HR practices rather than single practices one at a time, and ...

  19. PDF HRM studies focus on

    The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33:3, 444-471, DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2019.1711443 } Geoffrey Wood & Christine Bischoff. 2021. Human Resources Management in South Africa: context, issues and trends. Rogovsky, N. and Cooke, F. (Eds.). Towards a human-centred agenda: Human resource management in the BRICS countries in the face

  20. Chameleon: Mixed-Modal Early-Fusion Foundation Models

    View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: We present Chameleon, a family of early-fusion token-based mixed-modal models capable of understanding and generating images and text in any arbitrary sequence. We outline a stable training approach from inception, an alignment recipe, and an architectural parameterization tailored for the early-fusion, token-based, mixed-modal setting.

  21. PDF Surveilling the Masses with Wi-Fi-Based Positioning Systems

    1)The paper identifies an impactful vulnerability in Ap-ple's Wi-Fi positioning system and demonstrates ways of exploiting it to track users, including in the context of military and natural disaster situations. 2)The paper collects a longitudinal dataset that could benefit future research. 3)The paper provides recommendations for remediation.

  22. Working Paper 24-05: Tracking Our Footprint: CO2 Emissions from US

    Fairness We value varied perspectives and thoughts and treat others with impartiality. Accountability We are responsible for carrying out our work with transparency and professional excellence. Integrity We are committed to the highest ethical and professional standards to inspire trust and confidence in our work. Respect We treat others with dignity, share information and resources, and ...

  23. 2023 summer warmth unparalleled over the past 2,000 years

    Here, we combine observed and reconstructed June-August (JJA) surface air temperatures to show that 2023 was the warmest NH extra-tropical summer over the past 2000 years exceeding the 95% ...

  24. (Pdf) a Review on Digital Transformation in Human Resource Management

    Abstract and Figures. The digital revolution has profoundly impacted various facets of contemporary organizational management, none more so than human resources (HR) management. This paper ...

  25. PDF Deep Dive into the Unfading Sea Haze

    Besides the Word documents and pdf files, the threat actor also collected files related to messaging apps such as Telegram and Viber. ... With deep investments in research and development, Bitdefender Labs discovers over 400 new threats each minute and validates around 40 billion daily threat queries. The company has pioneered breakthrough ...