critical discourse analysis master thesis

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• Critical Discourse Analysis | Definition, Guide & Examples

Critical Discourse Analysis | Definition, Guide & Examples

Published on August 23, 2019 by Amy Luo . Revised on June 22, 2023.

Critical discourse analysis (or discourse analysis) is a research method for studying written or spoken language in relation to its social context. It aims to understand how language is used in real life situations.

When you conduct discourse analysis, you might focus on:

• The purposes and effects of different types of language
• Cultural rules and conventions in communication
• How values, beliefs and assumptions are communicated
• How language use relates to its social, political and historical context

Discourse analysis is a common qualitative research method in many humanities and social science disciplines, including linguistics, sociology, anthropology, psychology and cultural studies.  

Table of contents

What is discourse analysis used for, how is discourse analysis different from other methods, how to conduct discourse analysis, other interesting articles.

Conducting discourse analysis means examining how language functions and how meaning is created in different social contexts. It can be applied to any instance of written or oral language, as well as non-verbal aspects of communication such as tone and gestures.

Materials that are suitable for discourse analysis include:

• Books, newspapers and periodicals
• Marketing material, such as brochures and advertisements
• Business and government documents
• Websites, forums, social media posts and comments
• Interviews and conversations

By analyzing these types of discourse, researchers aim to gain an understanding of social groups and how they communicate.

Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check.

Unlike linguistic approaches that focus only on the rules of language use, discourse analysis emphasizes the contextual meaning of language.

It focuses on the social aspects of communication and the ways people use language to achieve specific effects (e.g. to build trust, to create doubt, to evoke emotions, or to manage conflict).

Instead of focusing on smaller units of language, such as sounds, words or phrases, discourse analysis is used to study larger chunks of language, such as entire conversations, texts, or collections of texts. The selected sources can be analyzed on multiple levels.

Discourse analysis is a qualitative and interpretive method of analyzing texts (in contrast to more systematic methods like content analysis ). You make interpretations based on both the details of the material itself and on contextual knowledge.

There are many different approaches and techniques you can use to conduct discourse analysis, but the steps below outline the basic structure you need to follow. Following these steps can help you avoid pitfalls of confirmation bias that can cloud your analysis.

Step 1: Define the research question and select the content of analysis

To do discourse analysis, you begin with a clearly defined research question . Once you have developed your question, select a range of material that is appropriate to answer it.

Discourse analysis is a method that can be applied both to large volumes of material and to smaller samples, depending on the aims and timescale of your research.

Step 2: Gather information and theory on the context

Next, you must establish the social and historical context in which the material was produced and intended to be received. Gather factual details of when and where the content was created, who the author is, who published it, and whom it was disseminated to.

As well as understanding the real-life context of the discourse, you can also conduct a literature review on the topic and construct a theoretical framework to guide your analysis.

Step 3: Analyze the content for themes and patterns

This step involves closely examining various elements of the material – such as words, sentences, paragraphs, and overall structure – and relating them to attributes, themes, and patterns relevant to your research question.

Step 4: Review your results and draw conclusions

Once you have assigned particular attributes to elements of the material, reflect on your results to examine the function and meaning of the language used. Here, you will consider your analysis in relation to the broader context that you established earlier to draw conclusions that answer your research question.

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Normal distribution
• Measures of central tendency
• Chi square tests
• Confidence interval
• Quartiles & Quantiles
• Cluster sampling
• Stratified sampling
• Thematic analysis
• Cohort study
• Peer review
• Ethnography

Research bias

• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Conformity bias
• Hawthorne effect
• Availability heuristic
• Attrition bias
• Social desirability bias

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Luo, A. (2023, June 22). Critical Discourse Analysis | Definition, Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved September 23, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/discourse-analysis/

Is this article helpful?

Other students also liked

What is qualitative research | methods & examples, what is a case study | definition, examples & methods, how to do thematic analysis | step-by-step guide & examples, get unlimited documents corrected.

✔ Free APA citation check included ✔ Unlimited document corrections ✔ Specialized in correcting academic texts

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, automatically generate references for free.

• Knowledge Base
• Methodology
• Critical Discourse Analysis | Definition, Guide & Examples

Critical Discourse Analysis | Definition, Guide & Examples

Published on 5 May 2022 by Amy Luo . Revised on 5 December 2022.

Discourse analysis is a research method for studying written or spoken language in relation to its social context. It aims to understand how language is used in real-life situations.

When you do discourse analysis, you might focus on:

• The purposes and effects of different types of language
• Cultural rules and conventions in communication
• How values, beliefs, and assumptions are communicated
• How language use relates to its social, political, and historical context

Discourse analysis is a common qualitative research method in many humanities and social science disciplines, including linguistics, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and cultural studies. It is also called critical discourse analysis.

Table of contents

What is discourse analysis used for, how is discourse analysis different from other methods, how to conduct discourse analysis.

Conducting discourse analysis means examining how language functions and how meaning is created in different social contexts. It can be applied to any instance of written or oral language, as well as non-verbal aspects of communication, such as tone and gestures.

Materials that are suitable for discourse analysis include:

• Books, newspapers, and periodicals
• Marketing material, such as brochures and advertisements
• Business and government documents
• Websites, forums, social media posts, and comments
• Interviews and conversations

By analysing these types of discourse, researchers aim to gain an understanding of social groups and how they communicate.

Prevent plagiarism, run a free check.

Unlike linguistic approaches that focus only on the rules of language use, discourse analysis emphasises the contextual meaning of language.

It focuses on the social aspects of communication and the ways people use language to achieve specific effects (e.g., to build trust, to create doubt, to evoke emotions, or to manage conflict).

Instead of focusing on smaller units of language, such as sounds, words, or phrases, discourse analysis is used to study larger chunks of language, such as entire conversations, texts, or collections of texts. The selected sources can be analysed on multiple levels.

Discourse analysis is a qualitative and interpretive method of analysing texts (in contrast to more systematic methods like content analysis ). You make interpretations based on both the details of the material itself and on contextual knowledge.

There are many different approaches and techniques you can use to conduct discourse analysis, but the steps below outline the basic structure you need to follow.

Step 1: Define the research question and select the content of analysis

To do discourse analysis, you begin with a clearly defined research question . Once you have developed your question, select a range of material that is appropriate to answer it.

Discourse analysis is a method that can be applied both to large volumes of material and to smaller samples, depending on the aims and timescale of your research.

Step 2: Gather information and theory on the context

Next, you must establish the social and historical context in which the material was produced and intended to be received. Gather factual details of when and where the content was created, who the author is, who published it, and whom it was disseminated to.

As well as understanding the real-life context of the discourse, you can also conduct a literature review on the topic and construct a theoretical framework to guide your analysis.

Step 3: Analyse the content for themes and patterns

This step involves closely examining various elements of the material – such as words, sentences, paragraphs, and overall structure – and relating them to attributes, themes, and patterns relevant to your research question.

Step 4: Review your results and draw conclusions

Once you have assigned particular attributes to elements of the material, reflect on your results to examine the function and meaning of the language used. Here, you will consider your analysis in relation to the broader context that you established earlier to draw conclusions that answer your research question.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

Luo, A. (2022, December 05). Critical Discourse Analysis | Definition, Guide & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 27 September 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/research-methods/discourse-analysis-explained/

Is this article helpful?

Other students also liked

Case study | definition, examples & methods, how to do thematic analysis | guide & examples, content analysis | a step-by-step guide with examples.

Master's Thesis - Critical Disourse Analysis: Media Representation of the Refugee (Magistrsko delo - Kritična analiza diskurza medijskih reprezentacij begunca)

• September 2020
• Thesis for: MA in Cultural Studies
• Advisor: dr. Mitja Velikonja

• The Peace Institute - Institute for Contemporary Social and Political Studies

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations

• Karla Schultz
• Julia Kristeva
• Leon S. Roudiez

• Harold S. Vogelaar
• John L. Esposito
• Marianne W. Jorgensen

• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

• Access through  your organization
• Purchase PDF

Article preview

Introduction, section snippets, references (36), cited by (156).

Journal of English for Academic Purposes

A discourse analysis of master's theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions, overall organization of thesis, concluding comments, the apprentice approach to advanced academic literacy: graduate students and their mentors, english for specific purposes, the structure of phd conclusion chapters, non-native speaker graduate students' thesis/dissertation writing in science: self-reports by students and their advisors from two us institutions, a genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations, humble servants of the discipline self-mention in research articles, authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic writing, journal of pragmatics, the use of personal pronouns: role relationships in scientific journal articles, contrastive esp rhetoric: metatext in finnish–english economic texts, thesis and dissertation writing: an examination of published advice and actual practice, introductions in research articles: variations across disciplines, points of focus and position: intertextual reference in phd theses.

• Ahmad, U. K. (1997). Scientific research articles in Malay: A situated discourse analysis. Unpublished doctoral...

Social context and socially constructed texts: The initiation of a graduate student into a writing research community

Generic moves in phd thesis introductions, local interactions: constructing contexts for composing in a graduate sociology program, informal elements in english academic writing: threats or opportunities for advanced non-native speakers, genre analysis: an investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of msc dissertations, genre analysis: an approach to text analysis for esp, a cross-disciplinary investigation of multi-word expressions in the moves of research article abstracts, form and function of citations in discussion sections of master's theses and research articles.

The student writers in this study tend to use integral citations more frequently than the published writers, indicating a preference for granting prominence to individual authors. What is also noteworthy is that the percentage of integral citations is higher in the discussion sections than in the introductions of these same biology theses, where only 12% of citations were integral compared to 27.9% in the discussions, showing that citation use can vary across parts of the same genre which fulfill different discourse functions (see Samraj (2008) for results from an analysis of master's thesis introductions). The results of the analysis using this framework shed some interesting light on citation use by student writers and experts in biology and are provided in Table 2.

Metadiscourse repertoire of L1 Mandarin undergraduates writing in English: A cross-contextual, cross-disciplinary study

In research describing frequency of occurrence of specified linguistic features, practice varies as to the reporting of quantitative results. Studies based on smaller corpora, such as Bruce (2010) or Samraj (2008) discussed above, seem to present raw counts. Studies based on larger corpora, such as Hyland (2009) or Lafuente Millan (2010) tend to present frequencies per 10,000 words.

Commenting on results in published research articles and masters dissertations in Language Teaching

A classification of genre families in university student writing, issues in the development of the british academic written english (bawe) corpus.

• Bibliography
• More Referencing guides Blog Automated transliteration Relevant bibliographies by topics
• Automated transliteration
• Relevant bibliographies by topics
• Referencing guides

Postcolonial Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method

• First Online: 16 October 2019

Cite this chapter

• Ruth Sanz Sabido 2  

1910 Accesses

3 Citations

This chapter explains the tenets of Postcolonial Critical Discourse Analysis (PCDA) as a theoretical and methodological framework. It introduces the notion of the ‘postcolonial’ and ‘Orientalism’, before providing a review of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), and the connections between language and social structures of power. It then focuses on the ways in which both Postcolonial Theory and Critical Discourse Analysis share an interest in resisting social structures that are based on unequal relations of power. This theoretical framework is complemented by a methodological approach, which is based on an adaptation of historical approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis, which also includes quantitative Content Analysis. Finally, it explains the sampling criteria and the process of data collection and analysis for this research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abell, J., & Myers, G. (2008). Analysing research interviews. In Qualitative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Google Scholar  

Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1977). The culture industry: Enlightenment as mass deception. In J. Curran, et al. (Eds.), Mass Communication and Society . London: Arnold.

Allen, R., & Frost, J. (1981). Daily Mirror . Cambridge: Patrick Stephens.

Anania, F. (2010). La metodología de la investigación histórica y los medios de comunicación. In J. C. Ibáñez & F. Anania (Eds.), Memoria Histórica e Identidad en Cine y Televisión (pp. 17–37). Zamora: Comunicación Social.

Ayerst, D. (1971). Guardian: Biography of a Newspaper . London: Collins.

Bell, A. (1991). The Language of News Media . Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Bhabha, H. K. (1985). Signs taken for wonders. In B. Ashcroft, et al. (Eds.) (2006), The Post-colonial Studies Reader (pp. 38–43). London: Routledge.

Blanton, R., et al. (2001). Colonial style and post-colonial ethnic conflict in Africa. Journal of Peace Research, 38, 473–491.

Article   Google Scholar  

Brunt, R., & Cere, R. (Eds.). (2011). Postcolonial Media Culture in Britain . Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Carroll, C., & King, P. (Eds.). (2003). Ireland and Postcolonial Theory . Cork: Cork University Press.

Carvalho, A. (2008). Media(ted) discourse and society: Rethinking the framework of Critical Discourse Analysis. Journalism Studies, 9 (2), 161–177.

Cere, R. (2011). Postcolonial and media studies: A cognitive map. In R. Brunt & R. Cere (Eds.), Postcolonial Media Culture in Britain (pp. 1–13). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Chippindale, P., & Horrie, C. (1999). Stick It Up Your Punter! The Uncut Story of the Sun Newspaper . London: Simon & Schuster.

Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Couldry, N. (2008). Media discourse and the naturalisation of categories. In R. Wodak & V. Koller (Eds.), Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere (pp. 67–88). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Deacon, D., et al. (1999). Researching Communications: A Practical Guide to Methods in Media and Cultural Analysis . London: Arnold.

Downing, D. (2004). Africa: Postcolonial Conflict . Oxford: Heinemann.

Eagleton, T. (1998). Postcolonialism: The case of Ireland. In D. Bennett (Ed.), Multicultural States: Rethinking Difference and Identity . London: Routledge.

Edelman, M. (1966). The Mirror: A Political History . London: Hamish Hamilton.

Escandell Vidal, M. V. (2009). El significado. In M. V. Escandell Vidal, et al. (Eds.), El lenguaje humano . Madrid: Editorial Universitaria Ramón Areces.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power . London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse . London: Edward Arnold.

Fairclough, N. (2009a). A Dialectical-Relational Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis in social research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 162–186). London: Sage.

Fairclough, N. (2009b). Language, reality and power. In J. Culpeper, et al. (Eds.), English Language: Description, Variation and Context (pp. 512–522). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T. (1979). Language and Control . London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Fowler, R., & Kress, G. (1979). Critical linguistics. In R. Fowler, et al. (Eds.), Language and Control (pp. 185–213). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Gandhi, L. (1998). Postcolonial Theory: A Critical Introduction . Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time . New York: Pantheon Books.

Ghandour, Z. B. (2010). A Discourse on Domination in Mandate Palestine: Imperialism, Property and Insurgency . Abingdon: Routledge.

Goldsworthy, D. (1971). Colonial Issues in British Politics 1945–1962: From ‘Colonial Development’ to ‘Wind of Change’ . London: Oxford University Press.

Hall, S. (Ed.). (1997). Representations: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices . London: Sage.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the Functions of Language . London: Edward Arnold.

Hansen, A. (Ed.). (2008). Mass Communication Research Methods . London: Sage.

Harper, G. (Ed.). (2001). Colonial and Post-colonial Incarceration . London: Continuum.

Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1993). Language as Ideology . London: Routledge.

Hooper, G., & Graham, C. (Eds.). (2002). Irish and Postcolonial Writing: History, Theory, Practice . Hampshire: Palgrave.

Hyatt, D. (2005). Time for a change: A Critical Discoursal Analysis of synchronic context with diachronic relevance. Discourse & Society, 16 (4), 543–560.

Kabir, A. J. (2009). Territory of Desire: Representing the Valley of Kashmir . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Book   Google Scholar  

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology . London: Sage.

Krishna, S. (2009). Globalization and Postcolonialism: Hegemony and Resistance in the Twenty-first Century . Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.

Krupat, A. (1996). Postcolonialism, ideology, and Native American literature. In B. Ashcroft, et al. (Eds.) (2006), The Post-colonial Studies Reader (pp. 176–179). London: Routledge.

Lazar, M. M. (Ed.). (2007). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lazar, M. M. (Ed.). (2008). Language, communication and the public sphere: A perspective from Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. In R. Wodak & V. Koller (Eds.), Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere (pp. 89–110). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Loomba, A. (1998). Colonialism/Postcolonialism . London: Routledge.

Macdonald, M. (2011). Discourses of separation: News and documentary representations of Muslims in Britain. In R. Brunt & R. Cere (Eds.), Postcolonial Media Culture in Britain (pp. 127–141). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Magdoff, H. (1978). Imperialism: From the Colonial Age to the Present Essays . New York: Monthly Review Press.

Manning, P. (2001). News and News Sources: A Critical Introduction . London: Sage.

Martin, G. (2010). Understanding Terrorism: Challenges, Perspectives, and Issues . London: Sage.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause . London: Continuum.

Matar, D. (2011). What It Means to Be Palestinian: Stories of Palestinian Peoplehood . London: I.B. Tauris.

Memmi, A. (2003). The Colonizer and the Colonized . London: Earthscan.

Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The Content Analysis Guidebook . London: Sage.

Nunan, D. (1993). Introducing Discourse Analysis . London: Penguin.

Oberhuber, F., & Krzyzanowski, M. (2008). Discourse analysis and ethnography. In R. Wodak & M. Krzyzanowski (Eds.), Qualitative Discourse Analysis in Social Sciences (pp. 182–203). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Prakash, G. (1995). After colonialism. In G. Prakash (Ed.), After Colonialism: Imperial Histories and Postcolonial Displacements . Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 87–121). London: Sage.

Riffe, D., et al. (2005). Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research . London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Said, E. W. (1978). Orientalism . London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Sardar, Z. (1999). Orientalism . Buckingham: Open University Press.

Schrøder, K. C. (2012). Discursive realities. In K. B. Jensen (Ed.), A Handbook of Media and Communication Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methodologies (pp. 106–130). Abingdon: Routledge.

Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice . London: Routledge.

Shindler, C. (2004). Reading The Guardian : Jews, Israel-Palestine and the origins of irritation. In T. Parfitt & Y. Egorova (Eds.), Jews, Muslims and Mass Media: Mediating the ‘Other’ (pp. 157–177). London: Routledge.

Smith, A. (2000). The fall and fall of the third Daily Herald , 1930–1964. In P. Catterall, C. Seymour-Ure, & A. Smith (Eds.), Northcliffe’s Legacy: Aspects of the British Popular Press, 1896–1996 . Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1977). Constructing Social Problems . New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Stewart, G. (2005). The History of The Times . London: HarperCollins.

Taylor, G. (1993). Changing Faces: A History of the Guardian, 1956–88 . London: Fourth Estate.

Thiong’o, N. W. (1981). The language of African literature. In B. Ashcroft, et al. (Eds.) (2006), The Post-colonial Studies Reader (pp. 263–265). London: Routledge.

Tiffin, H. (1987). Post-colonial literatures and counter-discourse. In B. Ashcroft, et al. (Eds.) (2006), The Post-colonial Studies Reader (pp. 99–101). London: Routledge.

Toolan, M. (1997). What is Critical Discourse Analysis and why are people saying such terrible things about it? Language and Literature, 6 (2), 83–103.

Trew, T. (1979). Theory and ideology at work. In R. Fowler, et al. (Eds.), Language and Control (pp. 94–116). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Tyrwhitt-Drake, H. (1999). Resisting the discourse of Critical Discourse Analysis: Reopening a Hong Kong case study. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1081–1088.

van Dijk, T. A. (1984). Prejudice in Discourse: An Analysis of Ethnic Prejudice in Cognition and Conversation . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse & Society, 4 (2), 249–283.

Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic Content Analysis . London: Sage.

Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (2003). Introduction: Theory, interdisciplinarity and Critical Discourse Analysis. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity (pp. 1–32). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Widdowson, H. G. (1995). Discourse analysis: A critical view. Language and Literature, 4 (3), 157–172.

Wodak, R. (Ed.). (1989). Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Wodak, R. (2009). Language and politics. In J. Culpeper, et al. (Eds.), English Language: Description, Variation and Context (pp. 576–593). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis . London: Sage.

Young, R. (2001). Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction . Oxford: Blackwell.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UK

Ruth Sanz Sabido

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth Sanz Sabido .

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Sanz Sabido, R. (2019). Postcolonial Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. In: The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict in the British Press. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52646-5_2

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52646-5_2

Published : 16 October 2019

Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, London

Print ISBN : 978-1-137-52645-8

Online ISBN : 978-1-137-52646-5

eBook Packages : Literature, Cultural and Media Studies Literature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research