assignment 6 1 study guide questions

Understanding Assignments

What this handout is about.

The first step in any successful college writing venture is reading the assignment. While this sounds like a simple task, it can be a tough one. This handout will help you unravel your assignment and begin to craft an effective response. Much of the following advice will involve translating typical assignment terms and practices into meaningful clues to the type of writing your instructor expects. See our short video for more tips.

Basic beginnings

Regardless of the assignment, department, or instructor, adopting these two habits will serve you well :

• Read the assignment carefully as soon as you receive it. Do not put this task off—reading the assignment at the beginning will save you time, stress, and problems later. An assignment can look pretty straightforward at first, particularly if the instructor has provided lots of information. That does not mean it will not take time and effort to complete; you may even have to learn a new skill to complete the assignment.
• Ask the instructor about anything you do not understand. Do not hesitate to approach your instructor. Instructors would prefer to set you straight before you hand the paper in. That’s also when you will find their feedback most useful.

Assignment formats

Many assignments follow a basic format. Assignments often begin with an overview of the topic, include a central verb or verbs that describe the task, and offer some additional suggestions, questions, or prompts to get you started.

An Overview of Some Kind

The instructor might set the stage with some general discussion of the subject of the assignment, introduce the topic, or remind you of something pertinent that you have discussed in class. For example:

“Throughout history, gerbils have played a key role in politics,” or “In the last few weeks of class, we have focused on the evening wear of the housefly …”

The Task of the Assignment

Pay attention; this part tells you what to do when you write the paper. Look for the key verb or verbs in the sentence. Words like analyze, summarize, or compare direct you to think about your topic in a certain way. Also pay attention to words such as how, what, when, where, and why; these words guide your attention toward specific information. (See the section in this handout titled “Key Terms” for more information.)

“Analyze the effect that gerbils had on the Russian Revolution”, or “Suggest an interpretation of housefly undergarments that differs from Darwin’s.”

Additional Material to Think about

Here you will find some questions to use as springboards as you begin to think about the topic. Instructors usually include these questions as suggestions rather than requirements. Do not feel compelled to answer every question unless the instructor asks you to do so. Pay attention to the order of the questions. Sometimes they suggest the thinking process your instructor imagines you will need to follow to begin thinking about the topic.

“You may wish to consider the differing views held by Communist gerbils vs. Monarchist gerbils, or Can there be such a thing as ‘the housefly garment industry’ or is it just a home-based craft?”

These are the instructor’s comments about writing expectations:

“Be concise”, “Write effectively”, or “Argue furiously.”

Technical Details

These instructions usually indicate format rules or guidelines.

“Your paper must be typed in Palatino font on gray paper and must not exceed 600 pages. It is due on the anniversary of Mao Tse-tung’s death.”

The assignment’s parts may not appear in exactly this order, and each part may be very long or really short. Nonetheless, being aware of this standard pattern can help you understand what your instructor wants you to do.

Interpreting the assignment

Ask yourself a few basic questions as you read and jot down the answers on the assignment sheet:

Why did your instructor ask you to do this particular task?

Who is your audience.

• What kind of evidence do you need to support your ideas?

What kind of writing style is acceptable?

• What are the absolute rules of the paper?

Try to look at the question from the point of view of the instructor. Recognize that your instructor has a reason for giving you this assignment and for giving it to you at a particular point in the semester. In every assignment, the instructor has a challenge for you. This challenge could be anything from demonstrating an ability to think clearly to demonstrating an ability to use the library. See the assignment not as a vague suggestion of what to do but as an opportunity to show that you can handle the course material as directed. Paper assignments give you more than a topic to discuss—they ask you to do something with the topic. Keep reminding yourself of that. Be careful to avoid the other extreme as well: do not read more into the assignment than what is there.

Of course, your instructor has given you an assignment so that they will be able to assess your understanding of the course material and give you an appropriate grade. But there is more to it than that. Your instructor has tried to design a learning experience of some kind. Your instructor wants you to think about something in a particular way for a particular reason. If you read the course description at the beginning of your syllabus, review the assigned readings, and consider the assignment itself, you may begin to see the plan, purpose, or approach to the subject matter that your instructor has created for you. If you still aren’t sure of the assignment’s goals, try asking the instructor. For help with this, see our handout on getting feedback .

Given your instructor’s efforts, it helps to answer the question: What is my purpose in completing this assignment? Is it to gather research from a variety of outside sources and present a coherent picture? Is it to take material I have been learning in class and apply it to a new situation? Is it to prove a point one way or another? Key words from the assignment can help you figure this out. Look for key terms in the form of active verbs that tell you what to do.

Key Terms: Finding Those Active Verbs

Here are some common key words and definitions to help you think about assignment terms:

Information words Ask you to demonstrate what you know about the subject, such as who, what, when, where, how, and why.

• define —give the subject’s meaning (according to someone or something). Sometimes you have to give more than one view on the subject’s meaning
• describe —provide details about the subject by answering question words (such as who, what, when, where, how, and why); you might also give details related to the five senses (what you see, hear, feel, taste, and smell)
• explain —give reasons why or examples of how something happened
• illustrate —give descriptive examples of the subject and show how each is connected with the subject
• summarize —briefly list the important ideas you learned about the subject
• trace —outline how something has changed or developed from an earlier time to its current form
• research —gather material from outside sources about the subject, often with the implication or requirement that you will analyze what you have found

Relation words Ask you to demonstrate how things are connected.

• compare —show how two or more things are similar (and, sometimes, different)
• contrast —show how two or more things are dissimilar
• apply—use details that you’ve been given to demonstrate how an idea, theory, or concept works in a particular situation
• cause —show how one event or series of events made something else happen
• relate —show or describe the connections between things

Interpretation words Ask you to defend ideas of your own about the subject. Do not see these words as requesting opinion alone (unless the assignment specifically says so), but as requiring opinion that is supported by concrete evidence. Remember examples, principles, definitions, or concepts from class or research and use them in your interpretation.

• assess —summarize your opinion of the subject and measure it against something
• prove, justify —give reasons or examples to demonstrate how or why something is the truth
• evaluate, respond —state your opinion of the subject as good, bad, or some combination of the two, with examples and reasons
• support —give reasons or evidence for something you believe (be sure to state clearly what it is that you believe)
• synthesize —put two or more things together that have not been put together in class or in your readings before; do not just summarize one and then the other and say that they are similar or different—you must provide a reason for putting them together that runs all the way through the paper
• analyze —determine how individual parts create or relate to the whole, figure out how something works, what it might mean, or why it is important
• argue —take a side and defend it with evidence against the other side

More Clues to Your Purpose As you read the assignment, think about what the teacher does in class:

• What kinds of textbooks or coursepack did your instructor choose for the course—ones that provide background information, explain theories or perspectives, or argue a point of view?
• In lecture, does your instructor ask your opinion, try to prove their point of view, or use keywords that show up again in the assignment?
• What kinds of assignments are typical in this discipline? Social science classes often expect more research. Humanities classes thrive on interpretation and analysis.
• How do the assignments, readings, and lectures work together in the course? Instructors spend time designing courses, sometimes even arguing with their peers about the most effective course materials. Figuring out the overall design to the course will help you understand what each assignment is meant to achieve.

Now, what about your reader? Most undergraduates think of their audience as the instructor. True, your instructor is a good person to keep in mind as you write. But for the purposes of a good paper, think of your audience as someone like your roommate: smart enough to understand a clear, logical argument, but not someone who already knows exactly what is going on in your particular paper. Remember, even if the instructor knows everything there is to know about your paper topic, they still have to read your paper and assess your understanding. In other words, teach the material to your reader.

Aiming a paper at your audience happens in two ways: you make decisions about the tone and the level of information you want to convey.

• Tone means the “voice” of your paper. Should you be chatty, formal, or objective? Usually you will find some happy medium—you do not want to alienate your reader by sounding condescending or superior, but you do not want to, um, like, totally wig on the man, you know? Eschew ostentatious erudition: some students think the way to sound academic is to use big words. Be careful—you can sound ridiculous, especially if you use the wrong big words.
• The level of information you use depends on who you think your audience is. If you imagine your audience as your instructor and they already know everything you have to say, you may find yourself leaving out key information that can cause your argument to be unconvincing and illogical. But you do not have to explain every single word or issue. If you are telling your roommate what happened on your favorite science fiction TV show last night, you do not say, “First a dark-haired white man of average height, wearing a suit and carrying a flashlight, walked into the room. Then a purple alien with fifteen arms and at least three eyes turned around. Then the man smiled slightly. In the background, you could hear a clock ticking. The room was fairly dark and had at least two windows that I saw.” You also do not say, “This guy found some aliens. The end.” Find some balance of useful details that support your main point.

You’ll find a much more detailed discussion of these concepts in our handout on audience .

The Grim Truth

With a few exceptions (including some lab and ethnography reports), you are probably being asked to make an argument. You must convince your audience. It is easy to forget this aim when you are researching and writing; as you become involved in your subject matter, you may become enmeshed in the details and focus on learning or simply telling the information you have found. You need to do more than just repeat what you have read. Your writing should have a point, and you should be able to say it in a sentence. Sometimes instructors call this sentence a “thesis” or a “claim.”

So, if your instructor tells you to write about some aspect of oral hygiene, you do not want to just list: “First, you brush your teeth with a soft brush and some peanut butter. Then, you floss with unwaxed, bologna-flavored string. Finally, gargle with bourbon.” Instead, you could say, “Of all the oral cleaning methods, sandblasting removes the most plaque. Therefore it should be recommended by the American Dental Association.” Or, “From an aesthetic perspective, moldy teeth can be quite charming. However, their joys are short-lived.”

Convincing the reader of your argument is the goal of academic writing. It doesn’t have to say “argument” anywhere in the assignment for you to need one. Look at the assignment and think about what kind of argument you could make about it instead of just seeing it as a checklist of information you have to present. For help with understanding the role of argument in academic writing, see our handout on argument .

What kind of evidence do you need?

There are many kinds of evidence, and what type of evidence will work for your assignment can depend on several factors–the discipline, the parameters of the assignment, and your instructor’s preference. Should you use statistics? Historical examples? Do you need to conduct your own experiment? Can you rely on personal experience? See our handout on evidence for suggestions on how to use evidence appropriately.

Make sure you are clear about this part of the assignment, because your use of evidence will be crucial in writing a successful paper. You are not just learning how to argue; you are learning how to argue with specific types of materials and ideas. Ask your instructor what counts as acceptable evidence. You can also ask a librarian for help. No matter what kind of evidence you use, be sure to cite it correctly—see the UNC Libraries citation tutorial .

You cannot always tell from the assignment just what sort of writing style your instructor expects. The instructor may be really laid back in class but still expect you to sound formal in writing. Or the instructor may be fairly formal in class and ask you to write a reflection paper where you need to use “I” and speak from your own experience.

Try to avoid false associations of a particular field with a style (“art historians like wacky creativity,” or “political scientists are boring and just give facts”) and look instead to the types of readings you have been given in class. No one expects you to write like Plato—just use the readings as a guide for what is standard or preferable to your instructor. When in doubt, ask your instructor about the level of formality they expect.

No matter what field you are writing for or what facts you are including, if you do not write so that your reader can understand your main idea, you have wasted your time. So make clarity your main goal. For specific help with style, see our handout on style .

Technical details about the assignment

The technical information you are given in an assignment always seems like the easy part. This section can actually give you lots of little hints about approaching the task. Find out if elements such as page length and citation format (see the UNC Libraries citation tutorial ) are negotiable. Some professors do not have strong preferences as long as you are consistent and fully answer the assignment. Some professors are very specific and will deduct big points for deviations.

Usually, the page length tells you something important: The instructor thinks the size of the paper is appropriate to the assignment’s parameters. In plain English, your instructor is telling you how many pages it should take for you to answer the question as fully as you are expected to. So if an assignment is two pages long, you cannot pad your paper with examples or reword your main idea several times. Hit your one point early, defend it with the clearest example, and finish quickly. If an assignment is ten pages long, you can be more complex in your main points and examples—and if you can only produce five pages for that assignment, you need to see someone for help—as soon as possible.

Tricks that don’t work

Your instructors are not fooled when you:

• spend more time on the cover page than the essay —graphics, cool binders, and cute titles are no replacement for a well-written paper.
• use huge fonts, wide margins, or extra spacing to pad the page length —these tricks are immediately obvious to the eye. Most instructors use the same word processor you do. They know what’s possible. Such tactics are especially damning when the instructor has a stack of 60 papers to grade and yours is the only one that low-flying airplane pilots could read.
• use a paper from another class that covered “sort of similar” material . Again, the instructor has a particular task for you to fulfill in the assignment that usually relates to course material and lectures. Your other paper may not cover this material, and turning in the same paper for more than one course may constitute an Honor Code violation . Ask the instructor—it can’t hurt.
• get all wacky and “creative” before you answer the question . Showing that you are able to think beyond the boundaries of a simple assignment can be good, but you must do what the assignment calls for first. Again, check with your instructor. A humorous tone can be refreshing for someone grading a stack of papers, but it will not get you a good grade if you have not fulfilled the task.

Critical reading of assignments leads to skills in other types of reading and writing. If you get good at figuring out what the real goals of assignments are, you are going to be better at understanding the goals of all of your classes and fields of study.

You may reproduce it for non-commercial use if you use the entire handout and attribute the source: The Writing Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Make a Gift

Classroom Assignment 6 - Class 8 PDF Download

Read the following passage carefully.

TWO GREAT PERSONALITIES, TWO FOLLIES

PART 1 —JAWAHARLAL NEHRU

As a boy, Jawaharlal Nehru once stole one of his

father's pens from his study thinking that his father

had two pens and he could not possibly use both of

them at the same time. That evening when his

father returned from court, he lost his cool on

finding one ofthe pens missing.

There was uproar in house and after frantic search,

the instrument was found in little Jawaharlal's

room. His father did not like the way his son had

taken his pen without his permission. He scolded

the boy so much that he wept bitterly and went

rushing to his mother.

That day he learned two important lessons — never

to do things on the sly and never to disobey his

father but more importantly, he understood why his

father had scolded him.

PART 2 — MAHATAMA GANDHI

Once, as a child, Gandhiji stole a bit of gold from his

brother's armlet to pay for the latter's debt Of

twenty-five rupees. It was an innocent thing for a

little boy to do to save his brother from disgrace. But

by doing so he had lost all peace ofmind and he could

not decide what amends he should make for the

wrong that he had done.

At last he decided to tell his father the whole truth.

He wrote a letter to him, telling him all about the

incident and promising that he would never steal

again. He asked his father to punish him as severely

as he wished and begged him not to feel pained

about it in any way. 

As the father read that letter, tears began to roll down his cheeks. This left Gandhi so devastated

with shame and remorse that he took a silent vow never to do an unrighteous deed again. He

strove to be good and truthful ever after. 

Q1: Tick(,/) the correct option for each of the following statements/questions.

Response to the Text and Questions on  Jawaharlal   Nehru and Mahatma Gandhi

(a)One thing common to the conduct of both Gandhiji and Jawaharlal Nehru was that they had:

(i) disobeyed their fathers

(ii) created uproar in their homes

(iii) told lies to their parents

(iv) stolen something important

Ans:  Disobeyed their fathers.

(b) Jawaharlal Nehru's father 'lost his cool' to find one of his pens missing. Here the

expression 'lost his cool' indicates which of the following personality traits?

(i) patience

(iii) eagerness

(iv) arrogance

 Ans:  Anger.

(c)A vice that Jawaharlal's conduct displayed was:

(ii)disobedience

(iii)dishonesty

(iv)temptation

Ans:  Disobedience.

(d)Gandhiji's fault was that he had:

(i) shown the courage to speak the truth 

(ii) sold something precious for a petty reason 

(iii) chosen the wrong means of doing a good thing 

(iv) failed to take his father's permission before selling the gold 

Ans:  Chosen the wrong means of doing a good thing.

(e)  How did their 'mistakes' affect both Jawaharlal Nehru and Gandhiji?

(i) Both began to hold a grudge against their fathers 

(ii) Both cried and ran to their mothers for solace 

(iii) Both sought to be punished for their misconduct 

(iv) Both repented and vowed never to repeat their mistakes

Ans:    Both repented and vowed never to repeat their mistakes.

(f)One character trait common to both Gandhiji and Nehru was their ability to:

(i) deny (ii) justify  (iii) hide  (iv) realize 

Ans:   Realize their mistakes.

(g)The mistakes that both Nehru and Gandhiji committed were a result of their:

(i) desire to seek attention of people around them 

(ii) childish ignorance of the right and the wrong 

(iii) families' faulty style of bringing them up 

(iv) hope that they wouldn't be found out  

Ans:   Childish ignorance of the right and the wrong.

(h)The expression 'on the sly' means:

(i) without too much thinking 

(ii) in a secret manner 

(iii) without elders' permission 

(iv) towards the end of something 

Ans:  In a secret manner.

Q2: After stealing gold from his brother's armlet Gandhiji felt:

(d) disturbed

(e) ashamed

(f) confident

(h) contented

Ans : Guilty, ashamed, upset, and disturbed.

Q3: Answer the following questions as briefly as possible. 

(a)What did Jawaharlal Nehru steal from his father's study and why?

Ans:  Jawaharlal Nehru stole one of his father’s pens from his study because he thought his father had two pens and he could not possibly use both of them at the same time.

(b)Why did Jawaharlal's father lose his cool?

Ans:  Jawaharlal's father lost his cool because one of his pens was missing when he returned from court, and it was an important item for him.

(c)Why did little Jawaharlal rush to his mother?

Ans:  Little Jawaharlal rushed to his mother after his father scolded him bitterly and wept, seeking comfort and solace from her.

(d)Why did Gandhiji decide to steal a bit of gold from his brother's armlet?

Ans:  Gandhiji stole a bit of gold from his brother's armlet to pay for the latter's debt of twenty-five rupees, believing it would save his brother from disgrace.

(e)What did Gandhiji write in his letter to his father?

Ans:  In his letter to his father, Gandhiji confessed the whole truth about stealing the gold, promised he would never steal again, and asked his father to punish him as severely as he wished, begging him not to feel pained about it.

(f)Why did Gandhiji's father weep on reading the letter?

Ans:  Gandhiji's father wept on reading the letter because he was moved by Gandhiji's honesty and repentance, and the sincerity in his promise never to commit such an act again affected him deeply.

Q4: What two important lessons did Jawaharlal and Gandhiji learn from their respective mistakes?

Ans:  Jawaharlal learned never to do things on the sly and never to disobey his father, understanding why his actions were wrong. Gandhiji learned the importance of honesty and the consequences of using wrong means to do a seemingly good thing.

Q5: List two traits of Gandhiji's personality as highlighted in Part 2 of the passage.

Ans: Honesty: Gandhiji confessed his mistake to his father.

Responsibility: He asked for punishment and resolved never to steal again.

Q6: Do you agree with the way Jawaharlal Nehru's father scolded him?

Ans:  Yes, I agree with the way Jawaharlal Nehru's father scolded him because it taught him valuable lessons about honesty and obedience, which are important in a child's upbringing.

Q7: In your opinion, is your mindset more like Jawaharlal Nehru's or Gandhiji's?

Ans: My mindset is more like Gandhiji's because I value honesty highly and believe in taking responsibility for my actions, similar to how Gandhiji handled his mistake.

Top Courses for Class 8

Classroom assignment 6 - class 8, objective type questions, important questions, semester notes, shortcuts and tricks, previous year questions with solutions, study material, mock tests for examination, extra questions, sample paper, past year papers, practice quizzes, viva questions, video lectures.

Classroom Assignment 6 Free PDF Download

Importance of classroom assignment 6, classroom assignment 6 notes, classroom assignment 6 class 8 questions, study classroom assignment 6 on the app, welcome back, create your account for free.

Forgot Password

Unattempted tests, change country, practice & revise.

Dedicated to Students: Discover a smarter way to study. Notes, Assignment Help, Exam Revision Packs and more.

• 5.00 rating from 7 reviews Rated 5.00 out of 5 based on 7 customer ratings

IOP2601 Assignment 4 Semester 1 Solutions and Calculations For QUESTIONS ONE TO SIX (27 MAY 2024)

R 100.00 Original price was: R100.00. R 60.00 Current price is: R60.00. 0 Downloads

• What is in the document
• More Products
• Additional Information

Description

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

COS1521 Assessment 1 2024 Solutions for Questions ONE to TWENTY-FIVE (10 May 2024)

INF3705 ASSIGNMENT 2 2024 COMPLETE AND WELL DETAILED ANSWERS (6 SEPTEMBER 2024)

INF1505 Assignment 02 2024 Quiz solutions For Questions 1 to 25. (27 June 2024) ALL ANSWERS ARE CORRECTLY COMPLETED

OPM1501 Assignment 02 2024 Complete Answers (Due Date – 21 April 2024)

CAS3701 Assignment / Assessment 03 2024 Complete solutions :Due Date – 19 April 2024

COS1511 Assessment 4 Replacing Ass No 1 DUE Monday, 29 April 2024, 11:00 PM SEMESTER 1 2024 (Questions One to Fifty Six)

Related products.

IOP1501 Notes which cover the whole module (easy and simple for better understanding)

RSC2601 ASSIGNMENT MEMO 2005 – 2017

LRM3702 Labour Relations Management: Micro – Exam Pack

 EMA1501: Notes and Past Assignments (Examples)

• Registration

Don't you have an account? Register Now! it's really simple and you can start enjoying all the benefits!

• Work & Careers
• Life & Arts
• Currently reading: Business school teaching case study: Unilever chief signals rethink on ESG
• Business school teaching case study: can green hydrogen’s potential be realised?
• Business school teaching case study: how electric vehicles pose tricky trade dilemmas
• Business school teaching case study: is private equity responsible for child labour violations?

Business school teaching case study: Unilever chief signals rethink on ESG

• Business school teaching case study: Unilever chief signals rethink on ESG on x (opens in a new window)
• Business school teaching case study: Unilever chief signals rethink on ESG on facebook (opens in a new window)
• Business school teaching case study: Unilever chief signals rethink on ESG on linkedin (opens in a new window)
• Business school teaching case study: Unilever chief signals rethink on ESG on whatsapp (opens in a new window)

Gabriela Salinas and Jeeva Somasundaram

Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.

In April this year, Hein Schumacher, chief executive of Unilever, announced that the company was entering a “new era for sustainability leadership”, and signalled a shift from the central priority promoted under his predecessor , Alan Jope.

While Jope saw lack of social purpose or environmental sustainability as the way to prune brands from the portfolio, Schumacher has adopted a more balanced approach between purpose and profit. He stresses that Unilever should deliver on both sustainability commitments and financial goals. This approach, which we dub “realistic sustainability”, aims to balance long- and short-term environmental goals, ambition, and delivery.

As a result, Unilever’s refreshed sustainability agenda focuses harder on fewer commitments that the company says remain “very stretching”. In practice, this entails extending deadlines for taking action as well as reducing the scale of its targets for environmental, social and governance measures.

Such backpedalling is becoming widespread — with many companies retracting their commitments to climate targets , for example. According to FactSet, a US financial data and software provider, the number of US companies in the S&P 500 index mentioning “ESG” on their earnings calls has declined sharply : from a peak of 155 in the fourth quarter 2021 to just 29 two years later. This trend towards playing down a company’s ESG efforts, from fear of greater scrutiny or of accusations of empty claims, even has a name: “greenhushing”.

Test yourself

This is the fourth in a series of monthly business school-style teaching case studies devoted to the responsible business dilemmas faced by organisations. Read the piece and FT articles suggested at the end before considering the questions raised.

About the authors: Gabriela Salinas is an adjunct professor of marketing at IE University; Jeeva Somasundaram is an assistant professor of decision sciences in operations and technology at IE University.

The series forms part of a wider collection of FT ‘instant teaching case studies ’, featured across our Business Education publications, that explore management challenges.

The change in approach is not limited to regulatory compliance and corporate reporting; it also affects consumer communications. While Jope believed that brands sold more when “guided by a purpose”, Schumacher argues that “we don’t want to force fit [purpose] on brands unnecessarily”.

His more nuanced view aligns with evidence that consumers’ responses to the sustainability and purpose communication attached to brand names depend on two key variables: the type of industry in which the brand operates; and the specific aspect of sustainability being communicated.

In terms of the sustainability message, research in the Journal of Business Ethics found consumers can be less interested when product functionality is key. Furthermore, a UK survey in 2022 found that about 15 per cent of consumers believed brands should support social causes, but nearly 60 per cent said they would rather see brand owners pay taxes and treat people fairly.

Among investors, too, “anti-purpose” and “anti-ESG” sentiment is growing. One (unnamed) leading bond fund manager even suggested to the FT that “ESG will be dead in five years”.

Media reports on the adverse impact of ESG controversies on investment are certainly now more frequent. For example, while Jope was still at the helm, the FT reported criticism of Unilever by influential fund manager Terry Smith for displaying sustainability credentials at the expense of managing the business.

Yet some executives feel under pressure to take a stand on environmental and social issues — in many cases believing they are morally obliged to do so or through a desire to improve their own reputations. This pressure may lead to a conflict with shareholders if sustainability becomes a promotional tool for managers, or for their personal social responsibility agenda, rather than creating business value .

Such opportunistic behaviours may lead to a perception that corporate sustainability policies are pursued only because of public image concerns.

Alison Taylor, at NYU Stern School of Business, recently described Unilever’s old materiality map — a visual representation of how companies assess which social and environmental factors matter most to them — to Sustainability magazine. She depicted it as an example of “baggy, vague, overambitious goals and self-aggrandising commitments that make little sense and falsely suggest a mayonnaise and soap company can solve intractable societal problems”.

In contrast, the “realism” approach of Schumacher is being promulgated as both more honest and more feasible. Former investment banker Alex Edmans, at London Business School, has coined the term “rational sustainability” to describe an approach that integrates financial principles into decision-making, and avoids using sustainability primarily for enhancing social image and reputation.

Such “rational sustainability” encompasses any business activity that creates long-term value — including product innovation, productivity enhancements, or corporate culture initiatives, regardless of whether they fall under the traditional ESG framework.

Similarly, Schumacher’s approach aims for fewer targets with greater impact, all while keeping financial objectives in sight.

Complex objectives, such as having a positive impact on the world, may be best achieved indirectly, as expounded by economist John Kay in his book, Obliquity . Schumacher’s “realistic sustainability” approach means focusing on long-term value creation, placing customers and investors to the fore. Saving the planet begins with meaningfully helping a company’s consumers and investors. Without their support, broader sustainability efforts risk failure.

Questions for discussion

Read: Unilever has ‘lost the plot’ by fixating on sustainability, says Terry Smith

Companies take step back from making climate target promises

The real impact of the ESG backlash

Unilever’s new chief says corporate purpose can be ‘unwelcome distraction ’

Unilever says new laxer environmental targets aim for ‘realism’

How should business executives incorporate ESG criteria in their commercial, investor, internal, and external communications? How can they strike a balance between purpose and profits?

How does purpose affect business and brand value? Under what circumstances or conditions can the impact of purpose be positive, neutral, or negative?

Are brands vehicles by which to drive social or environmental change? Is this the primary role of brands in the 21st century or do profits and clients’ needs come first?

Which categories or sectors might benefit most from strongly articulating and communicating a corporate purpose? Are there instances in which it might backfire?

In your opinion, is it necessary for brands to take a stance on social issues? Why or why not, and when?

Climate Capital

Where climate change meets business, markets and politics. Explore the FT’s coverage here .

Are you curious about the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Find out more about our science-based targets here

Promoted Content

Explore the series.

Follow the topics in this article

• Sustainability Add to myFT
• Impact investing Add to myFT
• Corporate governance Add to myFT
• Corporate social responsibility Add to myFT
• Business school case Add to myFT

International Edition