Another word for “according to”!!! On this page, we will find all the ways of saying “according to” in English with example sentences and ESL infographic.
Ways of saying “according to”.
Referring to
In agreement with
In accordance with
In the opinion of
In the light of
As determined by
Pursuant to
As you can see
In relation to
Consistent with
Conforming to
As far as I know
As part of …
In conformity with
As stated in/ by
In keeping with
As specified by
In consideration of
In proportion to
List of According to Synonyms
Last Updated on May 27, 2021
it helped me with my practical
January 16, 2024
Linda Brown
Looking for synonyms for according to the text ? We’ve got you covered!
Here’s a list of other ways to say according to the text .
Want to learn how to say according to the text professionally? Keep reading for examples and use cases.
Appropriate Use : Referring directly to a specific statement or claim in the text. Example : “As stated in the text, the company’s revenue has increased by 15% this year.”
Appropriate Use : Pointing out information or data presented in the text. Example : “As the text indicates, there is a significant correlation between sleep and productivity.”
Appropriate Use : Conforming to what has been mentioned or specified in the text. Example : “As per the text, the meeting is scheduled for next Wednesday.”
Appropriate Use : Suggesting that something is in agreement with the information provided in the text. Example : “In accordance with the text, the new policy will be implemented from the first of next month.”
Appropriate Use : Deriving an interpretation or conclusion from the content of the text. Example : “Based on the text, we can conclude that the marketing strategy was highly effective.”
Appropriate Use : Drawing inferences or interpretations from the text. Example : “As the text suggests, employee satisfaction directly impacts customer service quality.”
Appropriate Use : Referring to or adhering to the content of the text. Example : “Following the text, the experiment’s next step is data analysis.”
Appropriate Use : Suggesting consistency or agreement with what the text states. Example : “Her thesis is in line with the text’s theories on social dynamics.”
Appropriate Use : Referring to a description or account given in the text. Example : “As described in the text, the device operates in two distinct modes.”
Appropriate Use : Maintaining consistency with the information or viewpoint presented in the text. Example : “The project’s approach is in keeping with the text’s recommendations on sustainable development.”
Appropriate Use : Referring to something specifically mentioned in the text. Example : “As mentioned in the text, the survey was conducted across six different countries.”
Appropriate Use : Indicating that something is in harmony or does not contradict the text. Example : “The results are consistent with the text’s findings on climate change impacts.”
Appropriate Use : Referring to the structure, plan, or main points presented in the text. Example : “As the text outlines, there are three primary stages of the software development lifecycle.”
Appropriate Use : Indicating the way information or arguments are laid out in the text. Example : “The management strategy, as the text presents, focuses on both short-term and long-term goals.”
Appropriate Use : Showing conformity or accordance with the content of the text. Example : “Her analysis is in agreement with the text’s perspective on cultural influences in marketing.”
[email protected]
We help you expand your vocabulary and improve your understanding of the English language.
© SynonymPro
Advertisement
noun as in belief, assumption to be tested
Strongest matches
Strong matches
noun as in written dissertation
Weak matches
In “Back Home,” Gil also revisits the nostalgia for the South explored in his Johns Hopkins thesis, “Circle of Stone.”
At least father and son were in alignment on this central thesis: acting “gay”—bad; being thought of as gay—bad.
Her doctoral thesis, says Ramin Takloo at the University of Illinois, was simply outstanding.
Marshall McLuhan long ago argued the now accepted thesis that different mediums have different influences on thinking.
He wrote his Master's thesis on the underrepresentation of young people in Congress.
And indeed for most young men a college thesis is but an exercise for sharpening the wits, rarely dangerous in its later effects.
It will be for the reader to determine whether the main thesis of the book has gained or lost by the new evidence.
But the word thesis, when applied to Systems, does not mean the 'position' of single notes, but of groups of notes.
This conclusion, it need hardly be said, is in entire agreement with the main thesis of the preceding pages.
Sundry outlying Indians, with ammunition to waste, took belly and knee rests and strengthened the thesis to the contrary.
Words related to thesis are not direct synonyms, but are associated with the word thesis . Browse related words to learn more about word associations.
noun as in putting regard in as true
noun as in main part of written work
noun as in written or musical creation
noun as in argument for idea
Viewing 5 / 44 related words
From Roget's 21st Century Thesaurus, Third Edition Copyright © 2013 by the Philip Lief Group.
Synonyms & Similar Words
Antonyms & Near Antonyms
These examples are programmatically compiled from various online sources to illustrate current usage of the word 'thesis.' Any opinions expressed in the examples do not represent those of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us feedback about these examples.
Cite this entry.
“Thesis.” Merriam-Webster.com Thesaurus , Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/thesis. Accessed 11 Aug. 2024.
Nglish: Translation of thesis for Spanish Speakers
Britannica English: Translation of thesis for Arabic Speakers
Britannica.com: Encyclopedia article about thesis
Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!
Word of the day.
See Definitions and Examples »
Get Word of the Day daily email!
Plural and possessive names: a guide, commonly misspelled words, how to use em dashes (—), en dashes (–) , and hyphens (-), absent letters that are heard anyway, how to use accents and diacritical marks, popular in wordplay, 8 words for lesser-known musical instruments, it's a scorcher words for the summer heat, 7 shakespearean insults to make life more interesting, plant names that sound like insults, 10 words from taylor swift songs (merriam's version), games & quizzes.
Word of the Day
Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio
towards the direction that is the opposite to the one in which you are facing
Robbing, looting, and embezzling: talking about stealing
To add ${headword} to a word list please sign up or log in.
Add ${headword} to one of your lists below, or create a new one.
{{message}}
Something went wrong.
There was a problem sending your report.
Zach bryan’s girlfriend, brianna chickenfry, slammed for allegedly using n-word in resurfaced post.
Country singer Zach Bryan’s girlfriend, Brianna Chickenfry, is being slammed online by fans for allegedly using the N-word in some resurfaced posts.
Fans spoke up after the Tea Talk Instagram page posted screenshots on Friday of the 25-year-old influencer — whose real name is Brianna LaPaglia — allegedly using the racial slur in two Instagram comments from nearly a decade ago.
“chill she’s my n—a,” she reportedly wrote in one comment, while in another she is accused of saying, “still focused on cheer n—a.”
“Why isn’t she cancelled yet? Ugh. She’s insufferable,” one Instagram user commented under the page’s post.
“White women favorite word 😂,” another quipped .
“why do they even say it like that? the sentences that they use it in could’ve been the same [without] it,” a third user pointed out .
Another dismayed person encouraged people to “not normalise this behaviour.”
A fifth commenter noted that several people have been under fire lately for alleged past racist remarks, including one of the “It” girls of TikTok, Alix Earle.
An “AlixearleSnark” subreddit , for instance, has alleged evidence of the uber-popular creator using the N-word when she was a young teen.
Lifestyle influencer Brooke Schofield, meanwhile, apologized twice in the last week after past racist tweets resurfaced.
Chickenfry, a Barstool Sports personality, has not yet commented on the backlash and her team did not immediately respond to Page Six’s request for comment.
Start your day with Page Six Daily.
Please provide a valid email address.
By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy .
Want celebrity news as it breaks? Hooked on Housewives?
She began dating Bryan, 28, last year. They confirmed their relationship in July following his May split with Deb Peifer.
While they have kept their relationship generally to themselves, Chickenfry did not hold back when roasting her beau after he got arrested in Oklahoma in September 2023.
She took to her Instagram Story at the time to share a screenshot of herself listening to Britney Spears’ 2011 song “Criminal” with the lyrics, “Mama, I’m in love with a criminal,” playing.
Advertisement
Kamala Harris and her Democratic allies have found a new word to describe Donald Trump and JD Vance: “weird.” And it’s everywhere.
Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump, left, and Republican vice presidential candidate Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, attend the Republican National Convention, July 15, 2024, in Milwaukee. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, File)
Vice President Kamala Harris and her Democratic allies are emphasizing a new line of criticism against Republicans — branding Donald Trump and his running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance , as “weird.”
Democrats are applying the label with gusto in interviews and online, notably to Vance’s comments on abortion and his previous suggestion that political leaders who didn’t have biological children “don’t really have a direct stake” in the country.
The “weird” message appears to have given Democrats a narrative advantage that they rarely had when President Joe Biden was still running for reelection. Trump’s campaign, which so often shapes political discussions with the former president’s pronouncements, has spent days trying to flip the script by highlighting things about Democrats it says are weird.
“I don’t know who came up with the message, but I salute them,” said David Karpf, a strategic communication professor at George Washington University.
‘Weird’ is the political label-du-jour. The AP’s Jennifer King has more.
Karpf said labeling Republican comments as “weird” is the sort of concise take that resonates quickly with Harris supporters. Plus, Karpf noted, “it frustrates opponents, leading them to further amplify it through off-balance responses.”
“So far, at least, Trump-Vance has been incapable of finding an effective response,” Karpf said.
Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a Democrat who is on Harris’ short list for vice president , called Trump and Vance “just weird” last week in an MSNBC interview, which the Democratic Governors Association — of which Walz is chair — amplified in a post on X . Walz reiterated the characterization Sunday on CNN, referencing Trump’s repeated mentions of the fictional serial killer Hannibal Lecter from the film “Silence of the Lambs” in stump speeches.
Responding to Trump’s Thursday appearance on Fox News, the Harris campaign — in a news release with the subject line “Statement on a 78-Year-Old Criminal’s Fox News Appearance” — included “Trump is old and quite weird?” in a bulleted list of takeaways.
A day later, multiple news releases from the Harris campaign described her opponents similarly, declaring simply that “JD Vance is weird” in part due to his stances on abortion, and Harris’ campaign spokesperson saying that Vance had “spent all week making headlines for his out-of-touch, weird ideas.”
Two of Harris’ allies, Sens. Brian Schatz of Hawaii and Chris Murphy of Connecticut, on Friday posted a video on X calling Vance’s past comments about limiting the political power of childless Americans “a super weird idea.”
And then, at her first fundraiser since becoming the Democrats’ likely White House nominee, Harris used the characterization herself, calling out some of Trump’s “wild lies about my record and some of what he and his running mate are saying, it is just plain weird.”
“I mean that’s the box you put that in, right?” she added.
Many of Democrats’ comments appear to be allusions to a 2021 interview with Vance in which he slammed some prominent Democrats without biological children — including Harris — as “childless cat ladies” with “no direct stake” in America.
But Harris’ own characterization of Trump as “weird” may date back even further. In his 2021 book, political reporter Edward-Isaac Dovere wrote that Harris reportedly gathered with aides in 2018 to prepare for her own presidential bid.
What to know about the 2024 Election
As staff aimed to prepare her for how she’d react if, during a debate, Trump stood over her as he did Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in 2016, Harris reportedly quipped, “‘I’d turn around and say, ‘Why are you being so weird? What’s wrong with you?’”
On Sunday, Trump spokesman Steven Cheung posted video of Walz calling Trump and Vance “weird” as he stumped for Harris and said the likely Democratic nominee and her backers were themselves out of line for “trying to gaslight everyone into thinking the shooting was staged,” a reference to the assassination attempt at Trump’s rally in Pennsylvania.
More broadly, some of Trump’s allies have angled to turn the conversation back to Harris and what they portray as her failed policy ideas.
Donald Trump Jr., the former president’s oldest son, took to X on Monday to ask, “You know what’s really weird? Soft on crime politicians like Kamala allowing illegal aliens out of prison so they can violently assault Americans.”
On Saturday, Vance reposted an X video Trump Jr. shared in which Harris talked about “climate anxiety, which is fear of the future and the unknown of whether it makes sense for you to even think about having children.”
“It’s almost like these people don’t want young people starting families or something,” Vance wrote. “Really weird stuff.”
Republicans have long shared clips of Harris’ laugh and some of her jokes or stories to try to make the vice president seem weird — notably an anecdote she told last year about her mother scolding her, “You think you just fell out of a coconut tree?”
The “coconut tree” story has itself become a Democratic in-joke in the days since Harris took over the campaign. Many of her supporters have embraced coconut emojis in their online accounts.
Calling Republicans “weird” may be a way to take Republicans’ previous tactics and make them their own, said Matt Sienkiewicz, a communication professor at Boston College.
University at Buffalo political communication professor Jacob Neiheisel compared the “weird” message to Arizona Sen. John McCain’s 2008 attempt to portray Barack Obama as a celebrity with no real accomplishments .
“At a functional level, I think that this might be part of a concerted attempt to mitigate some of the longstanding efforts on the right to paint Harris in a similar way,” Neiheisel said.
Kinnard reported from Chapin, South Carolina, and can be reached at http://twitter.com/MegKinnardAP .
Follow the AP’s coverage of the 2024 election at https://apnews.com/hub/election-2024 .
Cash app users have until nov. 18, 2024 to submit their claim for reimbursement for the data and security breach..
Our audience experiences team would love to hear our readers' thoughts on artificial intelligence. Please fill out this short survey and share your feedback.
Cash App users could get some cash sent to their bank accounts soon.
In a settlement, the mobile payment service was ordered to pay out $15 million in damages.
According to a class-action lawsuit obtained by USA TODAY, plaintiffs sued Cash App Investing and Block Inc. for the companies' "failure to exercise reasonable care in securing and safeguarding consumer information."
The lawsuit said that the December 2021 data breach resulted, “in the unauthorized public release of the personally identifiable information of 8.2 million current and former Cash App Investing customers.”
In addition, a former employee gained access to Cash App users’ personal information during their employment and downloaded the data without the users’ knowledge, the lawsuit said.
If users had unauthorized or fraudulent withdrawals or transfers of funds from their Cash App account between Aug. 23, 2018, and before Aug. 20, 2024, they are eligible to submit a claim for up to $2,500, the Cash App website said.
Here is what you need to know about the Cash App settlement.
Meta settlement: Meta to pay Texas $1.4 billion in 'historic settlement' over biometric data allegations
Cash App users that will be able to file a claim must have had an account on Aug. 23, 2018 and before Aug. 20, 2024. The users that will qualify have not already been reimbursed by Block Inc., Cash App Investing or a third party, the mobile payment service said.
According to Cash App, a user can submit a claim for the following:
Users should only submit one claim form. However, if you have multiple Cash App accounts to submit a claim for, the mobile payment service recommends users to list all of their $(InsertYourCashTag) and information about their claims on a single claim form, Cash App said.
To file a claim, Cash App users can submit a completed claim form by Nov. 18, 2024 for consideration.
You can submit the claim form at https://cashappsecuritysettlement.com/submit-claim .
Ahjané Forbes is a reporter on the National Trending Team at USA TODAY. Ahjané covers breaking news, car recalls, crime, health, lottery and public policy stories. Email her at [email protected] . Follow her on Instagram , Threads and X (Twitter) @forbesfineest.
University of Notre Dame
Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
Claire Horisk, Dangerous Jokes: How Racism and Sexism Weaponize Humor , Oxford University Press, 2024, 204pp., $32.88 (hbk), ISBN 9780197691496.
Reviewed by Mary Kate McGowan, Wellesley College
Jokes are no joke; they can harm, disparage, and reinforce an unjust social hierarchy. Jokes also function in a complex communicative manner, and when we are amused, we are less critical of the derogating messages conveyed by jokes. In Dangerous Jokes: How Racism and Sexism Weaponize Humor , Claire Horisk argues persuasively for these claims. The book is clearly and carefully written in a manner accessible to a general audience. This is no small feat since the book also successfully incorporates complex tools from the philosophy of language as well as quite a bit of empirical research. It also argues for two novel philosophical claims. For philosophers of language interested in manipulative speech, and indeed for anyone interested in how jokes actually work, this is a must read. It’s also fun, highly informative, surprising in many ways, and philosophically astute.
Horisk makes a slew of important distinctions, but she focuses her attention on what she calls belittlement. A joke is belittling if it conveys a negative stereotype that supports—or has supported—an unjust social hierarchy. Jokes that demean lawyers are not belittling but jokes that demean women are; the difference, for Horisk, lies in the broader social structure and the subordinate position of the targeted group in that hierarchy.
One of the many things that the book does is bridge common sense beliefs about jokes with both philosophical theory and empirical evidence. To this end, Horisk identifies several widespread folk beliefs about jokes, assesses whether these theses are true, and also explains why they might seem true, even when they are false. The Harmless Fun thesis claims that jokes cannot be harmful; this thesis is refuted but Horisk argues that it might seem true because of two other theses: Wrong Audience and Wrong Joker. Wrong Audience claims that jokes can seem to be problematic when told to the wrong audience. The idea here is that a joke can seem harmful even when it is not but this is because it is told either to humorless people who don’t manage to get the joke or to oversensitive people who react to it in unwarranted ways. This thesis is also false, but there’s a surprising twist. People who are amused by a belittling joke might seem like the right audience for it. But, as Horisk argues, when one is amused by a joke, one is more likely to rely on less critical cognitive faculties; this means that one is more likely to uncritically accept the belittling content conveyed. The amused audience then is, in an important sense, the wrong one. The third thesis, Wrong Joker, contends that it is acceptable to tell a belittling joke about one’s own social group but not about a group to which one does not belong. Again, this thesis purports to protect Harmless Fun from apparent counter evidence and again the results are surprising. Although one might think that self-deprecating humor is less harmful than belittling other groups, the evidence suggests otherwise. When one belittles a different group, one violates a social norm against doing so, and the evidence suggests that doing that triggers critical faculties in one’s audience, thus potentially preventing them from taking the harmful content on board. When one tells a self-disparaging joke, by contrast, that particular social norm is not violated and so the audience is less likely to be critical of the harmful content conveyed.
One interesting issue not directly addressed by the book concerns the basis of amusement. One might be amused by the belittling content conveyed by a joke but one might also be amused by something else about it: the clever word play, the inside information required to get the joke, the unexpected nature of the crucial connection, the delivery, the timing, or any number of things. Although judiciously avoiding these complexities, Horisk is characteristically careful; she does not assume that being amused by a belittling joke involves endorsing the belittling content. Instead, she says only that if one is amused by such a joke, then that is some (circumstantial) evidence to think that one might hold such beliefs, and this is reason enough to investigate them.
This is a genuine crossover book, so in addition to making these issues available to a general audience and to identifying the above surprising empirical results, Horisk also argues for two novel philosophical theses. First, she argues that belittling jokes convey belittling content via generalized conversational implicatures. Prior philosophical attention to racist and sexist jokes did not concern their communicative function. Mostly, such work concerns the ethics of telling and enjoying (that is, being amused by or laughing at) such jokes. Second, Horisk develops an account of culpable listening. According to Horisk, when one is a participant in a conversation in which a belittling joke is told, one acts wrongly by allowing that belittling content into the common ground. This wrong is prior to any failure to speak out against that content. She says, “listening to racist language is sometimes wrong; challenging it is a corrective measure, which can be used to make reparations for the wrong (132)”. While many think that failing to object to belittling content can be wrong, Horisk goes considerably further; for Horisk, it’s wrong to even listen. This is an interesting—and even radical—claim.
In what follows, I will focus on the first claim, namely that belittling jokes convey content via generalized conversational implicature. As is well known, jokes convey content without explicitly stating that content and implicature is one way to convey content without saying it. There are several kinds: conventional implicature, particularized conversational implicature, and generalized conversational implicature. A generalized conversational implicature conveys content via a presumption that a speaker is being communicatively cooperative (this makes it conversational) but it does not rely on specific features of the conversational context (so it is generalized). Here are some examples of generalized conversational implicature. ‘Sally ate some of the cake’ generally implicates that Sally did not eat all of the cake, and ‘The pool is warm’ generally implicates that the pool is not hot. Horisk argues that belittling jokes convey their belittling content via this sort of invited inference.
Even though this is a public philosophy book that ought to omit technical and potentially distracting details, I’d nevertheless like for Horisk to say more. First, one might wonder whether Horisk is assuming that all jokes convey implicit content in the same way. Horisk does not make this assumption explicit or give any reason to support it. And it seems that there is good reason to reject it. After all, jokes are complex and varied. Why think that word play jokes convey implicit content the same way as narrative jokes? Second, it is unclear that Horisk’s argumentative strategy excludes all (plausible) alternatives. To see this, let’s first summarize Horisk’s argument, which is two-fold. She begins by arguing that belittling jokes share two features with generalized conversational implicatures: reinforcement and cancellation. Then, she argues against a presuppositional account, which she identifies as the main alternative account.
These features (of reinforcement and cancellation) are also features of particularized implicatures. So it’s unclear why this consideration supports Horisk’s contention (that belittling jokes convey content via generalized implicatures) as opposed to the claim that they—or at least some of them—convey that content via particularized implicatures. Narrative jokes, for example, often with quite rich contextual features, seem like especially good candidates for conveying content via particularized implicature. Horisk should say more.
In arguing against presuppositional accounts, Horisk targets Robert Stalnaker’s (fairly specific notion of) pragmatic presupposition. To pragmatically presuppose something, in Stalnaker’s sense, is to treat it as already shared (i.e., accepted by all and recognized as accepted by all) or to treat it as something that would be uncontroversially accepted by all. For those unfamiliar, some examples will help. When speaking with a family friend, one can take for granted that one has a sibling. That information is already shared, and it can be legitimately presupposed. We can also introduce presuppositions. To see this, suppose that I am speaking to a colleague (who doesn’t know anything about my birth family) and I excuse myself from a conversation by saying that I need to respond to my brother’s email; in this case, I presuppose that I have a brother and I legitimately do so even though my colleague does not already accept this (so it is not shared at the time of my utterance). I nevertheless presuppose it, because I rely on it and reasonably expect that my colleague will happily accept it.
Horisk argues against a presuppositional account with what she calls the contentious joker. Consider the following joke: “Hey, did you hear that Wellesley had to close its philosophy department? Yah, they lost all their majors as soon as the college required logic as part of the major.” This joke relies on the social belief that women are not good at math. Suppose now that Paul, a sexist jerk, tells this joke to his feminist friend, Helen, and he does so in order to get an (entertaining-to-him) rise out of her. Paul is a contentious joker. He does not believe that Helen accepts—or would readily accept—the claim that women are not good at math. As a result, and although the joke seems to presuppose that women cannot do math, it does not satisfy Stalnaker’s notion of presupposition. According to Horisk, this tells against presuppositional accounts and in favor of her generalized implicature account.
Horisk is absolutely correct that the contentious joker does not presuppose, in Stalnaker’s sense, that women cannot do math. But Stalnaker’s account is not the only account in town; it’s quite narrow. Moreover, Stalnaker’s account is designed for ideal contexts and an ignorant jerk telling a sexist joke to a card-carrying feminist does not seem to be an ideal context. (In later chapters, Horisk skillfully extends Stalnaker’s common ground framework in order to explain power differences amongst participants.) There also seems to be another option: one might think that Paul is flouting the norms of presupposition; he is pretending to presuppose something in order to irritate; on this way of thinking, which seems intuitive, Paul is still presupposing but he is abusing the practice of doing so. It’s also not clear how Horisk’s preferred account would fare with Paul’s joke; that is, it is not clear that Paul’s joke conveys belittling content via generalized implicature, as Horisk would have it. And, finally, as we saw above, jokes can convey content in different ways so even if a presuppositional account cannot handle the contentious joker, it does not follow that a presuppositional account cannot correctly explain how other jokes convey belittling content.
Horisk’s account of culpable listening is the most innovative and controversial claim in her excellent book. The claim, the account of it, and the arguments in favor of it are each too subtle and complex to investigate responsibly in such a short review. Consequently, I confine myself to two short comments. First, the view relies heavily on Stalnaker’s notion of common ground and so a lot depends on exactly what is required for something to be a part of the common ground. Second, there’s good news: Horisk’s future work will extend what she says here on the topic.
In sum, Dangerous Jokes: How Racism and Sexism Weaponize Humor is a terrific, informative, clear, accessible, unpretentious, careful, and innovative book on an important topic. It’s fun to read and teach. I recommend it as required reading for all social philosophers of language and for anyone interested in the subtle ways that jokes mask the harmful content they sometimes convey.
Advertisement
Supported by
Guest Essay
By Thomas B. Edsall
Mr. Edsall contributes a weekly column from Washington, D.C., on politics, demographics and inequality.
The advent of A.I. — artificial intelligence — is spurring curiosity and fear. Will A.I. be a creator or a destroyer of worlds?
In “ Can We Have Pro-Worker A.I. ? Choosing a Path of Machines in Service of Minds,” three economists at M.I.T., Daron Acemoglu , David Autor and Simon Johnson , looked at this epochal innovation last year:
The private sector in the United States is currently pursuing a path for generative A.I. that emphasizes automation and the displacement of labor, along with intrusive workplace surveillance. As a result, disruptions could lead to a potential downward cascade in wage levels, as well as inefficient productivity gains. Before the advent of artificial intelligence, automation was largely limited to blue-collar and office jobs using digital technologies while more complex and better-paying jobs were left untouched because they require flexibility, judgment and common sense.
Now, Acemoglu, Autor and Johnson wrote, A.I. presents a direct threat to those high-skill jobs: “A major focus of A.I. research is to attain human parity in a vast range of cognitive tasks and, more generally, to achieve ‘artificial general intelligence’ that fully mimics and then surpasses capabilities of the human mind.”
The three economists make the case that
There is no guarantee that the transformative capabilities of generative A.I. will be used for the betterment of work or workers. The bias of the tax code, of the private sector generally, and of the technology sector specifically, leans toward automation over augmentation. But there are also potentially powerful A.I.-based tools that can be used to create new tasks, boosting expertise and productivity across a range of skills. To redirect A.I. development onto the human-complementary path requires changes in the direction of technological innovation, as well as in corporate norms and behavior. This needs to be backed up by the right priorities at the federal level and a broader public understanding of the stakes and the available choices. We know this is a tall order.
“Tall” is an understatement.
In an email elaborating on the A.I. paper, Acemoglu contended that artificial intelligence has the potential to improve employment prospects rather than undermine them:
It is quite possible to leverage generative A.I. as an informational tool that enables various different types of workers to get better at their jobs and perform more complex tasks. If we are able to do this, this would help create good, meaningful jobs, with wage growth potential, and may even reduce inequality. Think of a generative A.I. tool that helps electricians get much better at diagnosing complex problems and troubleshoot them effectively.
This, however, “is not where we are heading,” Acemoglu continued:
The preoccupation of the tech industry is still automation and more automation, and the monetization of data via digital ads. To turn generative A.I. pro-worker, we need a major course correction, and this is not something that’s going to happen by itself.
Acemoglu pointed out that unlike the regional trade shock that decimated manufacturing employment after China entered the World Trade Organization in 2001, “The kinds of tasks impacted by A.I. are much more broadly distributed in the population and also across regions.” In other words, A.I. threatens employment at virtually all levels of the economy, including well-paid jobs requiring complex cognitive capabilities.
Four technology specialists — Tyna Eloundou and Pamela Mishkin , both on the staff of OpenAI , with Sam Manning , a research fellow at the Centre for the Governance of A.I., and Daniel Rock at the University of Pennsylvania — provided a detailed case study on the employment effects of artificial intelligence in their 2023 paper, “ GPTs Are GPTs : An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models.”
“Around 80 percent of the U.S. work force could have at least 10 percent of their work tasks affected by the introduction of large language models,” Eloundou and her co-authors wrote, and “approximately 19 percent of workers may see at least 50 percent of their tasks impacted.”
Large language models have multiple and diverse uses, according to Eloundou and her colleagues, and “can process and produce various forms of sequential data, including assembly language, protein sequences and chess games, extending beyond natural.” In addition, these models “excel in diverse applications like translation, classification, creative writing, and code generation — capabilities that previously demanded specialized, task-specific models developed by expert engineers using domain-specific data.”
We are having trouble retrieving the article content.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.
Thank you for your patience while we verify access.
Already a subscriber? Log in .
Want all of The Times? Subscribe .
88 other terms for according to research - words and phrases with similar meaning.
Alternatively
IMAGES
COMMENTS
11 "According To" Synonyms. Before we go over other ways to say according to, it's worth mentioning that an excellent alternative is to simply rewrite the text to be more direct.Here's an example: According to Dr. Joseph, the fracture will not heal properly if Jacob doesn't get enough rest. ↓ Dr. Joseph warned that the fracture will not heal properly if Jacob doesn't get enough rest.
Common Synonyms for According to. According to vs. In accordance with. " In accordance with " implies compliance with rules or specifications, whereas " according to " often refers to someone's point of view or a source of information. "According to our teacher, we must read the next chapter before the upcoming class.".
The phrase 'according to' is commonly utilized when we need to reference or attribute ideas, facts or opinions in writing. It plays a critical role in maintaining the integrity of academic and professional writing. However, repetitive utilization of this phrase may detract from the originality and readability of your writing.
Find 13 different ways to say ACCORDING TO, along with antonyms, related words, and example sentences at Thesaurus.com.
Another way to say According To? Synonyms for According To (other words and phrases for According To).
Alternatives to "According to ". 1. As stated by. Example: " As stated by the author, the experiment yielded significant results.". Meaning: This phrase is a respectful nod to the original source of the information or opinion. It indicates that you are not claiming the idea as your own but rather acknowledging the person who originally ...
in accordance with. in compliance with. in conformity with. in keeping with. in line with. accordant with. commensurate with. conforming to. consistent with.
Ways of Saying "According to". Referring to. As per. In agreement with. AB related. As believed by. In accordance with. As said by. In the opinion of.
ACCORDING TO - Synonyms, related words and examples | Cambridge English Thesaurus
Synonyms for ACCORDING TO in English: as claimed by, in the opinion of, on the authority of, as stated by, as believed by, on the report of, as maintained by, in keeping with, in line with, consistent with, …
accost. Synonyms for ACCORDING-TO: in accordance with, as, to the degree that, in consonance with, conforming to, just as, in-keeping-with, in line with, in agreement with, consistent with, congruent with, pursuant to.
Example: "Her thesis is in line with the text's theories on social dynamics." 9. As Described in the Text. Appropriate Use: Referring to a description or account given in the text. Example: "As described in the text, the device operates in two distinct modes." 10. In Keeping with the Text
according to one study. according to research. according to research carried out. according to research conducted. according to the research. according to the study. according to the survey. at a studio. for a study.
according to the report. according to the research. according to the study. according to the survey. according to this report. according to this survey. after this study. based on this study. following this study.
Synonyms for ACCORDING: corresponding, coinciding, conforming, agreeing, fitting, consisting, checking, answering; Antonyms of ACCORDING: differing (from ...
Find 48 different ways to say THESIS, along with antonyms, related words, and example sentences at Thesaurus.com.
Synonyms for THESIS: argument, contention, assertion, hypothesis, theory, guess, assumption, hunch; Antonyms of THESIS: fact, knowledge, assurance, certainty. ... II, so the two got married and Virginia Hislop left Stanford after completing her coursework but before handing in her thesis, according to the university.
THESIS - Synonyms, related words and examples | Cambridge English Thesaurus
Synonyms for THESIS in English: proposition, theory, hypothesis, idea, view, opinion, proposal, contention, line of argument, dissertation, …
"White women favorite word 😂," another quipped. "why do they even say it like that? the sentences that they use it in could've been the same [without] it," a third user pointed out .
Vice President Kamala Harris and her Democratic allies are emphasizing a new line of criticism against Republicans — branding Donald Trump and his running mate, Ohio Sen. JD Vance, as "weird." Democrats are applying the label with gusto in interviews and online, notably to Vance's comments on abortion and his previous suggestion that political leaders who didn't have biological ...
0 other terms for according to a research- words and phrases with similar meaning. Lists. synonyms. antonyms. definitions. sentences. thesaurus. suggest new. according to a study. according to a review. according to a survey. according to an analysis. according to an investigation. according to one study.
Cash App users could get some cash sent to their bank accounts soon.. In a settlement, the mobile payment service was ordered to pay out $15 million in damages. According to a class-action lawsuit ...
The Harmless Fun thesis claims that jokes cannot be harmful; this thesis is refuted but Horisk argues that it might seem true because of two other theses: Wrong Audience and Wrong Joker. Wrong Audience claims that jokes can seem to be problematic when told to the wrong audience. ... According to Horisk, this tells against presuppositional ...
When former President Donald Trump last week reasserted his unsubstantiated claim that immigrants are "taking Black jobs," the phrasing once again became internet fodder.
These "assistants," according to Schneier, serve as your advocate with others, and as a butler with you. This requires an intimacy greater than your search engine, email provider, cloud ...
What the jury found Donald Trump did to E. Jean Carroll was in fact rape, as commonly understood, even if it didn't fit New York law's narrow definition, says Judge Lewis A. Kaplan.
According to the Post, Kennedy seemed to have recorded the encounters as a way of policing himself. In one entry, he recalls being propositioned to have sex with two women: "It was tempting but ...
88 other terms for according to research - words and phrases with similar meaning. research suggests. by the studies. based on studies. according to studies. according to surveys. from the literature. according to survey. according to study.
Tim Walz's selection as Kamala Harris' running mate underscores both the power of social media and of being relatively affable and nondivisive.